dk7th wrote:holfresh wrote:dk7th wrote:holfresh wrote:dk7th wrote:holfresh wrote:dk7th wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Nalod wrote:Melo looked in pain.The team crumbled last year in the playoffs, literally.
Im sure most of us thought the depth we have would have sustained us. It did not.
Melo was still our best option and as long as he was able, willing and effective we'd go to him.
There was little choices to adjust mid series. Amare was not nearly "back" enough to warrant minutes and touches and JR is not where you want to go unless he is hot.
Melo is a big strong kid who gave it his best under the conditions.
Was it enough? No. Fault? Blame? Lets be fair, as a TEAM were did not match up well with Indy and we were not healthy enough to sustain.
You can be the best option and take closer to 16 shots and get 4 to 5 assists though. He's the best option to create offense - for both himself and others. (Or at least it should have been for both.)
bonn he is not capable of doing either well enough to form a contender around. and he is turning 29 in a few days.
dolan really really blew it
You are worried about Melo's age and u were an advocate of building around Amare???
no i am laughing at you for thinking that by dolan and isaiah wanting to bring melo here at all costs that we would be a great team instead of what i and others saw from the get-go as an underachieving mishmash.
So you felt that building around Amare was the better option???
yes, if by that you mean wait for the right player and that means a complete player and if stat is the middle of it that means a true point guard not some scrubby tweener who needs a kidd or a prigioni to be out there with him. lin fell into our laps but was sent packing because dolan's skin is too thin and his pockets are not deep when he gets shown up by a superior basketball guy. lin is a better orchestrator than felton, and would have allowed shumpert to be in the backcourt.
i am not saying things would have broken our way just like this, but a team of shumpert, lin, gallinari, mozgov, fields, and stoudemire would have been promising, entertaining-- and young.
So the fact that Amare hasn't played consistent basketball in two years hasn't detered your point of view??..By the way. winning basketball is entertaining...This is a lottery team which may be just your plan...
i didn't suffer through two solid years of roster flush to watch half of one season, where-- by the way-- the knicks would have achieved a 7th or 8th seed, only to have an overrated non-franchise type player brought in and yank the team off of its rails. you may not have the patience for a genuine rebuild but there are a significant number of fans who were primed for just that.
you're an addict and the substance you abuse is zekadolanomelophyl, formerly known as zekadolanomarburol.
zdm's main effect is it gives you the feeling of hope and relevance for 6 months and it causes hallucination where you see a fool's gold player as a franchise legend. when you come out of your stupor you say "hey it was fun while it lasted" and start scheming around july to score your next fix.
yes amare was going to eventually break down and i was fine with that. had he had a genuine point guard to finish on pick and rolls with it would have preserved his body but that's why walsh signed felton to an audition contract of two years on the cheap. stat's half a season of hero ball was sad, what with his bulling into 2 or 3 defenders over and over again, never finding the open man. gee where have i seen that before? oh yeah carmelo anthony did the same exact thing.
i waited for two years just to get to a zero point from which to have a fresh start. this after ten years of horror. i was willing to give walsh another two or three years trying to build a team that i would be proud of, that i would enjoy watching, and who i would find it easy to root for.
and gallinari is by no means an "average player." in fact for the effect he has on the game he is a bargain. the nuggets struggled without him both in the regular season and in the playoffs. he has a positive net effect on both sides of the ball, which is actually quite rare.
that you can't appreciate gallinari's value is a shame. below is an article that is a real eye-opener about him.
http://www.denverstiffs.com/2013/1/12/3866818/inside-the-numbers-danilo-gallinari-denver-nuggets
Cool. I will be sure to watch him when he comes back in 2014-2015. Here is another interesting article. It was written prior to his current season ending injury.
http://www.roundballminingcompany.com/2012/08/16/danilo-gallinari-back-on-the-court-for-italy-injury-prone/