Posted by bobs3304:
He's never really had a "pier".
True. And a man can't own a yacht without a pier. Just ask Spree.

Seriously though, yes, you are correct. That may account for the way Marbury plays. It also is a big reason why he's never been on a very successful team, IMO. The knock that Marbury has never been a winner conveniently forgets to take into account that
1) Players don't win games, teams do (12 man roster + coach); and
2) Marbury has never been on a very good team (KG and Amare as rookies or not much more, straight out of HS no less; only legit All-Star he's played with has been Marion)
3) Therefore, it's not necessarily a knock on Marbury that he has never been on a big winner.
Just imagine if Jordan had never played with another All-Star and never had a great coach. He would have willed his teams to the playoffs more often than not, most likely, but probably would never have won any championships. How would we remember him then? As a selfish gunner or stat-padder who couldn't win? Likewise, Wilt went through his career never having a solid coaching situation and never having a supporting cast like Russell; that's a major reason why Russell tended to get the best of him. That's no knock on Wilt, and it doesn't mean Russell was better. It just does not make sense to judge individual players by team accomplishments. That way of looking at things is probably the biggest fallacy circulating around professional sports discussions, with no sign of getting better, unfortunately.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/