|
Knixkik
Posts: 35476
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
|
tkf wrote:Knixkik wrote:tkf wrote:Knixkik wrote:tkf wrote:fishmike wrote:tkf wrote:Knixkik wrote:tkf wrote:Knixkik wrote:tkf wrote:Knixkik wrote:tkf wrote:Knixkik wrote:tkf wrote:MSG3 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Yeah, it's only been 3+ years of disappointment in this era Is every yr without a title a disappointment? We won 54 games last year. 2 games from the ECF. Bad ending, but a fun year. for what we gave up and the price we paid.. yea, we should expect a heck of a lot more.. A 2nd round exit is disappointing yet a first round exit would have been great under the gallo led Knicks because of the perceived upside. That's the mentality for some. it is a process, something you don't understand.. what good is a second round exit if that is pretty much your ceiling? that knick team had a potentially higher ceiling.. and it seems as if you and others can't move along without mentioning gallo, but get upset when I do... and for the record, it would have been the amare led knicks.. heck for all we know it could have been the CP3 led knicks.. but we will never know that now will we? enjoy carmelo and this 3-6 record and the toxic environment led by bustmelo and " I want to test free agency after wrecking this team to get here" drama... have fun.. LOL Amare is not capable of leading a team. We have seen what CP3, Harden, and Dwight got for return packages. Stop acting like we had a chance at those guys. You don't like Melo, but you are barking up the wrong tree. If you really wanted to rebuild properly, you would be arguing that trading resources to clear max cap space for 2 free agents was the wrong move. We misfired on the 2009 draft then traded it to unload players. Then only used that space on 1 max player. Today, we have zero production to show for that 2010 free agent period, while letting go of Lee who has been playing at an all-star level ever since. Melo was the icing on the cake, but far from the problem. If anything, he has helped to offset the main problem this team has. He was able to make a potentially tragic situation (after seeing what Amare is now) and still keep us competitive and moderately successful. Did we have an outside chance of landing another top player if we continued the "process", i don't know maybe, but it was a long shot if you are realistic about it. What you seem to miss is the most likely scenario was we resigned Gallo, W Chandler, still had all this money tied up with amare with no one to offset that, and used any and all resources to land a miscast like Monta Ellis, Rudy Gay, or OJ Mayo. You tend to see things as "the grass is always greener" but for once take a step back, let go of the Melo bias, look at how this organization functions, and understand where we would really be right now if we didn't complete that trade for Melo. Not what you would have done, but what this franchise would have done had they not traded for Melo. If you honestly think that is a better situation with better upside, then there is no hope for you. You think Melo wrecked this team to get here. He didn't make the trade. The real wrecking was the Knicks making the moves they made and misfiring on a plan far before that trade was ever thought up. first of all, the knicks were a more exciting team with amare and the kids... period!! Next, I was not for getting two free agents.. i was for getting LEBRON!! Big difference. I never was for this two max cats crap.... And you can't sit here and say we had no chance at Harden, or Paul.. really? we had no chance at them? I bet anything we would have probably gotten one of them or howard, especially with the picks, players and cap space we were sitting on... and at worse, we don't get them and still have, playes, picks and cap space.. sounds like a win-win to me.. Today, we have zero production to show for that 2010 free agent period, while letting go of Lee who has been playing at an all-star level ever since. Melo was the icing on the cake, but far from the problem. I am not putting this on amare.. I think we should not have given him an non-guaranteed deal for that many years, but no one expected his knees to give out this soon. I miss david lee and wish we had kept him.. but lee had his flaws defensively and I thought we could have used that money in other areas.. in the end. we could have amnestied amare, but instead we wasted that on billups, which was part of the dreaded carmelo trade.. carmelo wasn't icing on the cake, he was the shyt that hit the fan....
What you seem to miss is the most likely scenario was we resigned Gallo, W Chandler, still had all this money tied up with amare with no one to offset that, and used any and all resources to land a miscast like Monta Ellis, Rudy Gay, or OJ Mayo. Oh, so that was the most likely scenario? ok, I would take a resinged gallo and chandler, and still had moz, felton would have been off the books, and we still would have had our picks.. and honestly we didn't have to resign either one of chandler or gallo.. we had plenty of options. i love how you present the worst case scenario, but even then, we would still be better off than we are now..I would take OJ mayo who is far from a miscast.. you paint this picture as if our only hope was to do this ass backwards trade.... it is like telling your girlfriend to marry you, although you are lazy, with no job and you are a cheater.... because the other options is that she can marry a ax murderer with 10 baby mommas.. LOL.. The knicks were not a sign carmelo or be in bad shape situation.. dude I am going to just say this loud and clear.. CAMRELO IS A CLOWN... a franchise cancer, a overpaid one dimensional chucker... all of this he needs a running mate, he has no helo is utter bullcrap.... the knicks made a huge mistake with this trade, like they did getting bargnani, resigning JR smith and his brother, adding kenyon martin, letting lin go for nothing after he fell in our laps.... and the list goes on and one.. your defense of carmelo is becoming criminal.....it is so bad... All of this talk, yet no sustainable proof to back it up. No indication the Knicks team before Melo was ever going to be more than a 1st round team, never going to win 54 games or win the atlantic. On top of that, if you honestly look at the trades for Dwight, Harden, and Paul and honestly think we could have beat those packages, you are more mistaken and delusional than you seem. Your judgment has nothing to do with this team, it is all about any option is better than Melo, because you hate him so much. It severly clouds your judgment and makes you seem unreasonable. But the grass is always greener, we could traded for any other available star and outbid every other NBA team, with zero guaranteed lotto picks (such as in the Harden trade), zero projected stars (such as Gordon in the CP3 trade), etc smh. Keep living in your world.
Ah, let me see... the rockets traded kevin martin, lamb and two first roudn picks for harden..
knicks traded gallo, chandler, moz, felton, cap space from curry, two first round picks, two second round picks, anthony randolph... ah.. HELL yea we could have beat that deal, are you kidding me????? jeezus christ!!! dude!!! rofl.. [ Dude, i don't even know where to start. OKC got a guarenteed lottery pick. They got Lamb, who will be on a rookie contract for a long time. They let go of Martin because they aren't in position to pay him. Now listen carefully, they would have zero interest in Gallo and Chandler because of their contract situtions. Let that sink in. OKC would have zero use for our package of players. They want players on rookie contracts for the longest, and draft picks that are the highest. They don't want players who are due to get paid after a season. We could not beat Houston in either of those areas. You thinking we can outbid them considering those factors is laughable. so now you are speaking of what okc would have wanted? OKC could have asked us for curry's expiring contract and shipped us more dead weight, we were willing to take some on obviously... and they are not losing harden to get a rookie deal just to let him go.. they wanted talent in return, just not at hardens salary, gallo and chandler fill that, plus moz would have been a bonus on that team.. I am sorry, but you don't seem to grasp what OKC wanted.. they want a talent off the bench, they wanted to keep kevin martin, they didn't have to keep chandler, they could have kept gallo, and moz, they wanted a big to play with ibaka, and from what I read would have dealt perkins to save money... again, there was so much room for these teams to make a deal....there is no way in the world you are going to tell me that OKC would not like having a player like gallo off their bench instead of lamb right now.. LOL.. come on man... in the end, had the knicks done nothing.. AGAIN.. we would be no worse than 3-6, but would still have cap space and picks... and what the hell, maybe amare gets hurt and we are in the lottery this year.. like we may be anyway.. but instead we have a real shot at a top tier player... see how that works out.. so OKC would pay $16mm for Gallo and Mosgov but not the same for Harden? Talk about spewing garbage. Just cause you made it up doesnt make it true lol nah, you miss the point, I said they could offset that with moving perkins....and moz was not under the deal he is right now.. OKC was considering moving perkins, but they didn't have a lot of bigs.. perk makes 8 mil. .bring in moz to play those minutes and they save money.... did you even follow that situation fish? I know you are jumping in late, but you may want to hold that "lol" OKC was open to moving a number of pieces... especially perkins...Houston didn't want any parts of that.. the knicks we know love taking on garbage deals... plus the knicks could have used perkins honestly... either way they get their man... but this is just one of many scenarios... maybe they just ask for gallo and all the picks we traded... maybe you need to do some research on what happened.... OKC has been unable to trade Perkins. You have looked at the entire scenario upside down. Consider OKC letting go of Martin, they had no interest in anyone about to get paid. If they wanted to spend 10+ mil they would have resigned Harden. Consider Denver only accepted our deal because he refused to go to Brooklyn. You are fighting a losing battle with this one and make no sense... of course they have, because they haven't dealt with the knicks.. if the knicks wanted harden that bad, they would take on perkins, look at our history.. again you are ignoring HISTORY.. history dicatates knicks would have taken on perkins.. heck we took on billups.. 10+ mil is not the same as 14 mil which would put them over the luxury tax... Consider Denver only accepted our deal because he refused to go to Brooklyn. You are fighting a losing battle with this one and make no sense... think that if you want.. denver considered our deal becasue they were able to rape us in this deal.. believe me, if the deal was just chandler and curry's expiring deal, denver would not have done it...
if you believe that they would have, then you don't know anything about their GM.. they did it because they suckered dolan into giving up waaaaay too much.. the proof is in the pudding... we suck...we have no assets, and we are a mess... that is the bottom line.. the only one making no sense is you.. I asked you, how are we better now, than if we not had made the trade.. your only answer has been to tell me what other teams would have done, which is contrary to what they did, and that we had no other choice but to make this trade.. LOL.. you are not built for this bro.. Yes we are better now. 54-28 Atlantic Division title, 2nd round playoffs. A tiny sample size of 3-6 during an 82-game season does not override that. So there you go, that settles that. And since you clearly need a friendly reminder, here.... Carmelo Anthony Trade To New Jersey Nets Reportedly Approved By Both Teams; Melo Still Must Agree
According to reports on Friday, the Denver Nuggets and New Jersey Nets have tentatively agreed to a deal involving Carmelo Anthony. At this point, the only thing holding up the trade is Melo's willingness to sign a contract extension in New Jersey.
The Bergen Record cites multiple anonymous NBA sources in reporting that the two teams have both accepted to the terms of a trade that would send Anthony, Chauncey Billups, Sheldon Williams, Melvin Ely and Renaldo Balkman to New Jersey in exchange for Devin Harris, Derrick Favors, Troy Murphy, Ben Uzoh and four first-round picks. The Nets, however, will only execute the trade if Anthony agrees to sign a long-term extension with the Nets, something he has not yet expressed willingness to do. Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo Sports reported on Thursday that Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov has scheduled a meeting with Anthony in Los Angeles this All-Star weekend, presumably to sell the all-star forward on the idea of playing in New Jersey. On Friday, Anthony told the AP that reports of a meeting between he and Nets leadership were "news to him." In January, Prokhorov pulled the plug on a similar trade, telling the press that negotiations has worn on too long, and were taking a toll on the team. The Nuggets and Nets have been in talks over Anthony on-and-off since the summer, when Anthony declined a 3-year, $65 million extension with Denver. The Record also reported that the Nuggets would look to package Murphy and a draft pick in a deal with another team. --------------------------------------------- 4 FIRST ROUND PICKS, FOUR!!!. And #3 pick Favors. Dude look at that package, we were not competing with that lol. Are you crazy? Get over it, you are wrong!!! Treat this as an eye-opener for you, that was the going rate for Carmelo's services. 4 first round draft picks and one of the top picks from the most recent draft, who many viewed as having DPOY and all-star potential. LMAO I knew you would completely avoid this. Better off leaving it alone. |
11/19/2013 11:18 PM
