[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What about Clev and NY doing
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
12/16/2005  1:40 PM
...Jamal Crawford and Q

for

Larry Hughes, Eric Snow and a 2nd round pick?

Hughes is by far better than JC and Q, and is said not to be getting along in Cleveland.
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 79074
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/16/2005  1:54 PM
I would do this in a snap but CLE would choke on the idea.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
12/16/2005  1:56 PM
Posted by martin:

I would do this in a snap but CLE would choke on the idea.

I think this is decent for them. Hughes is better, but Q and Craw might be better fits, those guys need to run.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
12/16/2005  2:01 PM
I'd do it. Hughes is a good defensive player, a gambler, but he's still a pretty good defensive player. Snow would give Larry the starting PG he desires. I wouldn't mind a starting backcourt of Snow/Hughes and then trading Marbury for a scoring SF. Let me work trade checker and see what I can find.

Edit: What if the Knicks traded Marbury to Toronto for Jalen Rose and 1st round pick? His contract ends after next year and the Knicks would remain pretty competitive with Rose at SF and then after next year only have 37 million in salaries committed for 2007/2008, meaning they'd be well under the cap. JUST a thought.

PG- Snow
SG- Hughes
SF- Rose
PF- Frye
C- Curry
bench: nate/butler/james/ariza/lee

Granted the bench is thin there. Not sure how I feel about this proposal myself now thinking about it but it's somthing to atleast THINK about. It SHOULD satisfy those people that want salarycap space.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 12-16-2005 2:09 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
12/16/2005  2:13 PM
SF- Rose

i still taste a little vomit in my mouth when i read this, even though you're not talking about our current rose.

snow isn't a long term solution at PG. we'd cut down salary, but not be any closer to settled for the future at PG or SF. interesting idea, but still tricky. i think we only do it if we decide our entire backcourt now is a bunch of boneheads and want to tear it all down.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
12/16/2005  2:15 PM
Posted by Masterplan:
SF- Rose

i still taste a little vomit in my mouth when i read this, even though you're not talking about our current rose.

snow isn't a long term solution at PG. we'd cut down salary, but not be any closer to settled for the future at PG or SF. interesting idea, but still tricky. i think we only do it if we decide our entire backcourt now is a bunch of boneheads and want to tear it all down.

Yeah thats probably true. Maybe, I should just stick with Knights original plan and do the Craw/Q for Hughes. I really think that works out for both teams. A starting backcourt of Marbury/Hughes then use Ariza/Frye/Curry up front. Works for me.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
martin
Posts: 79074
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/16/2005  2:17 PM
is cle really down on Hughes?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
12/16/2005  2:20 PM
Posted by martin:

is cle really down on Hughes?

Theres been grumblings Martin and even prior to the heated exchange that Hughes and Lebron got into and there were grumblings of Hughes being down on Cleveland and vice versa even before that. Doesn't sound like its going to well for either party there.

If you want to check out the article...
http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/38342/20051216/lebron_and_hughes_have_heated_argument_following_recent_loss/

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
12/16/2005  2:20 PM
doubt Ferry has given up on Hughes this early.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
12/16/2005  2:27 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by martin:

is cle really down on Hughes?

Theres been grumblings Martin and even prior to the heated exchange that Hughes and Lebron got into and there were grumblings of Hughes being down on Cleveland and vice versa even before that. Doesn't sound like its going to well for either party there.

If you want to check out the article...
http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/38342/20051216/lebron_and_hughes_have_heated_argument_following_recent_loss/


"Yet, the Cavs still can't grasp Brown's defensive system enough to play it competently?"

well at least were not the only team too dumb to learn the coaches system
« Reply To Topic
What about Clev and NY doing
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy