playa2 wrote:tkf wrote:Marv wrote:JohnWallace44 wrote:18 - 12 - 8 crazy stat line from Lee in a game in which he was manhandled by LopezWhat do you take from that?
i take from it that they're both good players.
I take that lee should not have taken 20 shots and should have been looking to outwork lopez and keep him off the board.. lees 24 points were useless in that, we could have gotten some of those points from chandler... we needed lee to keep lopez out of the lane... make him work hard... lee trying to be a main option offensively in a game like this is not necessary.
Cmon Terry, do you really believe all yr long our players on 1 yr contracts are going to continue to play team ball? The players under one yr contracts understand Walsh and Danphoney are focused on big names free agents knowing they might not be around next yr. These guys know it's a business and will start to do what's best for them.
Guys like Harrington and Lee will take more shots(playing for a new contract) in games.
you still remember that name.. LOL.. of course it is not my name, but feel free playa. now all I need is iceman to come in here yelling and prodson getting on your case and this would be 2001 revisited... LOL
I said this before.. trying to develop young players while getting vets their minutes who are on expiring deals is a volitile mix... the key is, what is dantoni doing? trying to develop the kids or getting the vets their money.. I think it is pretty obvious here..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF