[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Game Thread: New York Knicks vs. Portland Trailblazers - Saturday, October 30, 2010 - 7:30 PM EST
Author Thread
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
10/30/2010  11:45 PM
eViL wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:No.

Don't give me that BS.

Team sucks, end of story.

I'll wait till they prove me otherwise.

k bro. let's hope they prove you wrong.

Hanging my ass...Prediction: 4-14 to start the season.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
AUTOADVERT
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
10/30/2010  11:47 PM
oohah wrote:
Vmart wrote:Spacing is a factor and having options when running a pick and roll is a must. You run the pick and roll with a couple of plan just in case the play isn't executed to perfection and spacing is poor or defense has covered it. That is what makes Nash so good with Pick and roll, he could possibly run two or more plays because he was so creative and it keeps defenses off balance. Right now Felton is running the Pick and roll to run the pick and roll and the defense pretty much figured out that he is running the pick and roll and only the pick and roll. Its as though he has tunnel vision.

Vmart, I do understand that the Pick & Roll has to be run "properly", but every point guard (Every player really) in the NBA should be able to run a pick & roll properly.

This is simply further proof of the erosion of fundamentals in the NBA today: That it is special that a point guard is good at the pick and roll, and that starting level point guards need extended periods of time to figure out the different options to be effective running the pick and roll.

In Steve Nash's case, he was more dangerous in the Pick and Roll situation because of his shooting, which makes sense, but the Pick and roll really isn't a "creative" play. The big man rolls, and you bounce it to him, throw it over the top, or in rare cases, shovel pass. If the play is covered by the defense, you simply reset, shoot, or throw it to another player who is in better position because the defense is trying to defend against the roll or closing out on you as the passer.

oohah

I'm watching the game and all I see is Amare getting the ball some 10-15 feet from the basket. There is something really wrong with Felton's ability to execute the pick and roll. I feel that the spacing is poor and the timing isn't there. Also I don't think tonight the blazers were fearing the Knicks outside shooting, hence the poor spacing. Amare is being doubled and tripled. If the Knicks brass doesn't get him help I feel that they may just pull a Ewing on him.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/30/2010  11:49 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:Good game? This is the same old franchise. Same old **** except they have some guys who block shots now. There is no difference in play. There is no offensive system whatseover. This team is not good and will continue to lose games if they play offense like they did today - particularly in the last five minutes of the fourth quarter.

I was there in section 225. I had a close centercourt seat to the live action and saw it all. I've been there in the past too. Today didn't seem different to me. Didn't seem like D'Antoni has any idea how to call plays for the team. Really getting tired of him and his damn accent and nonchalant approach to games. I am close to my limit with this coach.

What else is there to say? This is not a playoff team. Insult me and say I'm jumping the gun after 3 games. Right now this is not a playoff team. I know hat I've been seeing the past 2 games and what I saw tonight. I didn't see a playoff team.

I am sick and tired of the Knicks. I am sicked and tired of losing. I am sick and tired of the Knicks losing.

There are no more moral victories for me. We should've won that game. We didn't. That ****ing sucked.


I think the team has improved because they have an intense, fierce leader in Amare and a healthy, young but experienced Chandler. There is a team leader and leadership among the players. Coaching is what is lacking. D'Antoni's unstructured run and gun offense to make opponents adjust to his team is a convenient way to not practice plays while calling it a system. This team needs to have some set plays for coming out of time outs and the end of games. They need to practice these plays and be confident that they can execute them. The lack of coaching has been evident for two years. Now the talent excuse can no longer be used. I still cannot believe that die hard fans excuse a coaches lack of success because his players cannot play the style he wants to play and yet that has been the mantra by many for 164 games of misery, and drama. Coaches are supposed to work with what they have. Now the team doesn't have the right point guard again. The Knicks went to the finals with Charlie Ward and Chris Childs as their points.
D'Antoni needs to have his team practice some plays for coming out of time outs and he needs to watch game films of other teams to adjust his defense, not just films of his team to adjust and perfect their offense. He would really benefit from coaching with an older, former head coach instead of his brother, Weber and Herb. He is never going to hear a voice other than his own so there is no global approach to the game and the teams faults and strengths will never change.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/30/2010  11:51 PM
Markji wrote:I like the way the team has been playing. Tonite we collapsed at the end. But defensively, we played hard and well the entire game. Everyone missed their shot at the end including Turiaf who missed a shot and then missed 2 foul shots. Also, Portland was getting the bounces on their shots.

Rotation: MDA has changed his style. In all 3 games he has played a 10 man rotation instead of just 7 or 8 man. Mason has been terrible and Gallinari isn't at full strength. But 10 man rotation. I think this is a good way to go. 9 or 10 men/game. When AR and Gallo recover, we will be very strong.

They played hard defensively, at least most of the players but they didn't play well. Portland kept abusing the Knicks with simple back door plays and the Knicks did nothing to counter it. That's the coaches fault.

If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
10/30/2010  11:52 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:Good game? This is the same old franchise. Same old **** except they have some guys who block shots now. There is no difference in play. There is no offensive system whatseover. This team is not good and will continue to lose games if they play offense like they did today - particularly in the last five minutes of the fourth quarter.

I was there in section 225. I had a close centercourt seat to the live action and saw it all. I've been there in the past too. Today didn't seem different to me. Didn't seem like D'Antoni has any idea how to call plays for the team. Really getting tired of him and his damn accent and nonchalant approach to games. I am close to my limit with this coach.

What else is there to say? This is not a playoff team. Insult me and say I'm jumping the gun after 3 games. Right now this is not a playoff team. I know hat I've been seeing the past 2 games and what I saw tonight. I didn't see a playoff team.

I am sick and tired of the Knicks. I am sicked and tired of losing. I am sick and tired of the Knicks losing.

There are no more moral victories for me. We should've won that game. We didn't. That ****ing sucked.

What do you expect? Look who Amare is surrounded by. Obviously Amare needs CONSISTENT help. Hopefully that help is Carmelo Anthony.

In the mean time Im happy with not getting blown out.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/31/2010  12:31 AM
Crushalot and Childs2Dudley I think you guys need to keep in mind the fact that this is early in the season and this is a completely new team. You both talk as if this is a finished product that should be running perfectly right now, including the coach. The players are trying to learn each other and the coach's system. The coach is trying to learn his players and set rotations. Overall MOST of the things we need to happen are happening, but you can't expect perfection at this point.

Given that there are still lapses on D, there are MORE good and consistent defensive plays than bad. You can't try to make it seem like any good that the team is doing has nothing to do with Mike and all the bad is directly associated with his poor coaching. This team looks remarkably good early on and that's a testament to Mike getting these guys prepared. Answer me this, based on how the team looked in preseason did any of you expect them to look this good and competitive against 2 of the better teams in the league right off the bat? The Blazers aren't scrubs they're a very good team that is undefeated so far. The Celts we know how good they are.

Childs2Dudley you can't say this is the same ole team and that we suck when you know we would've been blown out in both games last year!!! We actually should've won this game and the reasons we lost are correctable. Try to be a bit more reasonable in your assessment of the team so you don't lose all credibility.

Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

10/31/2010  12:40 AM
nixluva wrote:
ramtour420 wrote:Felton needs to learn to look to dish even after commiting to driving it to the hole, Amare is still a much better finisher in the paint. It was hard to tell at which point exactly Amare became open on that last play of ours, down by 1, single posession game. The play where he cut into paint like a razor, only to be met by both aldridge and camby at the hoop. Thats when Amare became open. Once he starts passing it off to him, and others, in situations like that- he'll be an all-star. Think of it as a pick-and-roll that ends up with Felton penetrating until double team comes, then he'd be dishing it off to an open man in the paint. I really hope that last possesion for the win will get dissected and our pick and roll attack will get better.

EXCELLENT POST!!! This is what i've been saying. If you watch the plays, they would be successful if the PG would draw the defender and kick, but Felton didn't do that. He had Amar'e right there and didn't drop it off to him for the finish. Man until our PG's get better and recognizing when to hit Amar'e they're just wasting his ability to finish.

Papabear Says

This game wasn't lost because of the Pick and roll. It was lost because the other team had easy shots and we didn't defend the long 3 point ball.

Papabear
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
10/31/2010  12:42 AM
scks!
RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/31/2010  1:09 AM
nixluva wrote:Crushalot and Childs2Dudley I think you guys need to keep in mind the fact that this is early in the season and this is a completely new team. You both talk as if this is a finished product that should be running perfectly right now, including the coach. The players are trying to learn each other and the coach's system. The coach is trying to learn his players and set rotations. Overall MOST of the things we need to happen are happening, but you can't expect perfection at this point.

Given that there are still lapses on D, there are MORE good and consistent defensive plays than bad. You can't try to make it seem like any good that the team is doing has nothing to do with Mike and all the bad is directly associated with his poor coaching. This team looks remarkably good early on and that's a testament to Mike getting these guys prepared. Answer me this, based on how the team looked in preseason did any of you expect them to look this good and competitive against 2 of the better teams in the league right off the bat? The Blazers aren't scrubs they're a very good team that is undefeated so far. The Celts we know how good they are.

Childs2Dudley you can't say this is the same ole team and that we suck when you know we would've been blown out in both games last year!!! We actually should've won this game and the reasons we lost are correctable. Try to be a bit more reasonable in your assessment of the team so you don't lose all credibility.


I am not sure if you are reading what I have written. I like this team a lot and I have been pleased with their effort on both ends of the court. I reacted to your saying that the coach is drawing up plays but the players are not executing them or not seeing opportunities that the defense presents that more talented players might see. I think the void in player leadership has been filled. I think there is a team in place that acts and operates as a team. My concern is with the coach. I think the team needs to have some plays that it practices for coming out of time outs. I think the team needs to be prepared to adjust when a team plays zone. Those things are on the coach. The team is much improved. Many of the faults that the team still has lie with the coach. If you are going to write stuff about players not being able to execute the plays the coach draws up because they don't see things when the last two plays of the game went the way they did you have to be prepared to get the Nash crap. I wrote a lot about the problems that I see and I think you are just trying to sweep away real problems with this coach and his staff. Please reread what I wrote with an open mind without disregarding it. I may just trash D'antoni sometimes but I really like this team and he needs to be able to work with the guys he has and give them the best chance to win in a tight game. They are committed and competitive but not good enough to win if they can't get help executing down the stretch from their coach.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/31/2010  1:44 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:Crushalot and Childs2Dudley I think you guys need to keep in mind the fact that this is early in the season and this is a completely new team. You both talk as if this is a finished product that should be running perfectly right now, including the coach. The players are trying to learn each other and the coach's system. The coach is trying to learn his players and set rotations. Overall MOST of the things we need to happen are happening, but you can't expect perfection at this point.

Given that there are still lapses on D, there are MORE good and consistent defensive plays than bad. You can't try to make it seem like any good that the team is doing has nothing to do with Mike and all the bad is directly associated with his poor coaching. This team looks remarkably good early on and that's a testament to Mike getting these guys prepared. Answer me this, based on how the team looked in preseason did any of you expect them to look this good and competitive against 2 of the better teams in the league right off the bat? The Blazers aren't scrubs they're a very good team that is undefeated so far. The Celts we know how good they are.

Childs2Dudley you can't say this is the same ole team and that we suck when you know we would've been blown out in both games last year!!! We actually should've won this game and the reasons we lost are correctable. Try to be a bit more reasonable in your assessment of the team so you don't lose all credibility.


I am not sure if you are reading what I have written. I like this team a lot and I have been pleased with their effort on both ends of the court. I reacted to your saying that the coach is drawing up plays but the players are not executing them or not seeing opportunities that the defense presents that more talented players might see. I think the void in player leadership has been filled. I think there is a team in place that acts and operates as a team. My concern is with the coach. I think the team needs to have some plays that it practices for coming out of time outs. I think the team needs to be prepared to adjust when a team plays zone. Those things are on the coach. The team is much improved. Many of the faults that the team still has lie with the coach. If you are going to write stuff about players not being able to execute the plays the coach draws up because they don't see things when the last two plays of the game went the way they did you have to be prepared to get the Nash crap. I wrote a lot about the problems that I see and I think you are just trying to sweep away real problems with this coach and his staff. Please reread what I wrote with an open mind without disregarding it. I may just trash D'antoni sometimes but I really like this team and he needs to be able to work with the guys he has and give them the best chance to win in a tight game. They are committed and competitive but not good enough to win if they can't get help executing down the stretch from their coach.

Just know this, Mike D'Antoni has forgotten more about offensive basketball than you or I know. You're not giving credit to the head coach that had to pull together a team with 10 new players, determine who should play in the rotation. Get the team to have a good scheme on D, that so far is showing that they have a good sense of proper rotations on D. He had to teach them his offensive system and get them to jell as much as possible in a short period of time.

This team looks like a good team due to his coaching, not in spite of it. You can't just throw a bunch of guys together and have them come out playing like this without good coaching. You're not being reasonable in that regard. You realize that we're playing two ROOKIES in our starting lineup and you think our coach isn't doing a good enough job?

Ask yourself, does Mike somehow not know something about offensive basketball that would lead to successful plays or could it be the players like TD and Felton don't know how to play the position to the degree that they should to take advantage of all the options available? It's not enough to draw up great plays, the players have to execute and also be ready to deal with what the defense does. The Celts and Blazers are very good defensive teams, so you're not just gonna be able to run your set and score on them with the 1st option. We shut down the Blazers and Celts 1st options, but they kept going until they finally cracked our D.

We need for our PLAYERS to respond better to what the defense does. Plays were there and they missed them.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/31/2010  2:08 AM
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:Crushalot and Childs2Dudley I think you guys need to keep in mind the fact that this is early in the season and this is a completely new team. You both talk as if this is a finished product that should be running perfectly right now, including the coach. The players are trying to learn each other and the coach's system. The coach is trying to learn his players and set rotations. Overall MOST of the things we need to happen are happening, but you can't expect perfection at this point.

Given that there are still lapses on D, there are MORE good and consistent defensive plays than bad. You can't try to make it seem like any good that the team is doing has nothing to do with Mike and all the bad is directly associated with his poor coaching. This team looks remarkably good early on and that's a testament to Mike getting these guys prepared. Answer me this, based on how the team looked in preseason did any of you expect them to look this good and competitive against 2 of the better teams in the league right off the bat? The Blazers aren't scrubs they're a very good team that is undefeated so far. The Celts we know how good they are.

Childs2Dudley you can't say this is the same ole team and that we suck when you know we would've been blown out in both games last year!!! We actually should've won this game and the reasons we lost are correctable. Try to be a bit more reasonable in your assessment of the team so you don't lose all credibility.


I am not sure if you are reading what I have written. I like this team a lot and I have been pleased with their effort on both ends of the court. I reacted to your saying that the coach is drawing up plays but the players are not executing them or not seeing opportunities that the defense presents that more talented players might see. I think the void in player leadership has been filled. I think there is a team in place that acts and operates as a team. My concern is with the coach. I think the team needs to have some plays that it practices for coming out of time outs. I think the team needs to be prepared to adjust when a team plays zone. Those things are on the coach. The team is much improved. Many of the faults that the team still has lie with the coach. If you are going to write stuff about players not being able to execute the plays the coach draws up because they don't see things when the last two plays of the game went the way they did you have to be prepared to get the Nash crap. I wrote a lot about the problems that I see and I think you are just trying to sweep away real problems with this coach and his staff. Please reread what I wrote with an open mind without disregarding it. I may just trash D'antoni sometimes but I really like this team and he needs to be able to work with the guys he has and give them the best chance to win in a tight game. They are committed and competitive but not good enough to win if they can't get help executing down the stretch from their coach.

Just know this, Mike D'Antoni has forgotten more about offensive basketball than you or I know. You're not giving credit to the head coach that had to pull together a team with 10 new players, determine who should play in the rotation. Get the team to have a good scheme on D, that so far is showing that they have a good sense of proper rotations on D. He had to teach them his offensive system and get them to jell as much as possible in a short period of time.

This team looks like a good team due to his coaching, not in spite of it. You can't just throw a bunch of guys together and have them come out playing like this without good coaching. You're not being reasonable in that regard. You realize that we're playing two ROOKIES in our starting lineup and you think our coach isn't doing a good enough job?

Ask yourself, does Mike somehow not know something about offensive basketball that would lead to successful plays or could it be the players like TD and Felton don't know how to play the position to the degree that they should to take advantage of all the options available? It's not enough to draw up great plays, the players have to execute and also be ready to deal with what the defense does. The Celts and Blazers are very good defensive teams, so you're not just gonna be able to run your set and score on them with the 1st option. We shut down the Blazers and Celts 1st options, but they kept going until they finally cracked our D.

We need for our PLAYERS to respond better to what the defense does. Plays were there and they missed them.

Since you are asking me questions I want to ask you one. What plays were called during timeouts for the final two plays when the Knicks had a chance to win or go to ot( I am not concerned with the very last play) that gave them a chance to win coming out of the time out when the coach was setting things up? If D'Antoni is the offensive savante that you say at some point he has to adjust to his personnel. He does not have an mvp hof point guard on his team but the guy he has is more than capable. He has to realize that his situation in Phoenix was a once in a lifetime experience. Chances are he will never get the opportunity to work with a hof mvp point again.

How the players respond has to be taught. You can't practice running and shooting in a free/unstructured manner to have the opposing team adjust to you and leave out practicing for situations that come up in a game. That is not on the players. Watch the Nets who have similar talent. They were down in the 4th in both of their games and came back. Billy King said that he is so impressed with how prepared Avery has his team prepared for every situation. He didn't say his players aren't cerebral enough for his system or that they are missing opportunities the defense offers. He said they were prepared. D'Antoni needs to prepare his players. Preperation is more than practicing executing your offense better in the free flow of the game.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
10/31/2010  2:12 AM
The Portland Trailblazers shot 49% from the field today and scored 100 points. Boston scored 105 points last night. The Raptors scored a "low" 93 points on Wednesday. None of these games, to me, were impressive defensively besides the blocked shots. Blocked shots are good. I enjoy them. They show hustle, intensity and definitely play a role on the defensive end. You know what also plays a role? Keeping your main in front of you, clogging the passing lanes, protecting the paint and playing good man-to-man defense. The Knicks still struggle in all of these departments, although there is an obvious improvement because like Al Harrington and Jamal Crawford are no longer around. But just because these guys were awful on defense does not make this current team a very good defensive one. That is far from the truth.

The offensive side is one I'd like to spend more time on since this is a bigger issue for me. I didn't think it would be, not with "Offensive Genius" Mike D'Antoni running the show. But alas, it is thus far.

The offense that we ran today was exactly the same as the previous 2 years of D'Antoni offense we have seen, minus (again) guys like Al Harrington playing selfishly and foolishly. The past 3 games has seen this team unable to throw a basic entry pass into the post, does not set enough screens so that players can come off a screen for the pick and pop, and does not run enough pick and roll plays and when they do they run it quite horribly (a fault of Felton right now). There is no ball movement. A lot of stagnant play with players sitting around waiting for one guy to create. A lot of camping out at the 3-point launching 3 pointers. That's a game plan? "If we hit our 3 pointers we will win"? This a joke?

This system is predicated on great ball movement and we have not seen signs of that right now. The guards rarely penetrate and Amar'e finds himself getting the ball 20 feet away from the basket a majority of the time. This, in turn, forces him to create off the dribble. He forces up a shot, which is never a good thing, and we hope for the best. That's not what we signed this guy for. We need to figure out an easier way to get him the ball or we will fail miserably. We also need to stop launching 3-pointers (28 tonight, 27 against Boston, 24 against Toronto) and learn how to move the ball around for the best shot instead of settling for 3's. That's a LAZY offense.

The offense, thus far, is below average. That's me being nice. What I see is a team that needs proper coaching on both ends of the ball, particular the offense. A team that needs to understand that it is okay to run a pick and roll or drive and kick and not just run down the shot clock to shoot a contested 3. Right now I don't see that.

Nixluva, you don't offer a lot besides excuses. IF Gallinari comes back and shoots well, IF the offense shoots better (because we have great shooters, right? We rely on the 3 ball and we have average shooting at best and somehow this makes sense), IF IF IF. Huh? Gallinari coming back and shooting 3's does what exactly? I just finished explaining how this teams' offense is bad and you're talking about Danilo Gallinari. I'm not discussing him because he is not a factor in my point. The point is the offense needs to improve and that has nothing to do with Gallinari. It is way more than just one guy.

You talk about the players but the players were brought here to run the plays the coach tell them to. You cannot tell me that that the players are 100% at fault when this is a brand new roster yet I see the same exact offense as I did the past 2 seasons.

This team needs to improve drastically to even have a chance at the playoffs.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34060
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

10/31/2010  3:24 AM
This team hasn't quit *yet* so that's the good news. So let's throw one more "if" out there: if the Knicks are 2-3 after their first five, then we'll see an entriely new roster build upon that as the season progresses.

There is obviously a lot of improvement, but I like that the team hasn't quit. Before everyone on the court and bench would've shrugged and been like, "hey, we're gonna lose anyway--is McDonald's open?"

No excuses, they have to do better, deliver a better work product, but I think if these guys can grind out some wins in November and December and tread water, there will be some building momentum. All I really care about is seeing the attitude remain constant.

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34060
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

10/31/2010  3:24 AM
This team hasn't quit *yet* so that's the good news. So let's throw one more "if" out there: if the Knicks are 2-3 after their first five, then we'll see an entriely new roster build upon that as the season progresses.

There is obviously a lot of improvement, but I like that the team hasn't quit. Before everyone on the court and bench would've shrugged and been like, "hey, we're gonna lose anyway--is McDonald's open?"

No excuses, they have to do better, deliver a better work product, but I think if these guys can grind out some wins in November and December and tread water, there will be some building momentum. All I really care about is seeing the attitude remain constant.

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

10/31/2010  7:46 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/31/2010  7:52 AM
nixluva wrote:It's so early and really I didn't expect the team to be playing this well so soon. But it is still very early and they aren't all the way there in every facet yet. I just don't wanna hear how a coach that OTHER coaches ask for help with offense, can't draw up a play. PLEASE! Go read SSOL and look at the plays and you'll see that we're still not using most of what the guy tries to run. We need more time to allow this team to absorb all of this stuff.

There's no reason that Felton should stink so bad at PnR except that he's not comfortable playing in traffic. He seems to avoid getting into the teeth of the defense unless he's barreling to the hoop. And when he does he's not looking for teammates or simply can't see them. He's only 6' tall and seems to have a problem seeing the court when he gets in the middle of the bigs. I just don't think he has a natural feel for what you need to do in a PnR offense, but he's got to learn.

Excellent analysis as always. You're right, we gotta give this a little more time before it gets better..But I agree about Felton. He seems to be able to pull off some amazing things (that baseline drive with the 360 spin and finish underneath was awesome -- when's the last time we had a PG who could do something like that?) but then he struggles with less difficult things -- delivering the ball on the P&R, improvising quickly when option #1 is taken away (swing the damn ball if you can't get it to Amar'e, don't shoehorn it in or waste 10-15 secs. waiting for it to develop--if it's not there, it's not there), utililizing all his teammates, etc..TD's guilty of the same things...I'm confident it'll improve though. At least 2 big things I see that are correctable:

1 - Can Amar'e put it on the deck and get to the rim from 20' out? Yes he can and not many bigs 6'10" & over can but as we've seen now after a couple of games, it's pretty risky. Amar'e awesome and plays very hard but he's gotta cut down on these turnovers. Part of it isn't his fault --- Felton or TD can't simply give him the ball on the run 25' from the basket in traffic and expect the guy to do something with it there. There's hitting a guy on the break in transition for a layup or dunk and then there's giving up your dribble way too early as if the rock's a hot potato and giving the ball to your main big way too far out with little or no chance he'll be able to execute from there. Amar'e's had a ton of TOs so far but some of those I put on Felton & TD. They should begin to see what works with Amar'e and what really doesn't. He needs it in better position. Giving it to him way out on the perimeter 20-25' out where he'll have to take 5-6 dribbles to get to the basket is asking a lot -- STAT needs to be taking 1 or 2 dribble before a shot attempt. This should improve once they look at tape in practice and adjustments are made.

2 - Swing the ball if option 1 isn't there and get other teammates involved. Specifically I wanna see Fields getting more shot attempts. At least more touches because you know this kid will do the right thing with the ball if the shot isn't there for himself..He's gone for double figures in every game so far and I'm telling ya, he could've went for 20 every game if he only got the damn ball more. Easily..I know he's a rookie but I like everything I see so far in ever facet of the game. Bottom line is I trust him completely and I wanna see us feature him much more..It was a good decision to start him -- in his limited time he's shown me that he should be able to handle a little more of the scoring load -- yet Felton and TD aren't looking for him nearly enough. He's a weapon at our disposal that's been way underutilized so far..Right now until AR gets back and Gallo figures it out on offense, they gotta give the ball to Fields more and let him operate. Much more stuff should be running through Fields and I think it will as time goes on..Too much offensive ability from this kid that we can definitely use right now that's being ignored. I actually wouldn't mind Fields taking 15 shots a game right now.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
10/31/2010  7:52 AM
Finestrg wrote:
nixluva wrote:It's so early and really I didn't expect the team to be playing this well so soon. But it is still very early and they aren't all the way there in every facet yet. I just don't wanna hear how a coach that OTHER coaches ask for help with offense, can't draw up a play. PLEASE! Go read SSOL and look at the plays and you'll see that we're still not using most of what the guy tries to run. We need more time to allow this team to absorb all of this stuff.

There's no reason that Felton should stink so bad at PnR except that he's not comfortable playing in traffic. He seems to avoid getting into the teeth of the defense unless he's barreling to the hoop. And when he does he's not looking for teammates or simply can't see them. He's only 6' tall and seems to have a problem seeing the court when he gets in the middle of the bigs. I just don't think he has a natural feel for what you need to do in a PnR offense, but he's got to learn.

Excellent analysis as always. You're right, we gotta give this a little more time before it gets better..But I agree about Felton. He seems to be able to pull off some amazing things (that baseline drive with the 360 spin and finish underneath was awesome -- when's the last time we had a PG who could do something like that?) but then he struggles with less difficult things -- delivering the ball on the P&R, improvising quickly when option #1 is taken away (swing the damn ball if you can't get it to Amar'e, don't shoehorn it in or waste 10-15 secs. waiting for it to develop--if it's not there, it's not there), utililizing all his teammates, etc..TD's guilty of the same things...I'm confident it'll improve though. At least 2 big things I see that are correctable:

1 - Can Amar'e put it on the deck and get to the rim from 20' out? Yes he can and not many bigs 6'10" & over can but as we've seen now after a couple of games, it's pretty risky. Amar'e awesome and plays very hard but he's gotta cut down on these turnovers. Part of it isn't his fault --- Felton or TD can't simply give him the ball on the run 25' from the basket in traffic and expect the guy to do something with it there. There's hitting a guy on the break in transition for a layup or dunk and then there's giving up your dribble way too early as if the rock's a hot potato and giving the ball to your main big way too far out with little or no chance he'll be able to execute from there. Amar'e's had a ton of TOs so far but some of those I put on Felton & TD. They should begin to see what works with Amar'e and what really doesn't. He needs it in better position. Giving it to him way out on the perimeter 20-25' out where he'll have to take 5-6 dribbles to get to the basket is asking a lot -- STAT needs to be taking 1 or 2 dribble before a shot attempt. This should improve once they look at tape in practice and adjustments are made.

2 - Swing the ball if option 1 isn't there and get other teammates involved. Specifically I wanna see Fields getting more shot attempts. At least more touches because you know this kid will do the right thing with the ball if the shot isn't there for himself..He's gone for double figures in every game so far and I'm telling ya, he could've went for 20 every game if he only got the damn ball more. Easily..I know he's a rookie but I like everything I see so far in ever facet of the game. It was a good decision to start him -- in his limited time he's shown me that he should be able to handle a little more of the scoring load -- yet Felton and TD aren't looking for him nearly enough. He's a weapon at our disposal that's been way underutilized so far..Right now until AR gets back and Gallo figures it out on offense, they gotta give the ball to Fields more and let him operate. Much more stuff should be running through Fields and I think it will as time goes on..Too much offensive ability from this kid that we can definitely use right now that's being ignored. I actually wouldn't mind Fields taking 15 shots a game right now.

Amare was really never the main guy and he was able to take that ball from the FT line and dunk it almost every time. Now its a pull up or a finesse shot. I hate to say this but that loss was on him last night:(

RIP Crushalot😞
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

10/31/2010  8:01 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/31/2010  11:07 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
Finestrg wrote:
nixluva wrote:It's so early and really I didn't expect the team to be playing this well so soon. But it is still very early and they aren't all the way there in every facet yet. I just don't wanna hear how a coach that OTHER coaches ask for help with offense, can't draw up a play. PLEASE! Go read SSOL and look at the plays and you'll see that we're still not using most of what the guy tries to run. We need more time to allow this team to absorb all of this stuff.

There's no reason that Felton should stink so bad at PnR except that he's not comfortable playing in traffic. He seems to avoid getting into the teeth of the defense unless he's barreling to the hoop. And when he does he's not looking for teammates or simply can't see them. He's only 6' tall and seems to have a problem seeing the court when he gets in the middle of the bigs. I just don't think he has a natural feel for what you need to do in a PnR offense, but he's got to learn.

Excellent analysis as always. You're right, we gotta give this a little more time before it gets better..But I agree about Felton. He seems to be able to pull off some amazing things (that baseline drive with the 360 spin and finish underneath was awesome -- when's the last time we had a PG who could do something like that?) but then he struggles with less difficult things -- delivering the ball on the P&R, improvising quickly when option #1 is taken away (swing the damn ball if you can't get it to Amar'e, don't shoehorn it in or waste 10-15 secs. waiting for it to develop--if it's not there, it's not there), utililizing all his teammates, etc..TD's guilty of the same things...I'm confident it'll improve though. At least 2 big things I see that are correctable:

1 - Can Amar'e put it on the deck and get to the rim from 20' out? Yes he can and not many bigs 6'10" & over can but as we've seen now after a couple of games, it's pretty risky. Amar'e awesome and plays very hard but he's gotta cut down on these turnovers. Part of it isn't his fault --- Felton or TD can't simply give him the ball on the run 25' from the basket in traffic and expect the guy to do something with it there. There's hitting a guy on the break in transition for a layup or dunk and then there's giving up your dribble way too early as if the rock's a hot potato and giving the ball to your main big way too far out with little or no chance he'll be able to execute from there. Amar'e's had a ton of TOs so far but some of those I put on Felton & TD. They should begin to see what works with Amar'e and what really doesn't. He needs it in better position. Giving it to him way out on the perimeter 20-25' out where he'll have to take 5-6 dribbles to get to the basket is asking a lot -- STAT needs to be taking 1 or 2 dribble before a shot attempt. This should improve once they look at tape in practice and adjustments are made.

2 - Swing the ball if option 1 isn't there and get other teammates involved. Specifically I wanna see Fields getting more shot attempts. At least more touches because you know this kid will do the right thing with the ball if the shot isn't there for himself..He's gone for double figures in every game so far and I'm telling ya, he could've went for 20 every game if he only got the damn ball more. Easily..I know he's a rookie but I like everything I see so far in ever facet of the game. It was a good decision to start him -- in his limited time he's shown me that he should be able to handle a little more of the scoring load -- yet Felton and TD aren't looking for him nearly enough. He's a weapon at our disposal that's been way underutilized so far..Right now until AR gets back and Gallo figures it out on offense, they gotta give the ball to Fields more and let him operate. Much more stuff should be running through Fields and I think it will as time goes on..Too much offensive ability from this kid that we can definitely use right now that's being ignored. I actually wouldn't mind Fields taking 15 shots a game right now.

Amare was really never the main guy and he was able to take that ball from the FT line and dunk it almost every time. Now its a pull up or a finesse shot. I hate to say this but that loss was on him last night:(

Yeah, he wasn't great last night, but I don't think he was getting the ball in the best of position either. I don't really wanna see him in a position where he's given the ball 25' out and asked to make something happen. He's not Kobe Bryant -- he's a 6'10" 250 lb. PF/C...They should look to Landry Fields more for that and continue to look for Chandler for that. Think back to when STAT really took it to Duncan & the Spurs a few years back in the playoffs -- even last year when he lit up the Lakers for 40 --- he was operating in close, getting good high % shots and scoring the ball at will, never given the ball 25' from the basket and asked to make something happen..An adjustment needs to be made here and I'm confident it will.

TymeLessKnicks
Posts: 21061
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/6/2005
Member: #1050
Sweden
10/31/2010  9:10 AM
nba refs are such a joke.
Had enough Melo?
scoshin
Posts: 20584
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #568
10/31/2010  9:25 AM
Finestrg wrote:
nixluva wrote:It's so early and really I didn't expect the team to be playing this well so soon. But it is still very early and they aren't all the way there in every facet yet. I just don't wanna hear how a coach that OTHER coaches ask for help with offense, can't draw up a play. PLEASE! Go read SSOL and look at the plays and you'll see that we're still not using most of what the guy tries to run. We need more time to allow this team to absorb all of this stuff.

There's no reason that Felton should stink so bad at PnR except that he's not comfortable playing in traffic. He seems to avoid getting into the teeth of the defense unless he's barreling to the hoop. And when he does he's not looking for teammates or simply can't see them. He's only 6' tall and seems to have a problem seeing the court when he gets in the middle of the bigs. I just don't think he has a natural feel for what you need to do in a PnR offense, but he's got to learn.

Excellent analysis as always. You're right, we gotta give this a little more time before it gets better..But I agree about Felton. He seems to be able to pull off some amazing things (that baseline drive with the 360 spin and finish underneath was awesome -- when's the last time we had a PG who could do something like that?) but then he struggles with less difficult things -- delivering the ball on the P&R, improvising quickly when option #1 is taken away (swing the damn ball if you can't get it to Amar'e, don't shoehorn it in or waste 10-15 secs. waiting for it to develop--if it's not there, it's not there), utililizing all his teammates, etc..TD's guilty of the same things...I'm confident it'll improve though. At least 2 big things I see that are correctable:

1 - Can Amar'e put it on the deck and get to the rim from 20' out? Yes he can and not many bigs 6'10" & over can but as we've seen now after a couple of games, it's pretty risky. Amar'e awesome and plays very hard but he's gotta cut down on these turnovers. Part of it isn't his fault --- Felton or TD can't simply give him the ball on the run 25' from the basket in traffic and expect the guy to do something with it there. There's hitting a guy on the break in transition for a layup or dunk and then there's giving up your dribble way too early as if the rock's a hot potato and giving the ball to your main big way too far out with little or no chance he'll be able to execute from there. Amar'e's had a ton of TOs so far but some of those I put on Felton & TD. They should begin to see what works with Amar'e and what really doesn't. He needs it in better position. Giving it to him way out on the perimeter 20-25' out where he'll have to take 5-6 dribbles to get to the basket is asking a lot -- STAT needs to be taking 1 or 2 dribble before a shot attempt. This should improve once they look at tape in practice and adjustments are made.

2 - Swing the ball if option 1 isn't there and get other teammates involved. Specifically I wanna see Fields getting more shot attempts. At least more touches because you know this kid will do the right thing with the ball if the shot isn't there for himself..He's gone for double figures in every game so far and I'm telling ya, he could've went for 20 every game if he only got the damn ball more. Easily..I know he's a rookie but I like everything I see so far in ever facet of the game. Bottom line is I trust him completely and I wanna see us feature him much more..It was a good decision to start him -- in his limited time he's shown me that he should be able to handle a little more of the scoring load -- yet Felton and TD aren't looking for him nearly enough. He's a weapon at our disposal that's been way underutilized so far..Right now until AR gets back and Gallo figures it out on offense, they gotta give the ball to Fields more and let him operate. Much more stuff should be running through Fields and I think it will as time goes on..Too much offensive ability from this kid that we can definitely use right now that's being ignored. I actually wouldn't mind Fields taking 15 shots a game right now.

What it comes down to with Felton is he either has limited court vision, or is too hesitant to thread the needle with a pass. I mean, he's done a great job penetrating, against some of the better interior defenses in the league, and against ZONE defenses...yet when Felton drives, he's looking to score, he doesn't look to dish off.

Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
10/31/2010  9:34 AM
Childs2Dudley wrote:The Portland Trailblazers shot 49% from the field today and scored 100 points. Boston scored 105 points last night. The Raptors scored a "low" 93 points on Wednesday. None of these games, to me, were impressive defensively besides the blocked shots. Blocked shots are good. I enjoy them. They show hustle, intensity and definitely play a role on the defensive end. You know what also plays a role? Keeping your main in front of you, clogging the passing lanes, protecting the paint and playing good man-to-man defense. The Knicks still struggle in all of these departments, although there is an obvious improvement because like Al Harrington and Jamal Crawford are no longer around. But just because these guys were awful on defense does not make this current team a very good defensive one. That is far from the truth.

The offensive side is one I'd like to spend more time on since this is a bigger issue for me. I didn't think it would be, not with "Offensive Genius" Mike D'Antoni running the show. But alas, it is thus far.

The offense that we ran today was exactly the same as the previous 2 years of D'Antoni offense we have seen, minus (again) guys like Al Harrington playing selfishly and foolishly. The past 3 games has seen this team unable to throw a basic entry pass into the post, does not set enough screens so that players can come off a screen for the pick and pop, and does not run enough pick and roll plays and when they do they run it quite horribly (a fault of Felton right now). There is no ball movement. A lot of stagnant play with players sitting around waiting for one guy to create. A lot of camping out at the 3-point launching 3 pointers. That's a game plan? "If we hit our 3 pointers we will win"? This a joke?

This system is predicated on great ball movement and we have not seen signs of that right now. The guards rarely penetrate and Amar'e finds himself getting the ball 20 feet away from the basket a majority of the time. This, in turn, forces him to create off the dribble. He forces up a shot, which is never a good thing, and we hope for the best. That's not what we signed this guy for. We need to figure out an easier way to get him the ball or we will fail miserably. We also need to stop launching 3-pointers (28 tonight, 27 against Boston, 24 against Toronto) and learn how to move the ball around for the best shot instead of settling for 3's. That's a LAZY offense.

The offense, thus far, is below average. That's me being nice. What I see is a team that needs proper coaching on both ends of the ball, particular the offense. A team that needs to understand that it is okay to run a pick and roll or drive and kick and not just run down the shot clock to shoot a contested 3. Right now I don't see that.

Nixluva, you don't offer a lot besides excuses. IF Gallinari comes back and shoots well, IF the offense shoots better (because we have great shooters, right? We rely on the 3 ball and we have average shooting at best and somehow this makes sense), IF IF IF. Huh? Gallinari coming back and shooting 3's does what exactly? I just finished explaining how this teams' offense is bad and you're talking about Danilo Gallinari. I'm not discussing him because he is not a factor in my point. The point is the offense needs to improve and that has nothing to do with Gallinari. It is way more than just one guy.

You talk about the players but the players were brought here to run the plays the coach tell them to. You cannot tell me that that the players are 100% at fault when this is a brand new roster yet I see the same exact offense as I did the past 2 seasons.

This team needs to improve drastically to even have a chance at the playoffs.

A lot of what you say is true and I agree with regarding the offense. Not about the couch though.

Boston and Portland are great defensive teams. They know our strength and took it away by clogging the inside to negate Amare. Last night Portland played a lot of zone; at the end of the game, whenever Amare touched the ball there were 2 or 3 guys on him. That is why he was stripped of the ball so often. They were looking for that and they executed well.

We need more shooters who would spread the floor so Amare can be effective. Doesn't have to be an Allstar, just someone who can shoot the 3 consistently. In addition, Melo would be nice.....or have Wilson turn into a Melo type player to give us a second allstar option in crunch time.

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
Game Thread: New York Knicks vs. Portland Trailblazers - Saturday, October 30, 2010 - 7:30 PM EST

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy