[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Retired Numbers!!!
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

9/13/2005  10:40 AM
There was a question on Real Gm that asks: Does Pippen deserve to have his number retired? WTF? Yes he does!!! He helped define NBA basketball for the better part of a decade. Not even a question to ponder. 33 should be up in Chicago's rafters where it belongs.

Now......the Knicks.....

What does Charels Oakley have to do to get his number retired? He never was a scorer but when you talk about toughness and New York Knick basketball....Charles Oakley is the person most people think of even before Patrick Ewing sometimes. He should have his #34 retired by now....it's an insult.

Same could be said for Bernard King. Bernard King didn't leave in the best of terms but the Knicks organization didn't give him the respect he deserved. The league feared him when he was in a Knick uniform. He carried the Knicks on his back somuch that his ACL gave way!!! They need to put #30 up there with the rest and stop f'ing around.

Starks!!!! NY loves Starks!!! And that Oklahoma boy loves NY!!! It makes me sick that Marbs was allowed to wear his number!!! #3 should be gone!!!

Respect the building please!!! Respect the people who love the Knicks!!! Respect the players that gave us fans their blood, sweat, elbows, and headbutts!!!

Retired #3, #34, and #30!!!

(paid for by the same mofo's that pay those a-holes you never saw before today that are out trying to get you to vote for them!!!)
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
9/13/2005  11:14 AM
closest person would be oakley - and that's still a big if b/c of his relationship with management.
starks - solid player but not good enough to have it retired.

just goes to show you how we weren't able to give ewing and true help.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
9/13/2005  11:20 AM
Our best shot to win it all was in the '96- '97 season, but we blew it game 5 in Miami, need I say how? I would say Oakley, King get a little consideration, and Houston gets a little less, but overall, we really have had nobody worthy of it.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
9/13/2005  11:24 AM
...and to think they were actually talking about retiring Allan Houston's nunber!

Starks and Oak definitely should be considered first and foremost.
Starks' number would already be in the rafters had he not gane 2-18 in game 7 of the '94 Finals...

Hopefully, now we will have some players this year that left it all out on the floor like they did.
Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

9/13/2005  11:54 AM
Posted by HARDCOREKNICKSFAN:

...and to think they were actually talking about retiring Allan Houston's nunber!

No Allanfan20 is talking about that.....no way does Allan deserve to have his number retired. I will stage a protest against it if they even consider it!
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
jaydh
Posts: 23150
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
9/13/2005  11:59 AM
Posted by EnySpree:
Posted by HARDCOREKNICKSFAN:

...and to think they were actually talking about retiring Allan Houston's nunber!

No Allanfan20 is talking about that.....no way does Allan deserve to have his number retired. I will stage a protest against it if they even consider it!


how can you say starks or oakley deserves it, but not houston. Houston has hit more important shots. Retiring oakley's # is like San Antonio retiring Malik Rose #. Oak and starks are just glorified role players.
Nalod
Posts: 71899
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/13/2005  12:15 PM
Posted by HARDCOREKNICKSFAN:

...and to think they were actually talking about retiring Allan Houston's nunber!

Starks and Oak definitely should be considered first and foremost.
Starks' number would already be in the rafters had he not gane 2-18 in game 7 of the '94 Finals...

Hopefully, now we will have some players this year that left it all out on the floor like they did.

I agree, starks in one game could have make himself "made". He didn't. No number for Starks.

While oak is a fan favorite and pesonafied the era, I would have to say no.

Pippen is Hall of fame material with six rings! His HOF score is 189! 135 gets you in. Unless your Spencer Haywood or bernard king. I think he was top 50. Anyone in the hall of fame gets retired if spent large part of career with that team.

Funny, allan does not get the respect to get retired? HE was on this team for 9 years! He is the 4th all time leading scorer. Allan is not going into the hall, but he did far more than starks. Not the crowd favorite. This one is a bit tricky. I am on the fence with this one. If the number thing is for the fans, then no. If anynumber he gets retired with it should be number "100"! As in how many million he got paid on the last contract! That figure/symbol I think does more to harm his rep than anything.

Bernard: No. My favorite player of the era, but it was only three magical seasons he was our best player. He is sitting right at 135 HOF points! I don't think he gets in the hall!

Allan had done far more in a knick uniform than Bernard. Its a length of service thing.

He never really acomplished anything as he played on some marginal teams. Interesting, at age 34 he averaged 28pts a game at washington! With no championship, no MVP award, and only three seasons of individual acomplishment, can we really give him a number? if he played here longer, I'd say yes.

[Edited by - nalod on 09-13-2005 12:16 PM]
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

9/13/2005  12:18 PM
Posted by jaydh:


how can you say starks or oakley deserves it, but not houston. Houston has hit more important shots. Retiring oakley's # is like San Antonio retiring Malik Rose #. Oak and starks are just glorified role players.


What? Houston means nothing to this franchise or the people in this city. Fuck Allan Houston!!!!

Starks left it all out there everynight. He walked the line between good and evil for us Knick fans his whole career here. He kissed the court!!! Starks not having his jersey retired is a joke.

Oakley couldn't score unless it was a wide open look or he was cleaning up the garbage. The point is he gave it all for the Knicks and had everyones back. If there was a problem Oak was right there. He rebounded like a mofo and he didn't back down from no one. He is the Knicks!

Starks and Oakley ARE the Knicks!!!! Allan Houston is not! If Houston deserves it then so does, Hubert Davis!!!! Fuck Allan Houston!!!!

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

9/13/2005  12:23 PM
Posted by Nalod:

Funny, allan does not get the respect to get retired? HE was on this team for 9 years!

but then you say

If anynumber he gets retired with it should be number "100"! As in how many million he got paid on the last contract! That figure/symbol I think does more to harm his rep than anything.

Houston gets no love from me....I'm serious as a heart attack.....I will protest the Knicks if they consider it!!!! I will definately give up being a Knick fan.

Houston did not leave it out on the floor. He was a Knick 9 years? When he first got here Starks used to take his minutes in the fourth and Houston was a pure panty waste. Then 1999 playoff came and his scoring went way up along with Spree's be cause that's what they had. After that Houston the bitch came right back. Layden shakled his punk ass to the largest contract ever given to a guard!!!! Houston still is the highest paid shooting guard in the league. He is making Garnett money!!!

Fuck Allan Houston!!!!



[Edited by - enyspree on 09-13-2005 12:27 PM]
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Nalod
Posts: 71899
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/13/2005  3:13 PM
Enyspree,

Allan was a graceful scorer who did what he was asked to do, score points. He was not a well balanced player. Neither was Oak.

Allan could make things look almost effortless. You think a player of that caliber does not work hard? A hack like oak leaves it out there cuz that was his job! He made up for his lack of talent by hustling. He did what he needed to make it in the NBA! Starks was an emotional player who had a brief career (it started late)and was fueled by his emotions and a streak shooter.

It would appear that your more appreciative of tough players who have hard reputations and have over come adversity in some form to earn their place. Lets not forget a important fact that these players get paid real nice and that is many times more the reason they are "leaving it all on the court". There are plenty of journeyman players who did the same, but did not have the talent! They are paid for what they do, not the effort!

Are we just a bit jaded cuz you were a Spree fan? And if you loved spree's primal magnatisim, you likely hated Allans fundamental grace!

Given that, would it be a bit sensitive of you to thow out your history and passion for the knicks cuz they retired the 4th all time leading scorer of the team? I mean your very much a fan of the physical player who plays tough, intimidates others, and really "leaves it out there", and you get pissy cuz a fundamentally elite player gets his no. retired? Think Oak, Mase or Starks would renounce their allegence over a number retirement? You think Willis would have limped out there in 1970 to lift his team thru the pain if he knew one of the fans would pull up and leave cuz one player they did not like got an honor?

Willis played in pain for your sins Enyspree!

MaRbUrYiSaKnIcK
Posts: 20319
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/15/2004
Member: #737
USA
9/13/2005  4:12 PM
why dont you think marbury deserves to wear number 3?
Marbury is finally home at MSG!
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
9/13/2005  6:59 PM
Well said Nalod.

Nobody is discounting Marbury, but it's still too early b/c he's only been here for a year and a half and all we have in our belts is a first round exit in 4 games. You have to have a little bit more to show than leading the team in scoring and assists. Do it in the playoffs as your team advances and we'll talk.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
teslawlo
Posts: 21482
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #699
USA
9/13/2005  7:53 PM
I also agree with Nalod. I think getting a number retired has a lot to do with years played... I know the past few years have left knicks fans with a sour taste, and I think that houston has gotten a little too much blame since he is, obviously, the easiest one to blame. While the deficiencies in his game are known by all, I don't think it is his personal fault that he led the knicks during some of their most dismal seasons. He performed to the best of his ability (to the contrary of what some believe) and always performed his job (scoring and acting as the team's best outside shooter) consistently. Given all this, he should at least get a little consideration. I know some here would rather have sprewell's # retired than allan's, but let's all put aside our personal likes/dislikes for a moment. Just because houston doesn't always run around yelling and screaming like maniac, it doesn't mean he doesn't have any heart or that he doesn't care and isn't trying.
http://allknicks.com
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
9/13/2005  8:13 PM
All Allan Houston had was a smooth jumper. What else did he really do? All his job was to jump shoot. That was his one dimension. I used the past tense because with that arthritiic knees, in addition to age, that jumper will never be the same.

Players like Oak (and Starks) may not have had the Allan jumpshot, but that hustle won us alot of games. While he wasn't the most talented, no one could say that he ever gave less than 110% night in, night out. Opposing teams had to cover these players in different areas. If someone shuts down Allan's jumper, he wouldn't give you anything else.

Other players (like Spree, Nalod ) were versatile enough to make contributions in other ways to help us win. Oak and Starks did the same.

Put Allan's number in the rafters when he expands his game, but at this stage, I seriously doubt that'll happen.

Better yet, like Nalod said, hang the number 100 up for his contract.

Lastly, if the # of years played counts, didn't Oak play here 9 years?

...and what about this?

"Closed the 1997-98 season ranked 2nd in Knicks' franchise history in steals (844), 3rd in rebounds (7,291) and minutes (23,959) and 6th in games (727)"

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/charles_oakley/index.html


Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

9/13/2005  8:19 PM
Posted by Nalod:

Are we just a bit jaded cuz you were a Spree fan? And if you loved spree's primal magnatisim, you likely hated Allans fundamental grace!

Fuck Spree too.....I would have changed my name a while back but I've been using it so long. I used to go by SpreeH20!!! I used the H20 because I thought in 1999 that Houston finally found his balls.....I was wrong so I dumped it. Like I said Spree would be dumped too if I wasn't using it so long.

Why was Sean Elliots number retired? He had a few good years and hit a big shot towards the end of his career........Sean Elliot was adored by the fans and he defined what a San Antonio Spur was. Yes it's a fan thing......number should be retired because of what players mean to the franchise and fans.

Houston has a beautiful jumpshot.......aside from that what has he done that shows he is worthy of my respect? He can't honestly say that he gave his all throughout his career here. If his jumper is off.....he is nothing.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

9/13/2005  8:25 PM
Posted by MaRbUrYiSaKnIcK:

why dont you think marbury deserves to wear number 3?


He might earn it one day. It just shouldn't be Starks number.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Nalod
Posts: 71899
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/13/2005  9:00 PM
Posted by HARDCOREKNICKSFAN:

All Allan Houston had was a smooth jumper. What else did he really do? All his job was to jump shoot. That was his one dimension. I used the past tense because with that arthritiic knees, in addition to age, that jumper will never be the same.

Players like Oak (and Starks) may not have had the Allan jumpshot, but that hustle won us alot of games. While he wasn't the most talented, no one could say that he ever gave less than 110% night in, night out. Opposing teams had to cover these players in different areas. If someone shuts down Allan's jumper, he wouldn't give you anything else.

Other players (like Spree, Nalod ) were versatile enough to make contributions in other ways to help us win. Oak and Starks did the same.

Put Allan's number in the rafters when he expands his game, but at this stage, I seriously doubt that'll happen.

Better yet, like Nalod said, hang the number 100 up for his contract.

Lastly, if the # of years played counts, didn't Oak play here 9 years?

...and what about this?

"Closed the 1997-98 season ranked 2nd in Knicks' franchise history in steals (844), 3rd in rebounds (7,291) and minutes (23,959) and 6th in games (727)"

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/charles_oakley/index.html

I could go with Oak getting his number based on your logic and stats. good points.

Starks has some great highlights but I kind of lump him together with Mase whom also had some steller moments. While the 2 for 18 game remains a dark dark day, I recall too many ill timed technicals and bone head turnovers. Oak was a pilar and cornerstone of the franchise perhaps even more than Ewing.

for the record, spree broke my heart! I sided with him for the chock act, and loved his game! But the selfish antics just piled up. Its old news, and old subject! Im of the nature that a 12-14 million dollar salary paid by revenue from fans deserves a bit of respect to them. Of all the things he did, I thought the tirade against Dolan for what ever reason was very disrespect and offensive to those whom supported him thru thick and thin!

And dolan for all his evilness creating the downturn I think has shown great support toward Isiah and enabling him to redue the team and pay a record amount to a coach. Thats commitment! For all of Isiahs moves, he can't do any of it without the support of his owner. So lets give little jimmy some props and hope we can one day see them pouring champagne on each other while hoisting up the Obrien trophy!
DarkKnicks
Posts: 21064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/29/2005
Member: #882
Spain
9/14/2005  7:13 AM
Well, I can't tell if Houston deserves to have his number retired, but I honestly believe he deserves it more than Oakley and Starks. I don't know why you think Houston did not give everything to this team. He plays the way he plays, just like Oakley or Starks did. The only difference is that Houston is more talented.
TRU
Posts: 20752
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/25/2002
Member: #196
USA
9/14/2005  7:30 AM
Liking or disliking Allan is more indicative
of your personal disposition
than your basketball knowledge.

Some girls like badboys. Others like prissy J-crew dudes.

Jersey retirement means no one else will EVER deserve the number.

Only #33 in our era deserves that honor.

Not 20.

Not 34.

This is NEW YORK.

Grown men shouldn't be groupies.



[Edited by - tru on 09-14-2005 07:31 AM]
Let it be known: I believe in the Knicks this year-- deep into the playoffs, I swear to you my brothers...
Nalod
Posts: 71899
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/14/2005  8:54 AM
Posted by EnySpree:
Posted by Nalod:

Are we just a bit jaded cuz you were a Spree fan? And if you loved spree's primal magnatisim, you likely hated Allans fundamental grace!

Fuck Spree too.....I would have changed my name a while back but I've been using it so long. I used to go by SpreeH20!!! I used the H20 because I thought in 1999 that Houston finally found his balls.....I was wrong so I dumped it. Like I said Spree would be dumped too if I wasn't using it so long.

Why was Sean Elliots number retired? He had a few good years and hit a big shot towards the end of his career........Sean Elliot was adored by the fans and he defined what a San Antonio Spur was. Yes it's a fan thing......number should be retired because of what players mean to the franchise and fans.

Houston has a beautiful jumpshot.......aside from that what has he done that shows he is worthy of my respect? He can't honestly say that he gave his all throughout his career here. If his jumper is off.....he is nothing.

Sean got a ring or two. That kinda stuff galvanizes you in history.

Does Dick Barnett have his number retired? If so, he was a fine player, but if not for the 1970 team winning it all, no way he gets it.

Tru- good points. But we all like some players for their style. For me, I can appreciate Allans grace and fundamental skills. he made it look easy! And I equally dig Oaks grit!

I lump Mase and Starks together as mutts done good, but not good enough.

LJ had some great moments but was limited by his back and did not have his best years in NY.

Tru madea a good point, cut if off with ewing and all arguements are equal. I would have to agree that while Oak and Allan were great and had long service, they pale to Patricks career. That should be the standard. 10 years with HOF, or 10 years with a championship.

Retired Numbers!!!

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy