MS wrote:The trade was necessary to maximize value? Another ****ing joke.
We traded an all star that under 25 for a guy that won’t be in the league in two years and two late round firsts? One of the worst trades in nba history.
The timing of the trade not trading KP was the issue.
Phil Jackson had the timing right.
Then Mills went over his head and got him removed, because they thought KP was untouchable.
A year or so later, they realize they should trade him. Only now post ACL he has a lot less value, and then you also have him not playing and showing he is healthy. Top it off he is in a contract year, meaning he could choose not to sign with the new team that wants to trade for him. Getting assets at that time would be tough.
What Knicks needed to do is either trade Porzingis when Uncle Phil wanted to, or sign him to an extension, build his value up as a 25 points a night star on a bad team, and then off load him this summer. There is no way in hell Porzingis is passing up 150 million dollars with his injury history. The dumb move was not trading KP. It was the timing of the KP trade. Knicks could have had two lottery picks and a starter in 2017. They wound up with 2 low first round picks. Give him the extension and then build his value back up, which he easily does as the first option on a bad team. He would get you quality assets back.
Instead you neither land Durant or a major free agent. You do not get a quality asset or assets for KP. You do not even end up being bad enough to draft 1-2 in the lottery without KP. This entire thing is a disaster.
Mills is out of a job for a reason.