http://www.dailysouthtown.com/southtown/dssports/pro/302sd3.htm

Inside The Bulls

Curry, Bulls not communicating

Friday, September 30, 2005




By Paul Ladewski
Staff writer


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The longer the Eddy Curry controversy drags on, the more it appears a parting of ways may be the best solution for the Bulls and the malcontent free-agent center.

Amid speculation Curry no longer wants to be associated with the team in wake of its insistence that he submit to a genetic heart test, Bulls officials have not heard from him in several days.

"I tried to reach Eddy on a number of occasions but was unsuccessful," said Bulls general manager John Paxson, who last week indicated Curry would not be allowed to play without a favorable test result.

Asked whether Curry could be a disruption when preseason camp opens next week, Paxson said, "That's something we'll have to deal with."

Indications are Curry will accept a one-year, $5.1 million qualifying offer to return to the Bulls prior to the deadline today, although the official announcement might not come until Saturday.

With the support of the NBA Players' Association, Curry could refuse to take the test, in which case an arbiter probably would rule on the matter.

Bulls restricted free-agent guard Jannero Pargo is expected to accept an $875,000 qualifying offer today.

Paxson confirmed he had talked with the New York Knicks earlier in the week about a possible sign-and-trade deal for Curry, but he said it was highly unlikely such a move would be made.

Paxson denied a published report that in recent days he had repeatedly turned down the Knicks' proposed offer of forwards Tim Thomas and Michael Sweetney.

Paxson called it a "bizarre proposal" but declined to elaborate.

Such a deal would provide the Bulls with salary-cap relief, in that the contracts of Thomas and Sweetney are scheduled to expire after next season. At the same time, the Bulls are already well-stocked at the wing positions and the addition of Thomas could compromise team chemistry.

For weeks, the Knicks have been rumored to be interested in Curry, the kind of scorer they need to compliment banger Jerome James in the middle.

A major obstacle for such a deal is the Knicks have an overload of high-priced players in whom the Bulls have no interest. That Curry is subject to so-called base-year contract rules also complicates matters.

"If we went that route, we would have to get exactly what we wanted," Paxson said earlier this month. "That's our leverage. So it doesn't phase me one bit if there's a team out there that wants him."

Paxson said he would be open to any offer for Curry that would benefit the team, but he cautioned not to read anything into the statement.

"I would say that about any player on our team," Paxson said. "I think any person in my position with any team would say that."

probably for 3 years. 3 years $33mm for TT and Sweetney.

That deal sucks IMO

If there is a firesale for a guy of Baron Davis's caliber than you use TT for that. Otherwise let his fugazy ass come off the books and get Sweetney the ball down low.

^ Nobody on this site gets the concept of the "salary cap" and all the rules that come with it.

I'd expect way more from one of the older Knick fans around here.

It's called BYC Fishsticks. Look it up.

The only deal that would work is if A. Davis was involved, and if Isiah agreed to waive him so that Pax could resign him with the Vet. Min. before the season...

If I was Curry, I'm not sure that I would want to know the results of that genetic testing.

Posted by bobs3304:

^ Nobody on this site gets the concept of the "salary cap" and all the rules that come with it.

I'd expect way more from one of the older Knick fans around here.

It's called BYC Fishsticks. Look it up.

The only deal that would work is if A. Davis was involved, and if Isiah agreed to waive him so that Pax could resign him with the Vet. Min. before the season...

Curry wouldnt be signed to an extension, its a new contract. BYC would be if Curry signed an extension and they tried to trade him last year.

http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#72

boobs

Posted by BRIGGS:

i think they mustve offered Curry a maximum contract offer

if this was the case, then isiah needs to be fired on the spot.

there's only two other reasons why isiah should be immediately fired and that's trading for dampier or eric snow without dirk or lbj attached.

Brand has yet to play with a dominating player like Marburry. I like him, but I wouldn't want to trade anyone for him, especially given the fact that we have drafted Frye and Lee. To tell you the truth, I am very satisfied with the players that we have currently. We just have to trade a couple of our PFs to truly take advantage of our roster.

andre miller was on the cavs

Posted by fishmike:

I didnt really mean Baron, per say. Rather that caliber of player.

Would you trade Nate/Sweetney/TT and the Spurs 06 #1 for Elton Brand at the deadline?

fish would you do that deal? that is a lot for brand, a guy who I like a lot but hasn't been able to elevate the play of his own team. over the long run, do you think Brand will be better than curry? just curious..

Its hard to evaluate talent on the Clippers but I think Brand instantly gives you the frontcourt to be a top 3 team in the East. With Brand you can put guys like Frye, JJ, Lee and they becomes great role players.

I think with Brand we are still a little short of the Pacers, Pistons and Heat but we would take them deep to 6 or 7 games and be within a couple lucky Crawford 3's to stealing a series against them.

So yea... I think Brand is that good.

I think he would do for us what CWebb did for the Kings. MAybe not enough to win a title but I can guarentee you we get close enough to at least have a shot at it.