[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Who's our best PG


Author Poll
Bonn1997
Posts: 38654
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
Who's our best PG
Stephon Marbury
Jamal Crawford
Nate Robinson
View Results


Author Thread
Nalod
Posts: 71906
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/24/2005  3:18 PM
Poor steph.

Is your brilliant deductive reasoning offered based on his poverty of bad coaches or his self proclamation of being the best point in the league?

IF he is to be made SG, how would his shooting drop and assist increase?

Question is not who is our bestpoint, but our best SG???
AUTOADVERT
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
10/24/2005  3:21 PM
Nets' fan!!!!! He is one of the top PGs in the game today, but he will achieve greatness once he masters what Brown will be teaching him...

Posted by Nalod:

Poor steph.

Is your brilliant deductive reasoning offered based on his poverty of bad coaches or his self proclamation of being the best point in the league?

IF he is to be made SG, how would his shooting drop and assist increase?

Question is not who is our bestpoint, but our best SG???


The true Knickabocker..........
Nalod
Posts: 71906
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/24/2005  3:26 PM
Posted by diderotn:

Nets' fan!!!!! He is one of the top PGs in the game today, but he will achieve greatness once he masters what Brown will be teaching him...

Posted by Nalod:

Poor steph.

Is your brilliant deductive reasoning offered based on his poverty of bad coaches or his self proclamation of being the best point in the league?

IF he is to be made SG, how would his shooting drop and assist increase?

Question is not who is our bestpoint, but our best SG???


Net fan, Hey, remember, if thats true, then we had steph first! HA HA!

Anwser the question, how does a move to SG reduce his points and increase his dimes? Back it up for a change.


boomann
Posts: 20685
Alba Posts: 26
Joined: 6/29/2005
Member: #938
USA
10/24/2005  3:30 PM


I don't know who's better, but look at Nate's vertical it's got to be the best out of the three.
"We need another shot blocker and we need more girth in the middle, once that happens we have a chance to be a pretty decent team" Isiah on draft night
Nalod
Posts: 71906
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/24/2005  4:12 PM
You know, after seeing that picture I wish I could change my vote.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30255
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/24/2005  4:16 PM
Posted by nixluva:

I've had this discussion on a different forum and i've had to break down Steph's career and the teams he's been on. Suffice it to say that when he's had a decent team he's made the playoffs. Yet still his best teams have been unfortunately teams with very young players just starting out and not yet ready to contend.

Steph's rookie yr, 1st yr with Minny - 1996-97 He had KG & Gugliotta.
their record 40-42 made playoffs for 1st time in team history, the year before Steph they were 26-56. They were Swept by the 57-25 Rockets, who went to the West Conf. Finals, in the 1st rd.

Steph's 2nd yr in Minny - they had the teams 1st winning season, went 45-37 lost again in the 1st rd. in 5 games to the 61-21 Sonics.

Was this somehow a bad showing by Steph? I would think that this was a great job by a very young Steph and young KG. This team was a few years from being ready to contend. No one could blame Steph for this team losing to more experienced superior teams.

NJ was an injury riddled disaster his whole time there. His 1st year with NJ, was the lockout shortened year and he came to the team on Mar. 11th and he played 31 games for NJ. So we can't count that year for much. The only player to play all 50 games was Kendal Gill. jayson Williams, Seikaly all missed 20 or more games.

His 2nd yr. 99-00 they went 31-51 under Coach Don Casey. Kittles only played 62 games. Steph went down with a Knee injury the 1st week in April. He played in only 74 games and the team was officially eliminated from playoff contention on Apr. 7th. Mind you there was no Kmart or RJ on that team. Really only KVH was there to help in a big way. Casey was fired and Byron Scott hired.

His 3rd year 00-01 he only played 67 games and Kittles, Van Horn & Feick, didn't start the season with the team. they went 26-56. KMart had a good rookie season. Still this team was also snake bit from the start with injuries.

His 1st yr in PHX 01-02 they went 36-46. Penny came back from playing only 4 games the yr before as did Gugliotta after major Knee reconstruction. Jake Voskuhl was the Center along with Marion. This was not a very good team. Scott Skiles resigned and Frank Johnson was named coach.

His 2nd yr 02-03 they went 46-36 and were the Eighth seed against the Spurs. They lost in 6 games. Amare had a great Rookie season and won ROY, but they weren't ready to beat the eventual champion Spurs.

So you guys tell me at which stop along the way was Steph supposed to be able to pull his team out of the depths and win? The last year with the Suns, Amare was injured after playing only 18 games with Steph and then Coach Johnson was fired and then they made the trade of Steph & Penny. Now this wasn't because Steph was a horrible PG, it was a financial restructuring. They were capped out with both Steph & Penny's contracts and had no way to improve. They knew they had a nice young nucleus to build around and they took a chance at FA's. Now they didn't know they would get Nash, so don't try to make it seem like they had it all planned out. They just got lucky, that Dallas didn't want to pay.

These are the kinds of things that were being said about STeph when he was with the Suns:

"Steph was huge," Suns coach Frank Johnson says afterward with requisite amazement. "He wouldn't allow us to lose."

"Most importantly, in his second season with the Suns, Marbury has pulled this preseason lottery lock into playoff contention with hard-nosed play and solid team leadership. Simply put, there's not a point guard in the game who's outplaying him. And Marbury's clutch-time performance--measured by the NBA as production in the last two minutes of games and in overtime--has been among the best in the business all season long."

www.findarticles.com/p/ar...i_99848989

So lets kill this noise about him not being a clutch player. Who the heck did he have on the Knicks that could help him out. Its so much easier for a team to stop one player when he's the only real threat. Ask Kobe about that or even Jordan, before his team was good enough. Now that we've finally started to put a team around him, I think we'll be just fine and over the next few years we'll really get to see what this team can do WITH STEPH.

Good post. People are trying to say that Pheniox traded Marbury because he was a chemistry problem. But then why would the have pushed so hard for Kobe who just came off a rape charge, and forced Phil and Shaq out of LA?? They traded Marbury because they wanted to sell the team and capp flexability is easier to sell to a new owner. The same reason they traded 2 first rd picks to utah to take Guggs expiring contract off there hands.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
boomann
Posts: 20685
Alba Posts: 26
Joined: 6/29/2005
Member: #938
USA
10/24/2005  4:29 PM


Marbury has the best court vision of the three. He's top three in the league in assists and he can score whenever he feels like it. Look for Marbs to challenge for Assists leader with the team he has now there will be no passes dropped by Nazr and no more block parties due to guys with very limited vertical leaps(Kurt and Sweets). Marbury has never had a good roster to compliment him, but this year is much diffrent than his previous seasons.
"We need another shot blocker and we need more girth in the middle, once that happens we have a chance to be a pretty decent team" Isiah on draft night
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
10/24/2005  6:32 PM
KG came straight out of high school and is a player who I think it is most fair to compare to Amare. KG's FGA"s in his rookie year were 735.

That Steph holding a #8 pick, 19 year old, fresh out of high school rookie back argument, is totally and utterly ridiculous. Especiall on a team with at least 2 players (Steph, Marion) who were clearly much better than him.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
10/24/2005  7:22 PM
Stephon Marbury is not comparable to Amare or KG . Their impact 94 ft is 100 x's that of what Steph's is. Stephon was never better than Amare, neither was Marion. More experienced - yes, better - hell to the NO.

Amare put up 13.5 pts not getting the ball nearly enough. Kinda scary what would've happened if Steph had any BRAINS or Frank Johnson had any BALLS. Its understated how much giving D' Antoni the reigns, roping IT for Steph, and getting Nash in there (6 yrs 60 mill and Q got 6 yrs 44 mill which is 4 mill more than the 100 mill they owed Steph for you money was the cause Steph-activists) was huge not only for the Suns but for the league. The domiant big man for the next decade was brought forth. With all the troubles the guy who was set to be the face of the NBA was going thru in Colorado, what happened n Phoenix from Jan 04 thru last season was a gift from Heaven for Stern and the NBA logo.

1 to chew on:

if Steve Francis didn't spend the first 14 seconds of the shot clock showing off his handles damn near every possession, he would've made my list of guards ahead of Steph as well.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/24/2005  8:39 PM
Posted by McK1:

Stephon Marbury is not comparable to Amare or KG . Their impact 94 ft is 100 x's that of what Steph's is. Stephon was never better than Amare, neither was Marion. More experienced - yes, better - hell to the NO.

Amare put up 13.5 pts not getting the ball nearly enough. Kinda scary what would've happened if Steph had any BRAINS or Frank Johnson had any BALLS. Its understated how much giving D' Antoni the reigns, roping IT for Steph, and getting Nash in there (6 yrs 60 mill and Q got 6 yrs 44 mill which is 4 mill more than the 100 mill they owed Steph for you money was the cause Steph-activists) was huge not only for the Suns but for the league. The domiant big man for the next decade was brought forth. With all the troubles the guy who was set to be the face of the NBA was going thru in Colorado, what happened n Phoenix from Jan 04 thru last season was a gift from Heaven for Stern and the NBA logo.

1 to chew on:

if Steve Francis didn't spend the first 14 seconds of the shot clock showing off his handles damn near every possession, he would've made my list of guards ahead of Steph as well.


I suppose that Steph held Amare back so much that he won ROY.
Posted by McK1:

KG
* in his first 2 full seasons with Steph his fga's were 1100 and 1293 for a total of 2393 fga's and 272 and 332 fta for a total of 605 fta.

* his first 2 full seasons with a real pg in Terrell Brandon he got off 1526 attempts in 99-00 and 1475 field goal attempts in 00-01 for a total of 3001. Also in 99- 00 he went to the line 404 tmes and 00-01 467 times for a total of 871.

2393 fgas to 3001 fgas and 605 ftas to 871 ftas. WOW!

Needless to say, he got the ball a very considerable amount of times more. And it wasn't that Terrell Brandon couldn't score (look at his no.s asa full-time starter in Cleveland and Milwaukee), he was just SMART enough to realize the team would do better the more scoring opportunities KG got.

The Major flaw in your observation that KG's shots went up when Steph left is that you have to remember that Gugliotta was the teams high scorer the 2 full seasons Steph played with the Wolves. So taking away Steph and Gugs, KG's shots were going to increase out of necessity since Gug's replacement Joe Smith only avg. 13.7 ppg vs. Gugs 20 ppg. Nice try tho.

Oh and Terrell avg. 14.6 shots a game, 16.8 ppg and 7.7asts compare that with Steph 15 shots, 17.7 ppg and 8.6 asts. That looks pretty much like the same dang player to me. Even without Steph they still didn't get past the 1st rd.

Keep it comin tho, cuz this is fun. I haven't had a chance to break out all my Steph info in a while.


[Edited by - NIXLUVA on 10-24-2005 8:42 PM]

[Edited by - NIXLUVA on 10-24-2005 8:43 PM]
Nalod
Posts: 71906
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/24/2005  8:52 PM
You the Steph-meister!

Steph is a great talent, just needs to harness it to a team game!
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
10/24/2005  9:09 PM
young jedi.

during the Brandon years they not only added Joe Smith, but they also added Wally Z and Billups which means there were more people firing away, more egos to manage, more guys to keep happy and he still managed to get his own offense going as well. And the Wolves won 52 games.

Steph has never won more than 45 in a season. Suns won 44 games that year not 46.


the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/24/2005  9:30 PM
Posted by McK1:

young jedi.

during the Brandon years they not only added Joe Smith, but they also added Wally Z and Billups which means there were more people firing away, more egos to manage, more guys to keep happy and he still managed to get his own offense going as well. And the Wolves won 52 games.

Steph has never won more than 45 in a season. Suns won 44 games that year not 46.

I dont understand. Why are you speaking in generalities about the "Brandon years"? Be freakin specific why are you adding all of these other lowercase players? In any event, your theories are anything but strong. You have yet to show any definitive proof that Steph holds players back and somehow his replacements share the ball more. I showed that in the case of most of the players he's played with they had some of their best scoring seasons and took healthy amounts of shots playing with Steph. Surely there should be some proof of his teammates HUGE drop off somewhere in his career. But there isn't.

McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
10/24/2005  9:54 PM
in 00-01 season you got garnett geting 22 ppg; Brandon getting 16 ppg; Wally Z getting 14 a game; billups getting 9.3; Anthony Peeler averageing 10. 5 ppg; Laphonso Ellis 9.4 ppg.

that is 7 players average 9 points or more for a full season not to mention the bit buckets guys like Nesterovic got. And KG still put up over 300 more shots than he did when it was him Googs and Steph doing the majority of the scoring.

