[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Steve Nash thread (we probably need one now) Stein: Toronto and New York Nash's top two choices, no order
Author Thread
IrishKnickFan
Posts: 23223
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2012
Member: #4171

7/2/2012  8:47 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
IrishKnickFan wrote:i love shump but that injury he had is a severe injury. I mean its gonna take at least another yaer for him to be back to normal and who knows he might not be the same. I mean he already has had a history of knee injuries in his rookie year. I mean if he was a guy who scored 18-20 ppg then i would say hell no but we have to think about winning it all right now. We are not the thunder we dont have 7-8 years to figure it out

It is not severe. Guys come back from it all the time especially young guys


Are you talking about healthy guys who tear their ACLs in freak accidents or guys with weak, injury-prone knees even before the tear? I was just looking at the replay of the tear again. It's not like he had a bad collision and landed awkwardly. He was just dribbling the ball up court and out of nowhere his entire knee fell apart.

Same thing happened to Derrick Rose, non contact injury, but no one doubts Rose will come back with a vengeance once healed.


Really? I definitely would not give it a 100% chance that he'll return to MVP level.
i agree with you. rose is a hell of a player but he has had so many injuries already and he is only 23 so tahts not a good sign. I mean i've played with guys who were super talented but had bad injuries that limited what they could do even when they were healed. Now im not saying rose is done im just saying back injuries and ACL tears take time to come back to that MVP level
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/2/2012  8:48 PM
Modern medicine has proven better outcomes so I wouldn't worry until there's something to worry about.
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

7/2/2012  9:03 PM
s3231 wrote:I really love Shump but I wouldn't rule out trading him for Nash as much as I hate to say it...

Our core is built to win now and I think if it comes down to including Shump to bring Nash in, you really need to consider it since Shump might not be able to contribute at a high level at all next season.

It's not just about adding a PG with Nash, it's about adding one of the most lethal shooters in NBA history (we need shooting around Melo badly) and one of the best passers of all-time (we need someone to facilitate for our stars badly as well).

Moreover, Nash gives our offense a coach on the floor and to be honest, we need that since Woodson's idea of a great offense seems to be give the ball each time down the court to Melo for hero ball....

Simply put, adding Nash makes this team a true contender for the next couple of seasons and gives our rising star (Lin) the best mentor possible. Not to mention, we would still have the mini-MLE available to chase down a guy like Camby for even more depth.

I'm glad I'm not Grunwalk b/c that would be a tough decision to make...Fortunately though, it is being reported that Suns would be happy with Fields in there and it looks like we won't need to include Shump.


Factors to consider:

1) Nash's age

2) Shumpert's injury. and what you expect him to be like as a player in 5 years

3) Our present roster's window of opportunity

4) Whether or not you really think Nash is some kind of final piece who will help this Knicks team get a title


If Nash was 29 (Yeah, I know he could probably ask for the moon in terms of a contract), I would do it if financially feasible, especially given Shumpert's injury, and the uncertainty surrounding any serious damage to a guy's wheels.

If Nash was 29, and If you really believed in the roster you have, Nash could be the guy to put us over the top, and even be part of a of rebuilding process (or trade chip) if this roster failed to develop.

But Nash is not 29, so you really have to look at this roster's chances of getting by Miami in the next few years. Personally, I think this squad is never going to get you to the promised land... sorry. We will have some exciting playoff series and a lot of good moments, but we are never getting past Miami, barring an injury to one of their big 3.

I also think (hope) that Shumpert will be a very good player, who will emerge, at some point, as a leader on this team. Knowing the Knicks, we will also include future draft picks for Nash which will come to haunt us someday. I would hope that Lin and Shumpert will be playing for the Knicks for the next 8 years or so

You also have to look at the kind of team we have, and whether Nash is the right kind of PG for the collection of players we have. Personally, I don't think the Knicks have a roster best suited to Nash's skills. We have the pick and roll components, but for the most part our outside shooting, and the spacing it creates, is not there. In my opinion Nash will not be the player he has been in Phoenix because our offense is so predicated on what Anthony does. I, and others, have asked this question before: How do people expect the guy who became famous under MDA to do on a team whose star player rejected his former coach that kind of offense?

Will I take Nash on the cheap, For example, Fields and a future #2 pick?- yup. Will I sacrifice anything of real value on the team for him?- nope.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
MSG3
Posts: 22788
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/2/2009
Member: #2476
USA
7/2/2012  9:31 PM
I read somewhere that Bucher said Nash will make his decision tonight or tomorrow.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
7/2/2012  9:33 PM
Can't wait to for once be happy to say WE GOT PLAYED as he signs with Toronto
MSG3
Posts: 22788
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/2/2009
Member: #2476
USA
7/2/2012  9:36 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Can't wait to for once be happy to say WE GOT PLAYED as he signs with Toronto

History would suggest we're getting played. Thankfully if it's true it doesn't kill us and we now know we can use a sign and trade to to work something after signing our guys.

ATrain
Posts: 21487
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2010
Member: #3192

7/2/2012  9:42 PM
ChuckBuck wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
IrishKnickFan wrote:i love shump but that injury he had is a severe injury. I mean its gonna take at least another yaer for him to be back to normal and who knows he might not be the same. I mean he already has had a history of knee injuries in his rookie year. I mean if he was a guy who scored 18-20 ppg then i would say hell no but we have to think about winning it all right now. We are not the thunder we dont have 7-8 years to figure it out

It is not severe. Guys come back from it all the time especially young guys


Are you talking about healthy guys who tear their ACLs in freak accidents or guys with weak, injury-prone knees even before the tear? I was just looking at the replay of the tear again. It's not like he had a bad collision and landed awkwardly. He was just dribbling the ball up court and out of nowhere his entire knee fell apart.

Same thing happened to Derrick Rose, non contact injury, but no one doubts Rose will come back with a vengeance once healed.

This. Plus Rose also suffered from injuries all season long.

The Steve Nash thread (we probably need one now) Stein: Toronto and New York Nash's top two choices, no order

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy