Posted by Pharzeone:

Posted by EnySpree:

I think Charlie's skill set is alot better than Channing. I think if Toronto picked a player they actually needed instead of Charlie and he went to a team that needed him Charlie's minutes and numbers would be better than Channings.

Still I'm not mad the Knicks got Channing. I love Channing. Both players are so close it's not funny. Charlie has a better game when he puts it on the floor. Channing's jumper is basically automatic. Their athletic ability, rebounding and defense are basically the same. I think both players will add some more aspects to their games and will look similiar as time goes on.

I have to disagree with this post. Frye actually has a chance at being a excellent outside threat and a good inside threat. Charlie V lacks this. Charlie V is better on the perimeter without the ball. Frye also has a greater chance at having more of an impact on the defensive end. If you notice Channing is not getting the same foul calls that he did earlier. I think he will increase his blocking signficantly. Both players need to improve their rebounding though. I love Charlie V's game though, like it back at UCONN. I was interested in the Knicks getting him as well, if we went after a pg in the draft. I think both players will make many of their critics eat crow.