Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by nixluva:
Do you even think before you write? This team wasn't playing at a consistent 6 gams under. They started off the 1st month like that, but after that they played at around .500. This team will have a WINNING record next year.
Record after 20 games: 7-13
Record after 30 games: 12-18
Record after 40 games: 17-23
Record after 50 games: 22-28
Record after 60 games: 27-33
Record after 70 games: 30-40
That looks like consistently playing 6 games under .500 to me. Don't know what kind of homeristic math you're using.
This is the "homeristic math":
Knicks record in first 20 games: 7-13
record in games 21-30: 5-5
record in games 31-40: 5-5
record in games 41-50: 5-5
record in games 51-60: 5-5
record in games 61-70: 3-7
record in games 71-72: 1-1
So we see, after a subpar start, the Knicks played .500 ball in games 21-60. The recent 3-7 stretch were games played entirely without Lee and Crawford and mostly without Q, 3 of NY's top 5 players during their .500 stretch.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/