Posted by oohah:

Posted by djsunyc:

Posted by oohah:

Balkman partied all the time, multiple people have said it within the organization, announcers etc. off the record.

Where do you get your information please? Ultimate Knicks? Where? Where did you see this report? TV? Where is this off-the-record remark gathered from? Please tell me.

oohah

it's a blog but you need to scroll down to the bottom...

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/knicks/2007/11/knicks_nuggets_recap.html

You're not Rick-Rolling me punk!

oohah

it's not a rick roll...

i'll quote it if you don't want to read it...

And then there's Balkman, who's been known to give oohah many a rick roll...

Posted by Bippity10:

I'm not saying that Balkman was a disruption. I'm just raising one of about 75 possibilities that I've raised about the trade. All possibilities(including Walsh and D'Antoni being idiots) have an equal chance of being true. We just choose to pick the one that sets our agenda and deem that that one is true.

I don't know what 23 win team you were watching but I guess I'm just not understanding what you are expecting to get for Balkman. We got a 2nd round pick and roster flexibility. This is equally as important as using him as a possible throw in, in a future trade. Neither approach is right or wrong. That's why you have to wait and see. Hopefully this felixibility is used to help us down the line. But in the meantime to get all up in an uproar over a guy that has no role on this roster and had no role in a 23 win season is amazing to me. That's all I can say. Amazing.

Posted by Solace:

Posted by djsunyc:

Posted by Bippity10:

I'm not saying that Balkman was a disruption. I'm just raising one of about 75 possibilities that I've raised about the trade. All possibilities(including Walsh and D'Antoni being idiots) have an equal chance of being true. We just choose to pick the one that sets our agenda and deem that that one is true.

I don't know what 23 win team you were watching but I guess I'm just not understanding what you are expecting to get for Balkman. We got a 2nd round pick and roster flexibility. This is equally as important as using him as a possible throw in, in a future trade. Neither approach is right or wrong. That's why you have to wait and see. Hopefully this felixibility is used to help us down the line. But in the meantime to get all up in an uproar over a guy that has no role on this roster and had no role in a 23 win season is amazing to me. That's all I can say. Amazing.

i'm saying bip is a disruption...and there are 75 reasons for it...

There's way more than 75. Way.... more...

Posted by Solace:

Posted by Bippity10:

Posted by Solace:

Posted by djsunyc:

Posted by Bippity10:

I'm not saying that Balkman was a disruption. I'm just raising one of about 75 possibilities that I've raised about the trade. All possibilities(including Walsh and D'Antoni being idiots) have an equal chance of being true. We just choose to pick the one that sets our agenda and deem that that one is true.

I don't know what 23 win team you were watching but I guess I'm just not understanding what you are expecting to get for Balkman. We got a 2nd round pick and roster flexibility. This is equally as important as using him as a possible throw in, in a future trade. Neither approach is right or wrong. That's why you have to wait and see. Hopefully this felixibility is used to help us down the line. But in the meantime to get all up in an uproar over a guy that has no role on this roster and had no role in a 23 win season is amazing to me. That's all I can say. Amazing.

i'm saying bip is a disruption...and there are 75 reasons for it...

There's way more than 75. Way.... more...

You two again. Didn't I stomp your arses at the first Bippity get together. I guess you don't remember that.

Hmmm I'm pretty sure you got drunk off your ass at the first Bippity-get together and took pictures of you and some stuffed animals.