Uptown wrote:foosballnick wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Philc1 wrote:I’ve been to many Knicks games both home and away. I’ve only booed them once in 2005 when Marbury and Cury got blown out at home by the netsMost Knicks fans don’t boo. The ones that do are either drunk and/or are Wall St douchebags paying $2,000 a ticket
BS, the teams gets booed when they struggle and are not playing hard
How do you determine if someone is playing hard or not?
- In Baseball NY Fans tend to boo if a guy tends to strike out several times in key moments - does that mean the player is not playing hard or just that the pitcher was better?
- In Football NY Fans tend to boo if a QB throws a key interception or is sacked multiple times for losses or if the play calling does not "go for it" in key situations such as on 4th down and a few yards - are the players not playing hard?
- In Basketball NY Fans tend boo when a player misses a number of shots or has bad turnovers and the team falls behind by a significant scoring gap. Does this really have anything to do with how hard a player is playing?
I tend to believe that fans who boo are (in general) either living/reacting solely in the moment for their own gratification or just not that knowledgeable about the up and down nature of sports performance/competition.
Randle's low energy and lack of effort on defense and sloppy turnovers have been discussed ad nauseum on social media, blogs, this forum and others. If we see it, so do the people in the blue seats. In fact, they see it up close and personal and see things that people who watch from home aint able to see when the camera is off. I am also sure a lot of the people who attend games are the same people who read and or have contributed their opinion of Randle's play in social media, the blogs and forums. I don't think there's much of a separation between two. At times, Randle looks like a guy that got the bag and took his foot off the gas....
My point is not that Randle is a perfect player who deserves fan adoration at every turn - he's certainly not. However, I'm not a big fan of fan booing for any reason except to the extent of dirty play.
IMO your ratio of rabid vs casual fans attending games is off. IMO a majority of fans are much more casual and bandwagon than hardened basketball junkies who post and scour the internet and blogs all day for tidbits on the Knicks. It's why the same crowd chants "MVP" and "Boos" Randle in the same game. Simple as if the team is winning and Randle is playing like the bag man......they are not booing him. If the team is losing by 20 - they are booing.
Further, I think we underestimate how much energy and effort it takes for a guy to be a focal point on offense and average 34 minutes a night. Perhaps some of this is on Thibs if Randle does not have enough energy to sustain the necessary defensive effort for those minutes. We saw this before with Melo and Randle is getting roughly the same treatment - as the best player, he is the focal point of fan adoration and/or ire....from chants of MVP to loud Boos. To me this represents fan emotion, not fan knowledgeablity.
Anecdotally.... I'm a 25 Year Giants Season Tix holder (I've also had select season tix plans for the Rangers and Yankees in the past). I've experienced Eli Manning being booed mercilessly for throwing an interception by the same fans who loudly celebrated when he threw a touchdown in the same game. Thing is, those fans never once bothered to check if the interception was the result of a missed assignment/pattern by the receiver. I'm sticking with fans who boo are generally doing itin the moment for purely impulsive and emotional reasons.