draft granger or graham at #8.

trade tim + sweets for boozer.

trade penny + 2006 spurs #1 for curry @ 5 years/$60 mil.

despite what Chicago is saying about Curry, I truly think he is finished, and if he isn't, its a bad risk.

I mean, you want Curry? Go draft Bynum. Its cheaper cap & money and asset wise.

of course, curry would be plan D

i think boozer fits in well with marbury, q, and craw and even better if we get granger.

i want a physical presence at the C spot - if it's not bynum, then my first choice would be gadz for the MLE.

i bring up curry b/c i think this is the type of player isiah would target - a center, who's a risk, but has skills.

Posted by djsunyc:

of course, curry would be plan D

i think boozer fits in well with marbury, q, and craw and even better if we get granger.

i want a physical presence at the C spot - if it's not bynum, then my first choice would be gadz for the MLE.

i bring up curry b/c i think this is the type of player isiah would target - a center, who's a risk, but has skills.

Curry has the potential to be a dominant big man in the league, thats why you consider getting him.

Interesting. A lot of people certainly changed their views of Curry after we acquired him.

Posted by PhilinLA:

It seems like everyone was in favor of getting Curry before the heart thing. I remember having conversations about it since Zeke took over.

this is after the heart thing, this is in late June; and I can only see 2 response in his favor in this thread.

[Edited by - Killa4luv on 10-08-2005 6:52 PM]