Posted by VDesai:
You can make a case that Nash was the weakest MVP ever...and by some Margin. Just take a look at this list of MVP's and their stats and teams...
http://www.basketball-reference.com/awards/mvp.html
Honestly, based on past criteria for the MVP, you could make a very solid case for Shaq, Nowitzki or Iverson being far more worthy this year than Nash. But it just seems like the writers changed what they felt was worthy of the MVP this year. In past years, the writers almost always stayed away from PG's and stuck with big men. This year is quite an anamoly from that perspective, and it will be interesting if voters stay consistent with this. But as I said earlier, if they valued what PG's did the same as they did big men, Stockton would've won the award 3+ times with his 14+ assists seasons with 50% shooting and tough defense.
it's ok for voters to change their minds and their theories behind voting, but as I said before, let's just hope they stay consistent with it. Otherwise things were very fishy this year.
This is the bottom line. When Magic won it as a PG its because his numbers were out of this world.
22.5 pgs 7.9 rebs 12.8 assists.
The criteria was changed in the MVP voting, and one has to ask why. The NBA is a business, and Nash is very marketable, plus the fact that he's from another country makes the game have a more international appeal. And I say this in no way to take away from his overall incredibleness, but something has changed when this guy wins 2 MVP's withnumbers far below every other MVP candidate for the last 25 years.