[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Not a Caption pic
Author Thread
joec32033
Posts: 30605
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
9/16/2005  5:29 AM
but my favorite comic of all time!

~You can't run from who you are.~
AUTOADVERT
firefly
Posts: 23223
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
9/16/2005  6:08 AM
Oh man, Gary Larson is awesome. But listen to this. I was on the internet looking for more Far Side cartoons, when I found this.



Whadaya think?

[Edited by - firefly on 09-16-2005 06:09 AM]
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
Nalod
Posts: 70750
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/16/2005  9:00 AM
Basically I am in favor of artists being compensated when others are profiting from the work, or it dilutes the body of work.

I did a brief stint on Kazaa but removed it and forbid my children form taking music without compensation. Im ok with Internet radio, or other forums to listen, as one would on radio, but not able to make and duplicate the music. Satalite radio is one type that seems to gain approval from all.

In this case, its artwork.

I am not an artist, but I have had my work taken and used without compensation and I have to agree it sucks.

I do think the record companies have been slow to get with the times but they are coming around. Free market drives the markets but there must be respect to the artist.

I think the leter From Mr. Larson was a nice effort to explain himself before the lawyers swoop in and offends his supporters. In a way, those who put up those websites are perhaps innocently providing exposure but in reality are riding the backs of someones efforts.
bernard
Posts: 20730
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2003
Member: #475
9/16/2005  9:26 AM
I like Larson, but less so after reading his letter. I have one piece of advice to him: Get over yourself.

If you want to be paid for your work and to protect it from being distributed for free, that's fine. But this is a commercial issue, not one of artistic integrity. For someone who's so funny, you sure take yourself seriously.
Nalod
Posts: 70750
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/16/2005  10:14 AM
It is a nice way of saying it is an commercial issue.

I take business very personal when I am expressing myself thru my work and don't like my intelectual property being used for others to profit. It take it very personal when food, or tuition is taken awayfrom my kids.

It was nice for him to take a personal touch rather than the lawyers at first attempt.
knixphan
Posts: 20546
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/20/2002
Member: #258
Switzerland
9/16/2005  2:06 PM
Although somehow I imagine that most folks posting a far side pic are just taking a single image for the purpose of a joke - not making a profit or cutting into Larson's publisher's take... I am a professional artist, and I understand the difference between plagiarism and flattery...Stuff like this would be a case-by-case, if I were the artist in question, but hey - some folks are more 'sensitive' than others, like those people who can't be touched on the subway... Anyway, Bernard has a point, as does Nalod.
"I will dress in bright and cheery colors, and so throw my enemies into confusion."
Not a Caption pic

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy