I am not comparing Acy to the guys mentioned below, but who knows how a player who has not gotten a lot of time on the floor, but has shown a few good things, is going to eventually play if he finds a system and coach he fits in with.
How many would have predicted the eventual contributions of Starks and Mason when they came over to the Knicks based on their prior track record? Mason had not even played a college schedule in the NBA when we got him, and Starks did not even play in the NBA the year before we got him.
As for now, as others have said, Acy is a good change of pace guy who can probably do some of the things the Greek might do at some point.
Interesting that some had said he might also be a backup at the 3. Have not seen him on D enough against faster players, and from what we know, his offense is limited, but maybe they saw something new in his game during SL.
You bring in enough players, and sometimes guys you don't expect much from emerge as valuable parts of a team. Win/Win, IMO. If he is a stiff, you let him go next year- if he is a keeper, then maybe we get a decent rotation player who can give you 10-15 minutes a game.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?