[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

A good General NBA Read... Briggs, it talks about Bynum... And other teams. Robinson mentioned
Author Thread
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
9/17/2005  12:20 PM
Some of my thoughts:

Bynum is not ready. I'm glad we drafted a "ready" player. NY doesnt have time to wait. The time is now.

I'm glad that Vazquez pulled a "Freddy Weis" on Orlandough. Let those suckers burn. They've lucked into too many #1 lotto picks. Dwight Howard looks like he will pull an "Amare" this season and start destroying the L as a Center.

I'm glad that the PG that the Raps drafted also pulled a "Milos" on the Raps too. Let Toronno suck a little bit more. I'm glad all of our prospects are here and ready to go. When's the last time we've had 3 good first round picks in the fold? Seriously...

I wonder if Charlie V is going to play well for the Raps. He has Tim Thomas Gazy written all over him. And he just looks weird.

Is Deron Williams going to be a sleeper NBA player this year? He's really the key to the whole thing in Utah. They need someone to hold the team together on the floor and exert a Stockton-esque cool and guidance over the O and D. Either stardom or bust. (It is interesting to note that ALL the other PGs that Utah has had since stock have all BUSTED in the biggest way)

It is interesting that no one really discusses or rather RIPS Yao for playing so soft. If he was white he'd be called "Shawn Bradley" and if he was black he'd be "Erick Dampier" - I just dont think Yao is really all that. Maybe it's just me, but what is so special about this guy? I think Eddy Curry has more heart than Yao, and Curry has 2 heart conditions...

Will the entire Houston team actually break through? Is it me or did JVG really do his best coaching in NYK? Or can he really not get T-mac, an NBA superstar, to the Finals?

AUTOADVERT
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
9/17/2005  12:21 PM
http://msn.foxsports.com/fantasy/story/4871524

A good article about the NBA touching on many of the same issues from foxsports too...

"Off-season lowdown: 10 burning questions
Story Tools: Print Email
Steve Alexander /
Posted: 2 days ago



This week, I'll answer 10 of my own burning questions about the upcoming NBA season.

Training camp starts on Oct. 4, so things will progress quickly from there with the season tipping off on Nov. 1. In the meantime, it will be pretty quiet for a week or two other than some unexpected minor surgeries, free-agent signings and maybe a trade or two since Lorenzen Wright is still with Memphis as of today.
Here are my 10 burning questions going into the preseason this year.


1. Can Joe Johnson really play point guard?
Charles Barkley, Kenny Smith, Steve Belkin and John Dishinger say no. Mike Woodson, Joe Johnson and Billy Knight say yes. I think he will be able to handle point guard duties for the Hawks to a certain extent, but I think Tyronn Lue will get more minutes than Woodson currently sees him getting.

In reality, Johnson is a 6-7, 230-pound small forward who can also do a fine job playing shooting guard. My theory is the Hawks don't really care if they have a true point guard on the floor or not this year. They simply want to put the best young team they can out there, let them run and learn how to play NBA basketball. This will be a crucial year in the development of the Josh's (Smith and Childress) and newcomers Marvin Williams and Salim Stoudamire. It's also a year in which Al Harrington needs to step up and become a leader with Johnson. If J.J. and Al can get some good chemistry going, and the whole team can keep their attitudes in check and fight through another dismal win-loss record that's surely coming this year, they could be a real force in the 2006 season.

So, what's the answer to the question? It really doesn't matter if Joe Johnson can play point guard or not, at least not to the Hawks. Consider that he'll be getting 40 minutes a night on a bad team, combined with the eye-opening "zero games missed in the last three years stat," and you've got yourself a fantasy stud this season.


2. Is Eddy Curry's heart problem going away?
It depends on which heart problem we're talking about. If it's the enlarged/irregular heartbeat problem that his lack of a contract/trade is being blamed on, there's no way to know for sure. However, I don't think his physical heart condition will be an issue this season once he is in uniform and playing.


