jrodmc wrote:BigSm00th wrote:LOL the pity for bin laden is comical and borderline lunacy.this guy has the blood of thousands of innocent men, women, and children on his hands.
here is a maxim: if you don't actively plot and conspire to kill innocent people, you won't get shot in the head by a navy SEAL team that raids your house.
i think that is pretty fair. don't terrorize and you will not be terrorized.
Small, nitpicky point, but I don't think the SEALS think they are terrorists. I certainly don't think they are. That's like saying cops performing drug raids are terrorists. Terrorism is the premeditated use of violence against unarmed civilians for fanatical purposes. Saying Bin Laden is an unarmed civilian is like saying Columbian drug lords are unarmed civilians.
As you stated, it's very simple: Killing and/or planning to kill thousands (or any number) of unarmed civilians is what bad people do. Bad things have bad consequences. Getting yourself shot in the head (or hung) is one of those bad consequences. The folks who carry out the execution of justice are not terrorists.
Send closk.
Before I comment, as evidenced previously, I stand behind that decision. Completely.
The uproar comes from violence being he answer to violence. Means justifying the ends. That type of stuff. Furthermore, some see it as defying democracy, supposedly what this whole thing about: Radicalism versus Democracy.
I personally don't give a ****. He attacked our Nation-State and he was handled in kind. I don't understand why people think statesmenship either shouldn't or doesn't apply. He got his, and was denied the opportunity to address his minions and/or become a martyr
