[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

O'Conner: Indy, Donnie, Melo, "The Trade", Nuggets, MDA....
Author Thread
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

11/20/2012  11:59 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/20/2012  12:04 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
holfresh wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:Hotfresh,

Its rare that you see inefficient winners. Kobe was not too efficient but he did many other things that covered that up. Iverson got to the finals and was horribly inefficient.

Overall, it's tough to find inefficient winners and there is a reason for that.

Having said that, you still need the eyeball test to see and view the other aspects of the game that are shielded by stats.

Precisely my point...Championships are won by the play of a team and not by the efficiency of an individual...There are other aspect of the game that has to be happening for u to be successful...Focus on efficiency doesn't tell the complete story...How does a defense figure into being efficient???..We all know you aren't winning without it...Knicks are playing great ball and winning..No rings yet but who is efficient???...U can see how they are winning tho...

Still, you can't find/name too many inefficient championship player/teams.

But I can find lots teams/players that are efficient who aren't Champions..


Right; you can find lots of volume scorers on teams that aren't successful too.
Efficiency is necessary but not sufficient for team success.

Billips won, inefficient, Isiah won, inefficient, Kobe won, inefficient, Ewing should have won, Drexler clould have won, both inefficient, if not for Jordan...There are bigger things at work than efficiency...

I am not sure how you gauge efficiency.

Billups' PER and TS are off the charts. FG does not say the whole story.

They add FT to his FG...Which is why I don't take these numbers seriously..So a guy who shoots well from the line tends to trend higher...That's not efficient in my eyes...But hey, run with it...

AUTOADVERT
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

11/20/2012  12:00 PM
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
11/20/2012  12:54 PM
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

11/20/2012  2:48 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/20/2012  3:01 PM
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Which is true but those stats are skewed and not reflective of what one would normally considered efficient..For example as Knickshot brought up Billups...His FG% is bad...He shot selection is one of the worst I have seen in the game..He shoots early in the clock, and sometimes further out behind the three point line than one would normally be shooting..He often shoot of out the flow of the offense...But his game is a ball control game....He isn't good at the pick and roll so he doesn't make those risky passes...He is slow, so he isn't pushing the ball on the break with might be prone to 1 more turnover per game, maybe...So his overall assist to turnover should be good...His ft are excellent but his shot selection and FG is horrible yet he is considered efficient...It just doesn't tell the whole story, does it...

There are other variables that go into it...But Billups as an efficient player, can't see it...

mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

11/20/2012  3:13 PM
holfresh wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
holfresh wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:Hotfresh,

Its rare that you see inefficient winners. Kobe was not too efficient but he did many other things that covered that up. Iverson got to the finals and was horribly inefficient.

Overall, it's tough to find inefficient winners and there is a reason for that.

Having said that, you still need the eyeball test to see and view the other aspects of the game that are shielded by stats.

Precisely my point...Championships are won by the play of a team and not by the efficiency of an individual...There are other aspect of the game that has to be happening for u to be successful...Focus on efficiency doesn't tell the complete story...How does a defense figure into being efficient???..We all know you aren't winning without it...Knicks are playing great ball and winning..No rings yet but who is efficient???...U can see how they are winning tho...

Still, you can't find/name too many inefficient championship player/teams.

But I can find lots teams/players that are efficient who aren't Champions..


Right; you can find lots of volume scorers on teams that aren't successful too.
Efficiency is necessary but not sufficient for team success.

Billips won, inefficient, Isiah won, inefficient, Kobe won, inefficient, Ewing should have won, Drexler clould have won, both inefficient, if not for Jordan...There are bigger things at work than efficiency...

I am not sure how you gauge efficiency.

Billups' PER and TS are off the charts. FG does not say the whole story.

They add FT to his FG...Which is why I don't take these numbers seriously..So a guy who shoots well from the line tends to trend higher...That's not efficient in my eyes...But hey, run with it...

They add FT% and 3pt%

Those both make huge difference in efficiency.

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

11/20/2012  3:18 PM
It's all good..Just not a believer that's all...I think the eye test does a better job for me...
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

11/20/2012  3:20 PM
holfresh wrote:It's all good..Just not a believer that's all...I think the eye test does a better job for me...

I think you need both.

To say that Billups was inefficient base on his 2 pt FG%, and, while his PER and TS is insanely high - is not doing justice to your eye test

IrishKnickFan
Posts: 23223
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2012
Member: #4171

11/20/2012  3:24 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
holfresh wrote:It's all good..Just not a believer that's all...I think the eye test does a better job for me...

I think you need both.

To say that Billups was inefficient base on his 2 pt FG%, and, while his PER and TS is insanely high - is not doing justice to your eye test

LOL
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

11/20/2012  3:32 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/20/2012  3:34 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
holfresh wrote:It's all good..Just not a believer that's all...I think the eye test does a better job for me...

I think you need both.

To say that Billups was inefficient base on his 2 pt FG%, and, while his PER and TS is insanely high - is not doing justice to your eye test

Not wanting to get into it, BUT..How about his shot selection...turnover ratio goes into it, right..Dude is horrible pick and roll guy so he doesn't make risky passes..He is slow he doesn't push the ball..Less propensity to turn it over...How about he shoots early in the clock or disrupts the flow of the offense with his shots...Yet there is a stat out there that say this is good because you hit threes and ft..How is that possible???..Hollinger adds different values to certain aspects of his rating...Who decides that???..It's all weighted differently...So he is efficient because Hollinger says so???

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

11/20/2012  3:48 PM
P.S....No one who shoots 41% should be considered efficient...
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
11/20/2012  3:52 PM
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Which is true but those stats are skewed and not reflective of what one would normally considered efficient..For example as Knickshot brought up Billups...His FG% is bad...He shot selection is one of the worst I have seen in the game..He shoots early in the clock, and sometimes further out behind the three point line than one would normally be shooting..He often shoot of out the flow of the offense...But his game is a ball control game....He isn't good at the pick and roll so he doesn't make those risky passes...He is slow, so he isn't pushing the ball on the break with might be prone to 1 more turnover per game, maybe...So his overall assist to turnover should be good...His ft are excellent but his shot selection and FG is horrible yet he is considered efficient...It just doesn't tell the whole story, does it...

There are other variables that go into it...But Billups as an efficient player, can't see it...

yea, looking at billups career numbers you would wonder how that is efficient, without getting into al of the TS stuff, it sure doesn't look that way.. but what i was arguing is that some guys are not as efficient, but they make up for it in other ways, for example kidd.. He was in his prime not only an elite defender at the Pg spot, but an elite rebounder at that position and the best playmaker in the leauge.... the impact was huge... so while efficiency dosn't always mean championship, I just can't wonder why someone would not prefer an efficient player over one who is not, unless that other player has those other parts to his game like kidd does.. I don't think we can say that for carmelo..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

11/20/2012  4:03 PM
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Which is true but those stats are skewed and not reflective of what one would normally considered efficient..For example as Knickshot brought up Billups...His FG% is bad...He shot selection is one of the worst I have seen in the game..He shoots early in the clock, and sometimes further out behind the three point line than one would normally be shooting..He often shoot of out the flow of the offense...But his game is a ball control game....He isn't good at the pick and roll so he doesn't make those risky passes...He is slow, so he isn't pushing the ball on the break with might be prone to 1 more turnover per game, maybe...So his overall assist to turnover should be good...His ft are excellent but his shot selection and FG is horrible yet he is considered efficient...It just doesn't tell the whole story, does it...

There are other variables that go into it...But Billups as an efficient player, can't see it...

yea, looking at billups career numbers you would wonder how that is efficient, without getting into al of the TS stuff, it sure doesn't look that way.. but what i was arguing is that some guys are not as efficient, but they make up for it in other ways, for example kidd.. He was in his prime not only an elite defender at the Pg spot, but an elite rebounder at that position and the best playmaker in the leauge.... the impact was huge... so while efficiency dosn't always mean championship, I just can't wonder why someone would not prefer an efficient player over one who is not, unless that other player has those other parts to his game like kidd does.. I don't think we can say that for carmelo..


Ha..I'll take Melo over Kidd every day of the week and twice on Sundays...You have to game plan for Melo..Kidd, never, but that another argument for another day...But I get what you are saying...But along with Billups poor shooting, is his shot selection...
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
11/20/2012  4:11 PM
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Which is true but those stats are skewed and not reflective of what one would normally considered efficient..For example as Knickshot brought up Billups...His FG% is bad...He shot selection is one of the worst I have seen in the game..He shoots early in the clock, and sometimes further out behind the three point line than one would normally be shooting..He often shoot of out the flow of the offense...But his game is a ball control game....He isn't good at the pick and roll so he doesn't make those risky passes...He is slow, so he isn't pushing the ball on the break with might be prone to 1 more turnover per game, maybe...So his overall assist to turnover should be good...His ft are excellent but his shot selection and FG is horrible yet he is considered efficient...It just doesn't tell the whole story, does it...

There are other variables that go into it...But Billups as an efficient player, can't see it...

yea, looking at billups career numbers you would wonder how that is efficient, without getting into al of the TS stuff, it sure doesn't look that way.. but what i was arguing is that some guys are not as efficient, but they make up for it in other ways, for example kidd.. He was in his prime not only an elite defender at the Pg spot, but an elite rebounder at that position and the best playmaker in the leauge.... the impact was huge... so while efficiency dosn't always mean championship, I just can't wonder why someone would not prefer an efficient player over one who is not, unless that other player has those other parts to his game like kidd does.. I don't think we can say that for carmelo..

that's the whole thing of it. if melo had been a more complete player he would not be such a divisive figure.

he needs to work on his efficiency a lot because he has not been a good defender, has not been a great rebounder, has not been anything close to a creator for others.

billups is capable of creating for others, maybe not in the pick and roll but he certainly is a good enough floor general. and billups's most successful seasons in detroit and denver he was hovering around 60% true shooting.

what would help melo a lot is if he became a little more clever on his drives. as you noted he gets his stuff rejected a bunch. would it kill him to stop and do a pump fake in the lane and draw 2 free throws? honestly if he got to the line 11-12 times a game from getting fouled on drives he would do a great deal of good for his game.

i guess his fans are enamored of this "bully ball" approach-- this is bully ball, right? i'd rather see the dude play with more savvy and cleverness. i mean you have to know they are going to go for the rejection so why not get them off their feet, go up and under, convert and go to the line-- or not convert and still get two free throws.

i swear we will need to see this come playoff time!

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

11/20/2012  4:20 PM
dk7th wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Which is true but those stats are skewed and not reflective of what one would normally considered efficient..For example as Knickshot brought up Billups...His FG% is bad...He shot selection is one of the worst I have seen in the game..He shoots early in the clock, and sometimes further out behind the three point line than one would normally be shooting..He often shoot of out the flow of the offense...But his game is a ball control game....He isn't good at the pick and roll so he doesn't make those risky passes...He is slow, so he isn't pushing the ball on the break with might be prone to 1 more turnover per game, maybe...So his overall assist to turnover should be good...His ft are excellent but his shot selection and FG is horrible yet he is considered efficient...It just doesn't tell the whole story, does it...

There are other variables that go into it...But Billups as an efficient player, can't see it...

yea, looking at billups career numbers you would wonder how that is efficient, without getting into al of the TS stuff, it sure doesn't look that way.. but what i was arguing is that some guys are not as efficient, but they make up for it in other ways, for example kidd.. He was in his prime not only an elite defender at the Pg spot, but an elite rebounder at that position and the best playmaker in the leauge.... the impact was huge... so while efficiency dosn't always mean championship, I just can't wonder why someone would not prefer an efficient player over one who is not, unless that other player has those other parts to his game like kidd does.. I don't think we can say that for carmelo..

that's the whole thing of it. if melo had been a more complete player he would not be such a divisive figure.

he needs to work on his efficiency a lot because he has not been a good defender, has not been a great rebounder, has not been anything close to a creator for others.

billups is capable of creating for others, maybe not in the pick and roll but he certainly is a good enough floor general. and billups's most successful seasons in detroit and denver he was hovering around 60% true shooting.

what would help melo a lot is if he became a little more clever on his drives. as you noted he gets his stuff rejected a bunch. would it kill him to stop and do a pump fake in the lane and draw 2 free throws? honestly if he got to the line 11-12 times a game from getting fouled on drives he would do a great deal of good for his game.

i guess his fans are enamored of this "bully ball" approach-- this is bully ball, right? i'd rather see the dude play with more savvy and cleverness. i mean you have to know they are going to go for the rejection so why not get them off their feet, go up and under, convert and go to the line-- or not convert and still get two free throws.

i swear we will need to see this come playoff time!

Are u kidding???.Melo need to pull up in the lane and pump fake???..Did u just say that???

dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
11/20/2012  4:34 PM
holfresh wrote:
dk7th wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Which is true but those stats are skewed and not reflective of what one would normally considered efficient..For example as Knickshot brought up Billups...His FG% is bad...He shot selection is one of the worst I have seen in the game..He shoots early in the clock, and sometimes further out behind the three point line than one would normally be shooting..He often shoot of out the flow of the offense...But his game is a ball control game....He isn't good at the pick and roll so he doesn't make those risky passes...He is slow, so he isn't pushing the ball on the break with might be prone to 1 more turnover per game, maybe...So his overall assist to turnover should be good...His ft are excellent but his shot selection and FG is horrible yet he is considered efficient...It just doesn't tell the whole story, does it...

There are other variables that go into it...But Billups as an efficient player, can't see it...

yea, looking at billups career numbers you would wonder how that is efficient, without getting into al of the TS stuff, it sure doesn't look that way.. but what i was arguing is that some guys are not as efficient, but they make up for it in other ways, for example kidd.. He was in his prime not only an elite defender at the Pg spot, but an elite rebounder at that position and the best playmaker in the leauge.... the impact was huge... so while efficiency dosn't always mean championship, I just can't wonder why someone would not prefer an efficient player over one who is not, unless that other player has those other parts to his game like kidd does.. I don't think we can say that for carmelo..

that's the whole thing of it. if melo had been a more complete player he would not be such a divisive figure.

he needs to work on his efficiency a lot because he has not been a good defender, has not been a great rebounder, has not been anything close to a creator for others.

billups is capable of creating for others, maybe not in the pick and roll but he certainly is a good enough floor general. and billups's most successful seasons in detroit and denver he was hovering around 60% true shooting.

what would help melo a lot is if he became a little more clever on his drives. as you noted he gets his stuff rejected a bunch. would it kill him to stop and do a pump fake in the lane and draw 2 free throws? honestly if he got to the line 11-12 times a game from getting fouled on drives he would do a great deal of good for his game.

i guess his fans are enamored of this "bully ball" approach-- this is bully ball, right? i'd rather see the dude play with more savvy and cleverness. i mean you have to know they are going to go for the rejection so why not get them off their feet, go up and under, convert and go to the line-- or not convert and still get two free throws.

i swear we will need to see this come playoff time!

Are u kidding???.Melo need to pull up in the lane and pump fake???..Did u just say that???

not kidding. he is too predictable. it's why he gets stuffed even with less weight and doesn't go to the line more. it's why lebron and then the spurs jackson jammed him free throw line extended.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
11/20/2012  5:43 PM
dk7th wrote:
holfresh wrote:
dk7th wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Which is true but those stats are skewed and not reflective of what one would normally considered efficient..For example as Knickshot brought up Billups...His FG% is bad...He shot selection is one of the worst I have seen in the game..He shoots early in the clock, and sometimes further out behind the three point line than one would normally be shooting..He often shoot of out the flow of the offense...But his game is a ball control game....He isn't good at the pick and roll so he doesn't make those risky passes...He is slow, so he isn't pushing the ball on the break with might be prone to 1 more turnover per game, maybe...So his overall assist to turnover should be good...His ft are excellent but his shot selection and FG is horrible yet he is considered efficient...It just doesn't tell the whole story, does it...

There are other variables that go into it...But Billups as an efficient player, can't see it...

yea, looking at billups career numbers you would wonder how that is efficient, without getting into al of the TS stuff, it sure doesn't look that way.. but what i was arguing is that some guys are not as efficient, but they make up for it in other ways, for example kidd.. He was in his prime not only an elite defender at the Pg spot, but an elite rebounder at that position and the best playmaker in the leauge.... the impact was huge... so while efficiency dosn't always mean championship, I just can't wonder why someone would not prefer an efficient player over one who is not, unless that other player has those other parts to his game like kidd does.. I don't think we can say that for carmelo..

that's the whole thing of it. if melo had been a more complete player he would not be such a divisive figure.

he needs to work on his efficiency a lot because he has not been a good defender, has not been a great rebounder, has not been anything close to a creator for others.

billups is capable of creating for others, maybe not in the pick and roll but he certainly is a good enough floor general. and billups's most successful seasons in detroit and denver he was hovering around 60% true shooting.

what would help melo a lot is if he became a little more clever on his drives. as you noted he gets his stuff rejected a bunch. would it kill him to stop and do a pump fake in the lane and draw 2 free throws? honestly if he got to the line 11-12 times a game from getting fouled on drives he would do a great deal of good for his game.

i guess his fans are enamored of this "bully ball" approach-- this is bully ball, right? i'd rather see the dude play with more savvy and cleverness. i mean you have to know they are going to go for the rejection so why not get them off their feet, go up and under, convert and go to the line-- or not convert and still get two free throws.

i swear we will need to see this come playoff time!

Are u kidding???.Melo need to pull up in the lane and pump fake???..Did u just say that???

not kidding. he is too predictable. it's why he gets stuffed even with less weight and doesn't go to the line more. it's why lebron and then the spurs jackson jammed him free throw line extended.

This is a rare one.....I agree with you.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
11/20/2012  6:06 PM
tkf wrote:
foosballnick wrote:
tkf wrote:
foosballnick wrote:tkf,

You've mentioned a couple point in this thread that I am curious about.

One is that the Knicks will have to win a championship to justify the Melo trade. Just wondering why the expectations are so high? Knicks have not won in over 40 years, but in order for Melo to earn your respect this is what he must do? Even though you label him as only a "good" player in another thread. Do you feel that the prior to the Melo trade the roster was on it's way to a ship?


Second is that you indicated that the Nuggets are fine as constructed. Can you elaborate on how you see them finishing In the near future? I don't see them getting out of the First or second round in the West with this roster and don't see the former Knick pieces making significant contributions towards a ship.

why shouldn't they be high, we gave up a lot of pieces, picks and flexibility to get him.. we changed the team to suit him while pretty much throwing amare(100 mil man) to the back burner... we better win a ring or this was a complete waste....

I mean we don't have much to rebuild with, we gave that up... what are your expectations?


My expectations are to compete for a division title and get to the conference championship. It will be extremely difficult to beat the Heat if they are clicking. My expectations for the team prior to Melo were much lower. Compete on a night in and night out basis and get to the playoffs. I do not believe that longer term rebuilding efforts are effective any longer in the NBA given the new CBA. Teams either need to get lucky in the lottery or continually reload after 2-3 years.

I'm not sure why you would coin the Melo move as a waste without a championship. With or without the trade a championship is equally difficult and unlikely as long as Lebron leads the way. Further, the Knicks will have cap space after this run in 3 years. I like what I see in Grunwald so far and trust he will manage the roster appropriately. As long as the team is making money and competitive, Dolan will stay in check.

i think teams like the rockets, and thunder will dissagree... but to address your point, if you are not lucky in the lottery, how do you reload without the assets and picks to do so? if you are going to trade all of your flexibilty for one guy he better be "that guy", that foundation piece.. I just don't see carmelo as that guy and looking at your expectations I don't think you do as well.. this is not horse shoe.. you don't play to get close, you play to win...Are you telling me that the prior teas was never going to make any more moves?

Second is that you indicated that the Nuggets are fine as constructed. Can you elaborate on how you see them finishing In the near future?

sorry i didn't answer this before... Denver is young, they have picks, (our picks) very good youth and flexibility... they are a playoff team, and i can see them in the WCF over the next year or so, and at that point they can re-evaluate their talent, make moves or just add on with the picks they have.. their cap situation at the end of 14/15 season is very good, they will be able to go after more players... they are in very good shape... I mean they were not getting out of the first round with carmelo, i think even you can agree with that...

Further, the Knicks will have cap space after this run in 3 years.

even if that is the case, we won't have replenished any young talent.. just think in 2 years, guys like kyrie evans, jrue holliday, rondo, those guys who are still very young now will only be getting better, their teams will be adding pieces growing, we won't be doing that, we will almost be in rebuild mode with no young players(other than shump) having developed.... we may be behind those teams by then..

lets look at this... at the end of the 14/15 year, lets say we don't keep anyone not under contract, so that will leave us felton, shump and novak... feel good about buidling with that.. at least had we kept lin we can say, ok, we now have a foundation with lin and shump.. felton will be on the other side of 30 by then and he is just a average guard now... and look a this.. we will have our pick this year... most feel we will be good, so that is a late pick.. fine..

we have no pick next year in 2014, we also have no second round pick in 2013

we have our pick in 2015, and come 2016, the year in which we might not be as good depending if we are trying to rebuild as you stated since we will have cap room, denver has the right to swap, so if we are not good, they take our pick.. again, how do you rebuild that way.. you better hope we hit the free agent jackpot... and so far, we have yet to do that..

The Knicks didn't have picks to trade in the Melo deal that was why NJ's offer was so much better. The Knicks sent one 1st round pick to Denver. Most of the other picks had already been moved in previous trades. The Knicks were trying to be heavy hitters in 2010. When Walsh sent the teams lottery pick and a basically unprotected first rounder(2012) to move Jeffries contract you knew what the plan was. The young assets that you speak of have floundered since leaving NY. Not wishing them ill will. I think both Chandler and Gallo are rotation players and both might start on most teams.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
11/20/2012  6:10 PM
knickscity wrote:
dk7th wrote:
holfresh wrote:
dk7th wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Which is true but those stats are skewed and not reflective of what one would normally considered efficient..For example as Knickshot brought up Billups...His FG% is bad...He shot selection is one of the worst I have seen in the game..He shoots early in the clock, and sometimes further out behind the three point line than one would normally be shooting..He often shoot of out the flow of the offense...But his game is a ball control game....He isn't good at the pick and roll so he doesn't make those risky passes...He is slow, so he isn't pushing the ball on the break with might be prone to 1 more turnover per game, maybe...So his overall assist to turnover should be good...His ft are excellent but his shot selection and FG is horrible yet he is considered efficient...It just doesn't tell the whole story, does it...

There are other variables that go into it...But Billups as an efficient player, can't see it...

yea, looking at billups career numbers you would wonder how that is efficient, without getting into al of the TS stuff, it sure doesn't look that way.. but what i was arguing is that some guys are not as efficient, but they make up for it in other ways, for example kidd.. He was in his prime not only an elite defender at the Pg spot, but an elite rebounder at that position and the best playmaker in the leauge.... the impact was huge... so while efficiency dosn't always mean championship, I just can't wonder why someone would not prefer an efficient player over one who is not, unless that other player has those other parts to his game like kidd does.. I don't think we can say that for carmelo..

that's the whole thing of it. if melo had been a more complete player he would not be such a divisive figure.

he needs to work on his efficiency a lot because he has not been a good defender, has not been a great rebounder, has not been anything close to a creator for others.

billups is capable of creating for others, maybe not in the pick and roll but he certainly is a good enough floor general. and billups's most successful seasons in detroit and denver he was hovering around 60% true shooting.

what would help melo a lot is if he became a little more clever on his drives. as you noted he gets his stuff rejected a bunch. would it kill him to stop and do a pump fake in the lane and draw 2 free throws? honestly if he got to the line 11-12 times a game from getting fouled on drives he would do a great deal of good for his game.

i guess his fans are enamored of this "bully ball" approach-- this is bully ball, right? i'd rather see the dude play with more savvy and cleverness. i mean you have to know they are going to go for the rejection so why not get them off their feet, go up and under, convert and go to the line-- or not convert and still get two free throws.

i swear we will need to see this come playoff time!

Are u kidding???.Melo need to pull up in the lane and pump fake???..Did u just say that???

not kidding. he is too predictable. it's why he gets stuffed even with less weight and doesn't go to the line more. it's why lebron and then the spurs jackson jammed him free throw line extended.

This is a rare one.....I agree with you.

hey i'm like a broken clock-- i am accurate twice a day.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

11/20/2012  6:13 PM
dk7th wrote:
holfresh wrote:
dk7th wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Which is true but those stats are skewed and not reflective of what one would normally considered efficient..For example as Knickshot brought up Billups...His FG% is bad...He shot selection is one of the worst I have seen in the game..He shoots early in the clock, and sometimes further out behind the three point line than one would normally be shooting..He often shoot of out the flow of the offense...But his game is a ball control game....He isn't good at the pick and roll so he doesn't make those risky passes...He is slow, so he isn't pushing the ball on the break with might be prone to 1 more turnover per game, maybe...So his overall assist to turnover should be good...His ft are excellent but his shot selection and FG is horrible yet he is considered efficient...It just doesn't tell the whole story, does it...

There are other variables that go into it...But Billups as an efficient player, can't see it...

yea, looking at billups career numbers you would wonder how that is efficient, without getting into al of the TS stuff, it sure doesn't look that way.. but what i was arguing is that some guys are not as efficient, but they make up for it in other ways, for example kidd.. He was in his prime not only an elite defender at the Pg spot, but an elite rebounder at that position and the best playmaker in the leauge.... the impact was huge... so while efficiency dosn't always mean championship, I just can't wonder why someone would not prefer an efficient player over one who is not, unless that other player has those other parts to his game like kidd does.. I don't think we can say that for carmelo..

that's the whole thing of it. if melo had been a more complete player he would not be such a divisive figure.

he needs to work on his efficiency a lot because he has not been a good defender, has not been a great rebounder, has not been anything close to a creator for others.

billups is capable of creating for others, maybe not in the pick and roll but he certainly is a good enough floor general. and billups's most successful seasons in detroit and denver he was hovering around 60% true shooting.

what would help melo a lot is if he became a little more clever on his drives. as you noted he gets his stuff rejected a bunch. would it kill him to stop and do a pump fake in the lane and draw 2 free throws? honestly if he got to the line 11-12 times a game from getting fouled on drives he would do a great deal of good for his game.

i guess his fans are enamored of this "bully ball" approach-- this is bully ball, right? i'd rather see the dude play with more savvy and cleverness. i mean you have to know they are going to go for the rejection so why not get them off their feet, go up and under, convert and go to the line-- or not convert and still get two free throws.

i swear we will need to see this come playoff time!

Are u kidding???.Melo need to pull up in the lane and pump fake???..Did u just say that???

not kidding. he is too predictable. it's why he gets stuffed even with less weight and doesn't go to the line more. it's why lebron and then the spurs jackson jammed him free throw line extended.


For nine years, Melo has made a living going to the hole getting and ones...One of the quickest guys you see rebound a miss and execute a put back and because the refs having been making a few calls he should change his game..Get real...
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
11/20/2012  6:19 PM
holfresh wrote:
dk7th wrote:
holfresh wrote:
dk7th wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:
tkf wrote:
holfresh wrote:Jason Kidd got there, inefficient, Allen Iverson got there, inefficient...I'll take Melo getting us to the dance as inefficient as he is....thank you!!!!

this kind of reminds me of a friend of mine who flipped his car into a pole.. he wasn't wearing his seat belt and that saved his life..... I mean who in the heck needs seat belts right?

sometimes other factors play in.. Iverson, kidd did other things, especially kid who was a great playmaker.... those guys were better players.. but in the end, you do want efficient players....

run across a busy street with your eyes closed, you may get lucky a few times.. but that is not something i would practice..

i would like to know holfresh, what was your view of carmelo before he put on a knicks uniform?

NO...One thing has nothing to do with the other...Try again..

it's all relative man.... it's about doing the right thing,making the right decision, being efficient instead of inefficient, being smart instead of dumb... the same principles apply.

Which is true but those stats are skewed and not reflective of what one would normally considered efficient..For example as Knickshot brought up Billups...His FG% is bad...He shot selection is one of the worst I have seen in the game..He shoots early in the clock, and sometimes further out behind the three point line than one would normally be shooting..He often shoot of out the flow of the offense...But his game is a ball control game....He isn't good at the pick and roll so he doesn't make those risky passes...He is slow, so he isn't pushing the ball on the break with might be prone to 1 more turnover per game, maybe...So his overall assist to turnover should be good...His ft are excellent but his shot selection and FG is horrible yet he is considered efficient...It just doesn't tell the whole story, does it...

There are other variables that go into it...But Billups as an efficient player, can't see it...

yea, looking at billups career numbers you would wonder how that is efficient, without getting into al of the TS stuff, it sure doesn't look that way.. but what i was arguing is that some guys are not as efficient, but they make up for it in other ways, for example kidd.. He was in his prime not only an elite defender at the Pg spot, but an elite rebounder at that position and the best playmaker in the leauge.... the impact was huge... so while efficiency dosn't always mean championship, I just can't wonder why someone would not prefer an efficient player over one who is not, unless that other player has those other parts to his game like kidd does.. I don't think we can say that for carmelo..

that's the whole thing of it. if melo had been a more complete player he would not be such a divisive figure.

he needs to work on his efficiency a lot because he has not been a good defender, has not been a great rebounder, has not been anything close to a creator for others.

billups is capable of creating for others, maybe not in the pick and roll but he certainly is a good enough floor general. and billups's most successful seasons in detroit and denver he was hovering around 60% true shooting.

what would help melo a lot is if he became a little more clever on his drives. as you noted he gets his stuff rejected a bunch. would it kill him to stop and do a pump fake in the lane and draw 2 free throws? honestly if he got to the line 11-12 times a game from getting fouled on drives he would do a great deal of good for his game.

i guess his fans are enamored of this "bully ball" approach-- this is bully ball, right? i'd rather see the dude play with more savvy and cleverness. i mean you have to know they are going to go for the rejection so why not get them off their feet, go up and under, convert and go to the line-- or not convert and still get two free throws.

i swear we will need to see this come playoff time!

Are u kidding???.Melo need to pull up in the lane and pump fake???..Did u just say that???

not kidding. he is too predictable. it's why he gets stuffed even with less weight and doesn't go to the line more. it's why lebron and then the spurs jackson jammed him free throw line extended.


For nine years, Melo has made a living going to the hole getting and ones...One of the quickest guys you see rebound a miss and execute a put back and because the refs having been making a few calls he should change his game..Get real...

not change his game-- e x p a n d his game. look at dirk. until he followed up on the criticism barkley leveled at him-- no low post game-- he fell short. and then his coach asked him to recognize doubles earlier and keep that ball moving to beat the rotating defenders.

oh and dirk is an elite TS% guy for most of his career.

why not ask, demand, that anthony expand his game as well?

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
O'Conner: Indy, Donnie, Melo, "The Trade", Nuggets, MDA....

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy