Posted by Allanfan20:
I don't really like any 3 of those trades you proposed. Marbury is way too much to give for Artest, who can end his NBA career with one explosion at any given moment. WAAAAY too risky.
I'm not interested in Posey or Mike Miller, as we seem set at the 2 and 3 with Ariza and Q. I'd take Posey, but not for Marbury, same with Swift (Who we can just get for the MLE) and the pick. Not worth it. I have no interest in Mike Miller either.
As for Pierce for Marbury. I say Pierce is the better player, but now that we have Q, I think it's best for us that we just look to deal Marbury to other places, if we are looking to deal him.
Marbury for Artest? The reason that trade is not going to happen is because Indy would never agree to it. Artest is a top 10 player in this league and he would put up the same amount of points as Marbury but he would also shut down the other teams best player. The guy is an absolute beast and would provide the toughness that would fit perfectly with what Isiah is building.
Artest would singlehandedly turn us into a playoff team that makes it to the 2nd round. We lose so many games because we can't get stops. You put Artest at the 3 with Frye and Swift up front and we'll be just fine defensively. Especially with JYD, Nate, and Rose coming off the bench. At times when we need stops go with Nate, Artest, Ariza, JYD, Stro Swift or whoever we get with the MLE.
Pierce and Q would fit nicely together at the 2 and 3. I love Ariza but lets face it, he's not ready to step in and play 35 to 40 mins a night.
At least all those trades make us better defensively. Again, I'm not saying we should trade Marbury, I'm just saying if we do, these are our options. You propose trading Marbury to "other places." The fact is that there are very few places that we could trade him. It has to be to a team that is willing to accept his contract, wants to win now, and has another max player that is tradeable.
[Edited by - ray15 on 07/02/2005 18:58:17]