If we had a veteran point he would be the SG, no doubt.

^ I don't think you or anyone else should question LB's past track record. Obviously things don't look good now, but that doesn't mean LB doesn't know what he's doing.

I too have questioned the roster moves he's made so far, but I gotta believe LB knows whats up...

Posted by attaboy2005:

Steph is the veteran PG, that is not the problem, LB needs to stop playing games with the guys and having them look over their shoulders or at the bench every two seconds wondering if they are doiing the right thing or not.

That's why I keep running my displeasure with the rotation. Guys need to run plays together in real games by now they would be gelling.

Its not even mistakes cuz Larry is taking guys out for no reason.

Let's say the knicks get it together and make it a close race for a playoff spot. These games will be looked at. I think the knicks should have lost only 2 games.

Start Frye, ariza, curry, marbs, and q. Rotate craw, Davis, lee, butler, and Nate....what is the big secret? This is not rocket science nore is this all my children.

Play to win regardless of who you have.

Posted by eymyel827:

what puzzles me is coach tells us we need a real pointguard for marbury to play the 2, but he's willing to yank marbury from the game and let craw play the 1. why not play crawford as the point and marbury at the shooting guard from the start of the game? coach is making the excuse to force isiah to make a trade.

I didn't see the game last night but I read that Steph played the two at times during the game as LB put the ball in Jamal's hand. True or not?