[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

would you guys do this Trevor Ariza David Lee to Milwaukee
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2005  12:26 PM
for

PG Mo Williams
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
NewYorkSoul
Posts: 21243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/20/2005
Member: #855
Canada
12/8/2005  12:29 PM
why would they ever do that trade?
David f'n Lee for President!!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2005  12:32 PM
Posted by NewYorkSoul:

why would they ever do that trade?


they likely wouldnt, but thats not an unreasonable package.
RIP Crushalot😞
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
12/8/2005  12:33 PM
of course. Both of those guys are basically expendable. But who is Mil's backup PG? and are they gonna rely on TJ ford that heavily when he hasn't had a full NBA season under his belt yet? I don't think so.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2005  12:39 PM
how about Trevor Ariza David Lee for Mo Pete and a Raptor 2006 2nd round pick
RIP Crushalot😞
martin
Posts: 79073
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/8/2005  12:42 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

how about Trevor Ariza David Lee for Mo Pete and a Raptor 2006 2nd round pick

Mo Pete is a shooting guard ain't he? If you are going to trade those 2 guys you need a SOLID 3 back, nothing less.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/8/2005  1:00 PM
no to all of the above trades....
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
OasisBU
Posts: 24138
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/18/2002
Member: #257
USA
12/8/2005  1:04 PM
I think they need to rehab Stephs image, get his stats up - and ship him out. I just dont see this team surviving with him as the SG....PG maybe - but either way someone has to get traded to bring in a true SG. We have our bigs - Curry and Frye will be awesome for us. Now we need an impact SG, a serviceable SF - I think Q will be fine but I know a lot of people dont like him - and a decent PG.
"If at first you don't succeed, then maybe you just SUCK." Kenny Powers
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2005  1:24 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by BRIGGS:

how about Trevor Ariza David Lee for Mo Pete and a Raptor 2006 2nd round pick

Mo Pete is a shooting guard ain't he? If you are going to trade those 2 guys you need a SOLID 3 back, nothing less.

He's 6-7 225, much more 3, but has that solid outside shot and plays solid. Mo Williams--were not touching him.

My general hope is Isiah comes to the forefront here and dumps penny Davis and Malik ANyway he can to take those options away from Brown.
RIP Crushalot😞
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/8/2005  1:29 PM
I get to watch the Raptors pretty often up here. Mo Pete will drive you crazy if you're expecting any consistency on offense, but he is consistently a good defender. I don't think I'd trade Ariza OR Lee for him, though, let alone both of them for him.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/8/2005  1:38 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by martin:
Posted by BRIGGS:

how about Trevor Ariza David Lee for Mo Pete and a Raptor 2006 2nd round pick

Mo Pete is a shooting guard ain't he? If you are going to trade those 2 guys you need a SOLID 3 back, nothing less.

He's 6-7 225, much more 3, but has that solid outside shot and plays solid. Mo Williams--were not touching him.

My general hope is Isiah comes to the forefront here and dumps penny Davis and Malik ANyway he can to take those options away from Brown.


I agree, limit browns option of these clowns..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/8/2005  1:40 PM
Mo Pete sucks... we can do better than that.

If your willing to give up bigs then use a combo of Butler/Lee/Ariza to get Smith or Childress from the Hawks.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
12/8/2005  2:03 PM
Agreed. You're totally undervalueing Lee and Ariza. Both will be good players, or hopefully at least. Maybe nothing super special, but still solid. Mo Pete and a 2nd, no way. I think Fishmike is on a better track. Give me Josh Childress.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
DarkKnicks
Posts: 21064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/29/2005
Member: #882
Spain
12/8/2005  2:12 PM
Although Larry Brown keeps saying it, I don't think we need a PG at all, so my answer to that trade proposal is no.
Marbury/Crawford/Robinson is enough for me and that thing about none of them being a "pure" PG is BS to me.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2005  2:16 PM
Posted by DarkKnicks:

Although Larry Brown keeps saying it, I don't think we need a PG at all, so my answer to that trade proposal is no.
Marbury/Crawford/Robinson is enough for me and that thing about none of them being a "pure" PG is BS to me.



I don't think they'd part with Mo Williams anyway, and while thats fair value for Mo pete and a raptor 2006 2nd rounder--likely 1-2 at the top 2---I still think if they were interested, they could use expiring.

I was thinking one more scenario

the Bulls with gordon who can play 6th man

they like David Lee a lot
do we throw them
David Lee
Ariza
Butler
SA #1 06

for
B Gordon
RIP Crushalot😞
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/8/2005  2:17 PM
Ben Gordon would actually be repetitive here. We need a real PG or a real SF far far more urgently.
¿ △ ?
martin
Posts: 79073
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/8/2005  2:19 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by DarkKnicks:

Although Larry Brown keeps saying it, I don't think we need a PG at all, so my answer to that trade proposal is no.
Marbury/Crawford/Robinson is enough for me and that thing about none of them being a "pure" PG is BS to me.

I don't think they'd part with Mo Williams anyway, and while thats fair value for Mo pete and a raptor 2006 2nd rounder--likely 1-2 at the top 2---I still think if they were interested, they could use expiring.

I was thinking one more scenario

the Bulls with gordon who can play 6th man

they like David Lee a lot
do we throw them
David Lee
Ariza
Butler
SA #1 06

for
B Gordon

haha, but only if the rescind that #1 exchanges for the next 2 years, right?


Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
12/8/2005  2:19 PM
Posted by fishmike:

Mo Pete sucks... we can do better than that.

If your willing to give up bigs then use a combo of Butler/Lee/Ariza to get Smith or Childress from the Hawks.

Smith stinks, and finally...finally is getting call out for it in Atlanta. I wouldn't trade Butler straight up for Smith at this point. I would do it for Lee but not all 3. Childress has talent but has a surprisingly low BB IQ. Going to cost Woodson his job.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/8/2005  2:22 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by BRIGGS:

[quote]Posted by DarkKnicks:

Although Larry Brown keeps saying it, I don't think we need a PG at all, so my answer to that trade proposal is no.
Marbury/Crawford/Robinson is enough for me and that thing about none of them being a "pure" PG is BS to me.

I don't think they'd part with Mo Williams anyway, and while thats fair value for Mo pete and a raptor 2006 2nd rounder--likely 1-2 at the top 2---I still think if they were interested, they could use expiring.

I was thinking one more scenario

the Bulls with gordon who can play 6th man

they like David Lee a lot
do we throw them
David Lee
Ariza
Butler
SA #1 06

for
B Gordon

haha, but only if the rescind that #1 exchanges for the next 2 years, right?


yeah, if they pick Adam Morrison and Greg Oden
they automatically become knicks as well.
RIP Crushalot😞
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/8/2005  2:29 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by DarkKnicks:

Although Larry Brown keeps saying it, I don't think we need a PG at all, so my answer to that trade proposal is no.
Marbury/Crawford/Robinson is enough for me and that thing about none of them being a "pure" PG is BS to me.



I don't think they'd part with Mo Williams anyway, and while thats fair value for Mo pete and a raptor 2006 2nd rounder--likely 1-2 at the top 2---I still think if they were interested, they could use expiring.

I was thinking one more scenario

the Bulls with gordon who can play 6th man

they like David Lee a lot
do we throw them
David Lee
Ariza
Butler
SA #1 06

for
B Gordon

If you had Ben Gordon would you give him up for those players? Those are all question mark players. We don't know what they'll turn into. Ben's already the 6th man of the year and ROY runner up.
would you guys do this Trevor Ariza David Lee to Milwaukee

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy