[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I'm getting grumpy...
Author Thread
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/15/2005  12:31 PM
the knicks had 3 bad years, for most teams, this is a regular occurence.

We are looking to get out of this hole...baby steps.

We've been to the finals and been denied by jordan for the last 15 years.

In 19 months the roster is completely different and we are ready to take another run at the title.

Last seasons 16 - 13 stat was not a fluke, everything that happened after that was.

Now this team is better than last year's, whic could lead to a 20 and 10 start.

Why are those in the minority of this thinking finding it so hard to believe that we have a chance to make a run next year?

if chicago can do it with a bunch of no names and a strongly drafted sixth man rookie...the wizards can use players playing above themselves in a contract year to get bounced from the playoffs...if indiana can do it with both of their superstars suspended for half the season...

Why can't the knicks?
all kool aid all the time.
AUTOADVERT
LongIslandKnicksFan
Posts: 21187
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 11/18/2003
Member: #496
USA
7/15/2005  12:38 PM
Knicks of this year are not going to make it deep into the playoffs. We need more star players and a coach. Without a proven head coach like Larry Brown, we will be short of making the playoffs. The coach has a lot to do with a team winning.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/15/2005  12:53 PM
we can win the division though right? Doesn't that give us an automatic birth?
all kool aid all the time.
Nalod
Posts: 71391
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/15/2005  12:55 PM
Posted by rvhoss:

the knicks had 3 bad years, for most teams, this is a regular occurence.

We are looking to get out of this hole...baby steps.

We've been to the finals and been denied by jordan for the last 15 years.

In 19 months the roster is completely different and we are ready to take another run at the title.

Last seasons 16 - 13 stat was not a fluke, everything that happened after that was.

Now this team is better than last year's, whic could lead to a 20 and 10 start.

Why are those in the minority of this thinking finding it so hard to believe that we have a chance to make a run next year?

if chicago can do it with a bunch of no names and a strongly drafted sixth man rookie...the wizards can use players playing above themselves in a contract year to get bounced from the playoffs...if indiana can do it with both of their superstars suspended for half the season...

Why can't the knicks?

Im gonna shoot myself after reading this!
NYK3
Posts: 23572
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/30/2004
Member: #725
USA
7/15/2005  12:55 PM
Im not gonna sit here and make predictions like last year, the truth is none of us know what the heck is going to happen. I think we could win around 43-47 games but then also we could possible win 33-37 games. I also agree with rvhoss in that if teams like Washington and Chicago had such a great run last year why cant we??
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers!!!
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
7/15/2005  1:14 PM
Posted by NYK3:

the truth is none of us know what the heck is going to happen.
You will not break anymore TV's
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
roblackman
Posts: 20396
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #926
7/15/2005  1:20 PM
I know one thing, we can run with any team in the league now--we won't be getting beat down the floor on a consistent basis anymore. That's quite a turnaround from the previous years.
And the reply is...a post that makes sense (still waiting)
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/15/2005  1:23 PM
Posted by roblackman:

I know one thing, we can run with any team in the league now--we won't be getting beat down the floor on a consistent basis anymore. That's quite a turnaround from the previous years.

4 of them anyway...i guess that's better than what we had last year.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
roblackman
Posts: 20396
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #926
7/15/2005  1:26 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by roblackman:

I know one thing, we can run with any team in the league now--we won't be getting beat down the floor on a consistent basis anymore. That's quite a turnaround from the previous years.

4 of them anyway...i guess that's better than what we had last year.

Just watch, having a team that can run and get easy baskets and having a player to intimidate shots will make a huge difference to this team. Only 4? Marbury, Nate, Craw, Q, TT, JYD, Malik, Lee, Frye, James can all get up and down.
And the reply is...a post that makes sense (still waiting)
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/15/2005  1:30 PM
yes, all those guys can run (James? i disagree w/u on that one, but don't want to get into that again)...but i was talking about our likely starting 5...actually, if you think about it, only 3 of our starters are well suited for a running & gunning style game

TT, Q or Craw & Marbury

[Edited by - TMS on 07/15/2005 13:31:36]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38420
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
7/15/2005  1:39 PM
Posted by NYK3:

Im not gonna sit here and make predictions like last year, the truth is none of us know what the heck is going to happen.

Obviously, unlesss you are diderotn. Then you know exactly what is going to happen.
BigAppleStar3
Posts: 20141
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/8/2004
Member: #683
USA
7/15/2005  1:59 PM
Posted by NYK3:

Im not gonna sit here and make predictions like last year, the truth is none of us know what the heck is going to happen. I think we could win around 43-47 games but then also we could possible win 33-37 games. I also agree with rvhoss in that if teams like Washington and Chicago had such a great run last year why cant we??

Herb Williams is no Scott Skiles or Eddie Jordan, that's why.
NYK3
Posts: 23572
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/30/2004
Member: #725
USA
7/15/2005  2:09 PM
Posted by BigAppleStar3:
Posted by NYK3:

Im not gonna sit here and make predictions like last year, the truth is none of us know what the heck is going to happen. I think we could win around 43-47 games but then also we could possible win 33-37 games. I also agree with rvhoss in that if teams like Washington and Chicago had such a great run last year why cant we??

Herb Williams is no Scott Skiles or Eddie Jordan, that's why.
oh please thats a bunch of BS, Eddie Jordan and Skiles are great coaches now just cause they had 1 good year?? lets see them be successful for a couple years before we say anything and lets also give herb a full year before we judge him also

[Edited by - NYK3 on 07/15/2005 14:11:50]
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers!!!
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/15/2005  2:13 PM
there are so many unknowns with this team that there is no way to know how things are going to go.

And, should things work out- should Q & Craw somehow manage to shoot above 38%, should Nate, Lee & Frye make contributions, the roster stays healthy, Marbury is a leader and not a diva, and JJ is a factor- Herb will be a fine coach and you'll think he got them to play hard.

But- until this group proves otherwise, you have to look at last years record that came after the same kinds of predictions that you and everyone else is making.

Until they prove otherwise, this is a non-playoff team and they have the season to prove otherwise.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/15/2005  4:02 PM
Bottom line: playoffs or no, this team is going to be fun to watch, and it has a future, both through the draft and through continued development of Crawford, Sweets, Ariza, Frye, Nate and Lee. And Butler.


That's MUCH more than I could ask for a year ago, so I'm happy.
¿ △ ?
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/15/2005  4:02 PM
Bulls didnt add no names. They added top tier rookie talent in Gordon and Deng. They added a solid overseas player in Noccioni and they added a 4 year PG from a top program in Deng. They shipped off their most erratic player and brought in a tough coach that pushed defense.

The Knicks have upgraded their talent, but nothing close to what the Bulls did in their last offseason
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/16/2005  12:37 AM
I never heard of them before this last year...just Gordon.
Posted by fishmike:

Bulls didnt add no names. They added top tier rookie talent in Gordon and Deng. They added a solid overseas player in Noccioni and they added a 4 year PG from a top program in Deng. They shipped off their most erratic player and brought in a tough coach that pushed defense.

The Knicks have upgraded their talent, but nothing close to what the Bulls did in their last offseason
all kool aid all the time.
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
7/16/2005  12:55 AM
Posted by fishmike:

Bulls didnt add no names. They added top tier rookie talent in Gordon and Deng. They added a solid overseas player in Noccioni and they added a 4 year PG from a top program in Deng. They shipped off their most erratic player and brought in a tough coach that pushed defense.

The Knicks have upgraded their talent, but nothing close to what the Bulls did in their last offseason

"They shipped off their most erratic player" - uh oh, that would seem to explain a lot of the difference between the standings of the 2 franchises then, wouldn't it?

But seriously couldn't you say that theoretically we've equaled what they did? Isn't Nate looking like he could do what Gordon did last year if given the minutes? Believe me i'm not minimizing Gordon he was spectacular, but shoot, just look at Nate.

Q could easily equal Deng's production, I believe.

James could give the contributions that Nocioni did.

That still leaves us with Frye and Lee and them with Duhon.

And clearing out KT was IMO a necessary change.

I think we did fantastically.

Now about that tough coach to push defense . . .


TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/16/2005  9:50 AM
Posted by rvhoss:

I never heard of them before this last year...just Gordon.

[quote]Posted by fishmike:

Bulls didnt add no names. They added top tier rookie talent in Gordon and Deng. They added a solid overseas player in Noccioni and they added a 4 year PG from a top program in Deng. They shipped off their most erratic player and brought in a tough coach that pushed defense.

The Knicks have upgraded their talent, but nothing close to what the Bulls did in their last offseason

how could you have not heard of Duhon & Deng? do you watch college hoops at all?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/16/2005  9:57 AM
Posted by Marv:
Posted by fishmike:

Bulls didnt add no names. They added top tier rookie talent in Gordon and Deng. They added a solid overseas player in Noccioni and they added a 4 year PG from a top program in Deng. They shipped off their most erratic player and brought in a tough coach that pushed defense.

The Knicks have upgraded their talent, but nothing close to what the Bulls did in their last offseason

"They shipped off their most erratic player" - uh oh, that would seem to explain a lot of the difference between the standings of the 2 franchises then, wouldn't it?

But seriously couldn't you say that theoretically we've equaled what they did? Isn't Nate looking like he could do what Gordon did last year if given the minutes? Believe me i'm not minimizing Gordon he was spectacular, but shoot, just look at Nate.

Q could easily equal Deng's production, I believe.

James could give the contributions that Nocioni did.

That still leaves us with Frye and Lee and them with Duhon.

And clearing out KT was IMO a necessary change.

I think we did fantastically.

Now about that tough coach to push defense . . .

the bulls also had a young nucleus that finally started to click and buy in to skiles coaching.

theoretically, if everything comes together, something similar could happen to us.

I still think we're too much frankenstein's monster with too many odd parts- Q, MT, TT, craw, JJ are just players that IT was able to get with the weak assets we had- while they might be an improvement, they are still just a collection of parts-

kinda like the johnny cash song- one piece at a time
I'm getting grumpy...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy