[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Schump is gone (Knicks-Nuggs talking Shumpert/Faried swap)
Author Thread
Knixkik
Posts: 35476
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
11/14/2013  2:57 PM
fishmike wrote:
nycisgreat wrote:
fishmike wrote:Faried is a good player especially with small line ups because he's a dominating rebounder. Limited offensive game. At least he's young and we arent trading Shump for a guy about to be 40.

This probably helps us, but makes us even more married to JR.

Straight up trade between the two teams make no sense for the Knicks.

makes perfect sense. Knicks dont have a real PF on the roster. They have broken old guys. Shump is not a 3, he's a 2. We are commited to JR Smith there. Fills big need for both teams. Knicks would be a much better team with Faried starting at PF and Melo at the 3

How much sense does faried really make when chandler comes back? Seems like you either commit to Melo at the 4 or start bargnani with Melo at the 3.

AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
11/14/2013  3:05 PM
Vmart wrote:
tkf wrote:
Nalod wrote:Knuggs not interested.

as I said before, they would want more than just shumpert.. faried is the better player at this point..

This has nothing to do with who is better Denver knows that they can fleece the Knicks. They have done it before so they know.

WELL, that too.....

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
alexs
Posts: 20143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2007
Member: #1262
Kenya
11/14/2013  5:09 PM
jrodmc wrote:
JohnStarksFan wrote:Yo alexs, can you change the name of this thread man. It is not imminent that Shump is gone and it's killing my vibe.

Don't think you can edit thread titles, can you?

Martin or someone edited the title, orginally it just said "Shump is gone".. That was probably a bit premature but after 140 replies it is clear that it was something worth bringing up. Especially as it is a real possibility

jskinny35
Posts: 21585
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
11/14/2013  5:44 PM
Given that most of the board likes Shump and also Faried - is there another way to get Faried without giving up Shump? I personally can't understand how JR is valued more then Shump - especially when age, salaries and consistency are taken into account? These might not be realistic, but are the closest I could dream up...

Hardaway Jr, future 2nd and Beno for Faried and Q.Miller

Metta, Hardaway Jr, future 2nd and JR Smith for W.Chandler and Faried

Felton, Hardaway Jr, future 2nd and Beno for Faried and A.Miller

meloanyk
Posts: 20768
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/5/2013
Member: #5615

11/14/2013  11:06 PM
Smith is a needed second scorer
JohnStarksFan
Posts: 20550
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/4/2012
Member: #4220

11/15/2013  7:58 AM
Shump catches heat for not being a reliable scorer, and his point average is low. Anyone else realize this could be mostly due to the fact that there are zero plays run for him. His points only come off turnovers, the occasional fast break, and second chances. Every possession his job is to run to the corner and is stuck watching other guys dribble around. I'm surprised they don't have him running around, causing screens and freeing himself up for more looks.
Schump is gone (Knicks-Nuggs talking Shumpert/Faried swap)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy