Teams are scrambling to offer this kid a lot of money as a shooter, but didn't anyone learn a lesson from the incident with Houston? I know the kid has a much better game than Houston, he is not a one dimentional type of guy at all with his 23/4/2, but is he worth that type of contract????
The true Knickabocker..........
AUTOADVERT
roblackman Posts: 20396
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #926
I think he's worth it to Milwaukee since it is difficult for small market teams to keep players as good as Redd--they will definitely be overpaying for Redd but that's the only way he'll stay.
And the reply is...a post that makes sense (still waiting)
rain Posts: 20762
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2002
Member: #353 USA
You are right, Houston is too one dimensional for the contract that he received...At least you know what you are getting from Redd, but Houston can't rebound, can't create for himself, and can't do anything else but shoot the ball...
The true Knickabocker..........
Ira Posts: 24688
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
A max contract for Redd won't be the same as a max for Houston was. Here are the differences.
1) Since he's younger, it will start at 10-11 million. 2) It can only go for 5 years (new collective bargaining agreement). 3) The rate of increase will be smaller (new collective bargaining agreement). 4) He will finish the agreement when he's 30 years old - not in his mid 30's.
So it's a smaller contract in every way for a younger and more well rounded ballplayer. It makes sense for the Bucks or for another team under the cap.
Knicksfan Posts: 33483
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691 USA
Redd's situation just proves you that in the draft you can find a great player anywhere. Same with Ginobili, Parker. That why its so important to have draft picks and good people making the scouting...