[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I was totally on point about Nate
Author Thread
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
11/6/2005  8:05 PM
All of our rookies look better than him. He played decent tonight, but turnovers in the crucial parts of the game cannot be his 'thing'. Hes gotta turn it down a notch from 11 to 10. He has to learn to play under control, and he has got to stop trying to lay it in over guys so much taller than him everytime; its like a freaking turnover he is gettting his shot blocked so much.

Having said all of that, I am not sayign he sucks, he had his best moments in the boston game dishing two nice assists; he just as a long way to go.
AUTOADVERT
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
11/6/2005  8:20 PM
I still think he's a sg in a pg body. when he's out there with marbs, he seems to slow it down a bit.

If you said you were totally on "guard" with nate, I'd be with you all the way.

[Edited by - rvhoss on 11-06-2005 8:20 PM]
all kool aid all the time.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
11/6/2005  8:23 PM
His game is out of control. But he's also 5'7". The thing with Nate you have to realize is that if everyone was 5'7", his ceiling would be enourmous. But, alas, they're not. His ceiling is low because his size will prohibit him from being a star. Still, he can be an effective player off the bench if he plays under control.
...
I was totally on point about Nate

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy