[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

SSOL visited.....
Author Thread
VCoug
Posts: 24935
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2007
Member: #1406

12/9/2012  1:01 PM
Nalod wrote:
cooch2584 wrote:HUH?

you read the post and went back to bed to masturbate! Its a jerk off joke.

Read the post, agreed, got a stiffy, went back to bed. Sunday morning.

Just a joke.

Holding hands after jerking off!!!!

Get it???

Hello? Hello?

Just a joke!!!1

Now the joy of my world is in Zion How beautiful if nothing more Than to wait at Zion's door I've never been in love like this before Now let me pray to keep you from The perils that will surely come
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/9/2012  2:01 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:Rather than go back and regurgitate old arguments, the point of this thread has yet to be refuted by any serious argument in this thread. The Knicks are basically running MDA's offense, at least the half court part of it. Woody is using it because he knows that IT WORKS!!! It's been proven to work and help role players to excel. Players with limited ability but decent NBA skills do better playing in this offensive style and it's been proven over and over again. When Woody totally abandoned the system the Knicks didn't look as good once Melo cooled off. A super hot Melo somewhat covered up the fact that our role players weren't getting it done, but you can't expect Melo to be able to play on that level as he did last April for an entire season. Thus Woody made a logical decision to employ some of MDA's stuff. We all see it but some want to pretend that they don't.

No one is saying MDA is better than Woody or any credit needs to go to MDA, aside from acknowledgment of where these concepts came from. That's all any of us have pointed out. This is Woody's team Period!!! Just don't try and sell this crap that Woody came up with this offense on his own. It's not true and Woody would tell you that as he openly stated before the season. Stop bringing up meaningless arguments that have no point except to try and obscure the real point of this thread.

Woodson says Red Holtzman, Bobby Knight ,Larry Brown, and Bill Smith are influences on how he coaches. He said last year he went with some of the things that D'Antoni did because he didn't have time to insert his own stuff. Woodson has talked about being open minded and asked that players give input about things they think are working or not working. I am sure that he observed D'Antoni and incorporated anything that he thought was a strength but you are talking about a guy that has been coached and or coached with hof coaches. D'Antoni didn't invent the pick and roll or the three point shot.

This is the kind of comment that keeps me going back after you. You have this thing you do where you try and minimize what MDA does down to just PnR and 3's and you do that to try and make it seem like MDA is a hack and didin't do anything of value.

Did Woody run an offense like this before he came to the Knicks and was an assistant for MDA? IF he did then Media wouldn't be righting articles expressing surprise that the team was running primarily MDA's offense. You bring up Holtzman, Knight and Brown which is fine, but again Woody wasn't coaching offense like this before he got here so why now would those old coaches suddenly have him coaching like he's MDA?

“A different way of playing offensive pick-and-roll, he’s great at it,” Woodson said when asked what he learned from D’Antoni in their time together with the Knicks. “Some of the things that Mike did, I’m still doing. I’ve added a few things to what he’s done, but I like a lot of the things Mike did from an offensive standpoint. I think Mike is a fantastic coach and again, I wish him nothing but the best.”

http://zagsblog.com/knicks/woodson-melo-weigh-in-on-dantoni/

If it all just boiled down to running a PnR and that was it then why even say that he learned anything from MDA? There's a difference in how MDA ran what are basic plays and nearly every NBA coach recognizes that it's different. Only the BB geniuses here try and make it seem like MDA does nothing of note except PnR and shoot 3's. If it was so simple then why would someone write a book about it? There's just this mindless lack of respect for what MDA has done from fans but coaches all over BB have used his stuff indicating it was something different than what they already knew. You think Coach K needed to learn how to run a PnR and shoot 3's?

cooch2584
Posts: 21586
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2006
Member: #1187

12/9/2012  6:03 PM
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:Rather than go back and regurgitate old arguments, the point of this thread has yet to be refuted by any serious argument in this thread. The Knicks are basically running MDA's offense, at least the half court part of it. Woody is using it because he knows that IT WORKS!!! It's been proven to work and help role players to excel. Players with limited ability but decent NBA skills do better playing in this offensive style and it's been proven over and over again. When Woody totally abandoned the system the Knicks didn't look as good once Melo cooled off. A super hot Melo somewhat covered up the fact that our role players weren't getting it done, but you can't expect Melo to be able to play on that level as he did last April for an entire season. Thus Woody made a logical decision to employ some of MDA's stuff. We all see it but some want to pretend that they don't.

No one is saying MDA is better than Woody or any credit needs to go to MDA, aside from acknowledgment of where these concepts came from. That's all any of us have pointed out. This is Woody's team Period!!! Just don't try and sell this crap that Woody came up with this offense on his own. It's not true and Woody would tell you that as he openly stated before the season. Stop bringing up meaningless arguments that have no point except to try and obscure the real point of this thread.

Woodson says Red Holtzman, Bobby Knight ,Larry Brown, and Bill Smith are influences on how he coaches. He said last year he went with some of the things that D'Antoni did because he didn't have time to insert his own stuff. Woodson has talked about being open minded and asked that players give input about things they think are working or not working. I am sure that he observed D'Antoni and incorporated anything that he thought was a strength but you are talking about a guy that has been coached and or coached with hof coaches. D'Antoni didn't invent the pick and roll or the three point shot.

This is the kind of comment that keeps me going back after you. You have this thing you do where you try and minimize what MDA does down to just PnR and 3's and you do that to try and make it seem like MDA is a hack and didin't do anything of value.

Did Woody run an offense like this before he came to the Knicks and was an assistant for MDA? IF he did then Media wouldn't be righting articles expressing surprise that the team was running primarily MDA's offense. You bring up Holtzman, Knight and Brown which is fine, but again Woody wasn't coaching offense like this before he got here so why now would those old coaches suddenly have him coaching like he's MDA?

“A different way of playing offensive pick-and-roll, he’s great at it,” Woodson said when asked what he learned from D’Antoni in their time together with the Knicks. “Some of the things that Mike did, I’m still doing. I’ve added a few things to what he’s done, but I like a lot of the things Mike did from an offensive standpoint. I think Mike is a fantastic coach and again, I wish him nothing but the best.”

http://zagsblog.com/knicks/woodson-melo-weigh-in-on-dantoni/

If it all just boiled down to running a PnR and that was it then why even say that he learned anything from MDA? There's a difference in how MDA ran what are basic plays and nearly every NBA coach recognizes that it's different. Only the BB geniuses here try and make it seem like MDA does nothing of note except PnR and shoot 3's. If it was so simple then why would someone write a book about it? There's just this mindless lack of respect for what MDA has done from fans but coaches all over BB have used his stuff indicating it was something different than what they already knew. You think Coach K needed to learn how to run a PnR and shoot 3's?

Im not even gonna pick this apart,its been beaten like a dead horse. NEXT TOPIC

nykshaknbake
Posts: 22247
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2003
Member: #492
12/9/2012  8:50 PM


nixluva wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:I don't see how this thread title makes sense. MDA had us jacking contested 3s' early in possesion or passing the ball around the perimeter and jacking a contested 3. Very little penetration or thought into it. This is a different method entirely. It's like sayiong because the goal is to get the ball in the hoop and that the high school coach and Phil Jackson all subscribe to that plan they are using the same playbook.

Yet another one who doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. Woody himself said that he was going to use some of MDA's stuff and since STAT has been hurt he's had to rely more on those MDA sets. Of course they'll look different when you have Felton, Kidd and Prigs running the plays. You have more experienced, patient PG's and players overall they won't take bad shots or force it. This roster is vastly improved over last year!!!

Knicks before the Melo trade were #5 in the league in Offensive efficiency!!! They ended the year at #7 after the trade and with all the adjusting the team had to do. That wasn't about throwing up shots willy nilly. Last year with basically no PG this team still wasn't just throwing up shots every game. You know darn well that the problem for much of the year was a lack of a PG and that STAT and Melo weren't in the best of shape nor was their either of them sharp skills wise. Add in the fact that Melo decided to resist what he was being asked to do and you have a mess. Fields, TD, Bibby, Baron, Jared and Walker is FAR worse than what we have now. The sets are the same with the same goal and options to the plays, but the execution is better.

As I said before. Woody realized after last year that MDA's plays worked to help the role players to excel. Melo doesn't need that help, but the rest of the team needed that system to excel. Felton, Tyson, Brewer and Novack THRIVE in this system. It simplifies the game for them and creates open shots. They don't have to work as hard to get their offense. All of you that claim to know BB should know this is true.


