DLeethal wrote:martin wrote:DLeethal wrote:Team doesn't seem that much different than last year. Weak 3 point defense, questionable decision making, sporadic shooting, and can get lit up by anyone. I think the difference is this year we do have more firepower to win more shootouts. We will win 50+ games on talent alone and will have a shot against anybody in the East during the playoffs. But as of yet it does not seem like we made the leap to legit contender. We looked really good at full strength before the Brunson/OG injuries, albeit versus bad teams. So I'm not closing the book on this team finding its stride and looking like a contender at some point. But right now it just kind of feels like last year. A good, flawed, playoff team but not much more.
I'm still wait and see. They are missing a stronger PG play off bench but Deuce, Clarkson, Hart, Shamet have been decent in that absence. New'ish offense and really they need to start focusing on defense after Xmas timeline.
Indiana last year were below .500 until like nearly 40 games in. Heatles took a long while before they hit a stride.
Yeah I'm still waiting.
I'm with you on that. Offensive teams also turn it up on defense in the playoffs as well, we might be that kind of team (like Indy or Denver). We aren't really built for 82 game defense but we have pieces to be a playoff defense in shortened spans with more in-game strategy and management.
You know what, I think that describes the Knicks situation pretty well. Especially when you factor in Mitch and how he is being used and injury load managed.
Knicks long term, season long strategy should be to hone while varying the offense, cause that’ll always be their forefront strength of theirs especially with KAT and Brunson with shooters.
And then figure out enough defensive schemes and whatnot as it gets later into the season to **** with opposing teams scouting. And then let Mitch loose to **** it up ever more 🤯