BlueSeats wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:They are well coached.

Really? There was a rare P&R or fed cutter, but mostly they were all one-on-one and didn't do much of a job of protecting the paint or perimeter. I was not impressed.

Their D was very good. Not sure about the O.

BlueSeats wrote:

nixluva wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:They are well coached.

Really? There was a rare P&R or fed cutter, but mostly they were all one-on-one and didn't do much of a job of protecting the paint or perimeter. I was not impressed.

There's no comparison between Mike's offensive coaching and LB. LB has never been a great offensive coach. As we know he wins with a slow pace and defense. Thing is if he doesn't have smart and talented defenders it just doesn't work as well.

Gerald Wallace also seems to be in a slump. But they just looked out of sync both games. Low intensity.

2 game slump. we'll just call it Knicks D!

martin wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:

nixluva wrote:

BlueSeats wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:They are well coached.

Really? There was a rare P&R or fed cutter, but mostly they were all one-on-one and didn't do much of a job of protecting the paint or perimeter. I was not impressed.

There's no comparison between Mike's offensive coaching and LB. LB has never been a great offensive coach. As we know he wins with a slow pace and defense. Thing is if he doesn't have smart and talented defenders it just doesn't work as well.

Gerald Wallace also seems to be in a slump. But they just looked out of sync both games. Low intensity.

2 game slump. we'll just call it Knicks D!

Yeah it seemed to me that we took them out of their comfort zone. Our D is better cuz we have guys that can match up with their guys. We have size and athletic ability on the perimeter and it causes problems for teams. Chan, Fields and Gallo are all guys with good size and mobility. That allow us to match up really well. I mean a perimeter with guys that are strong, long and agile helps a lot. We go 6-7, 6-8 and 6-10. That's not easy to shoot over.