[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Ideal 05-06 Roster
Author Thread
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
7/2/2005  9:34 PM
If we're going to make this team a running, Phoenix East team... then lets do it the best we can. Marbury is going to look slow on this team, really slow. If you want to keep a marquee player then trade him for Iverson or Stevie Franchise. Marbs is NYC but we're trying to turn into Phoenix, he is not fast enough to set up Ariza, Crawford, Q, Nate, or even Timmy for that matter.

Telfair, Harris, Ford, Heinrich, these are the handful of guys who are as fast as this team wants to be. If we can get one and save money, sign me up.

My ideal (realistic) 05-06 Kincks team
5- Frye, Rose
4- Swift, JYD
3- Ariza, Timmy
2- Q, Crawford
1- Harris, Nate (Marbs, Sweets, traded for Harris, KVH and #1)
Coach: McMillan

That would be the fastest team in the league by far and much better defensively than last year. Run&Gun might not win a championship but at least its a philosophy instead of what we've seen post Camby.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
AUTOADVERT
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/3/2005  8:45 AM
there is a reason there are no replies...holiday weekend and any roster prefaced with 'ideal' has marbs.

ideal 05/06 roster
marbury, Q, artest, frye, kwame
bench/future ;)
ariza, nate, lee, swift, crawford


[Edited by - rvhoss on 07/03/2005 08:47:41]
all kool aid all the time.
DarkKnicks
Posts: 21064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/29/2005
Member: #882
Spain
7/3/2005  11:14 AM
Frye - Hunter
Sweetney - Taylor - Williams - Lee
Thomas - Ariza
Richardson - Crawford - Houston
Marbury - Robinson

I think I'm not asking a lot.
Knicksfan
Posts: 33483
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/3/2005  11:47 AM
Posted by JohnWallace44:

If we're going to make this team a running, Phoenix East team... then lets do it the best we can. Marbury is going to look slow on this team, really slow. If you want to keep a marquee player then trade him for Iverson or Stevie Franchise. Marbs is NYC but we're trying to turn into Phoenix, he is not fast enough to set up Ariza, Crawford, Q, Nate, or even Timmy for that matter.

Telfair, Harris, Ford, Heinrich, these are the handful of guys who are as fast as this team wants to be. If we can get one and save money, sign me up.

My ideal (realistic) 05-06 Kincks team
5- Frye, Rose
4- Swift, JYD
3- Ariza, Timmy
2- Q, Crawford
1- Harris, Nate (Marbs, Sweets, traded for Harris, KVH and #1)
Coach: McMillan

That would be the fastest team in the league by far and much better defensively than last year. Run&Gun might not win a championship but at least its a philosophy instead of what we've seen post Camby.

Ok, so in your ideal lineup you have Marbury traded when he clearly is fast enough for this team and he is finally closer to have a talented team with which he could finally win. This idea you have that all of a sudden Marb is slow is really far from reality. (Ohh, and lets not forget, you trade Marbury AND Sweetney in the Dallas trade. Great!) You then suddenly forget we still have Penny and Mo T on the team. Oh, and you have a 6'4"-6'6" as your only backup C? Far from ideal...
Knicks_Fan
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/3/2005  11:55 AM
its not just about being fast. Its a mentality. Steph has a halfcourt mentality and our starting frontcourt should be our 2nd unit. We need a dominant frontcourt player to start with Marbury that way we get the most out of Marbury and actally win games. What a concept! actually win more than 30games with a real frontcourt!
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
7/3/2005  12:41 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:

its not just about being fast. Its a mentality. Steph has a halfcourt mentality and our starting frontcourt should be our 2nd unit. We need a dominant frontcourt player to start with Marbury that way we get the most out of Marbury and actally win games. What a concept! actually win more than 30games with a real frontcourt!
Steph was running plenty in Phoenix and in Jersey.

He's fast enoguh and furthermore, Zeke is not trying to make us the SUns of the east. 1. we have no Amare, 2. That style of play has never won a championship and he is trying to buiild a contender. Young and athletic doesn't mean running and gunning for 48 minutes, but its gives you the versatility to change tempo and so forth.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/3/2005  12:56 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by gunsnewing:

its not just about being fast. Its a mentality. Steph has a halfcourt mentality and our starting frontcourt should be our 2nd unit. We need a dominant frontcourt player to start with Marbury that way we get the most out of Marbury and actally win games. What a concept! actually win more than 30games with a real frontcourt!
Steph was running plenty in Phoenix and in Jersey.

He's fast enoguh and furthermore, Zeke is not trying to make us the SUns of the east. 1. we have no Amare, 2. That style of play has never won a championship and he is trying to buiild a contender. Young and athletic doesn't mean running and gunning for 48 minutes, but its gives you the versatility to change tempo and so forth.

you hit the nail right on the head! exactly. until then we'll keep stay young & athletic and keep winning 30games per season
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/3/2005  1:13 PM
I understand that it doesn't happen overnight but if we want to play at that level we have to trade some of these guys. Hopefully we somehow land a dominant or close to dominating frontcourt player for TT & Penny despite it being a longshot. Or we have to consider trading Marbury and/Crawford for young players and high draft picks so we can draft the next big star!

[Edited by - gunsnewing on 07/03/2005 13:17:37]
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/3/2005  1:19 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by gunsnewing:

its not just about being fast. Its a mentality. Steph has a halfcourt mentality and our starting frontcourt should be our 2nd unit. We need a dominant frontcourt player to start with Marbury that way we get the most out of Marbury and actally win games. What a concept! actually win more than 30games with a real frontcourt!
Steph was running plenty in Phoenix and in Jersey.

He's fast enoguh and furthermore, Zeke is not trying to make us the SUns of the east. 1. we have no Amare, 2. That style of play has never won a championship and he is trying to buiild a contender. Young and athletic doesn't mean running and gunning for 48 minutes, but its gives you the versatility to change tempo and so forth.
EXACTLY
all kool aid all the time.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/3/2005  1:26 PM
but change the pace from what? I could understand if we we had a dominate starting frontcourt/halfcourt lineup but we don't. We still dont have an identity. We're not a good halfcourt team nor are we the phoenix suns. Our PFs are all slow with the exception of JYD who's extremely limited and David Lee. Not very comforting and our most dominant bigman inside is problably the 300lb Sweetney who can stay on the floor


[Edited by - gunsnewing on 07/03/2005 14:04:51]
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
7/3/2005  1:59 PM
Guns, I'm just curious - did passing on Bynum totally sour you on this team? If we had chosen him, would you have a generally optimistic view now?
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/3/2005  2:03 PM
Posted by Marv:

Guns, I'm just curious - did passing on Bynum totally sour you on this team? If we had chosen him, would you have a generally optimistic view now?

not just Bynum but Green, Granger & Graham were there to be had and we passed up on all 3. I feel like all this effort put into this this horrific season was all for nothing. I'm very disappointed especially since I;m hearing that we are still looking for a 7 footer. I thought we drafted Channing Frye 8th overall to be that guy!

why couldn't we just draft the best player available and then worry about trading crawford, TT, Penny, Sweetney & Co for good frontcourt player and a 7 footer?! I'm definitely not looking forward to another 30win season and another 7-10 draft pick and yet another safe draft pick to add to our core of overpaid role players.

[Edited by - gunsnewing on 07/03/2005 14:08:30]
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
7/3/2005  2:11 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by Marv:

Guns, I'm just curious - did passing on Bynum totally sour you on this team? If we had chosen him, would you have a generally optimistic view now?

not just Bynum but Green, Granger & Graham were there to be had and we passed up on all 3. I feel like all this effort put into this this horrific season was all for nothing. I'm very disappointed especially since I;m hearing that we are still looking for a 7 footer. I thought we drafted Channing Frye 8th overall to be that guy!

why couldn't we just draft the best player available and then worry about trading crawford, TT, Penny, Sweetney & Co for good frontcourt player and a 7 footer?! I'm definitely not looking forward to another 30win season and another 7-10 draft pick and yet another safe draft pick to add to our core of overpaid role players.

[Edited by - gunsnewing on 07/03/2005 14:08:30]

Okay. Understood. I'm definitely not interested in reopening pre-draft debates - I was just curious.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/3/2005  2:20 PM
Posted by Marv:
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by Marv:

Guns, I'm just curious - did passing on Bynum totally sour you on this team? If we had chosen him, would you have a generally optimistic view now?

not just Bynum but Green, Granger & Graham were there to be had and we passed up on all 3. I feel like all this effort put into this this horrific season was all for nothing. I'm very disappointed especially since I;m hearing that we are still looking for a 7 footer. I thought we drafted Channing Frye 8th overall to be that guy!

why couldn't we just draft the best player available and then worry about trading crawford, TT, Penny, Sweetney & Co for good frontcourt player and a 7 footer?! I'm definitely not looking forward to another 30win season and another 7-10 draft pick and yet another safe draft pick to add to our core of overpaid role players.

[Edited by - gunsnewing on 07/03/2005 14:08:30]

Okay. Understood. I'm definitely not interested in reopening pre-draft debates - I was just curious.

right its too late for that. we just have to hope that jerome james signs with us so that we can ensure 40wins and not 39 and another late lottery pick. Since I don't see us adding any legitimate frontcourt presence like kwame, swift, chandler, sar, wilcox, boozer, randolph.

hopefully jerome james, gadzuric & hunter are the answer
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/3/2005  2:31 PM
madness. So, MoT is over our heads and now Frye. (kidding)

News Flash...knicks new Roster:

Marbs/Nate
Q/Craw
TT/Ariza
Frye/MoT
Kwame/Rose

gone: jyd, sweets, houston

heaven forbid we move Penny and all hell breaks loose.
all kool aid all the time.
MX25
Posts: 20591
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/20/2004
Member: #555
USA
7/3/2005  5:18 PM
I don't know why you guys all want Kwame. IMO he's a lazy player with no offensive game. The guy has been a bust. His own team wants nothing to do with him yet everyone is going nuts over him. He's like Joe Smith. I'd rather get a guy like Steven Hunter or Reggie Evans.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/3/2005  5:25 PM
Posted by MX25:

I don't know why you guys all want Kwame. IMO he's a lazy player with no offensive game. The guy has been a bust. His own team wants nothing to do with him yet everyone is going nuts over him. He's like Joe Smith. I'd rather get a guy like Steven Hunter or Reggie Evans.

what do we got to lose a 300LB Sweetney and JYD? its worth the gamble
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
7/3/2005  7:03 PM
[quote]
Posted by rvhoss:

there is a reason there are no replies...holiday weekend and any roster prefaced with 'ideal' has marbs.

ideal 05/06 roster
marbury, Q, artest, frye, kwame
bench/future ;)
ariza, nate, lee, swift, crawford


[Edited by - rvhoss on 07/03/2005 08:47:41]

What would Swift do on your proposed team that he hasn't done with the young athletic team that he just came from? We need the offense to actually move. Unless Marbury is in the mood to slash through the D, he's not worth what were paying. The trade for Harris and KVH puts us years ahead in the cap situation. If that trade went through our highest paid player after next year would be Mo T. Then we could actually get a big name player instead of just flirting with them.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/3/2005  11:20 PM
1- Harris, Nate (Marbs, Sweets, traded for Harris, KVH and #1)
Briggs posted that trade a couple days ago... it sucked then also
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Knicksfan
Posts: 33483
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/4/2005  12:21 AM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by MX25:

I don't know why you guys all want Kwame. IMO he's a lazy player with no offensive game. The guy has been a bust. His own team wants nothing to do with him yet everyone is going nuts over him. He's like Joe Smith. I'd rather get a guy like Steven Hunter or Reggie Evans.

what do we got to lose a 300LB Sweetney and JYD? its worth the gamble

Man, poor Sweetney! Even at 300LB as you say, he was our best post up player. What if he is indeed working out wit Aguirre or whoever else and getting his body straight? He would be such a good player! Though I hope Sweetney comes into better shape next season, sometimes a 300LB Sweetney was better than Eddie Curry, for example.

If he comes in NBA shape, even a pessimist has to admitt that he is a very good low post presence...
Knicks_Fan
Ideal 05-06 Roster

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy