So does this mean that larry is planning on rolling with marbs as the 1 from now on? also the fact that frye, a rookie, means that larry isnt as anti-rookie as I thought, its such a shame that taylor doesnt have frye's work ethic, and rose doesnt have his height.

[Edited by - slimpack on 10-25-2005 3:17 PM]

I always thought that marbs to the 2 talk was crap...don't get me wrong, last year they said the same thing, and just like rocky fighting right handed, there are times in teh game when he played the 2...but it's not his position.

He will start every game at the point, however, in the tradition of labeling a player, he won't be solely responsible for taking the ball across the timeline.

When he is the best shooter on the floor, he will play in the offense as the SG, but he will be listed on the all star ballot as a PG.

btw...this is why arguing with mck1 about marbs not being a top 5 pg in the league and him sending me supporting documentation listing him as a top 5 SG is a waste of time and energy.

no doubt

[Edited by - rvhoss on 10-25-2005 3:28 PM]

Good question.

no doubt

Posted by Pharzeone:

Posted by BRIGGS:

C-curry
F frye
F ariza
G crawford
G marbury
C-James, Butler
F Taylor
G Penny
G Nate

Briggs is this per you or did you see Brown's lineup somewhere?

Posted by BRIGGS:

i dont have a batphone into knick hq's,its pure conjecture

I don't know, I thought maybe it was one of your infamous Knick (snitches) Insiders relaying this info.