Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
nycericanguy
Posts: 21420 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/20/2023 Member: #9127 |
![]() no way would HOU trade Amen for KD
|
martin
Posts: 74846 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
martin
Posts: 74846 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() Ixnay I guess
Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
martin
Posts: 74846 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() I'd view him as a bigger version of SGA who has more of a defensive background than an offensive one.
Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
VDesai
Posts: 41625 Alba Posts: 44 Joined: 10/28/2003 Member: #477 USA |
![]() If you are Phoenix are you really not taking a package of FVV, Jalen Green and maybe Jabari Smith? You get 2 young players who fit your SL, get younger and are still a competitive team built around Booker?
And Houston - you keep Amen, Sengun, Eason and all your picks and add KD? |
martin
Posts: 74846 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() VDesai wrote:If you are Phoenix are you really not taking a package of FVV, Jalen Green and maybe Jabari Smith? You get 2 young players who fit your SL, get younger and are still a competitive team built around Booker? Yeah good deal Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
Nalod
Posts: 70708 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() VDesai wrote:If you are Phoenix are you really not taking a package of FVV, Jalen Green and maybe Jabari Smith? You get 2 young players who fit your SL, get younger and are still a competitive team built around Booker? Makes sense. |
Knixkik
Posts: 35304 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() I’m not trading KAT. I’m still building around he and Brunson. The goal should just be the further insulate them defensively. Either by moving KAT to the 4 and pairing him with a rim protector, or moving hart to the bench and replacing him with an elite defender at the point of attack. Either way moving Hart to the bench addresses the bench concerns, and allows an opportunity to plug some gaps in the starting lineup to better support Brunson/ KAT with more shooting and/or defense.
|
fishmike
Posts: 53645 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
![]() Knixkik wrote:I’m not trading KAT. I’m still building around he and Brunson. The goal should just be the further insulate them defensively. Either by moving KAT to the 4 and pairing him with a rim protector, or moving hart to the bench and replacing him with an elite defender at the point of attack. Either way moving Hart to the bench addresses the bench concerns, and allows an opportunity to plug some gaps in the starting lineup to better support Brunson/ KAT with more shooting and/or defense.spot on. Especially the bold and I think the FO also see this. Huk is a small indication of the need. I bet we take another in this draft. Not sure I want KAT at the 4 all the time. I like him starting at the 5 but giving him stretches at the 4 as we saw in game 1 is key. Maybe a 50/50 split. He sure looked good next to Rudy for most of the year "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
VDesai
Posts: 41625 Alba Posts: 44 Joined: 10/28/2003 Member: #477 USA |
![]() fishmike wrote:Knixkik wrote:I’m not trading KAT. I’m still building around he and Brunson. The goal should just be the further insulate them defensively. Either by moving KAT to the 4 and pairing him with a rim protector, or moving hart to the bench and replacing him with an elite defender at the point of attack. Either way moving Hart to the bench addresses the bench concerns, and allows an opportunity to plug some gaps in the starting lineup to better support Brunson/ KAT with more shooting and/or defense.spot on. Especially the bold and I think the FO also see this. Huk is a small indication of the need. I bet we take another in this draft. Not sure I want KAT at the 4 all the time. I like him starting at the 5 but giving him stretches at the 4 as we saw in game 1 is key. Maybe a 50/50 split. He sure looked good next to Rudy for most of the year Yeah I think playing him at both is probably where things end up. The question is whether Mitch is the guy you want to be the 5 next to him and behind him or is it someone more reliable to be on the floor. And lets assume its a Mitch style of center playing next to him, and not someone with more offensive chops. I think Kessler is still a possibility. |
martin
Posts: 74846 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() VDesai wrote:fishmike wrote:Knixkik wrote:I’m not trading KAT. I’m still building around he and Brunson. The goal should just be the further insulate them defensively. Either by moving KAT to the 4 and pairing him with a rim protector, or moving hart to the bench and replacing him with an elite defender at the point of attack. Either way moving Hart to the bench addresses the bench concerns, and allows an opportunity to plug some gaps in the starting lineup to better support Brunson/ KAT with more shooting and/or defense.spot on. Especially the bold and I think the FO also see this. Huk is a small indication of the need. I bet we take another in this draft. Not sure I want KAT at the 4 all the time. I like him starting at the 5 but giving him stretches at the 4 as we saw in game 1 is key. Maybe a 50/50 split. He sure looked good next to Rudy for most of the year Yeah. It's why the Knicks went hard after Kessler. It's also why when they make a trade, they try to get another C. Like James Nnaji, formerly with Charlotte. There will be some dude like Goga Bitadze (pre $21M contract given to him by Orlando) that wants to get exposure like the pre-iHart Knicks and will take a chance on the Knicks. Defense, rebound, set picks and if you have an outside shot, you have a chance to join the Thibs lineup of backup centers who went from meh to iHart contract. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
Knixkik
Posts: 35304 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() martin wrote:VDesai wrote:fishmike wrote:Knixkik wrote:I’m not trading KAT. I’m still building around he and Brunson. The goal should just be the further insulate them defensively. Either by moving KAT to the 4 and pairing him with a rim protector, or moving hart to the bench and replacing him with an elite defender at the point of attack. Either way moving Hart to the bench addresses the bench concerns, and allows an opportunity to plug some gaps in the starting lineup to better support Brunson/ KAT with more shooting and/or defense.spot on. Especially the bold and I think the FO also see this. Huk is a small indication of the need. I bet we take another in this draft. Not sure I want KAT at the 4 all the time. I like him starting at the 5 but giving him stretches at the 4 as we saw in game 1 is key. Maybe a 50/50 split. He sure looked good next to Rudy for most of the year I do wonder if Hartenstein resigned or if we got Kessler, if Towns was also in the plans or not. But regardless, Kessler might still be part of the plan. Another name i would love is Keon Ellie. He’s one of the best point of attack defenders in the league and a career 43% 3pt shooter. And he’s on a minimum contract. Scott Perry runs the Kings now. Does that relationship help or hurt in this case ? |
martin
Posts: 74846 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() Knixkik wrote:martin wrote:VDesai wrote:fishmike wrote:Knixkik wrote:I’m not trading KAT. I’m still building around he and Brunson. The goal should just be the further insulate them defensively. Either by moving KAT to the 4 and pairing him with a rim protector, or moving hart to the bench and replacing him with an elite defender at the point of attack. Either way moving Hart to the bench addresses the bench concerns, and allows an opportunity to plug some gaps in the starting lineup to better support Brunson/ KAT with more shooting and/or defense.spot on. Especially the bold and I think the FO also see this. Huk is a small indication of the need. I bet we take another in this draft. Not sure I want KAT at the 4 all the time. I like him starting at the 5 but giving him stretches at the 4 as we saw in game 1 is key. Maybe a 50/50 split. He sure looked good next to Rudy for most of the year I think 100% YES. I have a vague theory that most all championship level teams need 2 near elite offensive engines. Maybe there are 1-off situations where your defense is so good that you can get away with 1 (Iverson, Hakeem, etc.) but it's more anomaly than anything or there are 2 offensive players after your alpha that are good enough while you have some elite defensive team things going on. As well, the near 5-out potential. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
Nalod
Posts: 70708 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() Knixkik wrote:martin wrote:VDesai wrote:fishmike wrote:Knixkik wrote:I’m not trading KAT. I’m still building around he and Brunson. The goal should just be the further insulate them defensively. Either by moving KAT to the 4 and pairing him with a rim protector, or moving hart to the bench and replacing him with an elite defender at the point of attack. Either way moving Hart to the bench addresses the bench concerns, and allows an opportunity to plug some gaps in the starting lineup to better support Brunson/ KAT with more shooting and/or defense.spot on. Especially the bold and I think the FO also see this. Huk is a small indication of the need. I bet we take another in this draft. Not sure I want KAT at the 4 all the time. I like him starting at the 5 but giving him stretches at the 4 as we saw in game 1 is key. Maybe a 50/50 split. He sure looked good next to Rudy for most of the year Rosas is likely the trade master with Aller as the money guy. not to say Leon does not have his hand in things, he signs off. Dolan gets final say as he writes the checks. WWW? What does he do here again? Knicks are very good at digging up unheralded up and coming players. iHart was a great example that perhaps worked out TOO GOOD! I don't know the path but I can also live with Mitch playing out his contract one more year and then walking as free agent. |