Frye, Marbury, Crawford. Not in that order of course but you get it.

Marb: 18
Craw: 17
Frye 15

Total: 50

This is our winning offensive formula and its realistic.

If they can give us 50 a night, the other less talented offensive players only need to chip in. I includeed Craw even though he isn't consistant, he needs to be in order for us to win, and I believe he can be. Eddy Curry, who can give you 20 if he stays on the court long enough, would also be the x factor not only for his scoring, but because his presence allows us to do different things on offense.

Then guys like ariza, nate, Mo, JJ, AD, Jackie, etc. only need to chip in 6 or 10 points here and there.

Am I the only one who think that we shouldnt use curry to post up anymore? Chicago virtually never did that. oh wait and to answer your question I agree to a very limited extend witch Ill go deeper into upon further provocation.

[Edited by - SlimPack on 12-05-2005 9:51 PM]

Posted by Killa4luv:

WTF are you talking about?

Hows that for further provacation?

I meant that Ill get deeper into if i was asked, but nevermind it was worded badly to begin with. anyway if what your saying is that those players should score that amount of PPG than I disagree. why? cuase fryes average should go up to about 17 or 18 further into the season. crawfords numbers should stay the same, cuase I think he should be given a chance at the PG and therefore he shouldnt be scoring too much. I just dont think LB is using people correctly period. curry should be averaging like 24 ppg, and be taken out of the post. and marbury should be averging like 25-27 ppg as a SG. and while were at it. davis should be averaging like 3ppg in 10mpg, and david lee should be averaging 10ppg in 19mpg. and oops i went off on a tangent

[Edited by - slimpack on 12-05-2005 11:31 PM]