[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Marbury and Crawford Can't Work
Author Thread
MS
Posts: 27063
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
11/3/2005  9:03 AM
11 turnovers between the two of them, they just don't mess well or play well off of each other. It's only the first game but one of them needs to go. They are both small in the clutch especially stephon he just can't make the big play, make the big free throw....its going to be a long season if Jamaal's feelings are hurt because he isn't starting, very sad that he would complain playing 36 minutes.....

And why is Malik Rose getting minutes over Frye, and where is David Lee, I would much rather have those two out there than see Mo Taylor, he doesn't play defense, come on Larry....

And Curry just doesn't care is really the problem with his rebounding, doesn't even put a body on anyone......JJ 4 fouls in 8 minutes thats a disgrace......

On another note the Bucks look like a very balanced team and have a far superior backcourt to use, Cleveland looks like they are going to be tough to beat, I know its the first game but we really have our work cut out for us.
AUTOADVERT
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
11/3/2005  9:14 AM
They can work together, just not at the end of the game and especially with the ball in Crawford's hands. He's probably the dumbest and most careless player to give the ball to in crunch time.

Unless Q was just so winded that he couldn't play at all in the last 8 minutes then he should have been in there instead of JC.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
11/3/2005  9:24 AM
Posted by islesfan:

They can work together, just not at the end of the game and especially with the ball in Crawford's hands. He's probably the dumbest and most careless player to give the ball to in crunch time.

Unless Q was just so winded that he couldn't play at all in the last 8 minutes then he should have been in there instead of JC.


I think it was also LB not wanting Q to hurt that Hammy again. We could have used Q big time down the stretch.

Marbs played masterfully down the stretch so I don't know what you're talking about MS.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
11/3/2005  9:29 AM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by islesfan:

They can work together, just not at the end of the game and especially with the ball in Crawford's hands. He's probably the dumbest and most careless player to give the ball to in crunch time.

Unless Q was just so winded that he couldn't play at all in the last 8 minutes then he should have been in there instead of JC.


I think it was also LB not wanting Q to hurt that Hammy again. We could have used Q big time down the stretch.

Marbs played masterfully down the stretch so I don't know what you're talking about MS.


I don't think he had a problem with Marbury per se last night, just the 2 of them playing together. They just don't play well together especially down the stretch.

They need a shooter who can open up the floor and stretch defenses. Maybe Q can be that guy or maybe he's more about quantity than quality as a shooter which may not help.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
11/3/2005  9:30 AM
Stephon was good down the stretch. My only beef with him in the clutch was that he couldnt hit a free throw. And what was up with the turnovers in OT? I hope this changes very quickly. I dont want to deal with another losing season.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
11/3/2005  9:41 AM
hey, at the end of the half crawford inexplicably lost the ball and marbs picked it up and hit a big 3.

That about sums it up for me.
all kool aid all the time.
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
11/3/2005  9:55 AM
I have said it here many times, Crawff and Marb is not a good combo. When Crawff is in the game, Marb tends to take a back sit just to allow Crawff to operate. He is a horrible decision maker and shouldn't be on the court at the same time with Marb. Marb was forced to guard a much taller and strong Davis or Pierce, all because Crawf is too weak to guard his position. I think that if Brown is going to substitute a player at the SG position, the rotation will have to be between Reezy, Barnes and Q. Bring Lee back and play him mostly at the SF position with Frye rotating from the PF and Center position. Frye can best serve as a PF especially when either Curry or Davis are on the court playing the Center spot. We got outrebounded because Barnes, Crawf, Marb, and Curry weren't boxing out. I can't blame Marb too much, because he was way too short to guard Ricky Davis and Pierce who are both 6'7".
The true Knickabocker..........
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/3/2005  10:26 AM
I guess the crawford romance is over. He was OK thowing lobs to Barnes and Curry. He defended better than Marbury and he had some good rebounds as well. He didnt have a great game over all. Supposedly he was very suprised to not be in the SL. I thought he played pretty well in the preseason but whatever Larry does must be right :)

First game of the year there are going to be some mistakes, some added TOs, some guys getting a little winded etc.

I'm not a big fan of placing blame, because its a team and when you lose there's always something EACH guy could have done better. To me though one thing sticks out like a sore thumb: Marbury FTs 5-12. For a guy in the 80%s for his career and a guard thats inexcusable.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
11/3/2005  10:36 AM
he used all his energy on defense. Pierce missed just as many. Curry as well. For me it was turnovers and rebounds.

We got it to overtime with all the missed ft's, in overtime they just wanted it more.

But you have to admit, crawford had a couple of "strange" turnovers. And that kid is in love with the alley oop.

One big worry is watching the bucks and other teams...they all seem to be having fun. The knicks seem to be working...i don't think crawford is a fan of working, I think he excels in a wide open game where a turnover isn't a big deal (see seattle and phoenix), now that it's a new structured regimen, he may end up being the odd man out and may actually WANT to be traded.

I wouldn't blame him...though Nate seems to take it well...marbs had a standard marbury game...I think it's true he takes a backseat to Crawford, but that's the new marbury, everybody hates it when he's being Starbury and playing as if he is the best player on the team...also, I think LB told him to be Starbury for a couple of stretches as well.

Good Road game in a hostile environment.

I'll accept the marbs missed free throws as a stat that sticks out, but you have to also look at the missed dunk (killed momentum), the crazy turnovers and the second chance buckets.

One game down, 81 to go...that was one of my 50 wins btw. Looks like 49.

no doubt (yes it's back, with Briggs and Dido getting all the shut the phuck votes, I figured I'd sprinkle it in randomly, but why no eff Oohah? That's who I stole it from...or maybe it's because I stole it...)
all kool aid all the time.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
11/3/2005  10:37 AM
ps...fishy...James SUCKS...but he did hit a big turnaround which got me out my seat. Also, MoT put in a good effort on defense (2 blocks) and hit some jumpers. If he gets into game shape...

Adios Rose...it was nice knowing you, but you gotta go...Lee and Frye will more than compensate.
all kool aid all the time.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
11/3/2005  10:45 AM
he used all his energy on defense. Pierce missed just as many. Curry as well. For me it was turnovers and rebounds.

Pierce missing free throws gets you even more aggravated about Marbury's free throw shooting woes. He's a professional PG. He has to be shooting 80%. Curry should be shooting 68 - 73%. We could have won the game if it weren't for missed free throws.

The rebounding is a different story. James just sucks. Antonio Davis is getting older by the minute. Taylor was NEVER a good rebounder and Rose is a f'in migit. So what do you friggin' expect to happen? These guys aren't going to magically going to become better, so if you want the rebounding, put Frye and Lee in who at least hustle their arses off, and play hard on D as well. The bumps and bruises will be there in the beginning, but in the end, it's for the best!
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
11/3/2005  1:35 PM
Posted by rvhoss:

ps...fishy...James SUCKS...but he did hit a big turnaround which got me out my seat. Also, MoT put in a good effort on defense (2 blocks) and hit some jumpers. If he gets into game shape...

Adios Rose...it was nice knowing you, but you gotta go...Lee and Frye will more than compensate.

about mo... he had a decent game, but really, what does he do that frye doesn't (insert food joke here)? all his points this game were swishing open Js, that's what frye can do. frye is a better shotblocker, and can be made into a better rebounder if he isn't one already. it really bugs me he didn't play.

about rose... he played this game at SF to guard pierce after barnes ariza and Q all picked up way too many fouls. i don't consider him to be taking minutes away from young guys, since he only came off the bench out of necessity, not as part of the rotation. but boy, did he look terrible.

i'm not going to read too much into marbury and crawford's turnovers, or nate's forced shots. i expect those kinds of possessions to decrease as team chemistry gets better and larry gets in their heads.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/3/2005  6:40 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:
he used all his energy on defense. Pierce missed just as many. Curry as well. For me it was turnovers and rebounds.

Pierce missing free throws gets you even more aggravated about Marbury's free throw shooting woes. He's a professional PG. He has to be shooting 80%. Curry should be shooting 68 - 73%. We could have won the game if it weren't for missed free throws.

Marbury's been around 80% FT for his whole career. Everyone is going to have an off game at the line. If this continues all year for Marbury, I'll get on his case as much as anyone. But I'm willing to accept one off game at the line from anyone. It doesn't mean I wouldn't want him to spend an extra hour today working on the FTs, though.
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/3/2005  6:59 PM
Don't get on Marbury so much about the missed FT.

Duncan missed TONS during the Finals....and yet somehow they still won and he was named MVP (Ginobili got ripped off).

I totally agree though. A backcourt of Craw and Steph won't work. Only 2 options from here on out - trade 1 of them...or have Craw come off the bench as our 6th man.

That still leaves us with a hole at SF, b/c while I like the hustle of Barnes and Ariza...they're not ready to man it by themselves.

If LB wasn't trying to force wins, I wouldn't care. But since we're in win-now mode yet again, something has to be done about the holes we have.
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
11/3/2005  7:01 PM
Last season Marbs and Craw were one of the best backcourt combo's in the league, averaging 38.4 pts and 12.5 asst. With LB wanting Marbs to play more of a shooting guard role this season, who else but Craw is available to play point at times? These guys will share plenty of court time together whether some of you like it or not!!
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/3/2005  7:03 PM
Posted by Travla:

Last season Marbs and Craw were one of the best backcourt combo's in the league, averaging 38.4 pts and 12.5 asst.


Na na, you're way off man.

You're only talkin about stats. That doesn't prove sh!t.

What we're talkin about is poor chemistry.

Crawford and Marbury will get theirs b/c of how immensely talented they are on the offensive end, but as far as working off eachother.....forget about it. (especially on D)
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/3/2005  8:18 PM
Posted by Travla:

Last season Marbs and Craw were one of the best backcourt combo's in the league, averaging 38.4 pts and 12.5 asst. With LB wanting Marbs to play more of a shooting guard role this season, who else but Craw is available to play point at times? These guys will share plenty of court time together whether some of you like it or not!!
The 38.4 doesn't mean much to me. Marbury was very efficient on offense last year but if you chuck up as many shots as Crawford did, you *better* be scoring a lot of points and hitting far more than 38%. As for the 12.5 assists, about 70% of them were from Marbury. By combining the stats of Marbury and Crawford, all you're really doing is obscuring the fact that Crawford was mediocre last year but the backourt #s when combined with Marbury's look good (as would *any* starting SGs #s when combined with Marbury's).

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 11-03-2005 8:19 PM]
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
11/3/2005  9:13 PM
Posted by fishmike:

I guess the crawford romance is over. He was OK thowing lobs to Barnes and Curry. He defended better than Marbury
no way. craws d was the worst on our squad yesterday by a long shot.


Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
11/3/2005  9:15 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Travla:

Last season Marbs and Craw were one of the best backcourt combo's in the league, averaging 38.4 pts and 12.5 asst. With LB wanting Marbs to play more of a shooting guard role this season, who else but Craw is available to play point at times? These guys will share plenty of court time together whether some of you like it or not!!
The 38.4 doesn't mean much to me. Marbury was very efficient on offense last year but if you chuck up as many shots as Crawford did, you *better* be scoring a lot of points and hitting far more than 38%. As for the 12.5 assists, about 70% of them were from Marbury. By combining the stats of Marbury and Crawford, all you're really doing is obscuring the fact that Crawford was mediocre last year but the backourt #s when combined with Marbury's look good (as would *any* starting SGs #s when combined with Marbury's).

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 11-03-2005 8:19 PM]
Agreed.
Marbury and Crawford Can't Work

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy