[ IMAGES: Images OFF turn on | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

why no talk of Q?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
11/8/2005  6:07 AM
I know what q can do offensively so I'm not going to bash him yet.

The trade is awesome hands down. Whenever Larry settles on a rotation things will fall in the right place God willing.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
AUTOADVERT
knicksmsg33
Posts: 20091
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/27/2005
Member: #1018
Jamaica
11/8/2005  9:05 AM
one of the major things that is troubling the knicks is that they are scared to launch a shot, and they don't pass the ball enough as larry wants. in some ways, we play better when we are making plays.
but i do agree that Q, should be comming off the bench, i also had issues with Barnes starting over Ariza, but that how it was
Galong Knicks
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
11/8/2005  9:16 AM
I actually like Q as our starting SG...he is not healthy enough, but he will work his way into playing shape. The problem is that we don't have a viable backup SG....Crawff is not a SG nor a PG...Larry is confused on how to use him.
The true Knickabocker..........
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
11/8/2005  1:39 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by codeunknown:

Hindsight is 20-20 but if we were able to trade Kurt to Indiana for James Jones and the #1 (Danny Granger), that would have been infinitely better.

I don't recall that trade rumor. Was that a possibility and we turned it down or is this just speculation?

Speculation
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
joec32033
Posts: 30528
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
11/8/2005  5:57 PM
I still think Q is the real deal at the two, I honestly think that Steph is the odd man out of this rotation. Q seems to be a 4th option on this team to me (Steph and Curry are the 1st two it seems and anyone other than Q is the 3rd). As was said, Q got a late start, and he seems more like an extra cog as opposed to the vital piece I think he should be in this offense.
~You can't run from who you are.~
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
11/8/2005  8:22 PM
Q is going to be a monster on the Knicks...

[IMG_block] http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000096I9P.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg [/IMG_block]
Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
Nalod
Posts: 68913
Alba Posts: 154
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
11/8/2005  11:34 PM
Posted by diderotn:

I actually like Q as our starting SG...he is not healthy enough, but he will work his way into playing shape. The problem is that we don't have a viable backup SG....Crawff is not a SG nor a PG...Larry is confused on how to use him.


Not a Sg, not a PG, Then what is he? A mutant? Hybrid? A man? Reptile?

A guard!
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
11/8/2005  11:46 PM
You don't hear much talk about Z either. Another under-used letter.
https:// It's not so hard.
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
why no talk of Q?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy