[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

OT: Politics Thread
Author Thread
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/4/2017  4:33 PM
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Nalod wrote:
holfresh wrote:People sometimes don't understand the different experiences of many groups in this country...They feel it's one experience and should be one point of view..This is for you Nix...


Thank you for sharing!!!

Very interesting and very important to see the history as it is and not revised.
It is exactly the same as in Russian Empire where slavery was abolished in 1723 and serves were freed from landlords power in 1861 to fee 90% of Russian population.
All ruling class and majority of educated class including the brightest and greatest minds and cultural idols who made great contributions to world culture, sciences, and humanity were all slave owners.
Also the Jews segregation in Russia started in 1791 was ended by Russian revolution in 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_of_Settlement
We cannot measure people leaving 200 years back by the moral values of our time.
And we should not be judged in 200 years by morals that will emerge.

So in a few years, my grand kids shouldn't judge Hitler's moral deeds??

1758 my forefather was brought here on the Slaveship Betsey from the slave castle on Bance Island, Sierra Leone Africa. I don't know his name or that of any other ancestor from this time... yet.

Thomas C. Born a slave 1819
William C. Born a Slave 1839
1865 the end of the Civil War.
William C. Jr. Born Free 1869
Richard C. Born 1913
Melvin C. Born 1946
I was born in 1965

So basically only 100 years passed from the end of the Civil War in 1865 until my birth in 1965. When I was born Jim Crow was at its end as the country passed the historic Civil Rights Laws. History does matter and what may seem like ancient history isn't that at all.

It is just 75 years since the brothers and sisters of my grandmother were killed in gas chambers together with their kids and family, together with 6 millions others...
My mother has their photo.. of all family... 45 people on one picture... black and white. 7 of them survived the Holocaust. My grand grand farther is also on the picture.
He was in hid 90th and died with all teeth still intact. He was a strong man.
I do not have any anger and any hate to those who killed them and to their descendants and their families.
Those who killed them and order to kill them are dead and God will jujge them. Those who are leaving now have nothing to do with all this.
My relatives on the picture are telling me that hate must be stopped otherwise their death has no meaning.
I am not the one to tell you that the history is not important and that we should not remember... We have to remember.
But we should remember not for the sake of hate but for the sake of forgiveness. Because there is no other way to leave together on this planet.


I can tell you that the Black experience in this country CONTINUED to be bad long after my Grandfather Richard who is listed above fought the Germans and received a Bronze Star and Purple Heart as a SEGREGATED soldier in WWII. He had to live with the indignity of racial discrimination until the day he died. Just as my father who went to Vietnam had to deal with Racism. I was the 1st one born in my family that did not experience Slavery or Jim Crow in this country.

Black people didn't HATE. They had HATE inflicted upon them. Did Black people in this country launch into massive raids of violent revenge upon the defeated former Slave Owners and Confederate Soldiers after the Civil War??? NO! They could have but they didn't. Nearly 4 Million abused, impoverished and illiterate people just asked to be treated fairly and with respect, but that's not what they got. They got lied to and cheated. They got Lynched, Burned alive, Imprisoned and re-enslaved under unjust laws designed to create a new slave workforce. Not until I was born did things ease up a little. Even then this system has not been even close to fair or just for Black People in this country. It's not about us hating White people or trying to take it out on the descendents of Slave Owners!!! You miss the point entirely when you keep saying these things.

Black people were here the whole time this country was being founded. Working, fighting and dying for this country. Then we have to watch European immigrants come to this country and progress and prosper while we were denied freedom to do the same. I don't wanna hear about FORGIVENESS!!! Man you have no idea how much crap Black People have FORGIVEN in their long journey to be treated equally and have what everyone else had the freedom to do. We started with LESS than NOTHING. We were enslaved which involved BREAKING the SPIRIT so that Slaves would be more compliant. We were stripped of our original language and culture and taught we were LESS THAN. No education for generations. No passed on knowledge and wealth. I don't think you fully understand what that does to a people when you spend HUNDREDS of years in a diminished state. Many of our problems are vestiges of Bad Habits from Slavery passed on from generation to generation. It's hard to overcome that at the same time society is holding you back. YOU DON'T KNOW THE HALF OF IT! You need to sit and talk with my Grandparents and parents to let them explain what a lifetime of living in this country back then was like. There were no GOOD OLE DAYS for Black People.

You come a long way and you own nothing to anyone.
You never get help and you will never get it.
This is how life is and this is how it will be.
Hundred of years or thousands of years you are the only masters of your destiny.
Freedom is not given, it is the state of mind, Spirit that cannot be taken away.
Your people are still roaming the desert but many already reached the Promised Land.
The eternal journey is hard and long. It takes many generations and hundred of years.
Just keep going...

OK so I should just tell my Sons and Daughter and Grand Children that they should wait for another Hundred years in order to be treated Equally??? There's a very real reason why Minorities and Women are so concerned with President Trump and the Republicans. He represents the way things USED to be. Oh they try to sugarcoat it with Populist talk and Nationalist lingo, but underneath all of that is a very dark core of hatred that we are especially sensitive to for the reasons I listed above!!! NO! Things are not just gonna be OK with the passage of time and NO I shouldn't take Hundreds of years for people to be treated fairly and just like European Immigrants were allowed to prosper in this country!!!

This country OWES a debt to African Americans, Native Americans and Hispanic Americans that they refuse to pay!!!

Tell them that that they are free and that they will get only what they will earn themselves.
Nobody will give them anything for granted. Never.
I can tell you this by the experience of 5 thousand years and 200 hundred countries.
All you can get it a slap to the hand and spit to the face.
And I do not have any problem with this because I do not have any expectations and it makes me strong, unbreakable.
Tutankhamen, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Obama, Trump, whatever... dust in the wind.

What you're saying is not actually accurate. The Jews did have help over the millennia. It wasn't just them sitting and hoping things would change for the better. They took action and they complained and protested and made appeals to higher powers. They didn't do it all on their own. All i'm saying is that when the Jewish People looked to America when they needed backing for their new State of Israel...

Creation of Israel, 1948

On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel. U.S. President Harry S. Truman recognized the new nation on the same day.

Although the United States supported the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which favored the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine, President Franklin D. Roosevelt had assured the Arabs in 1945 that the United States would not intervene without consulting both the Jews and the Arabs in that region. The British, who held a colonial mandate for Palestine until May 1948, opposed both the creation of a Jewish state and an Arab state in Palestine as well as unlimited immigration of Jewish refugees to the region. Great Britain wanted to preserve good relations with the Arabs to protect its vital political and economic interests in Palestine.

Soon after President Truman took office, he appointed several experts to study the Palestinian issue. In the summer of 1946, Truman established a special cabinet committee under the chairmanship of Dr. Henry F. Grady, an Assistant Secretary of State, who entered into negotiations with a parallel British committee to discuss the future of Palestine. In May 1946, Truman announced his approval of a recommendation to admit 100,000 displaced persons into Palestine and in October publicly declared his support for the creation of a Jewish state.

Throughout 1947, the United Nations Special Commission on Palestine examined the Palestinian question and recommended the partition of Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state. On November 29, 1947 the United Nations adopted Resolution 181 (also known as the Partition Resolution) that would divide Great Britain’s former Palestinian mandate into Jewish and Arab states in May 1948 when the British mandate was scheduled to end. Under the resolution, the area of religious significance surrounding Jerusalem would remain a corpus separatum under international control administered by the United Nations.

Although the United States backed Resolution 181, the U.S. Department of State recommended the creation of a United Nations trusteeship with limits on Jewish immigration and a division of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab provinces but not states. The State Department, concerned about the possibility of an increasing Soviet role in the Arab world and the potential for restriction by Arab oil producing nations of oil supplies to the United States, advised against U.S. intervention on behalf of the Jews. Later, as the date for British departure from Palestine drew near, the Department of State grew concerned about the possibility of an all-out war in Palestine as Arab states threatened to attack almost as soon as the UN passed the partition resolution.

Despite growing conflict between Palestinian Arabs and Palestinian Jews and despite the Department of State’s endorsement of a trusteeship, Truman ultimately decided to recognize the state Israel.

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/creation-israel

“It is my responsibility to see that our policy in Israel fits in with our policy throughout the world; second, it is my desire to help build in Palestine a strong, prosperous, free and independent democratic state. It must be large enough, free enough, and strong enough to make its people self-supporting and secure,” President Truman said in a speech October 28, 1948.

Truman's commitment was quickly tested after Israel's victory in its War of Independence when she applied to the U.S. for economic aid to help absorb immigrants. President Truman responded by approving a $135 million Export-Import Bank loan and the sale of surplus commodities to Israel. In those early years of Israel's statehood (also today), U.S. aid was seen as a means of promoting peace.

In 1951, Congress voted to help Israel cope with the economic burdens imposed by the influx of Jewish refugees from the displaced persons camps in Europe and from the ghettos of the Arab countries. Arabs then complained the U.S. was neglecting them, though they had no interest in or use for American aid then. In 1951, Syria rejected offers of U.S. aid. Oil-rich Iraq and Saudi Arabia did not need U.S. economic assistance, and Jordan was, until the late 1950s, the ward of Great Britain. After 1957, when the United States assumed responsibility for supporting Jordan and resumed economic aid to Egypt, assistance to the Arab states soared. Also, the United States was by far the biggest contributor of aid to the Palestinians through UNRWA, a status that continues to the present.

U.S. economic grants to Israel ended in 1959. U.S. aid to Israel from then until 1985 consisted largely of loans, which Israel repaid, and surplus commodities, which Israel bought. Israel began buying arms from the United States in 1962, but did not receive any grant military assistance until after the 1973 Yom Kippur War. As a result, Israel had to go deeply into debt to finance its economic development and arms procurement. The decision to convert military aid to grants that year was based on the prevailing view in Congress that without a strong Israel, war in the Middle East was more likely, and that the U.S. would face higher direct expenditures in such an eventuality.

Israel has received more direct aid from the United States since World War II than any other country, but the amounts for the first half of this period were relatively small. Between 1949 and 1973, the U.S. provided Israel with an average of about $122 million a year, a total of $3.1 billion (and actually more than $1 billion of that was loans for military equipment in 1971-73) . Prior to 1971, Israel received a total of only $277 million in military aid, all in the form of loans as credit sales. The bulk of the economic aid was also lent to Israel. By comparison, the Arab states received nearly three times as much aid before 1971, $4.4 billion, or $170 million per year. Moreover, unlike Israel, which receives nearly all its aid from the United States, Arab nations have gotten assistance from Asia, Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union and the European Community. Congress first designated a specific amount of aid for Israel (an "earmark") in 1971.

Meeting Israel's Special Needs

Since 1974, Israel has received nearly $100 billion in assistance, including three special aid packages. The first followed the signing of the Israel-Egypt peace treaty and Israel's withdrawal from the Sinai. The redeployment of Israeli forces and rebuilding of air bases in the Negev cost $5 billion. To partially compensate for this sacrifice, Israel received $3 billion ($2.2 billion of which was in the form of high-interest loans) in U.S. aid in 1979.

The second special package was approved in 1985, following a severe economic crisis in Israel, which sent inflation rates soaring as high as 445 percent. The $1.5 billion in emergency assistance-disbursed in two installments, in 1985 and 1986-was provided as part of Israel's economic stabilization program, which was implemented under the guidance of the U.S.-Israel Joint Economic Development Group (JEDG).

An extraordinary package was approved in 1996 to help Israel fight terrorism. Israel is to receive a total of $100 million, divided equally between fiscal years 1996 and 1997.

Regular Economic and Military Assistance

Israel's economic aid changed from the Commodity Import Program (CIP), which provides funds to foreign nations for the purchase of U.S. commodities, to a direct cash transfer in 1979. In return, Israel provided the Agency for International Development with assurances that the dollar level of Israel's non-defense imports from the U.S. would exceed the level of economic assistance granted Israel in any given year. Thus, Israel guaranteed that U.S. suppliers would not be disadvantaged by the termination of Israel's CIP Program.

Starting with fiscal year 1987, Israel annually received $1.2 billion in all grant economic aid and $1.8 billion in all grant military assistance. In 1998, Israel offered to voluntarily reduce its dependence on U.S. economic aid. According to an agreement reached with the Clinton Administration and Congress, the $1.2 billion economic aid package will be reduced by $120 million each year so that it will be phased out in ten years. Half of the annual savings in economic assistance each year ($60 million) will be added to Israel's military aid package in recognition of its increased security needs. In 2005, Israel received $360 million in economic aid and $2.22 billion in military aid. In 2006, economic aid is scheduled to be reduced to $240 million and military aid will increase to $2.28 billion.

For several years, most of Israel's economic aid went to pay off old debts. In 1984, foreign aid legislation included the Cranston Amendment (named after its Senate sponsor), which said the U.S. would provide Israel with economic assistance "not less than" the amount Israel owes the United States in annual debt service payments. The Cranston Amendment was left out of the FY1999 and subsequent appropriations bills. At that time Israel received $1.2 billion in ESF and owed only $328 million in debt service so the amendment was no longer needed.

In 1998, Israel was designated as a “major non-NATO ally,” which allows it to receive outdated military equipment the U.S. military wishes to sell or give away.

Roughly 26 percent of what Israel receives in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) can be spent in Israel for military procurement. From FY1988 to FY 1990, Israel was allowed to use $400 million in Israel. From FY1991 to FY1998, the amount was increased to $475 million. As U.S. military aid to Israel increased, according to the agreement to cut economic aid, the amout set aside for defense purchases in Israel has increased (but the percentage has remained roughly the same). In 2009, the figure was $671 million. The remaining 74 percent of FMF was spent in the United States to generate profits and jobs. More than 1,000 companies in 47 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have signed contracts worth billions of dollars through this program.

At the end of 1998, Israel requested an additional $1.2 billion in aid to fund moving troops and military installations out of the occupied territories as called for in the October 23, 1998, Wye agreement. Israel received $600 million of this in military aid in FY1999 and $300 million in each fiscal year 2000 and 2001 (see Wye funding table).

In February 2003, for the first time, Congress voted to cut aid to Israel against the wishes of the pro-Israel lobby and the government of Israel. The 0.65 percent deduction was not aimed at Israel; however, it was an across the board cut of all foreign aid programs for fiscal year 2003. The lobby and government also suffered a defeat when Congress deleted an administration request for an extra $200 million to help Israel fight terrorism. Even while cutting aid to Israel (which still was budgeted at $2.1 billion for military aid and $600 million for economic assistance), Congress included a number of provisions in the aid bill viewed as favorable to Israel, including a provision that bars federal assistance to a future Palestinian state until the current Palestinian leadership is replaced, and that state demonstrates a commitment to peaceful coexistence with Israel, and takes measures to combat terrorism.

The setbacks were also temporary as the Administration approved a supplementary aid request in 2003 that included $1 billion in FMF and $9 billion in loan guarantees to aid Israel's economic recovery and compensate for the cost of military preparations associated with the war in Iraq. One quarter of the FMF is a cash grant and three quarters will be spent in the United States. The loan guarantees are spread over three years and must be spent within Israel's pre-June 1967 borders. Each year, an amount equal to the funds Israel spends on settlements in the territories will be deducted from the loan amount, along with all fees and subsidies.

Altogether, since 1949, Israel has received more than $106 billion in assistance. This includes the four special allocations, the $10 billion in loan guarantees (spread over five years) approved in 1992, the $9 billion in guarantees offered in 2003, and a variety of other smaller assistance-related accounts, such as refugee resettlement (nearly $1.6 billion overall since 1973), the American Schools and Hospitals Abroad Program (ASHA), which supports schools, libraries and medical centers that demonstrate American ideas and practices (($144 million), and cooperative development programs (a total of $186 million since 1981).

The total does not include funds for joint military projects like the Arrow missile (for which Israel has received more than $1 billion in grants since 1986), which are provided through the Defense budget. President Bush requested $60 million for the Arrow for FY2003 and $136 million in FY2004. The United States also has provided $53 million for the Boost Phase Intercept program and $139 million for the Tactical High Energy Laser program under development in Israel to complement the Arrow.

Though the totals are impressive, the value of assistance to Israel has been eroded by inflation. While aid levels remained constant in total dollars from 1987 until 1999, the real value steadily declined. On the other side of the coin, Israel does receive aid on more favorable terms than other nations. For example, all economic aid is given directly to the Israeli government rather than allocated under a specific program. Also, starting in 1982, Israel began to receive all its economic aid in a lump sum early in the fiscal year instead of in quarterly installments as is done for other countries. Israel also receives offsets on FMS purchases (U.S. contractors agree to offset some of the cost of military equipment by buying components or materials from Israel).

A 10-Year Military Aid Agreement

In August 2007, the Bush Administration agreed to increase U.S. military assistance to Israel by $6 billion over the following decade. Israel is to receive incremental annual increases of $150 mllion, starting at $2.55 billion in FY2009 and reaching $3.15 billion per year for FY2013-2018.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/history-and-overview-of-u-s-foreign-aid-to-israel

African Americans are still waiting for their 40 Acres and a Mule!!!

Having a national state is great as nation has some place to run for their live when next wave of elimination occupier in some country.
It already saved lives of hundreds of thousands Jews since Israel was established. Now the probability of new Holocaust is smaller as we do not need to rely on other countries to open the door. When 6 millions died not many countries did. To many people want us dead rather that alive.
Never heard about anybody want to eliminate African Americans in US or elsewhere. May be I am not educated in this too.
If AA want to have national state so make yourself a nation and demand for it. I would support it.
Every nation should have a chance of self-determination. But first the nation should exist.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
AUTOADVERT
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/4/2017  4:41 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/4/2017  4:42 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:The narrative when discussing these issues with some people always tend to be. For blacks its everyone has an equal opportunity at success if you work extremely hard. For whites its we got to build walls and install an immigration ban because they are taking our jobs and businesses. But don't forget all lives matter.

For normal people narrative is about equal opportunity regardless race, gender, sex, religion, etc.
But for some people it is always about color, nation, gender, etc.
How about stop recognizing people by anything else but human beings?
Oh well... how we will find the bad guys then? And how we will find excuses for our own shortcomings?
Better to lump some bunch of folks together by easy recognizable criteria and... live is cool and clear.
Whites are bad... AA are victims... Jews are world grade conspiracy mongers... Americans are ignorant... Russians are brutal... and so on.
Laziness of the mind...

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/4/2017  4:51 PM
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Nalod wrote:
holfresh wrote:People sometimes don't understand the different experiences of many groups in this country...They feel it's one experience and should be one point of view..This is for you Nix...


Thank you for sharing!!!

Very interesting and very important to see the history as it is and not revised.
It is exactly the same as in Russian Empire where slavery was abolished in 1723 and serves were freed from landlords power in 1861 to fee 90% of Russian population.
All ruling class and majority of educated class including the brightest and greatest minds and cultural idols who made great contributions to world culture, sciences, and humanity were all slave owners.
Also the Jews segregation in Russia started in 1791 was ended by Russian revolution in 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_of_Settlement
We cannot measure people leaving 200 years back by the moral values of our time.
And we should not be judged in 200 years by morals that will emerge.

So in a few years, my grand kids shouldn't judge Hitler's moral deeds??

1758 my forefather was brought here on the Slaveship Betsey from the slave castle on Bance Island, Sierra Leone Africa. I don't know his name or that of any other ancestor from this time... yet.

Thomas C. Born a slave 1819
William C. Born a Slave 1839
1865 the end of the Civil War.
William C. Jr. Born Free 1869
Richard C. Born 1913
Melvin C. Born 1946
I was born in 1965

So basically only 100 years passed from the end of the Civil War in 1865 until my birth in 1965. When I was born Jim Crow was at its end as the country passed the historic Civil Rights Laws. History does matter and what may seem like ancient history isn't that at all.

It is just 75 years since the brothers and sisters of my grandmother were killed in gas chambers together with their kids and family, together with 6 millions others...
My mother has their photo.. of all family... 45 people on one picture... black and white. 7 of them survived the Holocaust. My grand grand farther is also on the picture.
He was in hid 90th and died with all teeth still intact. He was a strong man.
I do not have any anger and any hate to those who killed them and to their descendants and their families.
Those who killed them and order to kill them are dead and God will jujge them. Those who are leaving now have nothing to do with all this.
My relatives on the picture are telling me that hate must be stopped otherwise their death has no meaning.
I am not the one to tell you that the history is not important and that we should not remember... We have to remember.
But we should remember not for the sake of hate but for the sake of forgiveness. Because there is no other way to leave together on this planet.


I can tell you that the Black experience in this country CONTINUED to be bad long after my Grandfather Richard who is listed above fought the Germans and received a Bronze Star and Purple Heart as a SEGREGATED soldier in WWII. He had to live with the indignity of racial discrimination until the day he died. Just as my father who went to Vietnam had to deal with Racism. I was the 1st one born in my family that did not experience Slavery or Jim Crow in this country.

Black people didn't HATE. They had HATE inflicted upon them. Did Black people in this country launch into massive raids of violent revenge upon the defeated former Slave Owners and Confederate Soldiers after the Civil War??? NO! They could have but they didn't. Nearly 4 Million abused, impoverished and illiterate people just asked to be treated fairly and with respect, but that's not what they got. They got lied to and cheated. They got Lynched, Burned alive, Imprisoned and re-enslaved under unjust laws designed to create a new slave workforce. Not until I was born did things ease up a little. Even then this system has not been even close to fair or just for Black People in this country. It's not about us hating White people or trying to take it out on the descendents of Slave Owners!!! You miss the point entirely when you keep saying these things.

Black people were here the whole time this country was being founded. Working, fighting and dying for this country. Then we have to watch European immigrants come to this country and progress and prosper while we were denied freedom to do the same. I don't wanna hear about FORGIVENESS!!! Man you have no idea how much crap Black People have FORGIVEN in their long journey to be treated equally and have what everyone else had the freedom to do. We started with LESS than NOTHING. We were enslaved which involved BREAKING the SPIRIT so that Slaves would be more compliant. We were stripped of our original language and culture and taught we were LESS THAN. No education for generations. No passed on knowledge and wealth. I don't think you fully understand what that does to a people when you spend HUNDREDS of years in a diminished state. Many of our problems are vestiges of Bad Habits from Slavery passed on from generation to generation. It's hard to overcome that at the same time society is holding you back. YOU DON'T KNOW THE HALF OF IT! You need to sit and talk with my Grandparents and parents to let them explain what a lifetime of living in this country back then was like. There were no GOOD OLE DAYS for Black People.

You come a long way and you own nothing to anyone.
You never get help and you will never get it.
This is how life is and this is how it will be.
Hundred of years or thousands of years you are the only masters of your destiny.
Freedom is not given, it is the state of mind, Spirit that cannot be taken away.
Your people are still roaming the desert but many already reached the Promised Land.
The eternal journey is hard and long. It takes many generations and hundred of years.
Just keep going...

OK so I should just tell my Sons and Daughter and Grand Children that they should wait for another Hundred years in order to be treated Equally??? There's a very real reason why Minorities and Women are so concerned with President Trump and the Republicans. He represents the way things USED to be. Oh they try to sugarcoat it with Populist talk and Nationalist lingo, but underneath all of that is a very dark core of hatred that we are especially sensitive to for the reasons I listed above!!! NO! Things are not just gonna be OK with the passage of time and NO I shouldn't take Hundreds of years for people to be treated fairly and just like European Immigrants were allowed to prosper in this country!!!

This country OWES a debt to African Americans, Native Americans and Hispanic Americans that they refuse to pay!!!

Tell them that that they are free and that they will get only what they will earn themselves.
Nobody will give them anything for granted. Never.
I can tell you this by the experience of 5 thousand years and 200 hundred countries.
All you can get it a slap to the hand and spit to the face.
And I do not have any problem with this because I do not have any expectations and it makes me strong, unbreakable.
Tutankhamen, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Obama, Trump, whatever... dust in the wind.

What you're saying is not actually accurate. The Jews did have help over the millennia. It wasn't just them sitting and hoping things would change for the better. They took action and they complained and protested and made appeals to higher powers. They didn't do it all on their own. All i'm saying is that when the Jewish People looked to America when they needed backing for their new State of Israel...

Creation of Israel, 1948

On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel. U.S. President Harry S. Truman recognized the new nation on the same day.

Although the United States supported the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which favored the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine, President Franklin D. Roosevelt had assured the Arabs in 1945 that the United States would not intervene without consulting both the Jews and the Arabs in that region. The British, who held a colonial mandate for Palestine until May 1948, opposed both the creation of a Jewish state and an Arab state in Palestine as well as unlimited immigration of Jewish refugees to the region. Great Britain wanted to preserve good relations with the Arabs to protect its vital political and economic interests in Palestine.

Soon after President Truman took office, he appointed several experts to study the Palestinian issue. In the summer of 1946, Truman established a special cabinet committee under the chairmanship of Dr. Henry F. Grady, an Assistant Secretary of State, who entered into negotiations with a parallel British committee to discuss the future of Palestine. In May 1946, Truman announced his approval of a recommendation to admit 100,000 displaced persons into Palestine and in October publicly declared his support for the creation of a Jewish state.

Throughout 1947, the United Nations Special Commission on Palestine examined the Palestinian question and recommended the partition of Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state. On November 29, 1947 the United Nations adopted Resolution 181 (also known as the Partition Resolution) that would divide Great Britain’s former Palestinian mandate into Jewish and Arab states in May 1948 when the British mandate was scheduled to end. Under the resolution, the area of religious significance surrounding Jerusalem would remain a corpus separatum under international control administered by the United Nations.

Although the United States backed Resolution 181, the U.S. Department of State recommended the creation of a United Nations trusteeship with limits on Jewish immigration and a division of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab provinces but not states. The State Department, concerned about the possibility of an increasing Soviet role in the Arab world and the potential for restriction by Arab oil producing nations of oil supplies to the United States, advised against U.S. intervention on behalf of the Jews. Later, as the date for British departure from Palestine drew near, the Department of State grew concerned about the possibility of an all-out war in Palestine as Arab states threatened to attack almost as soon as the UN passed the partition resolution.

Despite growing conflict between Palestinian Arabs and Palestinian Jews and despite the Department of State’s endorsement of a trusteeship, Truman ultimately decided to recognize the state Israel.

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/creation-israel

“It is my responsibility to see that our policy in Israel fits in with our policy throughout the world; second, it is my desire to help build in Palestine a strong, prosperous, free and independent democratic state. It must be large enough, free enough, and strong enough to make its people self-supporting and secure,” President Truman said in a speech October 28, 1948.

Truman's commitment was quickly tested after Israel's victory in its War of Independence when she applied to the U.S. for economic aid to help absorb immigrants. President Truman responded by approving a $135 million Export-Import Bank loan and the sale of surplus commodities to Israel. In those early years of Israel's statehood (also today), U.S. aid was seen as a means of promoting peace.

In 1951, Congress voted to help Israel cope with the economic burdens imposed by the influx of Jewish refugees from the displaced persons camps in Europe and from the ghettos of the Arab countries. Arabs then complained the U.S. was neglecting them, though they had no interest in or use for American aid then. In 1951, Syria rejected offers of U.S. aid. Oil-rich Iraq and Saudi Arabia did not need U.S. economic assistance, and Jordan was, until the late 1950s, the ward of Great Britain. After 1957, when the United States assumed responsibility for supporting Jordan and resumed economic aid to Egypt, assistance to the Arab states soared. Also, the United States was by far the biggest contributor of aid to the Palestinians through UNRWA, a status that continues to the present.

U.S. economic grants to Israel ended in 1959. U.S. aid to Israel from then until 1985 consisted largely of loans, which Israel repaid, and surplus commodities, which Israel bought. Israel began buying arms from the United States in 1962, but did not receive any grant military assistance until after the 1973 Yom Kippur War. As a result, Israel had to go deeply into debt to finance its economic development and arms procurement. The decision to convert military aid to grants that year was based on the prevailing view in Congress that without a strong Israel, war in the Middle East was more likely, and that the U.S. would face higher direct expenditures in such an eventuality.

Israel has received more direct aid from the United States since World War II than any other country, but the amounts for the first half of this period were relatively small. Between 1949 and 1973, the U.S. provided Israel with an average of about $122 million a year, a total of $3.1 billion (and actually more than $1 billion of that was loans for military equipment in 1971-73) . Prior to 1971, Israel received a total of only $277 million in military aid, all in the form of loans as credit sales. The bulk of the economic aid was also lent to Israel. By comparison, the Arab states received nearly three times as much aid before 1971, $4.4 billion, or $170 million per year. Moreover, unlike Israel, which receives nearly all its aid from the United States, Arab nations have gotten assistance from Asia, Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union and the European Community. Congress first designated a specific amount of aid for Israel (an "earmark") in 1971.

Meeting Israel's Special Needs

Since 1974, Israel has received nearly $100 billion in assistance, including three special aid packages. The first followed the signing of the Israel-Egypt peace treaty and Israel's withdrawal from the Sinai. The redeployment of Israeli forces and rebuilding of air bases in the Negev cost $5 billion. To partially compensate for this sacrifice, Israel received $3 billion ($2.2 billion of which was in the form of high-interest loans) in U.S. aid in 1979.

The second special package was approved in 1985, following a severe economic crisis in Israel, which sent inflation rates soaring as high as 445 percent. The $1.5 billion in emergency assistance-disbursed in two installments, in 1985 and 1986-was provided as part of Israel's economic stabilization program, which was implemented under the guidance of the U.S.-Israel Joint Economic Development Group (JEDG).

An extraordinary package was approved in 1996 to help Israel fight terrorism. Israel is to receive a total of $100 million, divided equally between fiscal years 1996 and 1997.

Regular Economic and Military Assistance

Israel's economic aid changed from the Commodity Import Program (CIP), which provides funds to foreign nations for the purchase of U.S. commodities, to a direct cash transfer in 1979. In return, Israel provided the Agency for International Development with assurances that the dollar level of Israel's non-defense imports from the U.S. would exceed the level of economic assistance granted Israel in any given year. Thus, Israel guaranteed that U.S. suppliers would not be disadvantaged by the termination of Israel's CIP Program.

Starting with fiscal year 1987, Israel annually received $1.2 billion in all grant economic aid and $1.8 billion in all grant military assistance. In 1998, Israel offered to voluntarily reduce its dependence on U.S. economic aid. According to an agreement reached with the Clinton Administration and Congress, the $1.2 billion economic aid package will be reduced by $120 million each year so that it will be phased out in ten years. Half of the annual savings in economic assistance each year ($60 million) will be added to Israel's military aid package in recognition of its increased security needs. In 2005, Israel received $360 million in economic aid and $2.22 billion in military aid. In 2006, economic aid is scheduled to be reduced to $240 million and military aid will increase to $2.28 billion.

For several years, most of Israel's economic aid went to pay off old debts. In 1984, foreign aid legislation included the Cranston Amendment (named after its Senate sponsor), which said the U.S. would provide Israel with economic assistance "not less than" the amount Israel owes the United States in annual debt service payments. The Cranston Amendment was left out of the FY1999 and subsequent appropriations bills. At that time Israel received $1.2 billion in ESF and owed only $328 million in debt service so the amendment was no longer needed.

In 1998, Israel was designated as a “major non-NATO ally,” which allows it to receive outdated military equipment the U.S. military wishes to sell or give away.

Roughly 26 percent of what Israel receives in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) can be spent in Israel for military procurement. From FY1988 to FY 1990, Israel was allowed to use $400 million in Israel. From FY1991 to FY1998, the amount was increased to $475 million. As U.S. military aid to Israel increased, according to the agreement to cut economic aid, the amout set aside for defense purchases in Israel has increased (but the percentage has remained roughly the same). In 2009, the figure was $671 million. The remaining 74 percent of FMF was spent in the United States to generate profits and jobs. More than 1,000 companies in 47 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have signed contracts worth billions of dollars through this program.

At the end of 1998, Israel requested an additional $1.2 billion in aid to fund moving troops and military installations out of the occupied territories as called for in the October 23, 1998, Wye agreement. Israel received $600 million of this in military aid in FY1999 and $300 million in each fiscal year 2000 and 2001 (see Wye funding table).

In February 2003, for the first time, Congress voted to cut aid to Israel against the wishes of the pro-Israel lobby and the government of Israel. The 0.65 percent deduction was not aimed at Israel; however, it was an across the board cut of all foreign aid programs for fiscal year 2003. The lobby and government also suffered a defeat when Congress deleted an administration request for an extra $200 million to help Israel fight terrorism. Even while cutting aid to Israel (which still was budgeted at $2.1 billion for military aid and $600 million for economic assistance), Congress included a number of provisions in the aid bill viewed as favorable to Israel, including a provision that bars federal assistance to a future Palestinian state until the current Palestinian leadership is replaced, and that state demonstrates a commitment to peaceful coexistence with Israel, and takes measures to combat terrorism.

The setbacks were also temporary as the Administration approved a supplementary aid request in 2003 that included $1 billion in FMF and $9 billion in loan guarantees to aid Israel's economic recovery and compensate for the cost of military preparations associated with the war in Iraq. One quarter of the FMF is a cash grant and three quarters will be spent in the United States. The loan guarantees are spread over three years and must be spent within Israel's pre-June 1967 borders. Each year, an amount equal to the funds Israel spends on settlements in the territories will be deducted from the loan amount, along with all fees and subsidies.

Altogether, since 1949, Israel has received more than $106 billion in assistance. This includes the four special allocations, the $10 billion in loan guarantees (spread over five years) approved in 1992, the $9 billion in guarantees offered in 2003, and a variety of other smaller assistance-related accounts, such as refugee resettlement (nearly $1.6 billion overall since 1973), the American Schools and Hospitals Abroad Program (ASHA), which supports schools, libraries and medical centers that demonstrate American ideas and practices (($144 million), and cooperative development programs (a total of $186 million since 1981).

The total does not include funds for joint military projects like the Arrow missile (for which Israel has received more than $1 billion in grants since 1986), which are provided through the Defense budget. President Bush requested $60 million for the Arrow for FY2003 and $136 million in FY2004. The United States also has provided $53 million for the Boost Phase Intercept program and $139 million for the Tactical High Energy Laser program under development in Israel to complement the Arrow.

Though the totals are impressive, the value of assistance to Israel has been eroded by inflation. While aid levels remained constant in total dollars from 1987 until 1999, the real value steadily declined. On the other side of the coin, Israel does receive aid on more favorable terms than other nations. For example, all economic aid is given directly to the Israeli government rather than allocated under a specific program. Also, starting in 1982, Israel began to receive all its economic aid in a lump sum early in the fiscal year instead of in quarterly installments as is done for other countries. Israel also receives offsets on FMS purchases (U.S. contractors agree to offset some of the cost of military equipment by buying components or materials from Israel).

A 10-Year Military Aid Agreement

In August 2007, the Bush Administration agreed to increase U.S. military assistance to Israel by $6 billion over the following decade. Israel is to receive incremental annual increases of $150 mllion, starting at $2.55 billion in FY2009 and reaching $3.15 billion per year for FY2013-2018.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/history-and-overview-of-u-s-foreign-aid-to-israel

African Americans are still waiting for their 40 Acres and a Mule!!!

Having a national state is great as nation has some place to run for their live when next wave of elimination occupier in some country.
It already saved lives of hundreds of thousands Jews since Israel was established. Now the probability of new Holocaust is smaller as we do not need to rely on other countries to open the door. When 6 millions died not many countries did. To many people want us dead rather that alive.
Never heard about anybody want to eliminate African Americans in US or elsewhere. May be I am not educated in this too.
If AA want to have national state so make yourself a nation and demand for it. I would support it.
Every nation should have a chance of self-determination. But first the nation should exist.

You totally missed my point!!! The U.S. Government did a lot to help the Jews and the amount of money spent to help support Israel over all these years is massive and yet over that same period of time this country failed to help its African American citizens right here in this country. They owe substantially more of a debt to African Americans and I ask where is that help???

We don't need a separate nation!!! We helped BUILD this nation into what it is and yet at the same time the U.S. was reaching out to help the Jews establish Israel, they were kicking African Americans in the teeth!!! Do you not yet understand where we are coming from? My Grandfather took a bullet in WWII helping to liberate the Jews and he died never knowing freedom and fair treatment from his own country!!!

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/4/2017  6:13 PM
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Nalod wrote:
holfresh wrote:People sometimes don't understand the different experiences of many groups in this country...They feel it's one experience and should be one point of view..This is for you Nix...


Thank you for sharing!!!

Very interesting and very important to see the history as it is and not revised.
It is exactly the same as in Russian Empire where slavery was abolished in 1723 and serves were freed from landlords power in 1861 to fee 90% of Russian population.
All ruling class and majority of educated class including the brightest and greatest minds and cultural idols who made great contributions to world culture, sciences, and humanity were all slave owners.
Also the Jews segregation in Russia started in 1791 was ended by Russian revolution in 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_of_Settlement
We cannot measure people leaving 200 years back by the moral values of our time.
And we should not be judged in 200 years by morals that will emerge.

So in a few years, my grand kids shouldn't judge Hitler's moral deeds??

1758 my forefather was brought here on the Slaveship Betsey from the slave castle on Bance Island, Sierra Leone Africa. I don't know his name or that of any other ancestor from this time... yet.

Thomas C. Born a slave 1819
William C. Born a Slave 1839
1865 the end of the Civil War.
William C. Jr. Born Free 1869
Richard C. Born 1913
Melvin C. Born 1946
I was born in 1965

So basically only 100 years passed from the end of the Civil War in 1865 until my birth in 1965. When I was born Jim Crow was at its end as the country passed the historic Civil Rights Laws. History does matter and what may seem like ancient history isn't that at all.

It is just 75 years since the brothers and sisters of my grandmother were killed in gas chambers together with their kids and family, together with 6 millions others...
My mother has their photo.. of all family... 45 people on one picture... black and white. 7 of them survived the Holocaust. My grand grand farther is also on the picture.
He was in hid 90th and died with all teeth still intact. He was a strong man.
I do not have any anger and any hate to those who killed them and to their descendants and their families.
Those who killed them and order to kill them are dead and God will jujge them. Those who are leaving now have nothing to do with all this.
My relatives on the picture are telling me that hate must be stopped otherwise their death has no meaning.
I am not the one to tell you that the history is not important and that we should not remember... We have to remember.
But we should remember not for the sake of hate but for the sake of forgiveness. Because there is no other way to leave together on this planet.


I can tell you that the Black experience in this country CONTINUED to be bad long after my Grandfather Richard who is listed above fought the Germans and received a Bronze Star and Purple Heart as a SEGREGATED soldier in WWII. He had to live with the indignity of racial discrimination until the day he died. Just as my father who went to Vietnam had to deal with Racism. I was the 1st one born in my family that did not experience Slavery or Jim Crow in this country.

Black people didn't HATE. They had HATE inflicted upon them. Did Black people in this country launch into massive raids of violent revenge upon the defeated former Slave Owners and Confederate Soldiers after the Civil War??? NO! They could have but they didn't. Nearly 4 Million abused, impoverished and illiterate people just asked to be treated fairly and with respect, but that's not what they got. They got lied to and cheated. They got Lynched, Burned alive, Imprisoned and re-enslaved under unjust laws designed to create a new slave workforce. Not until I was born did things ease up a little. Even then this system has not been even close to fair or just for Black People in this country. It's not about us hating White people or trying to take it out on the descendents of Slave Owners!!! You miss the point entirely when you keep saying these things.

Black people were here the whole time this country was being founded. Working, fighting and dying for this country. Then we have to watch European immigrants come to this country and progress and prosper while we were denied freedom to do the same. I don't wanna hear about FORGIVENESS!!! Man you have no idea how much crap Black People have FORGIVEN in their long journey to be treated equally and have what everyone else had the freedom to do. We started with LESS than NOTHING. We were enslaved which involved BREAKING the SPIRIT so that Slaves would be more compliant. We were stripped of our original language and culture and taught we were LESS THAN. No education for generations. No passed on knowledge and wealth. I don't think you fully understand what that does to a people when you spend HUNDREDS of years in a diminished state. Many of our problems are vestiges of Bad Habits from Slavery passed on from generation to generation. It's hard to overcome that at the same time society is holding you back. YOU DON'T KNOW THE HALF OF IT! You need to sit and talk with my Grandparents and parents to let them explain what a lifetime of living in this country back then was like. There were no GOOD OLE DAYS for Black People.

You come a long way and you own nothing to anyone.
You never get help and you will never get it.
This is how life is and this is how it will be.
Hundred of years or thousands of years you are the only masters of your destiny.
Freedom is not given, it is the state of mind, Spirit that cannot be taken away.
Your people are still roaming the desert but many already reached the Promised Land.
The eternal journey is hard and long. It takes many generations and hundred of years.
Just keep going...

OK so I should just tell my Sons and Daughter and Grand Children that they should wait for another Hundred years in order to be treated Equally??? There's a very real reason why Minorities and Women are so concerned with President Trump and the Republicans. He represents the way things USED to be. Oh they try to sugarcoat it with Populist talk and Nationalist lingo, but underneath all of that is a very dark core of hatred that we are especially sensitive to for the reasons I listed above!!! NO! Things are not just gonna be OK with the passage of time and NO I shouldn't take Hundreds of years for people to be treated fairly and just like European Immigrants were allowed to prosper in this country!!!

This country OWES a debt to African Americans, Native Americans and Hispanic Americans that they refuse to pay!!!

Tell them that that they are free and that they will get only what they will earn themselves.
Nobody will give them anything for granted. Never.
I can tell you this by the experience of 5 thousand years and 200 hundred countries.
All you can get it a slap to the hand and spit to the face.
And I do not have any problem with this because I do not have any expectations and it makes me strong, unbreakable.
Tutankhamen, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Obama, Trump, whatever... dust in the wind.

What you're saying is not actually accurate. The Jews did have help over the millennia. It wasn't just them sitting and hoping things would change for the better. They took action and they complained and protested and made appeals to higher powers. They didn't do it all on their own. All i'm saying is that when the Jewish People looked to America when they needed backing for their new State of Israel...

Creation of Israel, 1948

On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel. U.S. President Harry S. Truman recognized the new nation on the same day.

Although the United States supported the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which favored the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine, President Franklin D. Roosevelt had assured the Arabs in 1945 that the United States would not intervene without consulting both the Jews and the Arabs in that region. The British, who held a colonial mandate for Palestine until May 1948, opposed both the creation of a Jewish state and an Arab state in Palestine as well as unlimited immigration of Jewish refugees to the region. Great Britain wanted to preserve good relations with the Arabs to protect its vital political and economic interests in Palestine.

Soon after President Truman took office, he appointed several experts to study the Palestinian issue. In the summer of 1946, Truman established a special cabinet committee under the chairmanship of Dr. Henry F. Grady, an Assistant Secretary of State, who entered into negotiations with a parallel British committee to discuss the future of Palestine. In May 1946, Truman announced his approval of a recommendation to admit 100,000 displaced persons into Palestine and in October publicly declared his support for the creation of a Jewish state.

Throughout 1947, the United Nations Special Commission on Palestine examined the Palestinian question and recommended the partition of Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state. On November 29, 1947 the United Nations adopted Resolution 181 (also known as the Partition Resolution) that would divide Great Britain’s former Palestinian mandate into Jewish and Arab states in May 1948 when the British mandate was scheduled to end. Under the resolution, the area of religious significance surrounding Jerusalem would remain a corpus separatum under international control administered by the United Nations.

Although the United States backed Resolution 181, the U.S. Department of State recommended the creation of a United Nations trusteeship with limits on Jewish immigration and a division of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab provinces but not states. The State Department, concerned about the possibility of an increasing Soviet role in the Arab world and the potential for restriction by Arab oil producing nations of oil supplies to the United States, advised against U.S. intervention on behalf of the Jews. Later, as the date for British departure from Palestine drew near, the Department of State grew concerned about the possibility of an all-out war in Palestine as Arab states threatened to attack almost as soon as the UN passed the partition resolution.

Despite growing conflict between Palestinian Arabs and Palestinian Jews and despite the Department of State’s endorsement of a trusteeship, Truman ultimately decided to recognize the state Israel.

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/creation-israel

“It is my responsibility to see that our policy in Israel fits in with our policy throughout the world; second, it is my desire to help build in Palestine a strong, prosperous, free and independent democratic state. It must be large enough, free enough, and strong enough to make its people self-supporting and secure,” President Truman said in a speech October 28, 1948.

Truman's commitment was quickly tested after Israel's victory in its War of Independence when she applied to the U.S. for economic aid to help absorb immigrants. President Truman responded by approving a $135 million Export-Import Bank loan and the sale of surplus commodities to Israel. In those early years of Israel's statehood (also today), U.S. aid was seen as a means of promoting peace.

In 1951, Congress voted to help Israel cope with the economic burdens imposed by the influx of Jewish refugees from the displaced persons camps in Europe and from the ghettos of the Arab countries. Arabs then complained the U.S. was neglecting them, though they had no interest in or use for American aid then. In 1951, Syria rejected offers of U.S. aid. Oil-rich Iraq and Saudi Arabia did not need U.S. economic assistance, and Jordan was, until the late 1950s, the ward of Great Britain. After 1957, when the United States assumed responsibility for supporting Jordan and resumed economic aid to Egypt, assistance to the Arab states soared. Also, the United States was by far the biggest contributor of aid to the Palestinians through UNRWA, a status that continues to the present.

U.S. economic grants to Israel ended in 1959. U.S. aid to Israel from then until 1985 consisted largely of loans, which Israel repaid, and surplus commodities, which Israel bought. Israel began buying arms from the United States in 1962, but did not receive any grant military assistance until after the 1973 Yom Kippur War. As a result, Israel had to go deeply into debt to finance its economic development and arms procurement. The decision to convert military aid to grants that year was based on the prevailing view in Congress that without a strong Israel, war in the Middle East was more likely, and that the U.S. would face higher direct expenditures in such an eventuality.

Israel has received more direct aid from the United States since World War II than any other country, but the amounts for the first half of this period were relatively small. Between 1949 and 1973, the U.S. provided Israel with an average of about $122 million a year, a total of $3.1 billion (and actually more than $1 billion of that was loans for military equipment in 1971-73) . Prior to 1971, Israel received a total of only $277 million in military aid, all in the form of loans as credit sales. The bulk of the economic aid was also lent to Israel. By comparison, the Arab states received nearly three times as much aid before 1971, $4.4 billion, or $170 million per year. Moreover, unlike Israel, which receives nearly all its aid from the United States, Arab nations have gotten assistance from Asia, Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union and the European Community. Congress first designated a specific amount of aid for Israel (an "earmark") in 1971.

Meeting Israel's Special Needs

Since 1974, Israel has received nearly $100 billion in assistance, including three special aid packages. The first followed the signing of the Israel-Egypt peace treaty and Israel's withdrawal from the Sinai. The redeployment of Israeli forces and rebuilding of air bases in the Negev cost $5 billion. To partially compensate for this sacrifice, Israel received $3 billion ($2.2 billion of which was in the form of high-interest loans) in U.S. aid in 1979.

The second special package was approved in 1985, following a severe economic crisis in Israel, which sent inflation rates soaring as high as 445 percent. The $1.5 billion in emergency assistance-disbursed in two installments, in 1985 and 1986-was provided as part of Israel's economic stabilization program, which was implemented under the guidance of the U.S.-Israel Joint Economic Development Group (JEDG).

An extraordinary package was approved in 1996 to help Israel fight terrorism. Israel is to receive a total of $100 million, divided equally between fiscal years 1996 and 1997.

Regular Economic and Military Assistance

Israel's economic aid changed from the Commodity Import Program (CIP), which provides funds to foreign nations for the purchase of U.S. commodities, to a direct cash transfer in 1979. In return, Israel provided the Agency for International Development with assurances that the dollar level of Israel's non-defense imports from the U.S. would exceed the level of economic assistance granted Israel in any given year. Thus, Israel guaranteed that U.S. suppliers would not be disadvantaged by the termination of Israel's CIP Program.

Starting with fiscal year 1987, Israel annually received $1.2 billion in all grant economic aid and $1.8 billion in all grant military assistance. In 1998, Israel offered to voluntarily reduce its dependence on U.S. economic aid. According to an agreement reached with the Clinton Administration and Congress, the $1.2 billion economic aid package will be reduced by $120 million each year so that it will be phased out in ten years. Half of the annual savings in economic assistance each year ($60 million) will be added to Israel's military aid package in recognition of its increased security needs. In 2005, Israel received $360 million in economic aid and $2.22 billion in military aid. In 2006, economic aid is scheduled to be reduced to $240 million and military aid will increase to $2.28 billion.

For several years, most of Israel's economic aid went to pay off old debts. In 1984, foreign aid legislation included the Cranston Amendment (named after its Senate sponsor), which said the U.S. would provide Israel with economic assistance "not less than" the amount Israel owes the United States in annual debt service payments. The Cranston Amendment was left out of the FY1999 and subsequent appropriations bills. At that time Israel received $1.2 billion in ESF and owed only $328 million in debt service so the amendment was no longer needed.

In 1998, Israel was designated as a “major non-NATO ally,” which allows it to receive outdated military equipment the U.S. military wishes to sell or give away.

Roughly 26 percent of what Israel receives in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) can be spent in Israel for military procurement. From FY1988 to FY 1990, Israel was allowed to use $400 million in Israel. From FY1991 to FY1998, the amount was increased to $475 million. As U.S. military aid to Israel increased, according to the agreement to cut economic aid, the amout set aside for defense purchases in Israel has increased (but the percentage has remained roughly the same). In 2009, the figure was $671 million. The remaining 74 percent of FMF was spent in the United States to generate profits and jobs. More than 1,000 companies in 47 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have signed contracts worth billions of dollars through this program.

At the end of 1998, Israel requested an additional $1.2 billion in aid to fund moving troops and military installations out of the occupied territories as called for in the October 23, 1998, Wye agreement. Israel received $600 million of this in military aid in FY1999 and $300 million in each fiscal year 2000 and 2001 (see Wye funding table).

In February 2003, for the first time, Congress voted to cut aid to Israel against the wishes of the pro-Israel lobby and the government of Israel. The 0.65 percent deduction was not aimed at Israel; however, it was an across the board cut of all foreign aid programs for fiscal year 2003. The lobby and government also suffered a defeat when Congress deleted an administration request for an extra $200 million to help Israel fight terrorism. Even while cutting aid to Israel (which still was budgeted at $2.1 billion for military aid and $600 million for economic assistance), Congress included a number of provisions in the aid bill viewed as favorable to Israel, including a provision that bars federal assistance to a future Palestinian state until the current Palestinian leadership is replaced, and that state demonstrates a commitment to peaceful coexistence with Israel, and takes measures to combat terrorism.

The setbacks were also temporary as the Administration approved a supplementary aid request in 2003 that included $1 billion in FMF and $9 billion in loan guarantees to aid Israel's economic recovery and compensate for the cost of military preparations associated with the war in Iraq. One quarter of the FMF is a cash grant and three quarters will be spent in the United States. The loan guarantees are spread over three years and must be spent within Israel's pre-June 1967 borders. Each year, an amount equal to the funds Israel spends on settlements in the territories will be deducted from the loan amount, along with all fees and subsidies.

Altogether, since 1949, Israel has received more than $106 billion in assistance. This includes the four special allocations, the $10 billion in loan guarantees (spread over five years) approved in 1992, the $9 billion in guarantees offered in 2003, and a variety of other smaller assistance-related accounts, such as refugee resettlement (nearly $1.6 billion overall since 1973), the American Schools and Hospitals Abroad Program (ASHA), which supports schools, libraries and medical centers that demonstrate American ideas and practices (($144 million), and cooperative development programs (a total of $186 million since 1981).

The total does not include funds for joint military projects like the Arrow missile (for which Israel has received more than $1 billion in grants since 1986), which are provided through the Defense budget. President Bush requested $60 million for the Arrow for FY2003 and $136 million in FY2004. The United States also has provided $53 million for the Boost Phase Intercept program and $139 million for the Tactical High Energy Laser program under development in Israel to complement the Arrow.

Though the totals are impressive, the value of assistance to Israel has been eroded by inflation. While aid levels remained constant in total dollars from 1987 until 1999, the real value steadily declined. On the other side of the coin, Israel does receive aid on more favorable terms than other nations. For example, all economic aid is given directly to the Israeli government rather than allocated under a specific program. Also, starting in 1982, Israel began to receive all its economic aid in a lump sum early in the fiscal year instead of in quarterly installments as is done for other countries. Israel also receives offsets on FMS purchases (U.S. contractors agree to offset some of the cost of military equipment by buying components or materials from Israel).

A 10-Year Military Aid Agreement

In August 2007, the Bush Administration agreed to increase U.S. military assistance to Israel by $6 billion over the following decade. Israel is to receive incremental annual increases of $150 mllion, starting at $2.55 billion in FY2009 and reaching $3.15 billion per year for FY2013-2018.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/history-and-overview-of-u-s-foreign-aid-to-israel

African Americans are still waiting for their 40 Acres and a Mule!!!

Having a national state is great as nation has some place to run for their live when next wave of elimination occupier in some country.
It already saved lives of hundreds of thousands Jews since Israel was established. Now the probability of new Holocaust is smaller as we do not need to rely on other countries to open the door. When 6 millions died not many countries did. To many people want us dead rather that alive.
Never heard about anybody want to eliminate African Americans in US or elsewhere. May be I am not educated in this too.
If AA want to have national state so make yourself a nation and demand for it. I would support it.
Every nation should have a chance of self-determination. But first the nation should exist.

You totally missed my point!!! The U.S. Government did a lot to help the Jews and the amount of money spent to help support Israel over all these years is massive and yet over that same period of time this country failed to help its African American citizens right here in this country. They owe substantially more of a debt to African Americans and I ask where is that help???

We don't need a separate nation!!! We helped BUILD this nation into what it is and yet at the same time the U.S. was reaching out to help the Jews establish Israel, they were kicking African Americans in the teeth!!! Do you not yet understand where we are coming from? My Grandfather took a bullet in WWII helping to liberate the Jews and he died never knowing freedom and fair treatment from his own country!!!

We already want over this once and you said that AA people do not need stuff...
So I am not sure how this owned debt should be repaid?

As far as US help to Israel American Jews paying substantially more taxes that US provided as help to Israel.
Plus Israel army is ready to support US interest in the region at any given time and Israel is hosting unlimited amount of US Navy and any other army units without asking for any compensation. If US will not help as a country American Jew will provide as much or more "stuff". And Israel will be glad to use it.
Even as Israel does not need this stuff any more also. It has one of largest per-capita incomes in the world and will only get more reach as a country by being one of the main high-tech hubs in the world.
I visited Israel 15 years back and you cannot recognize the county now. They did unbelievable jump in prosperity.
Despite war, terrorism, and almost all world trying to stump on them Israel rising even higher.
The country also became incredibly diverse - you can see people or every race, religion, all rainbow people leaving without fear and prejudice to each other.
A lot of Palestinian Arab youth start feeling Israel as their own country. It is unbelievable what prosperity and freedom can bring in such a short time.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/4/2017  6:46 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/4/2017  6:52 PM
arkrud wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Nalod wrote:
holfresh wrote:People sometimes don't understand the different experiences of many groups in this country...They feel it's one experience and should be one point of view..This is for you Nix...


Thank you for sharing!!!

Very interesting and very important to see the history as it is and not revised.
It is exactly the same as in Russian Empire where slavery was abolished in 1723 and serves were freed from landlords power in 1861 to fee 90% of Russian population.
All ruling class and majority of educated class including the brightest and greatest minds and cultural idols who made great contributions to world culture, sciences, and humanity were all slave owners.
Also the Jews segregation in Russia started in 1791 was ended by Russian revolution in 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_of_Settlement
We cannot measure people leaving 200 years back by the moral values of our time.
And we should not be judged in 200 years by morals that will emerge.

So in a few years, my grand kids shouldn't judge Hitler's moral deeds??

So Hither and Founding Fathers are same kind of villains. Congratulation man.
Some things are timeless and some just circumstantial.
Are Ancient Egyptians also villains because they used slaves?
Or cannibals are villains because they eat people... or Native Americans because they were taking scalps of killed enemies?
This is the way their culture evolved at a time.
Do not jujge and you will not be judged..

So to get this straight, the kidnapping of 13 million people from Africa and two million dying in the journey to the New World along with tens of millions dying in over 300 years of slavery is "circumstantial" while the Holocaust is timeless???..

I was hoping the exercise on the subject matter would have enlightened you to the plight of others but the depth of your ignorance knows no bounds, obviously I gave you too much credit.

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/4/2017  6:51 PM
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Nalod wrote:
holfresh wrote:People sometimes don't understand the different experiences of many groups in this country...They feel it's one experience and should be one point of view..This is for you Nix...


Thank you for sharing!!!

Very interesting and very important to see the history as it is and not revised.
It is exactly the same as in Russian Empire where slavery was abolished in 1723 and serves were freed from landlords power in 1861 to fee 90% of Russian population.
All ruling class and majority of educated class including the brightest and greatest minds and cultural idols who made great contributions to world culture, sciences, and humanity were all slave owners.
Also the Jews segregation in Russia started in 1791 was ended by Russian revolution in 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_of_Settlement
We cannot measure people leaving 200 years back by the moral values of our time.
And we should not be judged in 200 years by morals that will emerge.

So in a few years, my grand kids shouldn't judge Hitler's moral deeds??

1758 my forefather was brought here on the Slaveship Betsey from the slave castle on Bance Island, Sierra Leone Africa. I don't know his name or that of any other ancestor from this time... yet.

Thomas C. Born a slave 1819
William C. Born a Slave 1839
1865 the end of the Civil War.
William C. Jr. Born Free 1869
Richard C. Born 1913
Melvin C. Born 1946
I was born in 1965

So basically only 100 years passed from the end of the Civil War in 1865 until my birth in 1965. When I was born Jim Crow was at its end as the country passed the historic Civil Rights Laws. History does matter and what may seem like ancient history isn't that at all.

Wow...really interesting..Thanks for that...

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/4/2017  7:29 PM
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Nalod wrote:
holfresh wrote:People sometimes don't understand the different experiences of many groups in this country...They feel it's one experience and should be one point of view..This is for you Nix...


Thank you for sharing!!!

Very interesting and very important to see the history as it is and not revised.
It is exactly the same as in Russian Empire where slavery was abolished in 1723 and serves were freed from landlords power in 1861 to fee 90% of Russian population.
All ruling class and majority of educated class including the brightest and greatest minds and cultural idols who made great contributions to world culture, sciences, and humanity were all slave owners.
Also the Jews segregation in Russia started in 1791 was ended by Russian revolution in 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_of_Settlement
We cannot measure people leaving 200 years back by the moral values of our time.
And we should not be judged in 200 years by morals that will emerge.

So in a few years, my grand kids shouldn't judge Hitler's moral deeds??

So Hither and Founding Fathers are same kind of villains. Congratulation man.
Some things are timeless and some just circumstantial.
Are Ancient Egyptians also villains because they used slaves?
Or cannibals are villains because they eat people... or Native Americans because they were taking scalps of killed enemies?
This is the way their culture evolved at a time.
Do not jujge and you will not be judged..

So to get this straight, the kidnapping of 13 million people from Africa and two million dying in the journey to the New World along with tens of millions dying in over 300 years of slavery is "circumstantial" while the Holocaust is timeless???..

I was hoping the exercise on the subject matter would have enlightened you to the plight of others but the depth of your ignorance knows no bounds, obviously I gave you too much credit.

Both Holocaust and slavery represent what we as human civilization capable of.
We really ugly creatures and atrocities we committed against humanity and continue to commit now have no boundaries.
However Holocaust is the sole responsibility of Nazi party and its leaders and the governments of "free world" including US who allowed it to happened.
While slavery was a way of life of human race for thousands of years and was abolished in most of the countries in the world just last couple of hundred of years.
It was outlawed in some African countries only 40-50 years back but in fact still exist in many places of the world.
Should we count how many slaves died while building Pyramids in Egypt or Sankt Peterburg in Russia?
Should we put millions vanished in Stalin Gulag in the same category?

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/4/2017  7:38 PM
arkrud wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Nalod wrote:
holfresh wrote:People sometimes don't understand the different experiences of many groups in this country...They feel it's one experience and should be one point of view..This is for you Nix...


Thank you for sharing!!!

Very interesting and very important to see the history as it is and not revised.
It is exactly the same as in Russian Empire where slavery was abolished in 1723 and serves were freed from landlords power in 1861 to fee 90% of Russian population.
All ruling class and majority of educated class including the brightest and greatest minds and cultural idols who made great contributions to world culture, sciences, and humanity were all slave owners.
Also the Jews segregation in Russia started in 1791 was ended by Russian revolution in 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_of_Settlement
We cannot measure people leaving 200 years back by the moral values of our time.
And we should not be judged in 200 years by morals that will emerge.

So in a few years, my grand kids shouldn't judge Hitler's moral deeds??

So Hither and Founding Fathers are same kind of villains. Congratulation man.
Some things are timeless and some just circumstantial.
Are Ancient Egyptians also villains because they used slaves?
Or cannibals are villains because they eat people... or Native Americans because they were taking scalps of killed enemies?
This is the way their culture evolved at a time.
Do not jujge and you will not be judged..

So to get this straight, the kidnapping of 13 million people from Africa and two million dying in the journey to the New World along with tens of millions dying in over 300 years of slavery is "circumstantial" while the Holocaust is timeless???..

I was hoping the exercise on the subject matter would have enlightened you to the plight of others but the depth of your ignorance knows no bounds, obviously I gave you too much credit.

Both Holocaust and slavery represent what we as human civilization capable of.
We really ugly creatures and atrocities we committed against humanity and continue to commit now have no boundaries.
However Holocaust is the sole responsibility of Nazi party and its leaders and the governments of "free world" including US who allowed it to happened.
While slavery was a way of life of human race for thousands of years and was abolished in most of the countries in the world just last couple of hundred of years.
It was outlawed in some African countries only 40-50 years back but in fact still exist in many places of the world.
Should we count how many slaves died while building Pyramids in Egypt or Sankt Peterburg in Russia?
Should we put millions vanished in Stalin Gulag in the same category?

By your metrics, I could say Genocide occurs all the time...Africa, Bosnia, Aleppo, Armenian, etc...

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/4/2017  9:47 PM
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Nalod wrote:
holfresh wrote:People sometimes don't understand the different experiences of many groups in this country...They feel it's one experience and should be one point of view..This is for you Nix...


Thank you for sharing!!!

Very interesting and very important to see the history as it is and not revised.
It is exactly the same as in Russian Empire where slavery was abolished in 1723 and serves were freed from landlords power in 1861 to fee 90% of Russian population.
All ruling class and majority of educated class including the brightest and greatest minds and cultural idols who made great contributions to world culture, sciences, and humanity were all slave owners.
Also the Jews segregation in Russia started in 1791 was ended by Russian revolution in 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_of_Settlement
We cannot measure people leaving 200 years back by the moral values of our time.
And we should not be judged in 200 years by morals that will emerge.

So in a few years, my grand kids shouldn't judge Hitler's moral deeds??

So Hither and Founding Fathers are same kind of villains. Congratulation man.
Some things are timeless and some just circumstantial.
Are Ancient Egyptians also villains because they used slaves?
Or cannibals are villains because they eat people... or Native Americans because they were taking scalps of killed enemies?
This is the way their culture evolved at a time.
Do not jujge and you will not be judged..

So to get this straight, the kidnapping of 13 million people from Africa and two million dying in the journey to the New World along with tens of millions dying in over 300 years of slavery is "circumstantial" while the Holocaust is timeless???..

I was hoping the exercise on the subject matter would have enlightened you to the plight of others but the depth of your ignorance knows no bounds, obviously I gave you too much credit.

Both Holocaust and slavery represent what we as human civilization capable of.
We really ugly creatures and atrocities we committed against humanity and continue to commit now have no boundaries.
However Holocaust is the sole responsibility of Nazi party and its leaders and the governments of "free world" including US who allowed it to happened.
While slavery was a way of life of human race for thousands of years and was abolished in most of the countries in the world just last couple of hundred of years.
It was outlawed in some African countries only 40-50 years back but in fact still exist in many places of the world.
Should we count how many slaves died while building Pyramids in Egypt or Sankt Peterburg in Russia?
Should we put millions vanished in Stalin Gulag in the same category?

By your metrics, I could say Genocide occurs all the time...Africa, Bosnia, Aleppo, Armenian, etc...

Absolutely. You are 100% right.
No nation has monopoly of being abused.
It happened countless times.
It does not matter 6 millions, 1 million, or 1K.
The tragedy is the same.
But this is not an excuse for anything. Not for hate and anger and not for underachievement.
They knack you down but you stand up and get even better an work for yourself and fallen one.
Until the last man standing.
When nation obtained eternal freedom no one will enslave it. Destroy, kill until the last man, yes.
And this is the perfect payback.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
VCoug
Posts: 24935
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2007
Member: #1406

2/4/2017  10:10 PM
Steve Bannon had to be reminded he isn't the President

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/02/report-bannon-had-to-be-reminded-he-wasnt-the-president.html

Now the joy of my world is in Zion How beautiful if nothing more Than to wait at Zion's door I've never been in love like this before Now let me pray to keep you from The perils that will surely come
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

2/5/2017  12:22 AM
VCoug wrote:Steve Bannon had to be reminded he isn't the President

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/02/report-bannon-had-to-be-reminded-he-wasnt-the-president.html

Surely you are not suggesting that Trump and Bannon's ban on perfectly legal non immigrants and fulky vetted permanent residents from Muslim countries could have been motivated by racism or xenophobia? You know we have had zero incidents of terrorism committed by people from those countries, right? Don't you realize how important and well reasoned this executive order was?

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/5/2017  12:26 AM
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Nalod wrote:
holfresh wrote:People sometimes don't understand the different experiences of many groups in this country...They feel it's one experience and should be one point of view..This is for you Nix...


Thank you for sharing!!!

Very interesting and very important to see the history as it is and not revised.
It is exactly the same as in Russian Empire where slavery was abolished in 1723 and serves were freed from landlords power in 1861 to fee 90% of Russian population.
All ruling class and majority of educated class including the brightest and greatest minds and cultural idols who made great contributions to world culture, sciences, and humanity were all slave owners.
Also the Jews segregation in Russia started in 1791 was ended by Russian revolution in 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_of_Settlement
We cannot measure people leaving 200 years back by the moral values of our time.
And we should not be judged in 200 years by morals that will emerge.

So in a few years, my grand kids shouldn't judge Hitler's moral deeds??

1758 my forefather was brought here on the Slaveship Betsey from the slave castle on Bance Island, Sierra Leone Africa. I don't know his name or that of any other ancestor from this time... yet.

Thomas C. Born a slave 1819
William C. Born a Slave 1839
1865 the end of the Civil War.
William C. Jr. Born Free 1869
Richard C. Born 1913
Melvin C. Born 1946
I was born in 1965

So basically only 100 years passed from the end of the Civil War in 1865 until my birth in 1965. When I was born Jim Crow was at its end as the country passed the historic Civil Rights Laws. History does matter and what may seem like ancient history isn't that at all.

It is just 75 years since the brothers and sisters of my grandmother were killed in gas chambers together with their kids and family, together with 6 millions others...
My mother has their photo.. of all family... 45 people on one picture... black and white. 7 of them survived the Holocaust. My grand grand farther is also on the picture.
He was in hid 90th and died with all teeth still intact. He was a strong man.
I do not have any anger and any hate to those who killed them and to their descendants and their families.
Those who killed them and order to kill them are dead and God will jujge them. Those who are leaving now have nothing to do with all this.
My relatives on the picture are telling me that hate must be stopped otherwise their death has no meaning.
I am not the one to tell you that the history is not important and that we should not remember... We have to remember.
But we should remember not for the sake of hate but for the sake of forgiveness. Because there is no other way to leave together on this planet.


I can tell you that the Black experience in this country CONTINUED to be bad long after my Grandfather Richard who is listed above fought the Germans and received a Bronze Star and Purple Heart as a SEGREGATED soldier in WWII. He had to live with the indignity of racial discrimination until the day he died. Just as my father who went to Vietnam had to deal with Racism. I was the 1st one born in my family that did not experience Slavery or Jim Crow in this country.

Black people didn't HATE. They had HATE inflicted upon them. Did Black people in this country launch into massive raids of violent revenge upon the defeated former Slave Owners and Confederate Soldiers after the Civil War??? NO! They could have but they didn't. Nearly 4 Million abused, impoverished and illiterate people just asked to be treated fairly and with respect, but that's not what they got. They got lied to and cheated. They got Lynched, Burned alive, Imprisoned and re-enslaved under unjust laws designed to create a new slave workforce. Not until I was born did things ease up a little. Even then this system has not been even close to fair or just for Black People in this country. It's not about us hating White people or trying to take it out on the descendents of Slave Owners!!! You miss the point entirely when you keep saying these things.

Black people were here the whole time this country was being founded. Working, fighting and dying for this country. Then we have to watch European immigrants come to this country and progress and prosper while we were denied freedom to do the same. I don't wanna hear about FORGIVENESS!!! Man you have no idea how much crap Black People have FORGIVEN in their long journey to be treated equally and have what everyone else had the freedom to do. We started with LESS than NOTHING. We were enslaved which involved BREAKING the SPIRIT so that Slaves would be more compliant. We were stripped of our original language and culture and taught we were LESS THAN. No education for generations. No passed on knowledge and wealth. I don't think you fully understand what that does to a people when you spend HUNDREDS of years in a diminished state. Many of our problems are vestiges of Bad Habits from Slavery passed on from generation to generation. It's hard to overcome that at the same time society is holding you back. YOU DON'T KNOW THE HALF OF IT! You need to sit and talk with my Grandparents and parents to let them explain what a lifetime of living in this country back then was like. There were no GOOD OLE DAYS for Black People.

You come a long way and you own nothing to anyone.
You never get help and you will never get it.
This is how life is and this is how it will be.
Hundred of years or thousands of years you are the only masters of your destiny.
Freedom is not given, it is the state of mind, Spirit that cannot be taken away.
Your people are still roaming the desert but many already reached the Promised Land.
The eternal journey is hard and long. It takes many generations and hundred of years.
Just keep going...

OK so I should just tell my Sons and Daughter and Grand Children that they should wait for another Hundred years in order to be treated Equally??? There's a very real reason why Minorities and Women are so concerned with President Trump and the Republicans. He represents the way things USED to be. Oh they try to sugarcoat it with Populist talk and Nationalist lingo, but underneath all of that is a very dark core of hatred that we are especially sensitive to for the reasons I listed above!!! NO! Things are not just gonna be OK with the passage of time and NO I shouldn't take Hundreds of years for people to be treated fairly and just like European Immigrants were allowed to prosper in this country!!!

This country OWES a debt to African Americans, Native Americans and Hispanic Americans that they refuse to pay!!!

Tell them that that they are free and that they will get only what they will earn themselves.
Nobody will give them anything for granted. Never.
I can tell you this by the experience of 5 thousand years and 200 hundred countries.
All you can get it a slap to the hand and spit to the face.
And I do not have any problem with this because I do not have any expectations and it makes me strong, unbreakable.
Tutankhamen, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Obama, Trump, whatever... dust in the wind.

What you're saying is not actually accurate. The Jews did have help over the millennia. It wasn't just them sitting and hoping things would change for the better. They took action and they complained and protested and made appeals to higher powers. They didn't do it all on their own. All i'm saying is that when the Jewish People looked to America when they needed backing for their new State of Israel...

Creation of Israel, 1948

On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel. U.S. President Harry S. Truman recognized the new nation on the same day.

Although the United States supported the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which favored the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine, President Franklin D. Roosevelt had assured the Arabs in 1945 that the United States would not intervene without consulting both the Jews and the Arabs in that region. The British, who held a colonial mandate for Palestine until May 1948, opposed both the creation of a Jewish state and an Arab state in Palestine as well as unlimited immigration of Jewish refugees to the region. Great Britain wanted to preserve good relations with the Arabs to protect its vital political and economic interests in Palestine.

Soon after President Truman took office, he appointed several experts to study the Palestinian issue. In the summer of 1946, Truman established a special cabinet committee under the chairmanship of Dr. Henry F. Grady, an Assistant Secretary of State, who entered into negotiations with a parallel British committee to discuss the future of Palestine. In May 1946, Truman announced his approval of a recommendation to admit 100,000 displaced persons into Palestine and in October publicly declared his support for the creation of a Jewish state.

Throughout 1947, the United Nations Special Commission on Palestine examined the Palestinian question and recommended the partition of Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state. On November 29, 1947 the United Nations adopted Resolution 181 (also known as the Partition Resolution) that would divide Great Britain’s former Palestinian mandate into Jewish and Arab states in May 1948 when the British mandate was scheduled to end. Under the resolution, the area of religious significance surrounding Jerusalem would remain a corpus separatum under international control administered by the United Nations.

Although the United States backed Resolution 181, the U.S. Department of State recommended the creation of a United Nations trusteeship with limits on Jewish immigration and a division of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab provinces but not states. The State Department, concerned about the possibility of an increasing Soviet role in the Arab world and the potential for restriction by Arab oil producing nations of oil supplies to the United States, advised against U.S. intervention on behalf of the Jews. Later, as the date for British departure from Palestine drew near, the Department of State grew concerned about the possibility of an all-out war in Palestine as Arab states threatened to attack almost as soon as the UN passed the partition resolution.

Despite growing conflict between Palestinian Arabs and Palestinian Jews and despite the Department of State’s endorsement of a trusteeship, Truman ultimately decided to recognize the state Israel.

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/creation-israel

“It is my responsibility to see that our policy in Israel fits in with our policy throughout the world; second, it is my desire to help build in Palestine a strong, prosperous, free and independent democratic state. It must be large enough, free enough, and strong enough to make its people self-supporting and secure,” President Truman said in a speech October 28, 1948.

Truman's commitment was quickly tested after Israel's victory in its War of Independence when she applied to the U.S. for economic aid to help absorb immigrants. President Truman responded by approving a $135 million Export-Import Bank loan and the sale of surplus commodities to Israel. In those early years of Israel's statehood (also today), U.S. aid was seen as a means of promoting peace.

In 1951, Congress voted to help Israel cope with the economic burdens imposed by the influx of Jewish refugees from the displaced persons camps in Europe and from the ghettos of the Arab countries. Arabs then complained the U.S. was neglecting them, though they had no interest in or use for American aid then. In 1951, Syria rejected offers of U.S. aid. Oil-rich Iraq and Saudi Arabia did not need U.S. economic assistance, and Jordan was, until the late 1950s, the ward of Great Britain. After 1957, when the United States assumed responsibility for supporting Jordan and resumed economic aid to Egypt, assistance to the Arab states soared. Also, the United States was by far the biggest contributor of aid to the Palestinians through UNRWA, a status that continues to the present.

U.S. economic grants to Israel ended in 1959. U.S. aid to Israel from then until 1985 consisted largely of loans, which Israel repaid, and surplus commodities, which Israel bought. Israel began buying arms from the United States in 1962, but did not receive any grant military assistance until after the 1973 Yom Kippur War. As a result, Israel had to go deeply into debt to finance its economic development and arms procurement. The decision to convert military aid to grants that year was based on the prevailing view in Congress that without a strong Israel, war in the Middle East was more likely, and that the U.S. would face higher direct expenditures in such an eventuality.

Israel has received more direct aid from the United States since World War II than any other country, but the amounts for the first half of this period were relatively small. Between 1949 and 1973, the U.S. provided Israel with an average of about $122 million a year, a total of $3.1 billion (and actually more than $1 billion of that was loans for military equipment in 1971-73) . Prior to 1971, Israel received a total of only $277 million in military aid, all in the form of loans as credit sales. The bulk of the economic aid was also lent to Israel. By comparison, the Arab states received nearly three times as much aid before 1971, $4.4 billion, or $170 million per year. Moreover, unlike Israel, which receives nearly all its aid from the United States, Arab nations have gotten assistance from Asia, Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union and the European Community. Congress first designated a specific amount of aid for Israel (an "earmark") in 1971.

Meeting Israel's Special Needs

Since 1974, Israel has received nearly $100 billion in assistance, including three special aid packages. The first followed the signing of the Israel-Egypt peace treaty and Israel's withdrawal from the Sinai. The redeployment of Israeli forces and rebuilding of air bases in the Negev cost $5 billion. To partially compensate for this sacrifice, Israel received $3 billion ($2.2 billion of which was in the form of high-interest loans) in U.S. aid in 1979.

The second special package was approved in 1985, following a severe economic crisis in Israel, which sent inflation rates soaring as high as 445 percent. The $1.5 billion in emergency assistance-disbursed in two installments, in 1985 and 1986-was provided as part of Israel's economic stabilization program, which was implemented under the guidance of the U.S.-Israel Joint Economic Development Group (JEDG).

An extraordinary package was approved in 1996 to help Israel fight terrorism. Israel is to receive a total of $100 million, divided equally between fiscal years 1996 and 1997.

Regular Economic and Military Assistance

Israel's economic aid changed from the Commodity Import Program (CIP), which provides funds to foreign nations for the purchase of U.S. commodities, to a direct cash transfer in 1979. In return, Israel provided the Agency for International Development with assurances that the dollar level of Israel's non-defense imports from the U.S. would exceed the level of economic assistance granted Israel in any given year. Thus, Israel guaranteed that U.S. suppliers would not be disadvantaged by the termination of Israel's CIP Program.

Starting with fiscal year 1987, Israel annually received $1.2 billion in all grant economic aid and $1.8 billion in all grant military assistance. In 1998, Israel offered to voluntarily reduce its dependence on U.S. economic aid. According to an agreement reached with the Clinton Administration and Congress, the $1.2 billion economic aid package will be reduced by $120 million each year so that it will be phased out in ten years. Half of the annual savings in economic assistance each year ($60 million) will be added to Israel's military aid package in recognition of its increased security needs. In 2005, Israel received $360 million in economic aid and $2.22 billion in military aid. In 2006, economic aid is scheduled to be reduced to $240 million and military aid will increase to $2.28 billion.

For several years, most of Israel's economic aid went to pay off old debts. In 1984, foreign aid legislation included the Cranston Amendment (named after its Senate sponsor), which said the U.S. would provide Israel with economic assistance "not less than" the amount Israel owes the United States in annual debt service payments. The Cranston Amendment was left out of the FY1999 and subsequent appropriations bills. At that time Israel received $1.2 billion in ESF and owed only $328 million in debt service so the amendment was no longer needed.

In 1998, Israel was designated as a “major non-NATO ally,” which allows it to receive outdated military equipment the U.S. military wishes to sell or give away.

Roughly 26 percent of what Israel receives in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) can be spent in Israel for military procurement. From FY1988 to FY 1990, Israel was allowed to use $400 million in Israel. From FY1991 to FY1998, the amount was increased to $475 million. As U.S. military aid to Israel increased, according to the agreement to cut economic aid, the amout set aside for defense purchases in Israel has increased (but the percentage has remained roughly the same). In 2009, the figure was $671 million. The remaining 74 percent of FMF was spent in the United States to generate profits and jobs. More than 1,000 companies in 47 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have signed contracts worth billions of dollars through this program.

At the end of 1998, Israel requested an additional $1.2 billion in aid to fund moving troops and military installations out of the occupied territories as called for in the October 23, 1998, Wye agreement. Israel received $600 million of this in military aid in FY1999 and $300 million in each fiscal year 2000 and 2001 (see Wye funding table).

In February 2003, for the first time, Congress voted to cut aid to Israel against the wishes of the pro-Israel lobby and the government of Israel. The 0.65 percent deduction was not aimed at Israel; however, it was an across the board cut of all foreign aid programs for fiscal year 2003. The lobby and government also suffered a defeat when Congress deleted an administration request for an extra $200 million to help Israel fight terrorism. Even while cutting aid to Israel (which still was budgeted at $2.1 billion for military aid and $600 million for economic assistance), Congress included a number of provisions in the aid bill viewed as favorable to Israel, including a provision that bars federal assistance to a future Palestinian state until the current Palestinian leadership is replaced, and that state demonstrates a commitment to peaceful coexistence with Israel, and takes measures to combat terrorism.

The setbacks were also temporary as the Administration approved a supplementary aid request in 2003 that included $1 billion in FMF and $9 billion in loan guarantees to aid Israel's economic recovery and compensate for the cost of military preparations associated with the war in Iraq. One quarter of the FMF is a cash grant and three quarters will be spent in the United States. The loan guarantees are spread over three years and must be spent within Israel's pre-June 1967 borders. Each year, an amount equal to the funds Israel spends on settlements in the territories will be deducted from the loan amount, along with all fees and subsidies.

Altogether, since 1949, Israel has received more than $106 billion in assistance. This includes the four special allocations, the $10 billion in loan guarantees (spread over five years) approved in 1992, the $9 billion in guarantees offered in 2003, and a variety of other smaller assistance-related accounts, such as refugee resettlement (nearly $1.6 billion overall since 1973), the American Schools and Hospitals Abroad Program (ASHA), which supports schools, libraries and medical centers that demonstrate American ideas and practices (($144 million), and cooperative development programs (a total of $186 million since 1981).

The total does not include funds for joint military projects like the Arrow missile (for which Israel has received more than $1 billion in grants since 1986), which are provided through the Defense budget. President Bush requested $60 million for the Arrow for FY2003 and $136 million in FY2004. The United States also has provided $53 million for the Boost Phase Intercept program and $139 million for the Tactical High Energy Laser program under development in Israel to complement the Arrow.

Though the totals are impressive, the value of assistance to Israel has been eroded by inflation. While aid levels remained constant in total dollars from 1987 until 1999, the real value steadily declined. On the other side of the coin, Israel does receive aid on more favorable terms than other nations. For example, all economic aid is given directly to the Israeli government rather than allocated under a specific program. Also, starting in 1982, Israel began to receive all its economic aid in a lump sum early in the fiscal year instead of in quarterly installments as is done for other countries. Israel also receives offsets on FMS purchases (U.S. contractors agree to offset some of the cost of military equipment by buying components or materials from Israel).

A 10-Year Military Aid Agreement

In August 2007, the Bush Administration agreed to increase U.S. military assistance to Israel by $6 billion over the following decade. Israel is to receive incremental annual increases of $150 mllion, starting at $2.55 billion in FY2009 and reaching $3.15 billion per year for FY2013-2018.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/history-and-overview-of-u-s-foreign-aid-to-israel

African Americans are still waiting for their 40 Acres and a Mule!!!

Having a national state is great as nation has some place to run for their live when next wave of elimination occupier in some country.
It already saved lives of hundreds of thousands Jews since Israel was established. Now the probability of new Holocaust is smaller as we do not need to rely on other countries to open the door. When 6 millions died not many countries did. To many people want us dead rather that alive.
Never heard about anybody want to eliminate African Americans in US or elsewhere. May be I am not educated in this too.
If AA want to have national state so make yourself a nation and demand for it. I would support it.
Every nation should have a chance of self-determination. But first the nation should exist.

You totally missed my point!!! The U.S. Government did a lot to help the Jews and the amount of money spent to help support Israel over all these years is massive and yet over that same period of time this country failed to help its African American citizens right here in this country. They owe substantially more of a debt to African Americans and I ask where is that help???

We don't need a separate nation!!! We helped BUILD this nation into what it is and yet at the same time the U.S. was reaching out to help the Jews establish Israel, they were kicking African Americans in the teeth!!! Do you not yet understand where we are coming from? My Grandfather took a bullet in WWII helping to liberate the Jews and he died never knowing freedom and fair treatment from his own country!!!

We already want over this once and you said that AA people do not need stuff...
So I am not sure how this owned debt should be repaid?

As far as US help to Israel American Jews paying substantially more taxes that US provided as help to Israel.
Plus Israel army is ready to support US interest in the region at any given time and Israel is hosting unlimited amount of US Navy and any other army units without asking for any compensation. If US will not help as a country American Jew will provide as much or more "stuff". And Israel will be glad to use it.
Even as Israel does not need this stuff any more also. It has one of largest per-capita incomes in the world and will only get more reach as a country by being one of the main high-tech hubs in the world.
I visited Israel 15 years back and you cannot recognize the county now. They did unbelievable jump in prosperity.
Despite war, terrorism, and almost all world trying to stump on them Israel rising even higher.
The country also became incredibly diverse - you can see people or every race, religion, all rainbow people leaving without fear and prejudice to each other.
A lot of Palestinian Arab youth start feeling Israel as their own country. It is unbelievable what prosperity and freedom can bring in such a short time.

All that Bragging on Israel you just did and you missed my point about my Grandfather fighting to defeat Hitler and getting shot in the process, but where was his help from the U.S. government??? The Jews got help for Israel at that same time in 1947 and thereafter but over that same time period AA's were still being LYNCHED! Do you not have even a sense of the INJUSTICE in that??? How can you not understand how AA's feel about such things?

No it's not about the STUFF but at the same time this country seemed to have plenty of money and support for every other group except AA's! Not only did they STEAL from us all the free labor that made this country and others wealthy but then REFUSED to make RIGHT THE WRONG!!! Giving recognition and aid to Israel back when they needed it most was huge for them. Why then could this country not have done something for its loyal African American citizens? Even former Nazis did better than my Grandfather who came back injured in the war. Even tho he was awarded the Bronze Star and a Purple Heart he was still just another NIGGER when he got back!!!

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/5/2017  8:16 AM
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/5/2017  9:02 AM
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/5/2017  4:54 PM
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/5/2017  5:43 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/5/2017  5:46 PM
Bernie: This guy is a "fraud"...

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/5/2017  7:48 PM
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/04/opinion/sunday/why-nobody-cares-the-president-is-lying.html?src=me

MILWAUKEE — If President Trump’s first tumultuous weeks have done nothing else, at least they have again made us a nation of readers.

As Americans grapple with the unreality of the new administration, George Orwell’s “1984” has enjoyed a resurgence of interest, becoming a surprise best seller and an invaluable guide to our post-factual world.

On his first full day in office Mr. Trump insisted that his inaugural crowd was the largest ever, a baseless boast that will likely set a pattern for his relationship both to the media and to the truth.

At an event marking Black History Month last week, the president took a detour from a discussion of Frederick Douglass — he described the abolitionist as “an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more” — to talk about the press. “A lot of the media is actually the opposition party — they’re so biased,” he said. “So much of the media is the opposition party and knowingly saying incorrect things.”

Mr. Trump understands that attacking the media is the reddest of meat for his base, which has been conditioned to reject reporting from news sites outside of the conservative media ecosystem.

For years, as a conservative radio talk show host, I played a role in that conditioning by hammering the mainstream media for its bias and double standards. But the price turned out to be far higher than I imagined. The cumulative effect of the attacks was to delegitimize those outlets and essentially destroy much of the right’s immunity to false information. We thought we were creating a savvier, more skeptical audience. Instead, we opened the door for President Trump, who found an audience that could be easily misled.

The news media’s spectacular failure to get the election right has made it only easier for many conservatives to ignore anything that happens outside the right’s bubble and for the Trump White House to fabricate facts with little fear of alienating its base.

Unfortunately, that also means that the more the fact-based media tries to debunk the president’s falsehoods, the further it will entrench the battle lines.

During his first week in office, Mr. Trump reiterated the unfounded charge that millions of people had voted illegally. When challenged on the evident falsehood, Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, seemed to argue that Mr. Trump’s belief that something was true qualified as evidence. The press secretary also declined to answer a straightforward question about the unemployment rate, suggesting that the number will henceforth be whatever the Trump administration wants it to be.

He can do this because members of the Trump administration feel confident that the alternative-reality media will provide air cover, even if they are caught fabricating facts or twisting words (like claiming that the “ban” on Muslim immigrants wasn’t really a “ban”). Indeed, they believe they have shifted the paradigm of media coverage, replacing the traditional media with their own.

In a stunning demonstration of the power and resiliency of our new post-factual political culture, Mr. Trump and his allies in the right media have already turned the term “fake news” against its critics, essentially draining it of any meaning. During the campaign, actual “fake news” — deliberate hoaxes — polluted political discourse and clogged social media timelines.

Some outlets opened the door, by helping spread conspiracy theories and indulging the paranoia of the fever swamps. For years, the widely read Drudge Report has linked to the bizarre conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who believes that both the attacks of Sept. 11 and the Sandy Hook shootings were government-inspired “false flag” operations.

For conservatives, this should have made it clear that something was badly amiss in their media ecosystem. But now any news deemed to be biased, annoying or negative can be labeled “fake news.” Erroneous reports that the bust of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had been removed from the Oval Office or misleading reports that sanctions against Russia had been lifted will be seized on by Mr. Trump’s White House to reinforce his indictment.

Even as he continues to attack the “dishonest media,” Mr. Trump and his allies are empowering this alt-reality media, providing White House access to Breitbart and other post-factual outlets that are already morphing into fierce defenders of the administration.

The relationship appears to be symbiotic, as Mr. Trump often seems to pick up on talking points from Fox News and has tweeted out links from websites notorious for their casual relationship to the truth, including sites like Gateway Pundit, a hoax-peddling site that announced, shortly after the inauguration, that it would have a White House correspondent.

By now, it ought to be evident that enemies are important to this administration, whether they are foreigners, refugees, international bankers or the press.

But discrediting independent sources of information also has two major advantages for Mr. Trump: It helps insulate him from criticism and it allows him to create his own narratives, metrics and “alternative facts.”

All administrations lie, but what we are seeing here is an attack on credibility itself.

The Russian dissident and chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov drew upon long familiarity with that process when he tweeted: “The point of modern propaganda isn’t only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate truth.”

Mr. Kasparov grasps that the real threat is not merely that a large number of Americans have become accustomed to rejecting factual information, or even that they have become habituated to believing hoaxes. The real danger is that, inundated with “alternative facts,” many voters will simply shrug, asking, “What is truth?” — and not wait for an answer.

In that world, the leader becomes the only reliable source of truth; a familiar phenomenon in an authoritarian state, but a radical departure from the norms of a democratic society. The battle over truth is now central to our politics.

This may explain one of the more revealing moments from after the election, when one of Mr. Trump’s campaign surrogates, Scottie Nell Hughes, was asked to defend the clearly false statement by Mr. Trump that millions of votes had been cast illegally. She answered by explaining that everybody now had their own way of interpreting whether a fact was true or not.

“There’s no such thing, unfortunately, anymore as facts,” she declared. Among “a large part of the population” what Mr. Trump said was the truth.

“When he says that millions of people illegally voted,” she said, his supporters believe him — and “people believe they have facts to back that up.”

Or as George Orwell said: “The very concept of objective truth is fading out of the world. Lies will pass into history.” But Ms. Hughes’s comment was perhaps unintentionally insightful. Mr. Trump and company seem to be betting that much of the electorate will not care if the president tells demonstrable lies, and will pick and choose whatever “alternative facts” confirm their views.

The next few years will be a test of that thesis.

In the meantime, we must recognize the magnitude of the challenge. If we want to restore respect for facts and break through the intellectual ghettos on both the right and left, the mainstream media will have to be aggressive without being hysterical and adversarial without being unduly oppositional.

Perhaps just as important, it will be incumbent on conservative media outlets to push back as well. Conservatism should be a reality-based philosophy, and the movement will be better off if it recognizes that facts really do matter. There may be short-term advantages to running headlines about millions of illegal immigrants voting or secret United Nations plots to steal your guns, but the longer the right enables such fabrications, the weaker it will be in the long run. As uncomfortable as it may be, it will fall to the conservative media to police its worst actors.

The conservative media ecosystem — like the rest of us — has to recognize how critical, but also how fragile, credibility is in the Orwellian age of Donald Trump.

i think when this administration lies, it shows how much respect he has for his followers.

when he said he can shoot someone and not lose a vote, he meant that his followers are brainwashed sheep and will abandon their moral compass b/c they are in the palm of his hand.

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/5/2017  8:01 PM
stole this from somebody that got it on facebook...

You voted for Trump because Clinton was going to be in Wall Street's pocket. Trump wants to repeal Dodd-Frank and eliminate the Fiduciary Rule, letting Wall Street return to its pre-2008 ways.

You voted for Trump because of Clinton's emails. The Trump administration is running its own private email server.

You voted for Trump because you thought the Clinton Foundation was "pay for play." Trump has refused to wall off his businesses from his administration, and personally profits from payments from foreign governments.

You voted for Trump because of Clinton's role in Benghazi. Trump ordered the Yemen raid without adequate intel, and tweeted about "FAKE NEWS" while Americans died as a result of his carelessness.

You voted for Trump because Clinton didn't care about "the little guy." Trump's cabinet is full of billionaires, and he took away your health insurance so he could give them a multi-million-dollar tax break.

You voted for Trump because he was going to build a wall and Mexico was going to pay for it. American consumers will pay for the wall via import tariffs.

You voted for Trump because Clinton was going to get us into a war. Trump has provoked our enemies, alienated our allies, and given ISIS a decade's worth of recruiting material.

You voted for Trump because Clinton didn't have the stamina to do the job. Trump hung up on the Australian Prime Minister during a 5pm phone call because "it was at the end of a long day and he was tired and fatigue was setting in."

You voted for Trump because foreign leaders wouldn't "respect" Clinton. Foreign leaders, both friendly and hostile, are openly mocking Trump.

You voted for Trump because Clinton lies and "he tells it like it is." Trump and his administration lie with a regularity and brazenness that can only be described as shocking.

Let's be honest about what really happened.

The reality is that you voted for Trump because you got conned. Trump is a grifter and the American people were the mark. Now that you know the score, quit insisting the con-man is on your side.

well damn...

crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/5/2017  8:49 PM
This article is excellent and contains multiple stunners, including:

1) Trump did not know the Muslim Ban EO contained a stipulation that Bannon would be on the National Security Council. Bannon slipped it in. Trump had no idea and was furious.

2) The cabinet members do not know how to turn on the lights in their offices at night.

There are more. Really worth reading what a **** show this is -

¿ △ ?
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/5/2017  9:50 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/6/2017  9:07 AM
crzymdups wrote:This article is excellent and contains multiple stunners, including:

1) Trump did not know the Muslim Ban EO contained a stipulation that Bannon would be on the National Security Council. Bannon slipped it in. Trump had no idea and was furious.

2) The cabinet members do not know how to turn on the lights in their offices at night.

There are more. Really worth reading what a **** show this is -

I kind of suspected it's a free for all in the White House as Trump really isn't a guy who is making sure small stuff is getting done..It's a bit insane the Bannon pencilled himself in on the NSC and the Chairman of the Joint Cheif of Staff is out..Everyone doing their power own grab within the White House..Crazy..

Kellyanne having the toughest week..She is a disaster..

OT: Politics Thread

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy