[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Sure, Gut The Team And Throw In Landry Fields While You're At It
Author Thread
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
2/15/2011  6:30 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/15/2011  6:34 PM
eViL wrote:trading for players you can sign with cap space is the greatest plan of all </sarcasm>

Donnie Walsh has a lot more inside information that you and I and any of the reporters publishing articles about this. He has a better understand of the Melo situation. If Melo could be had via free agency, why is Donnie Walsh making trade offers?
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/15/2011  6:30 PM
eViL wrote:trading for players you can sign with cap space is the greatest plan of all </sarcasm>

Well it leaves no room for doubt. You get the 2nd piece to the puzzle and continue on from there. I really think many of us underestimate the impact of adding a 2nd Elite player to this team. A guy who can go off for 30, 40, or 50 on any given night and consistently gives you a focal point for your offense for the full 48 minutes is worth it. Now when Amar'e sits, we still have a focal point on offense and that means less meandering on offense, like we see the team do when Amar'e goes to the bench. Trust me it's gonna make a huge difference even right now.

Then we'll be able to add on to the team over the next 5 years. It's much easier to do when you already have the stars in place.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/15/2011  6:37 PM
OldFan wrote:No. Trade for Melo at a more reasonable price. If you can't do that then be a little more patient and see how things develop. Then you still have the option of trying to sign Howard.

Add Howard to most of what we have now and the Knicks are contenders.

If you sign Melo and give up the Farm you still need another superstar and may not even be able to do it under the new CBA.

Howard? who says he's even looking to get out of Orlando? he won't even be able to opt out til after the 2012 season he's not even addressing that topic at this point... what's next, we whiff on Howard & shift our focus on the next bigname FA in 2013? 2014? & who says Howard would want to share the frontcourt with Amare? if anything i would picture him wanting to play with a perimeter stud... if we want any hope of getting Howard it would likely involve us trading Amare in the process.

& what is your definition of "giving up the farm"? we get to keep 2 out of Wilson, Fields or Mozgov along with AR & our other bench players... in essence you're trading Felton for Billups & Gallo, another starter & a 1st rd pick for a superstar player... that's giving up the farm? what's your idea of a "fair trade"? Wilson, AR & Curry's expiring isn't gonna get it done & we have zero idea if we'll able to sign Melo this summer, there's way too many unknowns surrounding the new CBA & other teams getting involved to know what's gonna happen if we pass up the chance to trade for Melo now.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
2/15/2011  6:39 PM
TMS wrote:
eViL wrote:trading for players you can sign with cap space is the greatest plan of all </sarcasm>

do u know it's a guarantee that we'll get Melo in free agency?

none of us have any guarantees of anything, but that doesn't stop people from fearing franchise tags and other hypothetical scenarios. until you get him, there are no guarantees. all i can guarantee is that if he knows what's good, he will wait and sign in free agency allowing his new team (that's us) to upgrade by using the assets they saved by not having to trade for him. and we'll be in a better position as a team. that's 100% indisputable.

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
abs
Posts: 20060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/1/2011
Member: #3390

2/15/2011  6:39 PM
TMS wrote:3 for 2 i am ok with if i had to as long as third is not moz think we need his size based on rest of roster...i rally believe a deal will get done with them...far cry from nobody on the roster we are interested in...
abs wrote:idk 3/5 of your starting rotation 9 days before trade deadline plus a # 1 while there dont seem to be many other suitors that will make trade of similiar value....would love to be fly on wall or be in DW shoes great poker hand...

you're giving up 3 starters but you're getting back 2, 1 of whom is probably the best pure scorer in the NBA... i don't see what the hold up is... even if there are no other suitors, we're in no way guaranteed that Melo will sign here in free agency this summer... i personally think it would be unwise to take that risk... gonna be a tense 9 days.

eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
2/15/2011  6:42 PM
nixluva wrote:
eViL wrote:trading for players you can sign with cap space is the greatest plan of all </sarcasm>

Well it leaves no room for doubt. You get the 2nd piece to the puzzle and continue on from there. I really think many of us underestimate the impact of adding a 2nd Elite player to this team. A guy who can go off for 30, 40, or 50 on any given night and consistently gives you a focal point for your offense for the full 48 minutes is worth it. Now when Amar'e sits, we still have a focal point on offense and that means less meandering on offense, like we see the team do when Amar'e goes to the bench. Trust me it's gonna make a huge difference even right now.

Then we'll be able to add on to the team over the next 5 years. It's much easier to do when you already have the stars in place.

but we'll always be short one star if we have to trade to get melo. we will have to compete with miami every step of the way here. they will be trying to get those role players too. and with both teams capped out, and one team having 3 big stars vs. our team with only 2 big stars -- they will be the the desired destination for great role players who take pay cuts.

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/15/2011  6:43 PM
The 2 teams will talk for real at the All Star Game and i'm very confident they'll finalize this thing.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/15/2011  6:47 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/15/2011  6:48 PM
eViL wrote:
TMS wrote:
eViL wrote:trading for players you can sign with cap space is the greatest plan of all </sarcasm>

do u know it's a guarantee that we'll get Melo in free agency?

none of us have any guarantees of anything, but that doesn't stop people from fearing franchise tags and other hypothetical scenarios. until you get him, there are no guarantees. all i can guarantee is that if he knows what's good, he will wait and sign in free agency allowing his new team (that's us) to upgrade by using the assets they saved by not having to trade for him. and we'll be in a better position as a team. that's 100% indisputable.

all i know is DW is engaging the Nuggets in trade talks, he has access to information that you or i don't, that tells me he is just as concerned about fearing franchise tags & other hypothetical scenarios as anyone of us are otherwise he'd have just told Denver he's not dealing with them from the very beginning... there are no undisputable outcomes to this Melo drama, but what i do know is if we lose out on him because we're afraid to make a trade like this it will be a huge mistake for this franchise.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/15/2011  6:47 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/15/2011  6:48 PM
fishmike wrote:
Silverfuel wrote:
misterearl wrote:Silverfuel - please read more carefully. Nalod's post read that "incremental growth was an accomplishment" NOT a guarantee.

I'm asking him how does he know we can accomplish incremental growth every year. And please stop with the silly "please read more carefully" type condescending stuff.

your not being reasonable

chandler 23
Gallo 22, 150 NBA games
Fields 22, Rookie
Douglas 24, 108 NBA games
Williams 24, 160 NBA games
Mosgov 24, Rookie
AR 21, 113 NBA games

Really? These guys are what they are? Saying this group wont continue to improve is simply blowing smoke, especially when you consider the core guys in Chandler, Gallo, Fields and Mosgov are all high character guys with strong work ethics.


the knicks have 3 guys on that list that can start for most teams in the NBA.. gallo, chandler, fields... the other guys are solid rotation players for sure..... and they are all 24 and younger.. how can one not see growth here...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/15/2011  6:51 PM
TMS wrote:
OldFan wrote:
TMS wrote:i pretty much agree w/this guy's article:

http://newyork.sbnation.com/2011/2/15/1995384/the-price-isnt-too-high-make-the-trade-knicks

The Price Isn't Too High - Make the Trade, Knicks

By Joe Caporoso - Contributor

The Knicks need to start building their own big three, right now


Feb 15, 2011 - As SB Nation has been covering today, the New York Knicks have the ability to obtain Carmelo Anthony for Raymond Felton, Danillo Gallinari, another starter (likely Wilson Chandler), Eddy Curry's expiring contract (is that his full name now?), and a first round pick in return for Anthony and Chauncey Billups.

The initial reaction of many has been that the price is too steep and the Knicks should walk away from the offer. However, the more you watch this team hover around .500 and the more you realize they are only four games away from not even being a playoff team in the East, the more you need to get on board with this deal.

Yes, Raymond Felton got off to a very strong start but there is no arguing his play has declined in the previous the month, which has concincided with the Knicks being a 5-10 team in that period. Gallinari is young and has plenty of potential but believe it not, you have to give up something to get somebody like Carmelo Anthony on your team. Wilson Chandler would likely be the third piece in the deal and that is fine because you have to part with his fragile self before you let Landry Fields go anywhere.

The approach of waiting until free agency is starting to seem like a crap-shoot, with Anthony now entertaining the thought of signing an extension in Denver. There is also a chance another team, Chicago, Dallas, or Houston jumps in at the last hour before the trade deadline and spends the next few months getting Anthony to pen a long term deal.

If you are the Knicks, you take Billups for the rest of the season, put Anthony with Amare Stoudemaire, Landry Fields, and your collection of bench players (Shawne Williams, Bill Walker, Ronny Turiaf, Toney Douglas) and hope to make some noise in the Eastern Conference playoffs. The younger players will gain some worthy experience, while Anthony and Stoudemaire can get used to playing together in a big spot. After the season, you buyout Billups for 4 million dollars instead of paying his ridiculous 2011 salary and play the waiting game for Chris Paul or Deron Williams who should be counting the seconds until they could join Anthony and Stoudemaire.

If this team ever wants to win a title in a conference shared with the Celtics, Heat, Magic, and Bulls...it is going to take more than what they have now, way more. Raymond Felton is a nice player, but long term it is going to take a big three of Stoudemaire, Anthony, and Paul or Williams supported by an ideal role player like Fields and a young bench that hopefully develops to knock off any of those powers.

So you make this trade and you're still a superstar and a defense away from being a contender. Sound like a plan.

as opposed to your plan which is to develop Gallo & Wilson into the superstars we need to take us to the title?


I think people are ignoring the last part.. a young bench that "hopefully" develops.. haha so we are banking on williams, walker, turiaf and douglas becomming a championship bench, but can't bank on chandler and gallo becomming allstar talents... and they are closer to allstar level than those other guys are to championship bench ability..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
2/15/2011  6:52 PM
Silverfuel wrote:
eViL wrote:trading for players you can sign with cap space is the greatest plan of all </sarcasm>

Donnie Walsh has a lot more inside information that you and I and any of the reporters publishing articles about this. He has a better understand of the Melo situation. If Melo could be had via free agency, why is Donnie Walsh making trade offers?

honestly, i have no idea what the hell goes on behind the scenes and sometimes i feel like a bit of an idiot for even debating it. after all, the true winners in this rumor mill are the papers, the NBA and the rest of the media outlets that wanna keep us locked in. i really have no idea what is happening with Donnie, but i find it hard to believe that he threw away two seasons with the purpose of adding flexibility, and then decides to sh!t the bed out of fear of losing a trade for a player he feels he can sign.

melo wants to be in NY. we'll have the room to get him as a free agent and then flip our assets for another top tier guy. i cannot for the life of me see how he doesn't recognize that.

put it to you this way, do you think lebron really entertained signing anywhere but miami? i don't. then why did he host all those recruiting meetings? to give the appearance that it wasn't one big sham. the optimist in me feels like that's what this is. in the end, denver can say they tried to make the deal, NY can say they tried to make the deal, melo can say he kept his options open just like he said he would, and then finally, when he signs, he says "ny was just the best place for me and my family and it gives me the best chance at a title." then everyone but us can hate him for coming here. the end.

that's my explanation to why you hear about Donnie being in trade talks. the alternative is no trade talks and it looks like we've been tampering the whole time.

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/15/2011  6:55 PM
tkf wrote:
TMS wrote:
OldFan wrote:
TMS wrote:i pretty much agree w/this guy's article:

http://newyork.sbnation.com/2011/2/15/1995384/the-price-isnt-too-high-make-the-trade-knicks

The Price Isn't Too High - Make the Trade, Knicks

By Joe Caporoso - Contributor

The Knicks need to start building their own big three, right now


Feb 15, 2011 - As SB Nation has been covering today, the New York Knicks have the ability to obtain Carmelo Anthony for Raymond Felton, Danillo Gallinari, another starter (likely Wilson Chandler), Eddy Curry's expiring contract (is that his full name now?), and a first round pick in return for Anthony and Chauncey Billups.

The initial reaction of many has been that the price is too steep and the Knicks should walk away from the offer. However, the more you watch this team hover around .500 and the more you realize they are only four games away from not even being a playoff team in the East, the more you need to get on board with this deal.

Yes, Raymond Felton got off to a very strong start but there is no arguing his play has declined in the previous the month, which has concincided with the Knicks being a 5-10 team in that period. Gallinari is young and has plenty of potential but believe it not, you have to give up something to get somebody like Carmelo Anthony on your team. Wilson Chandler would likely be the third piece in the deal and that is fine because you have to part with his fragile self before you let Landry Fields go anywhere.

The approach of waiting until free agency is starting to seem like a crap-shoot, with Anthony now entertaining the thought of signing an extension in Denver. There is also a chance another team, Chicago, Dallas, or Houston jumps in at the last hour before the trade deadline and spends the next few months getting Anthony to pen a long term deal.

If you are the Knicks, you take Billups for the rest of the season, put Anthony with Amare Stoudemaire, Landry Fields, and your collection of bench players (Shawne Williams, Bill Walker, Ronny Turiaf, Toney Douglas) and hope to make some noise in the Eastern Conference playoffs. The younger players will gain some worthy experience, while Anthony and Stoudemaire can get used to playing together in a big spot. After the season, you buyout Billups for 4 million dollars instead of paying his ridiculous 2011 salary and play the waiting game for Chris Paul or Deron Williams who should be counting the seconds until they could join Anthony and Stoudemaire.

If this team ever wants to win a title in a conference shared with the Celtics, Heat, Magic, and Bulls...it is going to take more than what they have now, way more. Raymond Felton is a nice player, but long term it is going to take a big three of Stoudemaire, Anthony, and Paul or Williams supported by an ideal role player like Fields and a young bench that hopefully develops to knock off any of those powers.

So you make this trade and you're still a superstar and a defense away from being a contender. Sound like a plan.

as opposed to your plan which is to develop Gallo & Wilson into the superstars we need to take us to the title?


I think people are ignoring the last part.. a young bench that "hopefully" develops.. haha so we are banking on williams, walker, turiaf and douglas becomming a championship bench, but can't bank on chandler and gallo becomming allstar talents... and they are closer to allstar level than those other guys are to championship bench ability..

the point of the article was to say you need the stars & have the bench around them to win a title... it didn't put any onus on our bench guys developing into stars themselves... if u don't think guys like Williams, Walker, Turiaf & Douglas can become a championship worthy bench then tell me how guys like Leon Powe, Trevor Ariza, Luke Walton, Eddie House, etc. have championship rings on their finger.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

2/15/2011  6:56 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/15/2011  7:02 PM
TMS wrote:i pretty much agree w/this guy's article:

http://newyork.sbnation.com/2011/2/15/1995384/the-price-isnt-too-high-make-the-trade-knicks

The Price Isn't Too High - Make the Trade, Knicks

By Joe Caporoso - Contributor

The Knicks need to start building their own big three, right now


Feb 15, 2011 - As SB Nation has been covering today, the New York Knicks have the ability to obtain Carmelo Anthony for Raymond Felton, Danillo Gallinari, another starter (likely Wilson Chandler), Eddy Curry's expiring contract (is that his full name now?), and a first round pick in return for Anthony and Chauncey Billups.

The initial reaction of many has been that the price is too steep and the Knicks should walk away from the offer. However, the more you watch this team hover around .500 and the more you realize they are only four games away from not even being a playoff team in the East, the more you need to get on board with this deal.

Yes, Raymond Felton got off to a very strong start but there is no arguing his play has declined in the previous the month, which has concincided with the Knicks being a 5-10 team in that period. Gallinari is young and has plenty of potential but believe it not, you have to give up something to get somebody like Carmelo Anthony on your team. Wilson Chandler would likely be the third piece in the deal and that is fine because you have to part with his fragile self before you let Landry Fields go anywhere.

The approach of waiting until free agency is starting to seem like a crap-shoot, with Anthony now entertaining the thought of signing an extension in Denver. There is also a chance another team, Chicago, Dallas, or Houston jumps in at the last hour before the trade deadline and spends the next few months getting Anthony to pen a long term deal.

If you are the Knicks, you take Billups for the rest of the season, put Anthony with Amare Stoudemaire, Landry Fields, and your collection of bench players (Shawne Williams, Bill Walker, Ronny Turiaf, Toney Douglas) and hope to make some noise in the Eastern Conference playoffs. The younger players will gain some worthy experience, while Anthony and Stoudemaire can get used to playing together in a big spot. After the season, you buyout Billups for 4 million dollars instead of paying his ridiculous 2011 salary and play the waiting game for Chris Paul or Deron Williams who should be counting the seconds until they could join Anthony and Stoudemaire.

If this team ever wants to win a title in a conference shared with the Celtics, Heat, Magic, and Bulls...it is going to take more than what they have now, way more. Raymond Felton is a nice player, but long term it is going to take a big three of Stoudemaire, Anthony, and Paul or Williams supported by an ideal role player like Fields and a young bench that hopefully develops to knock off any of those powers.

Me too but the PG situation concerns me a little bit with this scenario as does this guy's plan for next year..Suppose we do this exactly how this guy outlines it: Take on Billups now and then buy him out for $4M in the offseason to avoid playing him the full $14M. Who's our PG next year?? This guy's basically saying scrap the whole year next season and wait for Paul or D-Will..I don't know if I agree with that...If anything, I'd keep Billups next year and just let him expire normally..Why waste an entire season?? To be honest, I would rather exclude Felton from the deal altogether and sweeten the pot another way -- maybe Moz or Moz and a 2014 1st rounder if necessary (assuming we're already either trading Randolph for a 1 or trading him to Minny and the Wolves then redirecting a 1st rounder + Corey Brewer) in lieu of Felton..So we're looking at:

Gallo, Chandler, Curry's expiring, AR for a pick [AR to Minny who agrees to send DEN Brewer + a 1st rounder], Moz OR Moz and our 2014 1st, $3M cash

What'dya think? Think they'd rather have Felton and save about $7M unloading Billups or could they be convinced to take Moz/Moz + that 2014 1st instead? I think I'd rather the latter..Hefty price, I know (I don't even care about trading Mozgov--losing him in a Melo deal wouldn't bother me in the slightest), but I think I'd prefer that and we forge ahead with Ray...We could always attempt to put together a package for either CP3 or D-Will using Felton eventually, no?? Then again, I'd love to keep AR outta this and actually PLAY HIM NEXT YEAR (AR slides into the Gallinari role where I think he'd better compliment STAT & Melo) but I have no confidence is ever gonna play him, so I guess he's gotta go..I don't even know any more man..

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/15/2011  6:58 PM
All I know is that i'm glad to know that the 2 teams plan to negotiate next weekend and this will likely be all over and done with. I really don't want to go into the offseason with this still hanging in the balance. Making the deal now erases all doubt and secures the future. I look at how KG, Pierce and Allen are finishing strong and there's a chance we can get our guys at a younger age than they were. A good run of 5 or more years is worth the sacrifice. Elite players are so rare, why take a chance on missing out on one in exchange for role players?
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
2/15/2011  6:59 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/15/2011  7:00 PM
eViL wrote:put it to you this way, do you think lebron really entertained signing anywhere but miami? i don't. then why did he host all those recruiting meetings? to give the appearance that it wasn't one big sham. the optimist in me feels like that's what this is. in the end, denver can say they tried to make the deal, NY can say they tried to make the deal, melo can say he kept his options open just like he said he would, and then finally, when he signs, he says "ny was just the best place for me and my family and it gives me the best chance at a title." then everyone but us can hate him for coming here. the end.

that's my explanation to why you hear about Donnie being in trade talks. the alternative is no trade talks and it looks like we've been tampering the whole time.


We have absolutely nothing to discuss then because we are talking about two totally different things. The issue at hand is the trade talks and if the trade talks are a sham then you and anyone else that feels this way can rest assured that NYK players like Gallo, Chandler etc are not going anywhere. If I were to reach that conclusion, I wouldn't even bother with these trade threads.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/15/2011  7:01 PM
Finestrg wrote:
TMS wrote:i pretty much agree w/this guy's article:

http://newyork.sbnation.com/2011/2/15/1995384/the-price-isnt-too-high-make-the-trade-knicks

The Price Isn't Too High - Make the Trade, Knicks

By Joe Caporoso - Contributor

The Knicks need to start building their own big three, right now


Feb 15, 2011 - As SB Nation has been covering today, the New York Knicks have the ability to obtain Carmelo Anthony for Raymond Felton, Danillo Gallinari, another starter (likely Wilson Chandler), Eddy Curry's expiring contract (is that his full name now?), and a first round pick in return for Anthony and Chauncey Billups.

The initial reaction of many has been that the price is too steep and the Knicks should walk away from the offer. However, the more you watch this team hover around .500 and the more you realize they are only four games away from not even being a playoff team in the East, the more you need to get on board with this deal.

Yes, Raymond Felton got off to a very strong start but there is no arguing his play has declined in the previous the month, which has concincided with the Knicks being a 5-10 team in that period. Gallinari is young and has plenty of potential but believe it not, you have to give up something to get somebody like Carmelo Anthony on your team. Wilson Chandler would likely be the third piece in the deal and that is fine because you have to part with his fragile self before you let Landry Fields go anywhere.

The approach of waiting until free agency is starting to seem like a crap-shoot, with Anthony now entertaining the thought of signing an extension in Denver. There is also a chance another team, Chicago, Dallas, or Houston jumps in at the last hour before the trade deadline and spends the next few months getting Anthony to pen a long term deal.

If you are the Knicks, you take Billups for the rest of the season, put Anthony with Amare Stoudemaire, Landry Fields, and your collection of bench players (Shawne Williams, Bill Walker, Ronny Turiaf, Toney Douglas) and hope to make some noise in the Eastern Conference playoffs. The younger players will gain some worthy experience, while Anthony and Stoudemaire can get used to playing together in a big spot. After the season, you buyout Billups for 4 million dollars instead of paying his ridiculous 2011 salary and play the waiting game for Chris Paul or Deron Williams who should be counting the seconds until they could join Anthony and Stoudemaire.

If this team ever wants to win a title in a conference shared with the Celtics, Heat, Magic, and Bulls...it is going to take more than what they have now, way more. Raymond Felton is a nice player, but long term it is going to take a big three of Stoudemaire, Anthony, and Paul or Williams supported by an ideal role player like Fields and a young bench that hopefully develops to knock off any of those powers.

Me too but the PG situation concerns me a little bit with this scenario as does this guy's plan for next year..Suppose we do this exactly how this guy outlines it: Take on Billups now and then buy him out for $4M in the offseason to avoid playing him the full $14M. Who's our PG next year?? This guy's basically saying scrap the whole year next season and wait for Paul or D-Will..I don't know if I agree with that...If anything, I'd keep Billups next year and just let him expire normally..Why waste an entire season?? To be honest, I would rather exclude Felton from the deal altogether and sweeten the pot another way -- maybe Moz or Moz and a 2014 1st rounder if necessary (assuming we're already either trading Randolph for a 1 or trading him to Minny and the Wolves then redirecting a 1st rounder + Corey Brewer) in lieu of Felton..So we're looking at:

Gallo, Chandler, Curry's expiring, AR for a pick [AR to Minny who agrees to send DEN Brewer + a 1st rounder], Moz OR Moz and our 2014 1st, $3M cash

What'dya think? Think they'd rather have Felton and save about $7M with Billups or could they be convinced to take Moz/Moz + that 2014 1st? I'd rather the later..Hefty price but I think I'd prefer that and we keep Ray...Then again, I'd love to keep AR outta this and actually PLAY HIM NEXT YEAR (AR slides into the Gallinari role where I think he'd better compliment STAT & Melo) but I have no confidence is ever gonna play him, so I guess he's gotta go..I don't even know any more man..

yeah bro i think u just made a good point about holding onto Billups... only problem w/that is it leaves us with zero cap space to target anyone else, so we'll have to hope that Mozgov develops into a viable fulltime starting C option for next season & we can grab a capable backup PG on a minimum contract... that's not an impossible scenario tho... having Billups as a 1.5 year stopgap is more than fine with me, i don't see him as much of a dropoff from Felton at all... if anything i'd trust his poise & experience in the playoffs over Felton, postseason basketball is a totally different animal i think that's when Billups' value becomes even greater.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
2/15/2011  7:06 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/15/2011  7:07 PM
Silverfuel wrote:
eViL wrote:put it to you this way, do you think lebron really entertained signing anywhere but miami? i don't. then why did he host all those recruiting meetings? to give the appearance that it wasn't one big sham. the optimist in me feels like that's what this is. in the end, denver can say they tried to make the deal, NY can say they tried to make the deal, melo can say he kept his options open just like he said he would, and then finally, when he signs, he says "ny was just the best place for me and my family and it gives me the best chance at a title." then everyone but us can hate him for coming here. the end.

that's my explanation to why you hear about Donnie being in trade talks. the alternative is no trade talks and it looks like we've been tampering the whole time.


We have absolutely nothing to discuss then because we are talking about two totally different things. The issue at hand is the trade talks and if the trade talks are a sham then you and anyone else that feels this way can rest assured that NYK players like Gallo, Chandler etc are not going anywhere. If I were to reach that conclusion, I wouldn't even bother with these trade threads.

yeah, that's why i said i kinda feel dumb for even being involved. but then i have to ask, why do you participate in these threads?

thanks. i think you've managed to successfully convince me to stop posting on the forum, to stop talking sports, and to just enjoy the games!

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/15/2011  7:08 PM
i think the knicks would be best served getting melo cheaper in the summer.

let wilson go, but keep landry, gallo, mozgov and definitely keep felton.

move some of those guys for a center like anderson varejao after melo is signed. (i'd trade gallo or mozgov plus the #1 pick we can get for AR for anderson varejao)


Felton
Fields
Melo
Amar'e
Varejao

bench: Gallo, Toney, Shawne Williams, Turiaf

why not wait for a full team? that squad can legitimately win it all.

WAIT UNTIL JULY. DOLAN, I'M TALKING TO YOU.

¿ △ ?
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
2/15/2011  7:10 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/15/2011  7:21 PM
eViL wrote:
Silverfuel wrote:
eViL wrote:put it to you this way, do you think lebron really entertained signing anywhere but miami? i don't. then why did he host all those recruiting meetings? to give the appearance that it wasn't one big sham. the optimist in me feels like that's what this is. in the end, denver can say they tried to make the deal, NY can say they tried to make the deal, melo can say he kept his options open just like he said he would, and then finally, when he signs, he says "ny was just the best place for me and my family and it gives me the best chance at a title." then everyone but us can hate him for coming here. the end.

that's my explanation to why you hear about Donnie being in trade talks. the alternative is no trade talks and it looks like we've been tampering the whole time.


We have absolutely nothing to discuss then because we are talking about two totally different things. The issue at hand is the trade talks and if the trade talks are a sham then you and anyone else that feels this way can rest assured that NYK players like Gallo, Chandler etc are not going anywhere. If I were to reach that conclusion, I wouldn't even bother with these trade threads.

yeah, that's why i said i kinda feel dumb for even being involved. but then i have to ask, why do you participate in these threads? do you really feel like your participation does anything to affect the outcome? thanks. i think you've managed to successfully convince me to stop posting on the forum, to stop talking sports, and to just enjoy the games!


No, its pointless. But I never asked you to stop posting on the forum. I only said you can rest assured.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
abs
Posts: 20060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/1/2011
Member: #3390

2/15/2011  7:13 PM
TMS wrote:billups will play better with melo and stat then will felton...yes he is older and slower but a much better leader orchestrator distributor and shooter plus his resume has plenty of playoff exp...might even be a better mentor to finally get through to douglas who loves to shoot and create for himself rather than create for others...
Finestrg wrote:
TMS wrote:i pretty much agree w/this guy's article:

http://newyork.sbnation.com/2011/2/15/1995384/the-price-isnt-too-high-make-the-trade-knicks

The Price Isn't Too High - Make the Trade, Knicks

By Joe Caporoso - Contributor

The Knicks need to start building their own big three, right now


Feb 15, 2011 - As SB Nation has been covering today, the New York Knicks have the ability to obtain Carmelo Anthony for Raymond Felton, Danillo Gallinari, another starter (likely Wilson Chandler), Eddy Curry's expiring contract (is that his full name now?), and a first round pick in return for Anthony and Chauncey Billups.

The initial reaction of many has been that the price is too steep and the Knicks should walk away from the offer. However, the more you watch this team hover around .500 and the more you realize they are only four games away from not even being a playoff team in the East, the more you need to get on board with this deal.

Yes, Raymond Felton got off to a very strong start but there is no arguing his play has declined in the previous the month, which has concincided with the Knicks being a 5-10 team in that period. Gallinari is young and has plenty of potential but believe it not, you have to give up something to get somebody like Carmelo Anthony on your team. Wilson Chandler would likely be the third piece in the deal and that is fine because you have to part with his fragile self before you let Landry Fields go anywhere.

The approach of waiting until free agency is starting to seem like a crap-shoot, with Anthony now entertaining the thought of signing an extension in Denver. There is also a chance another team, Chicago, Dallas, or Houston jumps in at the last hour before the trade deadline and spends the next few months getting Anthony to pen a long term deal.

If you are the Knicks, you take Billups for the rest of the season, put Anthony with Amare Stoudemaire, Landry Fields, and your collection of bench players (Shawne Williams, Bill Walker, Ronny Turiaf, Toney Douglas) and hope to make some noise in the Eastern Conference playoffs. The younger players will gain some worthy experience, while Anthony and Stoudemaire can get used to playing together in a big spot. After the season, you buyout Billups for 4 million dollars instead of paying his ridiculous 2011 salary and play the waiting game for Chris Paul or Deron Williams who should be counting the seconds until they could join Anthony and Stoudemaire.

If this team ever wants to win a title in a conference shared with the Celtics, Heat, Magic, and Bulls...it is going to take more than what they have now, way more. Raymond Felton is a nice player, but long term it is going to take a big three of Stoudemaire, Anthony, and Paul or Williams supported by an ideal role player like Fields and a young bench that hopefully develops to knock off any of those powers.

Me too but the PG situation concerns me a little bit with this scenario as does this guy's plan for next year..Suppose we do this exactly how this guy outlines it: Take on Billups now and then buy him out for $4M in the offseason to avoid playing him the full $14M. Who's our PG next year?? This guy's basically saying scrap the whole year next season and wait for Paul or D-Will..I don't know if I agree with that...If anything, I'd keep Billups next year and just let him expire normally..Why waste an entire season?? To be honest, I would rather exclude Felton from the deal altogether and sweeten the pot another way -- maybe Moz or Moz and a 2014 1st rounder if necessary (assuming we're already either trading Randolph for a 1 or trading him to Minny and the Wolves then redirecting a 1st rounder + Corey Brewer) in lieu of Felton..So we're looking at:

Gallo, Chandler, Curry's expiring, AR for a pick [AR to Minny who agrees to send DEN Brewer + a 1st rounder], Moz OR Moz and our 2014 1st, $3M cash

What'dya think? Think they'd rather have Felton and save about $7M with Billups or could they be convinced to take Moz/Moz + that 2014 1st? I'd rather the later..Hefty price but I think I'd prefer that and we keep Ray...Then again, I'd love to keep AR outta this and actually PLAY HIM NEXT YEAR (AR slides into the Gallinari role where I think he'd better compliment STAT & Melo) but I have no confidence is ever gonna play him, so I guess he's gotta go..I don't even know any more man..

yeah bro i think u just made a good point about holding onto Billups... only problem w/that is it leaves us with zero cap space to target anyone else, so we'll have to hope that Mozgov develops into a viable fulltime starting C option for next season & we can grab a capable backup PG on a minimum contract... that's not an impossible scenario tho... having Billups as a 1.5 year stopgap is more than fine with me, i don't see him as much of a dropoff from Felton at all... if anything i'd trust his poise & experience in the playoffs over Felton, postseason basketball is a totally different animal i think that's when Billups' value becomes even greater.

Sure, Gut The Team And Throw In Landry Fields While You're At It

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy