Posted by holfresh:
Posted by JrZyHuStLa:
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by martin:
Posted by holfresh:
And that in itself is worth rooting for them to lose the entire season?
would you rather have the 8th pick or 1st pick? Say it's 2005. Shot at Bogut, Deron Williams, Paul, Frye.
I am rooting for the #1 pick.
U would rather have the first pick naturally but it still guarantees nothing...The Cliipers has been in a position to get the top picks many years now and they are no better than the Knicks..
Clippers, Hawks,Bobcats,etc...
I thought it was alrady discussed that the #1 pick guarantees nothing in terms of talent, we're with you on that.
What we're saying is that it DOES guarantee flexibility as to who and what a franchise needs, how do you not agree with that fact ?
What flexibility might you be referring to?
In my opinion, the Knicks' two biggest needs are at PG and C.
Let's say the 2 best players in the 2008 draft (based on their collegiate/adolescent performances, since that is all we can go by) consists of a PG and C.
With the 10th pick, those players are gone. With the 1st or 2nd pick, they get one of those 2 players.
I can't believe you don't get it.
[Edited by - jrzyhustla on 02-09-2008 12:35 AM]