[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Hollinger: In Free-Agent Feeding Frenzy, Knicks Are ...
Author Thread
KnickerBlogger
Posts: 20058
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/5/2004
Member: #789
USA
7/6/2005  11:04 AM
[url=http://www.nysun.com/article/16570]In Free-Agent Feeding Frenzy, Knicks Are Shopping for Scraps[/url]
As for Brown, you might want to sit down before you read this. The Knicks supposedly want to give Sweetney to the Wizards so they can do a sign-and-trade for Brown. This is rumor, not fact, so we should give Isiah the benefit of the doubt. But if he does pull the trigger on such a ridiculous trade, James Dolan should find the pinkest slip in his possession and slide it under Isiah's door, taking care to cut the phone line before Thomas can execute any more deals.

Sweetney averaged 17.2 points and 11.1 rebounds per 40 minutes last year and led the Knicks with a 53.1% shooting mark. Brown, meanwhile, slumbered through the year with 12.9 points and 9.1 rebounds per-40 minutes, and was kicked off the team in the playoffs because of his lackadaisical attitude. Sound like a fair swap? And while some still gush over Brown's potential, keep in mind that Sweetney is actually seven months younger.
...
But Sweetney for Brown? Adding Antoine Walker? These aren't the kind of moves that a team serious about rebuilding should even be considering. One wonders if Isiah won't again short-circuit the process in a grab for immediate gratification, much as he did with the acquisitions of Marbury and Tim Thomas two years ago.
http://www.knickerblogger.net
AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/6/2005  11:08 AM
i agree 100% with this.
Knicksfan
Posts: 33483
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/6/2005  11:21 AM
Both quotes present concerns to me. Yeah, the Sweetney deal is one we would regret a lot in the future, that is, if they don't give us a good prospect, take another PF from us, like Rose, and throw in a pick. Yeah, fat and all you want to call him, Sweetney is very superior to Kwame, and we know he will bring a lot of rebounding and post up scoring, something we don't have much of. Sweetney has foul problems and needs to work on his body. While we don't know how much of those problems have already been worked on in the offseason, I do know that Sweetney has improved every year, and I believe he is ready to start at PF.

Kwame is a risk at best, so if we do the deal, we must get more from them, like what I already mentioned. I think that instead of Kwame, Isiah should spend all his energy on guys like Dalembert. As for Walker, please, how can he be thinking about Walker with the PF glut we have? And no, he wouldn't be the answer at SF. Forget about Walker...
Knicks_Fan
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/6/2005  11:21 AM
I agree in principal that Sweetney is better right now than Kwame. But I think Kwame's potential is higher than Sweetney's, especially on the defensive side. I think Kwame fits the vision Zeke has for this team better and I could see a winning team starting Kwame at PF. I really can't see a winning team starting Sweetney. He's fine off the bench, but I really can't see him starting. This team needs a starting PF. I think Kwame is the best, most realistic option for the starting PF slot.
¿ △ ?
Knicksfan
Posts: 33483
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/6/2005  11:26 AM
Posted by crzymdups:

I agree in principal that Sweetney is better right now than Kwame. But I think Kwame's potential is higher than Sweetney's, especially on the defensive side. I think Kwame fits the vision Zeke has for this team better and I could see a winning team starting Kwame at PF. I really can't see a winning team starting Sweetney. He's fine off the bench, but I really can't see him starting. This team needs a starting PF. I think Kwame is the best, most realistic option for the starting PF slot.

You can see Sweetney starting yet you can see Kwame reaching his potential? Sweetney has been a productive young player, he brings many things to our game that many players don't, like rebounding, post up game, etc. Its easier to see a young guy like him starting than watching a kid full of potential finally reaching it in NY when he hasn't done it in three years in Washington. Of course, there is always a possibility that he could make it, and it would be great for us. But its such a risk that trading a surer thing in Sweetney should bring more than just Kwame. If you are making a trade, get more than just Kwame, get another prospect or picks...
Knicks_Fan
Knixkik
Posts: 35480
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
7/6/2005  11:48 AM
I disagree with the arguments made. First off, production is as much a result of the team you are on than the talent level of the player. Just because Sweetney puts up better numbers doesn't make him the better player, it just says his team allows him to be more productive. Secondly, the article states that Sweetney possibly has more potential because he is actually younger, and that couldn't be further from the truth. Brown has a lot more potential without a doubt because of his physical tools. He is a big, athletic player with loads of potential. Sweetney has good skills, but is not real tall, not real athletic, and isn't nearly as good of a prospect. I don't care about Brown's attitude. If this deal is possible you have to make it, because you are getting the better prospect who fills a need as well.
Knicksfan
Posts: 33483
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/6/2005  11:59 AM
While I agree on the point that Kwame has more potential, I don't agree with that about time to play. Kwame has had a lot of time to play, while Sweetney has had to earn it ans we know that since young players don't get their time to develope here in NY if they dont contribute. While he may not have Kwame's potential and heithg, as of now the player that looks to have a better career is Sweetney because he has improved every year. Will Kwame ever play like he was expected, like his potential suggest? Thats not a given, thats a risk we would be taking. Sweetney is a solid player, while Kwame is just a potential good player...
Knicks_Fan
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/6/2005  12:01 PM
That writeup is such a joke, to compare two different players and use one scale for one and use another scale for another is absolutely biased. The guy who wrote this has a certain agenda and he's making sure that everyone knows what it is. How can you compare one player using his stats as *per 48 minutes* and the other player with his season averages. The author stated that Sweetney 17.2 points and 11.1 rebounds per 48, now if the author had done things right he would have next wrote that Kwame averaged 15.4 points and 10.9 rebounds per 48 instead of giving Kwame's season averages.

The fact is, we don't know yet whether or not Sweetney will ever be able to play more then 30 minutes a game becuase of his weight issues and we don't know if Kwame is going to keep his head on straight, too me they are both big risks but I'll take the risk of Kwame over Sweetney becuase I think Kwame has a better chance to be something really special and while I like Sweetney alot, I just don't see him being the bigtime powerforward we're hoping, I think he'll be good but not all-star good... just an opinion though.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07/06/2005 12:06:22]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
KnickerBlogger
Posts: 20058
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/5/2004
Member: #789
USA
7/6/2005  12:04 PM
Posted by Knixkik:

I disagree with the arguments made. First off, production is as much a result of the team you are on than the talent level of the player. Just because Sweetney puts up better numbers doesn't make him the better player, it just says his team allows him to be more productive. Secondly, the article states that Sweetney possibly has more potential because he is actually younger, and that couldn't be further from the truth. Brown has a lot more potential without a doubt because of his physical tools. He is a big, athletic player with loads of potential. Sweetney has good skills, but is not real tall, not real athletic, and isn't nearly as good of a prospect. I don't care about Brown's attitude. If this deal is possible you have to make it, because you are getting the better prospect who fills a need as well.

I couldn't disagree with this more. The Knicks on no occasion ever featured Sweetney to 'inflate' his numbers. If they ran more than 3 plays for him in any game I'd be shocked. The numbers are per-minute which would be immune to such treatement. And how do you inflate shooting percentage or per-minute rebounding?

As for the second part, while Brown might be a better physical specimin, that doesn't translate into potential. Hollinger mentions they are near the same age because youth combined with performance is what makes potential. Sweetney has had the better performance, so it makes it more likely that he'll be a better player. You only have to look at our own Tim Thomas to see that physical ability doesn't necessarily translate into an NBA career.
http://www.knickerblogger.net
KnickerBlogger
Posts: 20058
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/5/2004
Member: #789
USA
7/6/2005  12:11 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:

How can you compare one player using his stats as *per 48 minutes* and the other player with his season averages. The author stated that Sweetney 17.2 points and 11.1 rebounds per 48, now if the author had done things right he would have next wrote that Kwame averaged 15.4 points and 10.9 rebounds per 48 instead of giving Kwame's season averages.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07/06/2005 12:06:22]

Check your numbers again. Hollinger's numbers are per *40* minute averages, not per *48*.

Sweetney is 17.2/11.1
Kwame is 12.3/9.2

Check them yourself:

http://www.knickerblogger.net/stats/p40_Wizards.htm
http://www.knickerblogger.net/stats/p40_Knicks.htm
http://www.knickerblogger.net
OasisBU
Posts: 24138
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/18/2002
Member: #257
USA
7/6/2005  12:21 PM
why does Kwame have more potential then Sweets? Just because he is taller? To me that is just a silly argument.
"If at first you don't succeed, then maybe you just SUCK." Kenny Powers
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
7/6/2005  12:23 PM
Posted by KnickerBlogger:
You only have to look at our own Tim Thomas to see that physical ability doesn't necessarily translate into an NBA career.

That's exactly the way I see Kwame - TT Part 2.
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
7/6/2005  12:25 PM
let me settle this argument for you all. Sweetney gets all of his points through hard work and determination. the coaches don't call out any plays for him....where the primadona Kwame demands to have the ball to be successful. That is one of the reason why his coaches have always been on him.. At first, it was blamed on Doug Collins, but when Eddie Jordan took over, Kwame's true colors really came out. He and Arenas went at it a couple of times and etc. Look, if Kwame was the type of player I thought that N.Y needed, I would have been the first to call on Zeke to go after him. I have had the luxury to watch kwame since his arrival in D.C., he has yet to show that he is worth being a 1st pick
The true Knickabocker..........
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/6/2005  12:29 PM
I look at it this way, Isiah is GM, he should be given latitude on this last change of course. I dont agree with pick 8, but I agree with what he has been trying to do. I am going to give him the space to do what he wants for the next two years. The big red flags to me are any aqcuistion of A Walker OR Frye performing in a medicore fashion. If he wants to get rid of steph or pick up Kwame, he has my vote.
RIP Crushalot😞
MattSuspect
Posts: 20262
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2005
Member: #932
7/6/2005  12:31 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

i agree 100% with this.


Seriously. Trading your best low-post player for a lethargic underachiever is absurd. I'm off the Zeke bandwagon if this happens.

[Edited by - MattSuspect on 07/06/2005 12:33:10]
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
7/6/2005  12:34 PM
Isiah is a hell of a talent evaluator, he will pick the right guy for our squad. I can almost guaranty you that he will come out with someone other than Kwame....
The true Knickabocker..........
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/6/2005  12:35 PM
these per 40 minute stats crack me up...players who can't stay on the floor & have to resort to using per 48 minute stats are those that aren't starting calibre to begin with.

i think Howard Eisley had some impressive per 48 minute stats last year, didn't he?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/6/2005  12:40 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

I look at it this way, Isiah is GM, he should be given latitude on this last change of course. I dont agree with pick 8, but I agree with what he has been trying to do. I am going to give him the space to do what he wants for the next two years. The big red flags to me are any aqcuistion of A Walker OR Frye performing in a medicore fashion. If he wants to get rid of steph or pick up Kwame, he has my vote.
I agree... which is why Vin Baker and Mo Taylor had me scratching my head.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
7/6/2005  12:41 PM
Posted by TMS:

these per 40 minute stats crack me up...players who can't stay on the floor & have to resort to using per 48 minute stats are those that aren't starting calibre to begin with.

Sure, it's not cool that Sweetney would consistently find himself in foul trouble, but foul trouble is a correctable problem. I remember KT had some serious problems with foul trouble when he first became a Knick. He managed to overcome that after a few seasons.
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
7/6/2005  12:48 PM
Reason why Sweetney was always in foul trouble is because he was trying to show the coaches that he was worthy to be on the court. He wasn't confident of his playing time, because everytime he does something wrong, he gets yanked by Lenny. The kid couldn't operate freely...However, once he knew that he was a permanent starter, his fouls improved...

Posted by eViL:
Posted by TMS:

these per 40 minute stats crack me up...players who can't stay on the floor & have to resort to using per 48 minute stats are those that aren't starting calibre to begin with.

Sure, it's not cool that Sweetney would consistently find himself in foul trouble, but foul trouble is a correctable problem. I remember KT had some serious problems with foul trouble when he first became a Knick. He managed to overcome that after a few seasons.
The true Knickabocker..........
Hollinger: In Free-Agent Feeding Frenzy, Knicks Are ...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy