[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Getting Nestrovic & prospect
Author Thread
OAK
Posts: 20517
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/11/2005
Member: #957
Japan
8/22/2005  9:57 AM
SA is shopping Nestrovic. They need a SF.

We have a glut at G/SF position. Marbury & Craw are here to stay. We need a big man.

So, how about Q-Rich for Nestrovic & rights to Ian Mahinmi (SA's #28th selection of 2005 draft http://nbadraft.net/profiles/ianmahinmi.asp). The #s work on Real GM.

SA gets a SF who can score/rebound in Q-Rich. He is 25 yrs old, 4 yrs younger than Nestrovic. He has 5 yrs $37mm left on his deal (compared to 4 yrs $30mm ofr Nestrovic)

NY gets Nestrovic who I believe is better than JJ. He's a 7 footer who can score, rebound and block shots (though he didn't have a good yr). Mahinmi, a 19 yr old 6-10 PF, is supposed to be a monster prospect with good rebound & shot blocking skills.

NY Lineup
Crawford / Nate
Marbury / Ariza / Houston
TT / Lee / Rose
Sweetney / Frye / Taylor
Nestrovic / JJ / Butler

Rights to Mahinmi

I'd do this deal since it solves a glut at the perimeter and nets us a C & great prospect in Mahinmi. I see Craw as our starting PG, Marbury as SG, Ariza as future starting SF. Nestrovic is not a star C but having him and JJ, both 7+ ft, is a big frontcourt upgrade and allows Frye to take his time learing the ropes.

Thoughts?
AUTOADVERT
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
8/22/2005  10:02 AM
Trading for Nesterovic would be allright, but we would have to be gettin back a lot more then some foreign prospect and giving up a lot less then Q.

But we already have their 1st round pick next year, I guess we could take a couple more lol.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
8/22/2005  10:05 AM
Well, this is very well thought out, I'll give you that to begin with. BUT. Isiah has just brought in Q-Rich to the Knicks and he brought him in for a reason so I don't see him trading Q at all. I think if the Knicks were to ever trade Q they would be able to get much better value for him then RASSSSSSSSSSHO NEEEESTERVIC. You said that you think that Rasho is better then JJ, he MIGHT be but what are the Knicks going to do, they can't magically cut or waive JJ. JJ is here to stay right now and with Frye and Jackie Butler seeing alot of backup minutes, we don't have room for another marginal center like Rasho.

I don't see the Spurs wanting any of our players besides Ariza, Nate, or Frye anyway... they don't fit into Pops system.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
OAK
Posts: 20517
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/11/2005
Member: #957
Japan
8/22/2005  10:05 AM
This means...

Outgoing
KT(32) + Dijon Thompson(22) + Q-Rich(24)

Incoming
Nate(21) + Nestrovic(29) + Mahinmi(19)

We're getting younger, taller, more athletic, and better defensively. Also placing prospects in the pipeine for the future.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38476
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
8/22/2005  10:11 AM
Right now...I would rather just sit still and go to battle with the current crew and see what they can do. I also want Penny and Tiny Tim's contract to just expire. I would only do a trade if it is a no-brainer.
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
8/22/2005  10:11 AM
Rasho? LOL We need someone better and I think we can still get that.
Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
OAK
Posts: 20517
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/11/2005
Member: #957
Japan
8/22/2005  10:12 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:

You said that you think that Rasho is better then JJ, he MIGHT be but what are the Knicks going to do, they can't magically cut or waive JJ. JJ is here to stay right now and with Frye and Jackie Butler seeing alot of backup minutes, we don't have room for another marginal center like Rasho.

I don't think we need to worry about that. JJ sucks and gets into foul trouble so often, he will simply split mins with Rasho. Don't get me wrong. I'm not a big fan of Rasho. But it doesn't make sense to have Marbury, Craw, and Q together when we have Ariza & Lee who are more Larry Brown type of players waiting on the wing. M, C, and Q all are signed long term, and someone's gotta go. I don't think Isiah will trade Marbs or Craw. I mean it'd be near impossible to find takers right now. Trading Q for Rasho does address our need now, and get us a good prospect.

Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
8/22/2005  10:16 AM
honestly, i find it hard to believe that the spurs will give up on a prospect like Ian... they right now are thinking to #ell with Rasho, that's why we got Oberto
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
8/22/2005  10:20 AM
a) Nesterovic is really soft. The fact that he couldn't contribute in any positive way to a team that signed him for that express purpose is troubling. Then Nazi did the job. Even more troubling.

b) That leaves is dangerously thin at guard. I don't expect any contribution (other than a cap saving retirement) from H20. Ariza is not a guard.
OAK
Posts: 20517
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/11/2005
Member: #957
Japan
8/22/2005  10:22 AM
You guys think that Rasho is a bum, but if you look at his #s for the last 3-4 yrs, it's not bad. Yeah, you have to take it into consideration that he did play with KG and Duncan, both known to make others around them better. But he still is a 7 footer who can score 20 and block 5 shots on a good night.

We are not going to get a great big man for Q. It's simple as that. We have Timmy and Penny's expiring deals that may net us a big name player at the trade deadline (in our dreams). I'd be happy if we got a servicable big man in Rasho and Mahimni, using Q who is not a great player in my book. You have to remember that Mahimni was SA's 28th pick from last draft... SA's! That's probably the best team in NBA in terms of finding great talent from overseas.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/22/2005  10:27 AM
Gross. I think you're severely underrating Q and overrating Rasho. Yuck. I like the prospect from San Antonio okay, but still.... gross.

I wouldn't even trade Tim Thomas for Rasho.
¿ △ ?
OAK
Posts: 20517
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/11/2005
Member: #957
Japan
8/22/2005  10:28 AM
Posted by simrud:

Trading for Nesterovic would be allright, but we would have to be gettin back a lot more then some foreign prospect and giving up a lot less then Q.

But we already have their 1st round pick next year, I guess we could take a couple more lol.

Who do you think we could get for Q then? Realistically.
toodarkmark
Posts: 21145
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/2/2004
Member: #515
USA
8/22/2005  10:31 AM
Didn't Nazzy sort of take his starting job with better play? Why didn't we just keep Nazzy then?

I don't care what people think. People are stupid. - Charles Barkley
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/22/2005  10:32 AM
if he was brought here, i don't even think he would start. i think he would play the okur role.

i'm not a fan of rasho but i think moving q, right now, may be a bit premature. this would then leave us with relatively thin backcourt again.
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
8/22/2005  10:39 AM
moving Q is a bad move. Q could have at least gotten us Kwame Brown, who is a good player when he gets his touches and is not pouting.
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
8/22/2005  10:40 AM
i liked Rasho's progression in Minn. I had read an article about McHale working with him a lot to teach him his old up and under move, and the the next time I saw them play I watched for it and i was pretty impressed with the way the guy was playing.

But he certainly was pathetic this year. SA really is so freaking smart. They saw what they needed for a championship, a guy like Nazr to step in and give them what Rasho was supposed to but wasn't. They even managed to clear out an expensive mistake (sorry - but that's how I see Malik) in the process.

I lilke the way you're thinking in trying to get us more bigs, especially the young prospect.

But there is no way I'd trade Q. Our backcouirt is set beautifully right now IMO. Q can get minutes at 3 as well as 2, and Marbs, Craw and Nate can all go 1 and 2. Let's let this backcourt play, learn Larry 's system and see where it all shakes out.
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
8/22/2005  10:52 AM
I doubt that we'll trade Q anytime soon, Marv. Let's not take some of these posters' wild imaginations too seriously. I doubt that most folks are even considering ust how much Q will actually be able to contribute in Larry's system.
Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
OAK
Posts: 20517
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/11/2005
Member: #957
Japan
8/22/2005  10:59 AM
Posted by Marv:

i liked Rasho's progression in Minn. I had read an article about McHale working with him a lot to teach him his old up and under move, and the the next time I saw them play I watched for it and i was pretty impressed with the way the guy was playing.

But he certainly was pathetic this year. SA really is so freaking smart. They saw what they needed for a championship, a guy like Nazr to step in and give them what Rasho was supposed to but wasn't. They even managed to clear out an expensive mistake (sorry - but that's how I see Malik) in the process.

I lilke the way you're thinking in trying to get us more bigs, especially the young prospect.

But there is no way I'd trade Q. Our backcouirt is set beautifully right now IMO. Q can get minutes at 3 as well as 2, and Marbs, Craw and Nate can all go 1 and 2. Let's let this backcourt play, learn Larry 's system and see where it all shakes out.


Hmmmm... maybe you guys are right.

I'm worried about our front court since we couldn't land the likes of Kwame, Gadz, Zaza.
Having JJ and Frye at C is too weak IMHO.

To tell you the truth, I'm so freeking bored and felt the need to stir the pot!!!!!! Can't wait for the training camp...
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
8/22/2005  11:08 AM
Posted by OAK:

Hmmmm... maybe you guys are right.

I'm worried about our front court since we couldn't land the likes of Kwame, Gadz, Zaza.
Having JJ and Frye at C is too weak IMHO.

To tell you the truth, I'm so freeking bored and felt the need to stir the pot!!!!!! Can't wait for the training camp...

Stirring the pot is always good! I like the idea of going after the big, I just don't think that Rasho is the right guy to go after, not right now. As a few said before and I failed to mention in my previous post, I'm willing to just go with the team that Isiah has assembled so far and see what we've got, obviously if a no-brainer trade comes along you make it, but I don't see that happening.. YET. I'm willing to go with Sweets, Frye, and JJ on the front-line to see what they can contribute(especially Frye and Sweets) to us before I go out making moves.




[Edited by - nyk4ever on 08-22-2005 11:09 AM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/22/2005  11:14 AM
Posted by OAK:
Posted by simrud:

Trading for Nesterovic would be allright, but we would have to be gettin back a lot more then some foreign prospect and giving up a lot less then Q.

But we already have their 1st round pick next year, I guess we could take a couple more lol.

Who do you think we could get for Q then? Realistically.

I think it's far too early to tell whether or not Q fits here.


¿ △ ?
Getting Nestrovic & prospect

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy