[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

how about this line up tomorrow
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/20/2005  11:12 PM
C-David Lee
F Channing Frye
F Trevor Ariza
G Jamal Crawford
G Stephon Mabs

use Lee like they are using the C in Pheonix maybe he gives up a few points but uses his speed and agility for rebounds and moves around bigger slower C like rasho
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
12/20/2005  11:14 PM
larry brown will not utilize revutionary or progressive lineups.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
12/20/2005  11:24 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

larry brown will not utilize revutionary or progressive lineups.

the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/21/2005  7:28 AM
Its crazy. When the Knicks have gone small and/or quick we play very well. Mostly because the offense runs through the guards. The minute it runs through the bigs in Curry or other everyone stands around, and that seems to carry over to D
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
12/21/2005  9:51 AM
I like it. Both David Lee and Dave Cowens are 6'9

Just run baby!
once a knick always a knick
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

12/21/2005  1:22 PM
If were serious about rebuilding, why not go with that line-up. When Curry gets back, Lee should be the first (big) off the bench. For a rebuilding team, whats the point of giving Taylor, Rose (the rim recker)and AD more minutes than Lee. It makes no sense. Isiah says there rebuilding but Brown didn't get the memo because he's not coaching like he's rebuilding. Why have Nate in the inactive list. I'm not the biggest Nate fan, but for crying out loud let the kid play and put Taylor on the inactive list. Too many bigs as it is.

Check the raptors, they are letting the kids play and will better off next season for it.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
12/21/2005  1:26 PM
Posted by bigbeast:

If were serious about rebuilding, why not go with that line-up. When Curry gets back, Lee should be the first (big) off the bench. For a rebuilding team, whats the point of giving Taylor, Rose (the rim recker)and AD more minutes than Lee. It makes no sense. Isiah says there rebuilding but Brown didn't get the memo because he's not coaching like he's rebuilding. Why have Nate in the inactive list. I'm not the biggest Nate fan, but for crying out loud let the kid play and put Taylor on the inactive list. Too many bigs as it is.

Check the raptors, they are letting the kids play and will better off next season for it.

I still think that Isiah wants Mo Taylor and Malik to play a bit so other teams can see what they got left. Other teams might be interested if one of there players goes down, they'll be able to know what Malik and Mo have left since they've been getting time and could offer up a trade. I think as February gets closer these guys will be playing less and less.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/21/2005  1:32 PM
this lineup with curry starting and lee off the bench makes sense,and then bring butler along with nate and Q, cut the rotation down to the young guys and just go with it.. If we are really rebuilding, this should of been the plan from day 1!
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

12/21/2005  1:41 PM
I forgato about Butler. Yeah, he needs some minutes too. As far as showcasing Rose and Taylor, I don;t knw about that. Teams in this league know what taylor and especially Rose bring to the table. I just think Brown is playing them because he's not concerend about rebuilding, he wants Wins. He thinks the vets give him the best opportunity to win in crunch time. The problem is, these VETs have been there befroe but they just aren't that good. Taylor and Rose are expiring contract trade bait at this point in their careers. Nothing more nothing less
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
how about this line up tomorrow

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy