fishmike wrote:mrbigshot... I never called you names. That was in response to the guy who a) made up false things and claimed I said them and b) said I had sand in my vagina (I dont).My true colors? What would those be? That I am pro-MDA and anti-Melo? I will repeat what I have said for however many years I have posted here. Its always about the players. Thats just me. Thats just how I feel about basketball. While people desperatly needed Chaney fired, then Lenny, then Larry, then Isiah, then MDA (and probably soon Woody) in order to fix this team I have and will continue to blame whatever issues exist with the team on the players, or at the very least primarily on the players. When the team stinks, its usually because you need better players.
I dont care what the circumstances between MDA and Melo were. The FACT is MDA failed here because he couldnt get his best player to play well. Another fact is that Melo didnt play hard for the last coach we had and it cost the Knicks games in the standings. Indy, Orl, Atl, Bos... all are about 4 games away from us. While Melo was pouting and standing in the corner we were losing games to bad teams. MDA had to go. Fine. The change needed to happen. OK.. lets all move on. But Melo bailing on the coach cost us games. Get it through your head. The Knicks PLAYERS have nobody to blame but themselves for not being a higher seed, so when we get smoked in round one the responsibility falls on the players. Are you going to blame the matchups on another failed post season? Sorry.. the players are responsible for that also.
Funny... your defense of Melo vs. MDA was he was told to stand in a corner when MDA did everything to get this guy involved at the start of the season.
Great people are still blaming MDA.
True colors... lol. Yea... good one. Im a Knick fan. I love em when they win and hate em when they lose. One thing I dont do though is blame coaches for players missing shots and getting beat by other players.
Fishmike, I apologize, I thought that was directed at me. I don't believe that you have a vagina and if you do, it occupies sand
Maybe Fish? Get it Fishmike?
Bad joke - sorry.
My statement of "Melo in the corner" was a silly over exaggeration meant to mimic the silly over exaggerated of "Melo dogged it and quit". I believe they are both silly and just used for propaganda purposes.
I agree that it is usually the players (for the most part) unless the coach is causing friction and/or contention and makes him about himself and, not catering to the players that he has to to stubborness. I think it is rarely about coaching skills. On this site, there are/were very few that were anti Melo and MDA or pro both. It is mostly a partisan stance with a few exceptions. By belittling Melo it states that "see, MDA was not bad it's just that Melo is an idiot" or belittling MDA as to say that it is the reason why Melo was playing badly. Both are untrue. It takes a collective effort to win and a collective effort to lose. MDA did not lose here because of Melo. He lost here for many reasons. Stat being one of them, Melo being one of them, TD being one of them ... Saying that they lost because of Melo not playing well is wrong on so many levels. He did a good job in PHX and a bad job here.
I have stated many times that Melo sucked. That Amare sucked. That MDA sucked and the defense sucked. Melo could not hit a jump shot at all!! Do you think he missed on purpose? I hate the partisanship that often defies logic.
We all just want the knicks to win. I don't blame players for a coach coaching badly or a coach for a player missing shots. It's way too simplistic and intentionally ignoring many other variables.
And again, I agree with you that coaches don't really make that much of a diff very often but there are exceptions:
PJax, Pat Riley, Pop - having a great coach that demands respect do to his record makes a huge difference. Unfortunately with todays diva's, its hard to get respect just because you're the coach.