Nixluva you have been consistently the most deluded poster who knows the least of what he's talking about. There is no way you'd be able to tell if someone did or didn't know what he was talking about. I'm surprised you can even dress yourself in the morning.

With that said...looking at the game it doesn't resemble MDA's game. It doesn't matter what Woody said LAST season. Rex Ryan says his team is the best he's ever had. Believe it? I said I'd start dunking like Michael Jordan but noone believes I am either.

We had Felton and Billups under MDA. Billups is as veteran in a good way as it gets. We did not have anywhere near the results. SO much for having or not having a PG.

If you didn't notice we improved immediately after MDA left. With the same roster!

Melo has been one of the deadliest scorers in the league since he got here. Including last year. How many points has STAT scored for us this year?

The sets are not anywhere near the same as last. Not even close. And there was very little thriving last year untill MDA left.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/9/2012  10:24 PM
I keep reading the same lame explanations of what is going on with the Knicks. TOo many of you keep bringing up the lack of success in the past under MDA as if that erases the point i'm making which is that Woody is succeeding using MDA's offense as the base of this years team offense. Woody has tweaked some things but under it all is MDA's offensive system

If any of you watched the post game on NBA TV Brent Barry just said that this is MDA's system the Knicks are playing. He had to make it clear that the offense this team is running is based on the MDA spread the floor concepts. All of you guys talking nonsense to me about this just need to stop and accept the facts. You have nothing with which to refute my points nor the points of the OP. Face it you guys are just wrong.

mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

12/9/2012  10:26 PM
WHO

GIVES

A

SHYT

JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241

12/9/2012  10:26 PM
SSOL never started the season undefeated at home.
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/9/2012  10:26 PM
nixluva wrote:I keep reading the same lame explanations of what is going on with the Knicks. TOo many of you keep bringing up the lack of success in the past under MDA as if that erases the point i'm making which is that Woody is succeeding using MDA's offense as the base of this years team offense. Woody has tweaked some things but under it all is MDA's offensive system

If any of you watched the post game on NBA TV Brent Barry just said that this is MDA's system the Knicks are playing. He had to make it clear that the offense this team is running is based on the MDA spread the floor concepts. All of you guys talking nonsense to me about this just need to stop and accept the facts. You have nothing with which to refute my points nor the points of the OP. Face it you guys are just wrong.

What you fail to understand is Woodson adapts his system to his personnel. He is not locked into a particular system like D'Antoni.

Dudes are reaching trying to give the failed D'Antoni credit for something he shouldnt get credit for.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

12/9/2012  10:28 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
nixluva wrote:I keep reading the same lame explanations of what is going on with the Knicks. TOo many of you keep bringing up the lack of success in the past under MDA as if that erases the point i'm making which is that Woody is succeeding using MDA's offense as the base of this years team offense. Woody has tweaked some things but under it all is MDA's offensive system

If any of you watched the post game on NBA TV Brent Barry just said that this is MDA's system the Knicks are playing. He had to make it clear that the offense this team is running is based on the MDA spread the floor concepts. All of you guys talking nonsense to me about this just need to stop and accept the facts. You have nothing with which to refute my points nor the points of the OP. Face it you guys are just wrong.

What you fail to understand is Woodson adapts his system to his personnel. He is not locked into a particular system like D'Antoni.

Dudes are reaching trying to give the failed D'Antoni credit for something he shouldnt get credit for.

well said.

What Nixluva failed to mentioned that was said on NBA tv is that a smart coach steals ideas from others coach and are willing to adapt to their personnel.

Uhhhhhhhhhhh - sound NOT familiar to one of our recent disaster coaches?

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/9/2012  10:52 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
nixluva wrote:I keep reading the same lame explanations of what is going on with the Knicks. TOo many of you keep bringing up the lack of success in the past under MDA as if that erases the point i'm making which is that Woody is succeeding using MDA's offense as the base of this years team offense. Woody has tweaked some things but under it all is MDA's offensive system

If any of you watched the post game on NBA TV Brent Barry just said that this is MDA's system the Knicks are playing. He had to make it clear that the offense this team is running is based on the MDA spread the floor concepts. All of you guys talking nonsense to me about this just need to stop and accept the facts. You have nothing with which to refute my points nor the points of the OP. Face it you guys are just wrong.

What you fail to understand is Woodson adapts his system to his personnel. He is not locked into a particular system like D'Antoni.

Dudes are reaching trying to give the failed D'Antoni credit for something he shouldnt get credit for.

well said.

What Nixluva failed to mentioned that was said on NBA tv is that a smart coach steals ideas from others coach and are willing to adapt to their personnel.

Uhhhhhhhhhhh - sound NOT familiar to one of our recent disaster coaches?

They were just talking again about how great Woodson is at calling plays coming out of time outs. Nice that it isn't Amare for three anymore.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/9/2012  10:52 PM
If you guys were paying attention they also mentioned that the improved personnel has a LOT to do with the success as well. You can't overlook the additions to the roster. Replacing TD, Fields, Bibby, Walker etc. with quality vets makes a huge diff, but that isn't what this is about. All of you keep making this a comparison argument when it's not. THIS WAS A DAMNED OBSERVATION!!! Understand the difference. This isn't Woody vs. MDA. It's just a point of FACT that Woody has employed MDA's schemes as the basis for the offense. Since NONE OF YOU have refuted this I would consider this yet another argument that you guys have failed to win on substance. We repeat this in every thread. I post written proof or video evidence and all you guys do is insult MDA or me. LAME...
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/9/2012  10:54 PM
nixluva wrote:If you guys were paying attention they also mentioned that the improved personnel has a LOT to do with the success as well. You can't overlook the additions to the roster. Replacing TD, Fields, Bibby, Walker etc. with quality vets makes a huge diff, but that isn't what this is about. All of you keep making this a comparison argument when it's not. THIS WAS A DAMNED OBSERVATION!!! Understand the difference. This isn't Woody vs. MDA. It's just a point of FACT that Woody has employed MDA's schemes as the basis for the offense. Since NONE OF YOU have refuted this I would consider this yet another argument that you guys have failed to win on substance. We repeat this in every thread. I post written proof or video evidence and all you guys do is insult MDA or me. LAME...
Except that the success was immediate with the same personnel.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

12/9/2012  11:06 PM
nixluva wrote:If you guys were paying attention they also mentioned that the improved personnel has a LOT to do with the success as well. You can't overlook the additions to the roster. Replacing TD, Fields, Bibby, Walker etc. with quality vets makes a huge diff, but that isn't what this is about. All of you keep making this a comparison argument when it's not. THIS WAS A DAMNED OBSERVATION!!! Understand the difference. This isn't Woody vs. MDA. It's just a point of FACT that Woody has employed MDA's schemes as the basis for the offense. Since NONE OF YOU have refuted this I would consider this yet another argument that you guys have failed to win on substance. We repeat this in every thread. I post written proof or video evidence and all you guys do is insult MDA or me. LAME...

Funny how you want to excuse a coach for personnel but hold the player accountable.

AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/9/2012  11:13 PM
nixluva wrote:If you guys were paying attention they also mentioned that the improved personnel has a LOT to do with the success as well. You can't overlook the additions to the roster. Replacing TD, Fields, Bibby, Walker etc. with quality vets makes a huge diff, but that isn't what this is about. All of you keep making this a comparison argument when it's not. THIS WAS A DAMNED OBSERVATION!!! Understand the difference. This isn't Woody vs. MDA. It's just a point of FACT that Woody has employed MDA's schemes as the basis for the offense. Since NONE OF YOU have refuted this I would consider this yet another argument that you guys have failed to win on substance. We repeat this in every thread. I post written proof or video evidence and all you guys do is insult MDA or me. LAME...

Give it up man.

D'Antoni has an old team in LA and he is already complaining that guys aren't athletic enough.

I recall Fields and Bibby being Mike D'Antoni players because they can shoot. Now Brewer, Smith, White, etc are Mike D'Antoni players. GTFOH.

As you pointed out a million times on this forum. SSOL is a VERY VERY specific system. This aint SSOL and you know that.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/9/2012  11:55 PM
As I've been saying it's sad to watch you guys keep resorting to MDA bashing when that isn't what this thread is about. To repeat the point of this thread is to point out that the offense still has a LOT of MDA's concepts at the core of it. So far NOTHING any of you have written refutes this. Media have gone on record supporting this point. Woody has admitted it as well. The only ones who can't come to grips with this fact are the posters on this forum who hate MDA so much that they can't even admit what it plainly happening every game they watch. That's cool tho cuz i'm content with knowing all of you are frauds when it comes down to it. No real counter arguments except "MDA SUCKS" "MDA's a loser" blah blah blah. MAN UP and admit we're right on this one!
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/9/2012  11:59 PM
nixluva wrote:As I've been saying it's sad to watch you guys keep resorting to MDA bashing when that isn't what this thread is about. To repeat the point of this thread is to point out that the offense still has a LOT of MDA's concepts at the core of it. So far NOTHING any of you have written refutes this. Media have gone on record supporting this point. Woody has admitted it as well. The only ones who can't come to grips with this fact are the posters on this forum who hate MDA so much that they can't even admit what it plainly happening every game they watch. That's cool tho cuz i'm content with knowing all of you are frauds when it comes down to it. No real counter arguments except "MDA SUCKS" "MDA's a loser" blah blah blah. MAN UP and admit we're right on this one!
I just watched his team allow the shot clock to run down to 5 seconds before fouling when they were down 5 with under 30 seconds to go. They lost to the Jazz at home and the announcers said it was the worst defensive performance by the Lakers this year. Fans were booing. The jazz got a road win in LA. D'Antoni is 4-7 and his team looks really bad.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/10/2012  12:03 AM
nixluva wrote:As I've been saying it's sad to watch you guys keep resorting to MDA bashing when that isn't what this thread is about. To repeat the point of this thread is to point out that the offense still has a LOT of MDA's concepts at the core of it. So far NOTHING any of you have written refutes this. Media have gone on record supporting this point. Woody has admitted it as well. The only ones who can't come to grips with this fact are the posters on this forum who hate MDA so much that they can't even admit what it plainly happening every game they watch. That's cool tho cuz i'm content with knowing all of you are frauds when it comes down to it. No real counter arguments except "MDA SUCKS" "MDA's a loser" blah blah blah. MAN UP and admit we're right on this one!

LOL so using a few MODIFIED sets from MDA is now the CORE of our system now. Come on man stop it.

So we can say SSOL is a modified form Nellie ball right?

You act like the core principles of SSOL are some new idea. The core principles of most systems are the same. The implementation of those core principles differs though.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

12/10/2012  12:06 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:As I've been saying it's sad to watch you guys keep resorting to MDA bashing when that isn't what this thread is about. To repeat the point of this thread is to point out that the offense still has a LOT of MDA's concepts at the core of it. So far NOTHING any of you have written refutes this. Media have gone on record supporting this point. Woody has admitted it as well. The only ones who can't come to grips with this fact are the posters on this forum who hate MDA so much that they can't even admit what it plainly happening every game they watch. That's cool tho cuz i'm content with knowing all of you are frauds when it comes down to it. No real counter arguments except "MDA SUCKS" "MDA's a loser" blah blah blah. MAN UP and admit we're right on this one!
I just watched his team allow the shot clock to run down to 5 seconds before fouling when they were down 5 with under 30 seconds to go. They lost to the Jazz at home and the announcers said it was the worst defensive performance by the Lakers this year. Fans were booing. The jazz got a road win in LA. D'Antoni is 4-7 and his team looks really bad.

that was a real MDA moment

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/10/2012  1:34 AM
You guys are still trying to make this about MDA vs. Woody or just a plain old MDA bashing. You know reading is fundamental. STAY ON TOPIC! The point of this thread isn't about MDA as a coach vs. Woody as a coach nor is about the current state of the Lakers vs. the Knicks. You guys only do that because you have NOTHING of substance to make your case about the point of this thread. You've lost the argument and only want to kick dirt on MDA. The point is that the Knicks are still making use of MDA's offensive system. That stuff is working for this team. Many of you guys hated on this system and tried to make it seem like we'd move away from it, but we're still running Spread floor, high PnR and shooting 3's at a league leading pace. ie. MDA Ball!!! Refute that or don't waste our time.
ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
12/10/2012  8:58 AM
MDA didn't create Spread, high PnR, or shooting 3's.
SSOL visited.....

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy