tkf wrote:mreinman wrote:tkf wrote:mreinman wrote:tkf wrote:mreinman wrote:dwiley20 wrote:awwffulll....Melo you are not that hurt
How do you know this? Did you examine him?
well he has been awful... so either he is that hurt or he has flat out sucked.... which is it?
I don't know, do you?
What I think was that he was hurt but if thats the case, he should not be taking 17 shots.
I will not use fuzzy logic to conclude anything.
well try using some logic at all..
carmelo has been pretty bad of late... so either he is just flat out sucking... or maybe he is hurt to the point he should not be on the court... I don't think he is hurt that bad... I have other thoughts... but asking a poster if he examined carmelo is a bit ridiculous, especially if you don't feel these performances are typical of the kind of play he has been giving the knicks... the poster obviously feels something is wrong, and just sucking isn't one of them.. the possibility of him being "that hurt" is somewhat real...
I tried using logic with you a number of times but with you I am knocking on a rock.
team wins, player x is on the team and their best player (supposedly - facts/stats not included or deprecated ones), therefore, player x is better than player y who is the best player on his team that has not won.
Fuzzy logic.
I am no carmelo fan but I like to be open minded about him too instead of being blinded by a vendetta.
Post some numbers sometimes. Do some research and come up with some interesting insights. Don't just blab all the time - its a bit old and quite boring.
I think that Melo is gone next year but it would be funny if Jax gave him a stupid contract just to see you guys bitch and moan (NOT REALLY).
you keep defending yourself saying you are not a carmelo fan.. truth be told, you are a homer, trying to hide behind the " I am not a carmelo fan" talk.. Your post show otherwise...
I tried using logic with you a number of times but with you I am knocking on a rock.
dude I pegged you from the start as a double talking snake oil salesman.. and you have lived up to it....
you are not being open minded at all.. the poster asked if carmelo was that injured as to his terrible play.. you made it seem as if he was crazy for even hinting at it.. by asking him the silly and condescending question " did you examine him".. so I ask you... a simple question... is carmelo this bad or maybe he is really hurt? you said you don't know? well I will rephrase it.. do you think he is that hurt or do you think he really is this bad? either way you look foolish trying to take a piss on that posters comment..... It is not like the carmelo shoulder injury hasn't been documented... AGAIN.....
AGAIN - I will end up embarrassing you as usual.
The poster said "Melo, you are NOT that hurt" (TKF, Did you comprehend this statement?)
I said "how do you know? Did you examine him"?
Did you even look at this? Read? Comprehend? Anything? Or did your Hypersensitivity and low self esteem just trigger an(other) ooopsy episode? Do you just sh1t some sh1t just to sh1t Melo sh1t?
Only a dope comes at a guy who may be hurt and pick on a couple of games since the supposed/reported injury instead of looking at his overall season and responsibilities. But you are what you are.
He had a very efficient year carrying a pile of sh1t but as you have shown with your simplistic comments that you don't know or follow or understand efficiency so again I knock on your rock.
If you FOCUS and follow my comments and critiques of a said player, you would see and perhaps (though not likely) comprehend what it means to be open minded and balanced.
"Is carmelo this bad or is he hurt"?
Is this a real question or part of your fuzzy reasoning? The question in itself makes no sense however I will not even try to explain why because it is pointless to give an explanation to one who does not have the ability to comprehend as it would be to have a puppet show for blind people.
Like before, let me know how I can help because I have a flaw in me then does not let me give up on people. Its the Charlie Brown in me.
so here is what phil is thinking ....