rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777 Switzerland
|
yeah, the thing about larry was that he still made use of elden campbell and corlis williamson, unlike previous knick coaches who just let malcontents either ride on the bench or play to pump up trade value, LB plays to win games.
If someone isn't defending, he replaces them with a defender...we now have solid defenders at each position for easy situational subbing: Nate, Ariza, Rose, Lee, and in many ways James and Frye (shot blocking), so while nobody believes marbury will win defensive player of the year, the team defense is what will improve dramatically.
Detroit was better during LB than previously, it's just the fundamentals of the game. Positioning, positioning, positioning.
I suck at basketball (can't hit free throws or dribble or shoot for that matter) but I get boards and play tough defense and my teams usually win.
Then one game a buddy's dad, who was a coach, showed me a place to stand by the back board and suddenly, I was getting rebounds without having to out jump my opponent, which was great when I was exhausted (those 5 on 5 full court adventures are trouble)
So, what I'm saying is that defensive positioning can overcome a lineup of offensive minded players...yeah yeah I know, I'm sure previous coaches preached this, however, none have the authority to actually DNP a star.
LB has that authority and the knicks defense will be remarkedly improved...couple that with the improved offense and you have a winner.
Skiles is a good coach, but is he respected?
Remember when Robert Horry threw a towel in a coaches face (was that skiles or ainge) at the time Horry was considered a loser, now he's got 6 rings.
Not sure why I told that story, but it just goes to show, some coaches are just better than others.
We have the best of all time.
[Edited by - rvhoss on 10-06-2005 11:40 AM]
all kool aid all the time.
|