Eddy Curry grabs far fewer boards than he should for a man of his size and frame. One of his two heart problems is up to him to correct. (Glenn James / Getty Images)

If we're talking about his "heart," as in work ethic and character, that's a whole different story. Curry is now famous for laziness, both on the court and off. He did come into last season in great shape and looked like a different guy, but could muster just under five rebounds per game. Are you kidding me? I can count more guards on both hands who averaged more rebounds than Curry did last year, and he's a 7-foot, 300-pound monster. The Bulls, along with most other teams, are secretly thankful a medical condition of some sort arose with Curry, because now they have a very convenient excuse not to sign him to an outrageous multiyear deal worth $80 million.

If he has always been lazy and finally showed up in shape at the start of a contract year, what makes anyone think he's going to keep it together once he signs the mega-deal? Quite simply, he won't. You've seen it with countless other big men over the years, and Erick Dampier and Mark Blount come to mind immediately.

Curry will likely just stay with the Bulls this year, hope his heart ailment becomes an afterthought and then go for some sort of mega-deal at the end of the season.


3. What were the Lakers, Clippers and Magic thinking?
Do you think these three teams regret their draft picks now? I went on Los Angeles radio the day before the draft and boldly claimed the Lakers would take Andrew Bynum and the Clippers would take Yaroslav Korolev. Did I believe it? Well, sort of, but I wasn't really sure they'd both be willing to take guys who may never even see the light of day. Then they did it! Korolev isn't ready for the NBA in the first place and could easily stay in Europe this year, while Bynum is at least two years away. However, the Lakers hired Kareem Abdul-Jabbar to work with the kid, so maybe they have hopes for him later this season or next year, although it's highly doubtful he could make an impact that soon. Had Phil Jackson been the coach of the Lakers earlier, I'm guessing they would have taken one of several sure things instead. Names like May, Granger, Green, Warrick, McCants, Wright, Graham and Robinson all come to mind.

Then you get to the Magic's selection of Fran Vazquez with the No. 11 pick. It's a miracle he wasn't selected by the Raptors instead, since their luck would have made his whole "deciding to go play in Spain instead of the NBA" thing make complete sense.

Instead, Vazquez is Orlando's PR mess, causing extreme embarrassment for an organization that had him on the cover of their fan magazine shortly after draft day, and after he announced he was not coming. Apparently, his girlfriend has him on a Christie-like leash. She told him he would not like America, and that he needed to stay right where he was. His response was not much more than, "Um, OK." What a joke. And why did the Magic not seem to have a clue this was coming? I'm no business mogul, but if I were considering making that big of an investment, I probably would have gone to Spain to make sure everything smelled right.


4. What was Rob Babcock thinking?
Speaking of the Raptors, have you started your office pool to see when Babcock loses his job yet? Yeah, me neither. But we should. Like many husbands out there, this dude just can't seem to do anything right. Go ahead and type "Rob Babcock is an idiot" into a search engine and you'll be amazed at the number of direct hits you'll see.

I don't claim to be a Raptors expert, but here's a short list of things I know of off the top of my head.


Rob Babcock should consider himself fortunate if he can hang onto his job in Toronto past Christmas. (Ron Turenne / Getty Images)

— He drafts "center" Rafael Araujo last year. Oops.

— He acquires Rafer Alston, who I love, but apparently makes Jalen Rose look like a model citizen and has an inability to get along with cool people, let alone a hard-nosed, disciplinarian head coach like Sam Mitchell. Oh, and then he makes sure he comes out of this year's draft without a point guard to back him up, then signs everyone's favorite point-guard wannabe, Jose Calderon. Jay Williams appears to be next in line. Yes, the same Jay Williams who hasn't played in two years after a life-threatening motorcycle accident.

— He gives away All-Star Vince Carter. Yeah, I know Vince quit on the team, but I bet he doesn't quit on his new one (Nets). New Jersey is not exactly run in an ideal fashion either, but is twice as effective as Babcock's "system."

— He drafts Charlie Villanueva with the No. 7 pick. Hell, Charlie's own website had him excited about possibly going as high as number 12!

— Finally, he comes out last week and tells the team and fans they are going to be worse than before, because they basically made no additions and lost Donyell Marshall. As the Guinness guy would say, "Brilliant!" Oh, and they only have one point guard, who is typically disgruntled, etc., etc.

You have to sell the fans on winning now, or at least being on the road to winning. After the public backlash his statements caused, he immediately backtracked and said the team is on the right track. Yeah, right. Jalen probably said it best on "The Best Damn Sports Show, Period," when he said even the Bad News Bears coach was more optimistic than Babcock. It has to be a great feeling when Jalen's the most level-headed individual in the organization. Sorry Raptors fans, but it's going to be another long year. I give Babcock until December.


5. Is Doug Christie really better than Jerry Stackhouse and Marquis Daniels?
How the Mavericks can possibly conclude that Christie is the answer at shooting guard is beyond me, but they're planning on starting Christie over both these guys. It was just a year ago that fantasy draft magazines had Daniels going at the No. 29 pick in drafts! Not now, as Avery Johnson apparently doesn't like him or his game. That has got to change, as both Jerry Stackhouse and Daniels are much better players than Christie, who is somewhat uncertain after undergoing ankle surgery recently. At least if Doug and Jackie are starting, the chances of her doing something frighteningly hilarious are increased.


6. Can Deron Williams handle being "The Man" in Utah?
I think he can. He should be relatively unchallenged for the point guard job in Utah, and with Carlos Boozer, Matt Harpring, Andrei Kirilenko and Mehmet Okur around, I expect big things from Deron this season.


Houston, we have no problem. Look for the Stro-Show to be on full display this coming season. (Bill Baptist / Getty Images)


7. Is Stromile Swift really the answer to all of Houston's questions?
Yes. This is the year he breaks out. It has to be. He has the potential to be one of the most exciting big men in the league with his ability to run, jump and block shots. Look for a very satisfying year if you come away from your draft with the Stro Show. Stro and low, that is the tempo.


8. Can Jason Williams play for Pat Riley, and with Shaq and Flash?
Everyone seems to think he's a perfect fit here, and he probably is. He will get almost all the point guard minutes and could be in for the best season of his life. However, he always seems to be an instant away from fighting with a coach, player or fan, so buyer beware.


9. Can Larry Brown sleep at night knowing his starting center is Jerome James, who will be backed up by rookie Channing Frye?
2005 Rotoworld.com Fantasy Football Online Draft Guide




400+ NFL Players Profiled, Ranked and Stats Projected
25+ Fantasy Football Strategy and Content Articles
32 NFL Team Reports
Tiering Strategy with each position seperated into tiers
Customized Cheatsheets - your scoring, our projections

Buy it today


No. This has disaster written all over it. Brown will put up with James' apathy for about two weeks, and will then move to Frye. When that doesn't work, look for Pat Ewing to make a comeback. Well, maybe not, but something will have to happen. There's also a lot of underlying tension with the Knicks regarding their overload at shooting guard. Jamal Crawford is going to be the odd man out, and I'm guessing he doesn't exactly handle it professionally. As Public Enemy once said, there's a poison goin' on.


10. Will Chris Webber make a fantasy impact this year?
I am guessing Webber owners are going to be disappointed this year. Samuel Dalembert's numbers are going up this year. Andre Iguodala's numbers are going up this year. Kyle Korver's numbers are going up this year. Allen Iverson's numbers aren't going down this year. Where's that leave C-Webb? I'm not sure. First of all, he has to stay healthy. Secondly, he has to keep his attitude and head in the game when he realizes he's not "The Man." What are the odds of that happening? Let's just say Chris may decide to smoke his troubles away this year, which is probably not a good thing.

-Doc

Steve "Dr. A" Alexander runs the NBA coverage for Rotoworld.com and is a regular contributor to FoxSports.com as well. He also covers the PGA, NFL, MLB and AFL, and successfully represents Rotoworld.com in various "expert" leagues throughout the year. The 2005-2006 season marks his fourth year of covering hoops for Rotoworld.com."
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
9/17/2005  1:28 PM



It's funny where they get these facts from, because Phil Jackson was the MAIN reason that Bynum is on the Lakers. Id always try to get a player I feel has the goods to bring us to a championship, and that why I liked Bynum so much because he is unique. Im a hopeful Knick fan, but not a rose-colored glasses cheerleader type, we are not a now team. we CANNOT compete with teams like Indiana Detroit Miami and if you have no shot at even considering getting out of round 1--well thats not really a now team. I like Frye and Nate, and I hope Lee does beat expectations--i like the direction we are going--but i would still swap bynum for frye right now if i could.
RIP Crushalot😞
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
9/17/2005  1:50 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:




It's funny where they get these facts from, because Phil Jackson was the MAIN reason that Bynum is on the Lakers. Id always try to get a player I feel has the goods to bring us to a championship, and that why I liked Bynum so much because he is unique. Im a hopeful Knick fan, but not a rose-colored glasses cheerleader type, we are not a now team. we CANNOT compete with teams like Indiana Detroit Miami and if you have no shot at even considering getting out of round 1--well thats not really a now team. I like Frye and Nate, and I hope Lee does beat expectations--i like the direction we are going--but i would still swap bynum for frye right now if i could.
Wow; I actually agree with all that. Isiah tried to get the #10 pick to get Bynum, but he should have drafted Bynum @ 8 and tried to get Frye with the #10 pick. I still like the roster but it would have more upside with Bynum.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/17/2005  2:23 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by BRIGGS:




It's funny where they get these facts from, because Phil Jackson was the MAIN reason that Bynum is on the Lakers. Id always try to get a player I feel has the goods to bring us to a championship, and that why I liked Bynum so much because he is unique. Im a hopeful Knick fan, but not a rose-colored glasses cheerleader type, we are not a now team. we CANNOT compete with teams like Indiana Detroit Miami and if you have no shot at even considering getting out of round 1--well thats not really a now team. I like Frye and Nate, and I hope Lee does beat expectations--i like the direction we are going--but i would still swap bynum for frye right now if i could.
Wow; I actually agree with all that. Isiah tried to get the #10 pick to get Bynum, but he should have drafted Bynum @ 8 and tried to get Frye with the #10 pick. I still like the roster but it would have more upside with Bynum.


UPSIDE? I really think i'm beginning to hate that word. Its a nice mirage, but these players rarely turn out to live up to the hype. While I wouldn't have been angry if we had taken Bynum, i'm not about to go crazy that we didn't either. Frye will be a good player in this league, of that I have no doubt. We don't even know that much about Bynum. He's never done ANYTHING. Frye has a body of work and while its not #1 pick level, its also not shabby. Its funny how they say Frye has no upside. If a guy like Boozer can come in and exceed expectations, why not Frye.

Overall they Knicks have added a good amount of talent. No bigtime players, but guys who hustle, have a high skill level, athletic ability and good college experience. Adding Q & JJ is an upgrade. You can argue over how much, but still they bring things we lacked last year. We have young guys who may be on the verge of putting it all together, in JC & Sweets and Ariza should show improvement as well. All these things along with a great coach should help this team to make a huge leap in the standings this year. I think they might even develop into a second rd team.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
9/17/2005  2:53 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by Bonn1997:

[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:




It's funny where they get these facts from, because Phil Jackson was the MAIN reason that Bynum is on the Lakers. Id always try to get a player I feel has the goods to bring us to a championship, and that why I liked Bynum so much because he is unique. Im a hopeful Knick fan, but not a rose-colored glasses cheerleader type, we are not a now team. we CANNOT compete with teams like Indiana Detroit Miami and if you have no shot at even considering getting out of round 1--well thats not really a now team. I like Frye and Nate, and I hope Lee does beat expectations--i like the direction we are going--but i would still swap bynum for frye right now if i could.
Wow; I actually agree with all that. Isiah tried to get the #10 pick to get Bynum, but he should have drafted Bynum @ 8 and tried to get Frye with the #10 pick. I still like the roster but it would have more upside with Bynum.


UPSIDE? I really think i'm beginning to hate that word. Its a nice mirage, but these players rarely turn out to live up to the hype. While I wouldn't have been angry if we had taken Bynum, i'm not about to go crazy that we didn't either. Frye will be a good player in this league, of that I have no doubt. We don't even know that much about Bynum. He's never done ANYTHING. Frye has a body of work and while its not #1 pick level, its also not shabby. Its funny how they say Frye has no upside. If a guy like Boozer can come in and exceed expectations, why not Frye.

Overall they Knicks have added a good amount of talent. No bigtime players, but guys who hustle, have a high skill level, athletic ability and good college experience. Adding Q & JJ is an upgrade. You can argue over how much, but still they bring things we lacked last year. We have young guys who may be on the verge of putting it all together, in JC & Sweets and Ariza should show improvement as well. All these things along with a great coach should help this team to make a huge leap in the standings this year. I think they might even develop into a second rd team.


Im a Frye fan. On another forum I argued quite vehemently that he should be a late lottery pick--and Im not upset that we took him because he can be a really good player. But I think it's fair to understand that some other people may believe that Andrew Bynum had a higher ceiling and would have been willing to wait for it. I dont agree with people who say frye scks, or frye is soft, I like Frye and Nate quite a bit myself, but I would still rather have Bynum Nate and Gomes:>)
RIP Crushalot😞
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
9/17/2005  7:00 PM
Two words about Bynum. Eddy Curry.
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
9/17/2005  8:12 PM
Posted by Caseloads:

Two words about Bynum. Eddy Curry.

I don't think so. Bynum is athletic, has long arms and a good shooting touch. He could be a great one. Granted it won't be this year or next, but he has a shot at greatness.


Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
9/17/2005  8:30 PM
Posted by Ira:
Posted by Caseloads:

Two words about Bynum. Eddy Curry.

I don't think so. Bynum is athletic, has long arms and a good shooting touch. He could be a great one. Granted it won't be this year or next, but he has a shot at greatness.
And how do you know that Bynum can be great? What has he done other than play decent HS ball? Honestly, this is a ton of hype about a guy that is not all that - yet, if ever!

rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
9/17/2005  9:57 PM
thank you nixluva. amen until bynum is good or reaches this high ceiling, I think it's time to put him to rest...kwame brown was a number one pick.

Basically, what I'm saying is, you guys seem to have a knack for criticising (sp) a knick to build up another player on another team, and when someone calls you on it, you say "I'm a fan of that guy"

That's bull****.

Until bynum plays a college game (oh, he's never done that) or plays a pro game (oh, he's never done that) ... well, just keep complaining how much you prefer bynum (with your weekly frye bashings) until he reaches this potential...I have a feeling Tim Thomas will reach his potential in the meantime.

[Edited by - rvhoss on 09-17-2005 10:03 PM]
all kool aid all the time.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
9/17/2005  10:04 PM
Replace your sentence with Tim Thomas and it fits.
Posted by Ira:

I don't think so. Bynum Tim Thomas is athletic, has long arms and a good shooting touch. He could be a great one. Granted it won't be this year or next, but he has a shot at greatness.


all kool aid all the time.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
9/17/2005  10:43 PM
Posted by Caseloads:

Two words about Bynum. Eddy Curry.


I have no idea what Bynum will or will not eventually be, I have a solid projection of what I believe he will be, but he is nothing like Eddie Curry, and thats not a knock on Eddie Curry. I still think Eddie Curry can be a really good player-and still a force at times IF he is healthy and controls his weight. I think they made mistakes with Eddie Curry and he didnt develop what he still can be and a lot of that has to do with his mind.

Bynum is a much longer player with a better understanding of the game and more IQ--he's going to be able do things like block shots rebound and pas much better than Curry and his fundamental skill will be better--bt his he the raw power of what Curry can be in the post--I dont think so, two really different types of players. Curry really is a mini Shaq who doesnt rebound or block shots, but uses his great size and explosion around the bucket to score easy points and at a high FG%

Bynum is more like a skilled version of Brendan Haywood with higher IQ and eventually much more offensive skills, but that is the body type. He could end up a couple of inches taller than Haywood.
RIP Crushalot😞
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
9/18/2005  2:19 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Caseloads:

Two words about Bynum. Eddy Curry.


I have no idea what Bynum will or will not eventually be, I have a solid projection of what I believe he will be, but he is nothing like Eddie Curry, and thats not a knock on Eddie Curry. I still think Eddie Curry can be a really good player-and still a force at times IF he is healthy and controls his weight. I think they made mistakes with Eddie Curry and he didnt develop what he still can be and a lot of that has to do with his mind.

Bynum is a much longer player with a better understanding of the game and more IQ--he's going to be able do things like block shots rebound and pas much better than Curry and his fundamental skill will be better--bt his he the raw power of what Curry can be in the post--I dont think so, two really different types of players. Curry really is a mini Shaq who doesnt rebound or block shots, but uses his great size and explosion around the bucket to score easy points and at a high FG%

Bynum is more like a skilled version of Brendan Haywood with higher IQ and eventually much more offensive skills, but that is the body type. He could end up a couple of inches taller than Haywood.
is haywood actually any good? (sarcasm)
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
9/19/2005  10:23 AM
Could Bynum be a bust? Sure he could. But, at this point, so could Frye. And judging by the way he was accumulating fouls against summer league players, I don't think Frye is all that ready. As far as the Thomas comparison, Bynum's much more intelligent than Thomas and hopefully has a better work ethic.

Also, and this is an important point, you don't stop shooting the dice because sometimes you get snakeyes. Bynum would have been an intelligent gamble where we drafted.
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
9/19/2005  1:38 PM
Posted by Ira:

Could Bynum be a bust? Sure he could. But, at this point, so could Frye. And judging by the way he was accumulating fouls against summer league players, I don't think Frye is all that ready. As far as the Thomas comparison, Bynum's much more intelligent than Thomas and hopefully has a better work ethic.

Also, and this is an important point, you don't stop shooting the dice because sometimes you get snakeyes. Bynum would have been an intelligent gamble where we drafted.
and sometimes you fully bust. We could not afford a full bust. Frye is going to be at least decent.


rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
9/19/2005  4:30 PM
frye's fouls were pretty much all in one game...I'm sure they told him to go after everything in that game...taking out that game, can you let me know your justification for him "accumulating fouls"

He didn't accumulate fouls in 4 years of college and the NCAA tourney...you guys make me sick.
all kool aid all the time.
MS
Posts: 27063
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
9/20/2005  9:29 AM
Frye sucks I don't know who anyone was watching the guy isn't tough gets pushed around, gets into foul trouble is not a great rebounder, and has no muscle on his body, ultimate *****, I would have went Brynum, Green or Granger players with real upside potential......

Nate Rob was a steal, pencil in Ariza in a few years as a very good player, and then you could have filled three starting positions down the road, i am expecting small things from Frye
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
9/20/2005  9:45 AM
MS, I'd say Bynum or Green could hit real big or bust, it's a gamble if you're willing to take, fine. Granger seems solid, I guess it'll depend on whether his offensive game takes off if he's going to become a star. Frye to me looks much like Bosh and Camby did coming into the league. Look at his performance in the tourney. I think he's gonna pan out fine.
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
9/20/2005  10:44 AM
Posted by Marv:

MS, I'd say Bynum or Green could hit real big or bust, it's a gamble if you're willing to take, fine. Granger seems solid, I guess it'll depend on whether his offensive game takes off if he's going to become a star. Frye to me looks much like Bosh and Camby did coming into the league. Look at his performance in the tourney. I think he's gonna pan out fine.
yeah, finally we are drafting guys that are decent that have the potential to do big things.... ooops that other p word again. and it's not punnany


A good General NBA Read... Briggs, it talks about Bynum... And other teams. Robinson mentioned

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy