[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

great trade that won't happen
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Ray15
Posts: 20281
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2004
Member: #668
8/9/2005  12:10 PM
Marbury and Sweetney for a resigned Duhon and a resigned Tyson Chandler...

The bulls get a legit star in his prime. He would be perfect next to Hinrich in the backcourt. They get a solid replacement for Chandler who's asking price may be a bit too high for the bulls.

From our standpoint, these two guys are exactly what this team needs. We get younger, more athletic, and MUCH better defensively. Larry Brown would absolutley love Duhon and with Ty Chandler and Jerome James we would be very solid defensively up front. Fyre can come in and block some shots as well. Look at the length we would have with that frontcourt rotation and if you bring in Rose off the bench also that is a solid frontcourt on both ends of the court.

Duhon, Crawford, Q, Chandler, James

with Nate, Ariza, Rose, Frye as the 9 man rotation with JYD getting spot mins.

Screw both TT and Mo
Defense and Toughness
AUTOADVERT
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
8/9/2005  12:12 PM
yup. you said it buddy.



but keep dreaming anyway.
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
8/9/2005  1:11 PM
Posted by Ray15:

Marbury and Sweetney for a resigned Duhon and a resigned Tyson Chandler...

The bulls get a legit star in his prime. He would be perfect next to Hinrich in the backcourt. They get a solid replacement for Chandler who's asking price may be a bit too high for the bulls.

From our standpoint, these two guys are exactly what this team needs. We get younger, more athletic, and MUCH better defensively. Larry Brown would absolutley love Duhon and with Ty Chandler and Jerome James we would be very solid defensively up front. Fyre can come in and block some shots as well. Look at the length we would have with that frontcourt rotation and if you bring in Rose off the bench also that is a solid frontcourt on both ends of the court.

Duhon, Crawford, Q, Chandler, James

with Nate, Ariza, Rose, Frye as the 9 man rotation with JYD getting spot mins.

Screw both TT and Mo
First off, that is a bad trade from a standpoint of you get Duhon who maybe at best a career backup pg, and you give up something for nothing. 2nd Chandler maybe one of the longest disappointing bust I have ever seen. Why people think that Chandler as a strictly shotblocker is worth more than he is getting is sort of beyond me. Yeah he can block shots.... 3) That trade doesn't even add up financially Marbury is a max player unless you are saying that Chandler should be signed for max money?
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
8/9/2005  1:16 PM
Not crazy about Duhon, but decent. Chandler would be a huge step in the right direction for our frontcourt. Then we can start Crawford at the 1, Q at the 2 and Ariza at the 3. Not bad.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Nalod
Posts: 71396
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/9/2005  1:20 PM


I would like to see Nate emerge to get 15 min a nite and make a difference!

And if he ever slams a putback again I would fine and suspend him one game for activity not condusive to the team!

I'd love him, but our points should not be playing that deep!
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/9/2005  1:41 PM
first off, there's no difference in my eyes between tyson chandler and eddie curry. both players FINALLY played hard and healthy for their contract year. jury is still way way out on both of them.

you can talk work ethic all you want but has chandler's game really improved any since his rookie year? has there been development? i don't see any - all that's happened is that he finally played a full season.

now with that said, i would like to bring him in here but NOT for marbury and sweetney - that's absolutely NUTS.

marbury, love him or hate him, but the only way you trade him is if you get a star player in return or significant cap room. a re-signed duhon and re-signed chandler does not accomplish either.
nykbasketball
Posts: 20413
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/30/2005
Member: #862
USA
8/9/2005  2:04 PM
no way i do that for marbs and sweeets
What's Defense?
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
8/9/2005  4:03 PM
Posted by nykbasketball:

no way i do that for marbs and sweeets
ditto.
rojasmas
Posts: 21207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/25/2004
Member: #639
8/9/2005  4:40 PM
I don't think it is enough either.
We could be the Dallas Mavs of the East.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/9/2005  5:01 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by nykbasketball:

no way i do that for marbs and sweeets
ditto.
ditto
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/9/2005  7:13 PM
unless you're getting back a proven star player in his prime or some ending contracts & high lottery picks, why trade Marbury? IT would never do it.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
« Reply To Topic
great trade that won't happen
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy