[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

is the knicks' defense back??!?!
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44927
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
11/7/2005  9:20 PM
as of today, november 7 (courtesy of sporstline.com)

the new york knicks are 2nd in the league in rebounding with 50.3 rebs per game. (utah is 1st with 51 rebs per game)
the new york knicks LEAD the league with 52 offensive rebounds.
the new york knicks are 10th in the league in giving up 94.3 points per game.
AUTOADVERT
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
11/7/2005  9:23 PM
Now all we have to figure out is how to maintain stats like those and WIN.
Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
11/7/2005  9:40 PM
look at sloan and LB going old school.
all kool aid all the time.
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
11/7/2005  10:06 PM
Take those stats with a grain of salt. Rebounds per game is not the best measure of a team's rebounding ability, nor is ppg allowed per game the best measure of defense. Both of those measures fail to adjust for team possessions. Rebounds per game also fails to adjust for rebounding opportunities (teams that play games with more missed shots due to superior defense or inferior offense will have more opportunities to pad the rebound per game stat, even if we adjust for possessions). knickerblogger.net usually has the really useful stats in this respect as opposed to the flawed per game stats, but the stats page there has not yet been updated from last season.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
11/7/2005  10:09 PM
Also, of course, even if we had access to the better stats, there would still be the problems of small sample size (only 3 games) and bias (stats thus far need to be considered in light of the competition they have come against). So there is still reason to believe that our defense and rebounding are taking big steps, but it's much too early for any truly conclusive evaluations just yet.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
11/7/2005  10:13 PM
yes, and early on it makes sense that the coaches that are the most demanding start out right away high in those stat categories, maximizing personel while they are still on their sides and have fresh legs...the fundamentally sound categories

[Edited by - rvhoss on 11-07-2005 10:16 PM]
all kool aid all the time.
djsunyc
Posts: 44927
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
11/7/2005  10:16 PM
Posted by tomverve:

Also, of course, even if we had access to the better stats, there would still be the problems of small sample size (only 3 games) and bias (stats thus far need to be considered in light of the competition they have come against). So there is still reason to believe that our defense and rebounding are taking big steps, but it's much too early for any truly conclusive evaluations just yet.

tom - how DARE you question the numbers??!!? you're a hater.
Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
11/7/2005  10:20 PM
We are shooting 39% of course we are leading the league in offensive boards!
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
11/7/2005  10:21 PM
with the number of turnovers we are generating, the points against tells me we have strong team defense.
all kool aid all the time.
efw
Posts: 20667
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/10/2005
Member: #1002

11/7/2005  11:20 PM
Even LB said the offensive rebounds meant nothing because we still missed all the putbacks. What good is a rebound if it doesn't translate into points?
knicksmsg33
Posts: 20091
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/27/2005
Member: #1018
Jamaica
11/7/2005  11:32 PM
Posted by rvhoss:

with the number of turnovers we are generating, the points against tells me we have strong team defense.

this is a very good point only the celtics cracked the 100pt mark and that was due to the game going to OT, so the defense is making incriment in pints allowed area and some rebounding, but what matters most is wins

Galong Knicks
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
11/7/2005  11:58 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

as of today, november 7 (courtesy of sporstline.com)

the new york knicks are 2nd in the league in rebounding with 50.3 rebs per game. (utah is 1st with 51 rebs per game)
the new york knicks LEAD the league with 52 offensive rebounds.
the new york knicks are 10th in the league in giving up 94.3 points per game.


OK, so knickerblogger.net doesn't have the 05/06 stats running yet, but they're available on 82games.com for each team (though not in a convenient table where you can see how teams rank comparatively). After a bit of work, here's a better version of the above team stats and their rankings (hopefully these stats are self-explanatory):

offensive rebounding %: 36% (ranks 5th)
defensive rebounding %: 73% (ranks 6th)

points allowed per 100 possessions: 98 (ranks 8th)
eFG% allowed: .468 (ranks 15th)
t/o forced %: 17% (ranks 11th)

So, looks pretty good (certainly better than last year). BUT, again, these numbers do not mean much of anything right now because of small sample sizes and heavy biases. For instance, right now the Knicks rank better than the Pacers in points allowed per 100 possessions and eFG% allowed, but we shouldn't expect that to last. (Conversely, we should expect that some teams that currently rank ahead of the Knicks should fall behind them over time.)

Also, note how curious it is that NY ranks 8th in pts allowed per 100 possessions, but only 15th in eFG% allowed. The reason for this anomoly is that opposing teams are shooting a pretty healthy 31.3 FTA against us, but only converting them at a 66% clip. That 66% FT% is a fluke due to small sample size; expect it to eventually rise to league averages (~75%), thus raising our pts allowed over time as well. We are probably closer to a middle of the pack defensive team right now than an upper echelon defensive team, though again, not much of substance can be concluded from the current set of stats we have available.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
NewYorkSoul
Posts: 21243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/20/2005
Member: #855
Canada
11/8/2005  12:07 AM
well remember, it is very early in the season, and teams are usually rusty at this time of year.
David f'n Lee for President!!
is the knicks' defense back??!?!

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy