[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

one scenario - target boozer and curry...
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44927
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/26/2005  5:38 PM
draft granger or graham at #8.

trade tim + sweets for boozer.

trade penny + 2006 spurs #1 for curry @ 5 years/$60 mil.
AUTOADVERT
franco12
Posts: 33220
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
6/26/2005  8:07 PM
despite what Chicago is saying about Curry, I truly think he is finished, and if he isn't, its a bad risk.

I mean, you want Curry? Go draft Bynum. Its cheaper cap & money and asset wise.
Ira
Posts: 24678
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
6/26/2005  8:30 PM
How can a player who's 6'11", weighs 285 lbs, and is considered to be an athletic big man average 5.4 boards in his 29 minutes per game?
djsunyc
Posts: 44927
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/26/2005  8:38 PM
of course, curry would be plan D

i think boozer fits in well with marbury, q, and craw and even better if we get granger.

i want a physical presence at the C spot - if it's not bynum, then my first choice would be gadz for the MLE.

i bring up curry b/c i think this is the type of player isiah would target - a center, who's a risk, but has skills.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/26/2005  10:53 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

draft granger or graham at #8.

trade tim + sweets for boozer.

trade penny + 2006 spurs #1 for curry @ 5 years/$60 mil.
Assuming they get no valuable use out of Penny, the Bulls would basically be paying $15 mil (his salary) to get the Spurs #1 pick next year (which no team would pay more than maybe $1 mil for). If they don't want to keep Curry, it would make much more sense to let him walk or to do a more reasonable sign and trade.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
6/26/2005  11:59 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

of course, curry would be plan D

i think boozer fits in well with marbury, q, and craw and even better if we get granger.

i want a physical presence at the C spot - if it's not bynum, then my first choice would be gadz for the MLE.

i bring up curry b/c i think this is the type of player isiah would target - a center, who's a risk, but has skills.
Curry has the potential to be a dominant big man in the league, thats why you consider getting him.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
10/8/2005  6:19 PM
Who was visionary in June about Eddy Curry?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/8/2005  6:49 PM
Interesting. A lot of people certainly changed their views of Curry after we acquired him.
PhilinLA
Posts: 24941
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2004
Member: #696
10/8/2005  6:50 PM
It seems like everyone was in favor of getting Curry before the heart thing. I remember having conversations about it since Zeke took over.
http://amonthhoffundays.blogspot.com/ We got a ringer.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
10/8/2005  6:52 PM
Posted by PhilinLA:

It seems like everyone was in favor of getting Curry before the heart thing. I remember having conversations about it since Zeke took over.


this is after the heart thing, this is in late June; and I can only see 2 response in his favor in this thread.

[Edited by - Killa4luv on 10-08-2005 6:52 PM]
« Reply To Topic
one scenario - target boozer and curry...
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy