I too, am referring to ON THE COURT. You are the one expanding this into other areas.
Okay. But "I am sure they all came from some street somewhere, so let's not take it there." led me to believe that you were expanding.
I was not referring to any statisitc. This is where you took things out of context.
Did I take things out of context? I am just wondering how this toughness is qualified, and I am still wondering.
Again, you blur the clear line between stats and toughness.
I didn't blur it, I am just wondering what 'toughness' is. Toughness in and of itself is worth not too much in a backetball game. The blurring here is between how good a player is vs. perceived toughness.
Nowhere did I say that Lee was an enforcer.
That is why I prefaced with "If you think"
OK, let me clarify it then: one doesn't have to be from anybody's "street" to have a tough persona on the court.
Having a 'tough persona' or 'playing with fire' is not the same as behaving like you're from the street or, more loosely put, acting like an assh*le. Does everyone have to have a tough persona? Isn't it good enough to be a productive player? Why ask KVH to be a tough guy? That's what the Charles Oakleys are for.
Kenyon (moreso during his time w/the Nets) and Spree have talent and fire, which often appeals to fans. That's a topic seserving of it's own thread.
KVH has talent too. As far as fire, KM and LS have it, but they bring a load of negative behavior with it. I prefer Reggie Miller's type of fire myself. KM benefited greatly from his time with J Kidd, now he should back up his mouth with his game, like Sprewell has in the past. However, there used to be a place for the quiet players with steady games, like KVH.
What about players like Zo, Big Ben, or even Shaq? Those players don't fit any same fan's definition of "soft", and they don't "misbehave" on or off the court either.
This is an easy one.
First off, unlike KVH, these guys are centers and 'power players'. Their job is to be the 'tough guy' on their teams. They are totally different types of players than KVH. Would it make sense if I said: Big Ben, Shaq, and Zo have no skills because they can't dribble through their legs, step back and hit a 3 like KVH?
I couldn't say for sure whether Shaq, Zo or Ben Wallace are gentlemen off the court, but I know they aren't criminals.
On the court, I saw Shaq take a roundhouse swing at Brad Miller while his back was turned, that was pretty ungentlemanly, but I wouldn't say he is not a gentleman on the court. Wallace is as tough as they come on the court, but I wouldn't say he does anything to be labeled 'ungentlemanly'.
Zo is dirty and ungentlemanly on the court. In college he made what I consider to be the dirtiest play I have ever seen. His ungentlemanly play in the NBA is well catalogued.
What the hell makes KVH any more a gentleman that anyone else, including the names I just mentioned? NOTHING.
KVH is by all accounts and from what I have seen, a pleasant soft-spoken guy, even on the court.
That dude is just plain SOFT.
But you refuse to qualify that statement in anyway, with any concrete examples.
No need to explain a thing. It's my opinion, just how you have yours. We will see during the season he ends up the next KVH or not. I hope to God that Lee is a helluva lot better than that.
If Lee is a Helluva lot better than KVH, we got an all-star on our hands.
Lastly, there's no reason to even go further with this KVH mess- I thnak God he's gone and I'm happy about the new direction in which the Knicks are going. Toss the KVH hats and let's root for the players that we have on this team NOW, which includes David Lee.
Fair Enough.
***
Fishmike said most of what I am trying to say much better than I did a couple of posts up.
oohah
[Edited by - oohah on 10-17-2005 5:14 PM]