Thats called ball distribution!

Please show me a Marbury team where the ball was spread around like that.

[Edited by - McK1 on 10-24-2005 9:55 PM]

[Edited by - McK1 on 10-24-2005 9:56 PM]
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/24/2005  10:14 PM
Steph has never won more than 45 in a season. Suns won 44 games that year not 46.
That's what we call a distinction without a difference
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/24/2005  10:27 PM
McK1, I thought you had originally made a couple of good points, but when you start in with "if Steph had any BRAINS" it becomes clear that you main point is that you dislike Marbury. Your argument does not seem objective.

Let me ask you this:

What if it turns out that Marbury's best position is not point guard. Does that make him the best-passing shooting guard ever? Does he then retroactively become an unselfish player?

oohah
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/25/2005  12:14 AM
Posted by McK1:

in 00-01 season you got garnett geting 22 ppg; Brandon getting 16 ppg; Wally Z getting 14 a game; billups getting 9.3; Anthony Peeler averageing 10. 5 ppg; Laphonso Ellis 9.4 ppg.

that is 7 players average 9 points or more for a full season not to mention the bit buckets guys like Nesterovic got. And KG still put up over 300 more shots than he did when it was him Googs and Steph doing the majority of the scoring.

Thats called ball distribution!

Please show me a Marbury team where the ball was spread around like that.

OK first of all You can't just pick a team out of thin air and say that this is proof that Steph leads to horrible ball distribution. Steph never played with those guys you bring up on the Twolves, only with KG can there be a direct comparison. Its like when people say that Kidd was so much better with the Nets, but they don't mention that Steph never Played with RJ or Collins and Kmart was fully healthy and more experienced when he played with Kidd. They also don't bring up the fact that the Nets had record games lost due to injury when Steph was there.

But OK i'll bite on your example.

00-01 Twolves KG -- 22.0 Brandon 16.0 Wally 14.0 Billups 9.3 Peeler 10.5 Ellis 9.4
02-03 Suns---Steph 22.3 Marion 21.2 Amare 13.5 J Johnson 9.8 Penny 10.6 The Suns didn't have anyone the equal of Ellis coming off the bench, still I think the scoring was spread as well as could be expected.

The 00-01 TWolves scored 97ppg and the 02-03 Suns scored 95ppg. Despite not having the same depth or veteran players as the TWolves I Think Steph did a good job with that Suns team. Its easy to throw the ball around when you have a deep team.

This is why I think the Knicks will do well this year and the years to come. This team has depth. I'd like another pure shooter to add to the mix tho.




[Edited by - NIXLUVA on 10-25-2005 12:16 AM]
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
10/25/2005  1:08 AM
Posted by oohah:

McK1, I thought you had originally made a couple of good points, but when you start in with "if Steph had any BRAINS" it becomes clear that you main point is that you dislike Marbury. Your argument does not seem objective.

Let me ask you this:

What if it turns out that Marbury's best position is not point guard. Does that make him the best-passing shooting guard ever? Does he then retroactively become an unselfish player?

oohah

quote:

Steph had any BRAINS

translation:

if Steph had a higher basketball IQ.

-----

does it make him the best passing shooting guard ever?

NO.

I never saw Oscar Robertson or Pete Maravich play but judging from the clips and recounts Steph isn't on the same planet. As far as 2's I have seen Michael Jordan, Allen I and Kobe rank ahead of Steph. The difference IMO is those 3 guys just made/make plays with the ball in their hands over the course of the game; Steph goes about his numbers with a pre-set deliberance. I'll pass the first half and shoot the 2nd is the trend for Steph.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/25/2005  1:25 AM
quote:

Steph had any BRAINS

translation:

if Steph had a higher basketball IQ.

Okay, but I didn't really need a translation. I was just pointing out that your choice of words show that your argument is strongly formed by your dislike for Marbury and is not objective.
does it make him the best passing shooting guard ever?

NO.

I never saw Oscar Robertson or Pete Maravich play but judging from the clips and recounts Steph isn't on the same planet. As far as 2's I have seen Michael Jordan, Allen I and Kobe rank ahead of Steph. The difference IMO is those 3 guys just made/make plays with the ball in their hands over the course of the game; Steph goes about his numbers with a pre-set deliberance. I'll pass the first half and shoot the 2nd is the trend for Steph.

I might argue some of those players, but why? So you listed 5 greats as better passers than Stephon Marbury, all of whom are in the Hall of Fame or likely headed there. See who you are comparing him to?

Even if you call Marbury a Shooting Guard in Point Guard's clothing, over 8 assists for his career is pretty good, especially for a player who if he were playing his natural position of Shooting Guard, would be commended for scoring lots of points instead of being disparaged.

In fact we should be applauding Marbury for taking on the added resposibility of bringing the ball up and running the team for 9 seasons, which is more than any team should ask of its Shooting Guard.

oohah


[Edited by - oohah on 10-25-2005 01:30 AM]
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
10/25/2005  1:34 AM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by McK1:

in 00-01 season you got garnett geting 22 ppg; Brandon getting 16 ppg; Wally Z getting 14 a game; billups getting 9.3; Anthony Peeler averageing 10. 5 ppg; Laphonso Ellis 9.4 ppg.

that is 7 players average 9 points or more for a full season not to mention the bit buckets guys like Nesterovic got. And KG still put up over 300 more shots than he did when it was him Googs and Steph doing the majority of the scoring.

Thats called ball distribution!

Please show me a Marbury team where the ball was spread around like that.

OK first of all You can't just pick a team out of thin air and say that this is proof that Steph leads to horrible ball distribution. Steph never played with those guys you bring up on the Twolves, only with KG can there be a direct comparison. Its like when people say that Kidd was so much better with the Nets, but they don't mention that Steph never Played with RJ or Collins and Kmart was fully healthy and more experienced when he played with Kidd. They also don't bring up the fact that the Nets had record games lost due to injury when Steph was there.

But OK i'll bite on your example.

00-01 Twolves KG -- 22.0 Brandon 16.0 Wally 14.0 Billups 9.3 Peeler 10.5 Ellis 9.4
02-03 Suns---Steph 22.3 Marion 21.2 Amare 13.5 J Johnson 9.8 Penny 10.6 The Suns didn't have anyone the equal of Ellis coming off the bench, still I think the scoring was spread as well as could be expected.

The 00-01 TWolves scored 97ppg and the 02-03 Suns scored 95ppg. Despite not having the same depth or veteran players as the TWolves I Think Steph did a good job with that Suns team. Its easy to throw the ball around when you have a deep team.

This is why I think the Knicks will do well this year and the years to come. This team has depth. I'd like another pure shooter to add to the mix tho.




[Edited by - NIXLUVA on 10-25-2005 12:16 AM]


nixluv you are the one who wanted to include teammates in this discussion as proof as to why KG's shot attempts would increase. As rebuttal I introduced the 00-01 season numbers with Steph's replacement Brandon and how he faired with having to distribute the ball with several more than just himself KG and 1 other requiring shots.

in 02-03 steph had 5 players averaging 9 or more with him which is comendable. Only thing though Steph took double the shots of his starting star bigman. Steph was the point-guard. He is not supposed to take all the shots. The Suns didn't need that. Looking to get Amare and Joe Johnson the ball was key 1 when Nash tookover not because they went into a cacoon and finally emerged, but because only a BLIND MAN [or BLIND PG] couldn't see what type of potential was there. There is no age or years playing requirement for putting the ball in the hands of guys with the skill level of those 2. We're seeing it now with the rooks and Crawford is the one out there growing game by game with the youngins not Steph and I guess we'll get more insight these next 2 games whether its by attriton r by design. Either way, the fact that steph hasn't even attempted to feed Curry for 1 alley and he was top 5 in dunks lastseason is a brow-raiser. Nate and Craw have hit him.

It seems trivial but this is 1 way Curry is used to scoring points. The fact that he has the hands and agility to complete those types of plays added a powerful dimension to the bulls half-court attack. Driving it and dumping off looks nice for Steph's highlights but:

a) why work that hard to just make yourself look good when

b) the other option a lob from the perimeter puts both you and your big man in the spotlight and

c) gives the D something else to worry about when drawing up defensive schemes
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
Who's our best PG

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy